Engineering, The State University of New York (SUNY) at Buffalo and from 2008 to 2012, I was an assistant professor in the Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Dakota State University (NDSU). Previously, from 2004 to 2008, I worked for Magma Design Automation, San Jose CA, where I received the outstanding technical contribution award in 2007. During the Summer of 2001, I worked on analog circuit synthesis and layout at NeoLinear Inc., Pittsburgh PA. During 1996-1997, I was an Erasmus graduate student at the University of Patras, Greece. I serve on the technical program committee of several conferences including NOCS, SOCC, and ReConFig. I am a senior member of IEEE and a member of ACM and Eta Kappa Nu. I
children or elderlyparents and working in industries that have been affected negatively by the pandemic [21].Virtual research allows UREP STEM students to continue to participate in a paid experience thatpositively influences their interactions with faculty and peers, and promotes STEM identity,community, and sense of belonging, while juggling many responsibilities outside of school.Virtual Research Experiences and OutcomesInstitutional Context The site for this program is a predominately White private research-intensive universitylocated in the Northeast of the United States. Infused with a strong entrepreneurial culture, theUniversity is home to over 40 research centers and institutes spanning disciplines fromperformance, design, fine
2006. Her most recent teaching position was in the First Year Engineering Program at Northeastern for 10 years, where she helped to establish the First Year Engineering Learning & Innovation Center makerspace and their new ”Cornerstone” integrated project-based learning curricula.Mrs. Claire Jean Duggan, Northeastern University Claire Duggan is the Executive Director of The Center for STEM Education at Northeastern University. She has led and/or collaborated on multiple educational initiatives impacting the science and engineering landscape.Dr. Jacqueline A. Isaacs, Northeastern University Dr. Jacqueline Isaacs joined Northeastern in 1995 and has focused her research pursuits on assessment of the regulatory
two main themes that had a major impact on the transition from an HBCU to a PWI fora Black engineering graduate student: expectations for/preconceived notions of graduate school,difficulties in the socialization process due to institutional culture.Expectations and preconceived notions of Doctoral program X developed his expectations for his doctoral program based mainly on the interactionsthat he had with his undergraduate research advisors, who warned him of the rigor of Doctoralprograms. This is consistent with the findings of Amelink et al., who identified interactions withgraduate students and faculty while enrolled as an undergraduate, and undergraduate researchexperience factors that impacted the anticipatory stage of the
, researchersdeveloped and distributed topical electronic surveys, conducted focus groups in person and byvideo conference, and studied institutional data. Where data was not available, researchersworked collaboratively with institutional research to develop engineering-centric data analyticstools for identifying opportunities and developing long term strategies.The process for studying climate involved a closer look at every aspect of the student experience.In this report, admissions practices, reasons students leave/stay in engineering, and experienceswithin the college are the focal point. These topics were pursued to better understand theinterconnectedness of student experiences and the impact on student decisions.Phase 1: Admissions PracticesA review of
-traditional students, adeeper examination of this group within graduate education research becomes critical, especiallyconsidering that only a few studies concentrate on their motivations and experiences. The resultsof these examinations can support graduate programs to make further changes to the design anddelivery of their doctoral curriculums by accounting for the unheard voices of these non-traditional students and raising awareness of their lived experiences throughout their program. In this paper, we describe the preliminary results of a collaborative autoethnographicexploration of the professional and educational experiences of two professional non-traditionaldoctoral students in engineering and computing education. We define
enter the relationship with unique identities and self-cultures that mustbe transformed, and boundaries crossed in the mentorship process. Such a mentorship culturalbridge is designed to relationally connect mentor and mentee to each other in functional andimpactful ways, with goals to discover more about each other’s culture, build relational trust andempathy, practice relationship building, improve cross-cultural communication skills, andprovide a pathway to improved understanding and valuing of differences. Moreover, thiscultural bridge should make graduate education mentorship a mutually beneficial effort andinspire mentees to be successful in a competitive culture of high expectations, such aspreparation for and success in a Ph.D. program
The research team is author’s Johnson, Josiam, and Lee. As a research team, ourindividual positionalities impacted our interest in this research topic and how we view the SBP.Namely, for this study, we believe it is important to highlight our prior experiences with thecontext as suggested by works on positionality in engineering education research by Hampton etal. [20] and Secules et al. [21]. The research team for this study consists of individuals with arange of proximity to the SBP and students at the center of this study. Lee directed the SBP formany years during their time in graduate school and now serves as the Director of Research inthe DEP that hosts the SBP. Johnson has worked with the University DEP as a graduate assistantas well
is to connect students, specifically Black Americans, to hands-on engineering educationthat will lead to securing occupations in the civil service complex (Hampton University Schoolof Engineering, n.d.). Hampton University’s College of Engineering and Technology makes its purpose forserving the Black community ubiquitous via public records from research initiatives to outreach.The engineering college emphasizes the importance of creating a learning experience wherestudents are given research to practice pedagogies around environment, technology, andtransportation. For example, students and faculty members have access to multiple major grantsfocused on impactful topics such as energy efficiency, pollution control from
phases of the study that led to the Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report. Dr. Rochelle received her B.S. in physics from Spelman College and both her M.Engr. in Mechanical Engineering and Ph.D. in Science and Mathematics Education from Southern University and A&M College.Dr. Dayna Lee Mart´ınez, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc. Dayna currently serves as a Manager of Research & Innovation at SHPE. In this role, she oversees the design and development of the Equipando Padres program as well as graduate and advanced students programming. An industrial engineer by training, before joining SHPE, Dayna was a faculty
educational innovation efforts. EIF atthese institutions, in particular, teach high percentages of lower-level engineering courses, whichare critical courses for supporting persistence within engineering [2], [4]. In addition, priorresearch has shown that EIF want to develop and implement learner-centered, culturallyresponsive instructional designs, but lack the support given to their tenure-line counterparts atfour-year institutions [18].Given the recent growth in these positions, researchers have called for universities to addressdepartmental and university-wide culture and policies around hiring, developing, and promotinginstructional faculty [34], [35], [36], [26]. We know that a very important factor EIF consider inchoosing their current role is
Massachusetts-Amherst. Dr. Downey focuses on critical qualitative inquiry with a discerning eye toward humanizing and culturally sustaining pedagogies.Idalis Villanueva Alarc´on, University of Florida Dr. Villanueva Alarc´on is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Education Department at the Uni- versity of Florida. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational re- searcher, and professional development mentor for underrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best practices’ for stu- dent professional development and training. In addition, she has developed methodologies around hidden
educator, engineering educational re- searcher, and professional development mentor for underrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best practices’ for stu- dent professional development and training. In addition, she has developed unique methodologies around hidden curriculum, academic emotions and physiology, and engineering makerspaces. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Resistance to advocacy around hidden curriculum in engineeringIntroduction We analyzed participants’ experiences with hidden curriculum (HC) in engineering, orthe unacknowledged, unwritten, and often