allowed for a 5-minute question/answer session, then administered a short © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedingsquiz. These assessments usually had 2-3 questions, were closed book, but open notes. Thisoffering also included a group project, similar to the previous year.During Spring 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic caused an unexpected change in the courseformat. The initial plans were identical to Spring 2019. Instead, the course was a partial flip forfirst half, then online asynchronous the second half of the semester. This included a 5-classflipped sequence on geometric design of roads and a 3-class flipped sequence on intersectionperformance
, external flows, and compressible flow. There were 7 laboratory experiments:pressure measurement, Venturi meter, flow loss, vertical flow through an orifice, horizontal flowthrough an orifice, flow meters, and fluid friction. The lecture portion of the course met twice perweek for 75 minutes during a 15-week semester. The laboratory sections met approximately onceevery two weeks for 110 minutes.When the course was next offered in 2019, due to a program curriculum change, the coursebecame a 3-credit lecture, and the laboratory portion was moved to a separate course. The lecture © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedingscourse met twice per week for 75
include courserepetition, change of degree objective (major change), or existing college completely. It has alsobeen reported that “students who do not succeed in gateway courses disproportionately comefrom lower-income, first-generation, and underrepresented minority groups” (Koch, 2017, p. 14;McGowan, Felten, Caulkins, & Artze-Vega, 2017). In recent work, the majority of the issues canbe linked to “an intensive cluster of encompassing problems with (gateway) curriculum designand teaching methods, and with assessment and grading practices” (Weston et al., 2019, p. 198). © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings With gateway courses being
response to the following questions. Your response is confidential, will not affectyour scholarship, and most importantly will help us to improve the university’s NSF ScholarshipProgram.Q1 When did you enter the NSF Scholarship Program? o Fall 2017 o Fall 2018 o Fall 2019 o Fall 2020Q2 What is your current class standing? o Freshman o Sophomore o Junior o Senior © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference ProceedingsQ3 Please evaluate the extent to which participation in S-STEM Scholars helped you in the following areas: N/A None Not Much A Little Quite a
Class.” Proceedings of the 2017ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[12] K.S. Corbett, K. Evans, S. McAdams, J. Gaudin, M.A. Walker and T.S. Fontenot, “Work inProgress: Developing a Model for Student-led Peer Mentorship Programs.” Proceedings of the2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[13] Q. Tahmina, “Does Peer Mentoring Help Students be Successful in an IntroductoryEngineering Course?” Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[14] L.K. Someh, B.P. O’Connell, K.S. Grahame and J. Levi, “Friendly mentor or formerconsultant: peer-mentors in First Year Engineering Courses,” Proceedings of the 2020 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, 2020.[15] C. Kiassat and R. Elkharboutly, “Peer Mentoring
. “Extracting domain-specific words- a statistical approach”. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop 2009. 2009, pp. 94–98.[10] Hongye Liu et al. “A Digital Book Based Pedagogy to Improve Course Content Accessibility for Students with and without Disabilities in Engineering or other STEM courses (WIP)”. In: 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Minneapolis, MN: ASEE Conferences, Aug. 2022. URL: https://peer.asee.org/41438.[11] Chirantan Mahipal et al. ““What did I just miss?!” Presenting ClassTranscribe, an Automated Live-captioning and Text-searchable Lecture Video System, and Re- lated Pedagogical Best Practices”. In: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference. June 2019. DOI : 10.18260/1
- © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings Synchronous Overlap-Add (FESOLA) ”, the proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA), pp. 31-34, New Paltz, NY, USA, 2019. doi: 10.1109/WASPAA.2019.8937258.[8] E. Moulines and F. Charpentier, “Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones”, Speech Communication, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 453 – 467, 1990.[9] J. Allen, “Short-term spectral analysis, synthesis, and modification by discrete Fourier transform,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 235–238, 1977.[10] S. Roucos
2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings Feasibility of Using the CAPE Framework to Identify Gaps in Equity-focused CS Education Research Joey Reyes* Monica M. McGill* Knox College & CSEdResearch.org CSEdResearch.org jmreyes@knox.edu monica@csedresearch.org Abstract As computer science (CS) quickly gains ground in K-12 classrooms, CS education research (CSER) is also rapidly growing. It remains unclear, however, the extent to which this growth in research captures key equity-focused
2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings 1 Redesign of Purdue Construction Engineering and Management 2 (CEM) Capstone Course 3 Brandon Fulk Kyubyung Kang* Purdue University Purdue University fulk@purdue.edu kyukang@purdue.edu 4 5 INTRODUCTION 6 7 In large part, the evaluation of construction engineering education has gone untouched 8 since its inception post-WWII (Abudayyeh et al., 2000). More specifically, the curriculum 9 and overall content for the construction engineering education within the Purdue10 Construction Engineering and Management
techniquesdo not always yield the desired results. Morrison (2019) argued that there is a 6 © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedingsdisconnect between theory and institutional practice for diversity and inclusion programsand policies. For example, at one of the largest STEM colleges in the US (Anonymous,n.d.), the aviation maintenance and engineering technology program has seen a largeincrease in the number of students applying for the program since 2010, hitting its highpoint in 2019 – pre-pandemic year. However, although applications have gone up forboth men
2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings Work-in-Progress: Partnerships to Create Opportunity through Informal Learning Kristin Giglietti* H. Rex Gaskins Marcia Pool* University of Illinois Urbana- University of Illinois Urbana- University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign Champaign Champaign kgigliet@illinois.edu mpool@illinois.eduAbstractWhile many Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs exist, these are notalways easily accessible due to many factors including cost and lack of communication;therefore, greater access
2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings Exploring the Potential Benefits and Risks of ChatGPT in Engineering Education Sinan Onal Department of Industrial Engineering Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville sonal@siue.eduAbstractThis paper examines the potential benefits and risks of using ChatGPT, an AI-powered chatbot developedby OpenAI, in engineering education by generating sample questions and answers and solving samplemathematical problems related to course subjects in the industrial engineering curriculum. The
identifying institution information. The paper will be improved by including more details on the LMS modules. I12 ADDIE Model, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON (last updated Feb. 25, 2019), https://www.uwb.edu/it/service-catalog/teaching-learning/hybrid-and-online-learning/instructional-design/addie. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 9 2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings encourage you include excerpts from the learning materials developed. Assignment snapshots, discussion questions, etc. can be included. One discussion prompt is provided in the footnotes - please move
disabilities in science and engineering,” Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation, Tech. Rep., 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21321/data-tables[6] K. W. Phillips, “How diversity makes us smarter,” Scientific American, Oct 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-diversity-makes-us-smarter/[7] E. A. Cech and T. J. Waidzunas, “Systemic inequalities for LGBTQ professionals in STEM,” Science Advances, vol. 7, no. 3, p. eabe0933, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/sciadv.abe0933 ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Illinois–Indiana Section Conference Proceedings [8] R. A. Miller, A. Vaccaro, E
Manufacturing (IJIDeM), vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 909-922, 2019. [14] R. M. Lima, P. H. Andersson, and E. Saalman, "Active Learning in Engineering Education: a (re) introduction," vol. 42, ed: Taylor & Francis, 2017, pp. 1-4. [15] H. Travis and T. Lord, "Traditional and constructivist teaching techniques," Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 34, no. 3, p. 12, 2004. [16] W. L. Saunders, "The constructivist perspective: Implications and teaching strategies for science," School science and mathematics, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 136-141, 1992. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings[17] R. S. Prawat