CADTechnical Report and PresentationsSustainable Design and Technology Detail DesignMaterial Selection in Design Teamwork Update/Peer Assessment/RolesDesign for Manufacturability Design Verification/Test Plans/Engr. StatisticsHuman Factors EngineeringIntellectual Property & Patents Page 15.65.3Engineering Ethics Ethics Case StudyEntrepreneurship Ethics Case Study ConclusionProduct Liability Update PresentationsDesign with Quality in Mind Teamwork ExerciseIndustrial DesignCost
, and Systems Engineering. • Apply these abstract concepts and practical skills to design and construct robots and robotic systems for diverse applications. • Have the imagination to see how robotics can be used to improve society and the entrepreneurial background and spirit to make their ideas become reality. • Demonstrate the ethical behavior and standards expected of responsible professionals functioning in a diverse society.3.3. Measurable OutcomesBased on the above objectives, the outcomes are that all graduating students will have • an ability to apply broad knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering, • an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret
problems. This requires students to plan the designprocess comprising of project definition and planning, specification definition, conceptdevelopment, detail design, testing and refinement, and production.5.5 Demonstrate an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility The RFID-AD design platform is a natural place to introduce ethical as well as globalengineering issues. By working on these projects, students obtain first hand feedback from theend user. This helps students obtain a clear picture of the health and wealth of public, and todisclose promptly the factors that might endanger the end user. By working with end user, butnot the corporate industries, students have the ability to approach system design based onusability
in a discussion of science through outreach f) Create a museum exhibit to demonstrate a complex engineering concept to non-technical audience with various learning styles g) Identify your dominant learning style and develop strategies for enhancing skills in the other learning styles h) Adapt your teaching and communication to address multiple learning styles i) Identify levels of Bloom’s taxonomy in HW and test questions and in project deliverables j) Evaluate biomechanical designs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, and manufacturability
societal context ofengineering and a passion for life-long learning. This will be achieved by guiding studentsthrough new educational opportunities to: • build disciplinary excellence with multidisciplinary perspective, • nurture critical thinking, • develop multicultural competence, • cultivate collaboration and leadership skills, and • promote an ethic of service to the profession and the communityTo provide the necessary incentives and mechanisms for change, to-date the College has heldthree internal solicitations for proposals to transform undergraduate education providing facultyand staff with modest grants for release time and other resources. A total of 26 projects havebeen funded. The purpose of this paper is to describe our
build on their academic courses and expand them o Project use the set of skills learned in program of study• Projects develop effective communication skills (verbal and written) o Oral/Written presentations are requiredWith regard to the ABET outcomes, the projects meet at least the following criteria:• An ability to function on a multi-disciplinary team Page 15.1379.7• An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility• An ability to communicate effectively• Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning.• Knowledge of contemporary issues.• An ability to apply knowledge of
instructional models without fully discarding them. Though this subjectwas designated to be delivered as a Problem-Based Learning (PBL) subject, the educationalapproach taken was such that the PBL delivery was only a part of a pedagogical toolbox. Themain educational thrust was one of inductive learning and teaching derived from courses suchas creative arts. Aside from PBL, the inductive teaching approach incorporated Case-Based(CBL) and Enquiry- Based learning (EBL) which provided the appropriate pedagogicalscaffolding for knowledge integration. Material technological sciences, manufacturingengineering, engineering design, issues of ethics, sustainability and environment were weavedtogether. Such educational approach was necessary if strictly academic
junior year, cannot join the program at any other time.A new Introduction to STEM course was implemented in the DEEA program as one ofthe first courses that the new DEEA students ever take in College. The new course coversfundamental concepts and information about engineering professions, ethics, engineeringeconomics, systems of units, and other topics that are included in the Introduction toEngineering courses at STC and UTPA. In addition, the course also involves CBI withhands-on activities to engage and motivate students to learn and get familiar withpractical applications in STEM fields. In this new Introduction to STEM course, 53students participated during the Summer II term in 2009. 2. Supporting STEM Pathways with CBI and Hands
). Assessment of Ethics Modules in an Engineering Curriculum. ASEE 114th Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI. June 24–27, 2007. Paper # AC 2007-14. Teaching Ethics – II. Session # 3440. Wednesday, 27th June 2007. 12:30 – 2 PM.51. Narayanan, Mysore. (2007). Assessment of Perceptual Modality Styles. ASEE 114th Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI. June 24–27, 2007. Paper # AC 2007-18. Assessment and Evaluation in Engineering Education – I. Session # 1530. Monday, 25th June 2007. 2:15 – 4 PM.52. Narayanan, Mysore (2007). The Three R’s of Assessment: Recording, Reviewing and Reporting. ASEE 114th Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI. June 24–27, 2007. Poster # AC 2007- 15. Emerging Trends in
Simulating mechanical systems Lecture 11 Simulating electrical systems Lecture 12 An overview of formal systems engineering Lecture 13 The systems engineering life cycle Lecture 14 Physical definition, designation, validation of requirements Lecture 15 Using simulation to refine/validate systems design specifications Lecture 16 Risk analysis, management, mitigation Lecture 17 Testing, design for testing, what to test, validating tests Lecture 18 Reliability, reliability analysis and reliability testing Lecture 19 Manufacturability, producibility, maintainability Lecture 20 Creating safe designs, ethics Lecture 21 Software engineering, configuration management
Virginia’sDepartment of Science, Technology and Society (STS) which is housed in the School ofEngineering and Applied Science. The multidisciplinary STS department “advancesunderstanding of the social and ethical dimensions of science and technology2”. This paper willdescribe the development of course and its goals, expand on the course syllabus and choice oftexts, discuss the in-port field experiences, and summarize the assessment of both the studentsand the course. Page 15.481.2Course development and details The home institution of the course faculty member is the Colorado School of Mines(CSM). A Humanitarian Engineering Program3 has been developed at
feasibility of the design,and make decisions leading to an optimal system design. System integration, human factorsengineering, computer-aided design, maintainability, and fabrication techniques are addressed.This course provides an integrative experience in support of the overarching academic programgoal, and is often interdisciplinary in nature. Students spend extensive time in projectdevelopment laboratories fabricating and refining their final products.The course learning objectives are: • Apply the Engineering Design Process to design and build creative solutions for open- ended engineering problems. • Work effectively within a multidisciplinary design team in a professional and ethical manner. • Develop and conduct experiments
- Understand the importance of sustainability concepts.• PLO # 2- Acquire scientific knowledge and methods required to evaluate the sustainability of systems.• PLO # 3 - Learn to design, manufacture, and operate processes in an environmentally conducive manner.• PLO # 4- Demonstrate critical thinking skills required to analyze problems in their social and environmental context.• PLO # 5 - Develop economically, environmentally, and socially sound sustainable decisions• PLO # 6 - Evaluate the impact of products, processes, and activities through life cycle assessment• PLO # 7 - Communicate through graduate level oral and writing skills.• PLO # 8 - Demonstrate understanding of professional and ethical
system, component, or process to meet desired needs withinrealistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability”3; second, the emphasis on multidisciplinary teamwork; andthird, students‟ understanding of the “impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic,environmental, and societal context”3. The confluence of these three accreditation programoutcomes has been a dramatic increase in the number of engineering programs incorporatingservice learning projects in engineering education.In the past decade, many engineering programs have embarked on service learning projects toenhance the learning experience of undergraduate students. Among these projects
profit businesses through to completion and delivery to the • Analyze business case studies client. • Discuss ethical and legal aspects of business decisions • Communicate effectively in a short oral presentation • Interview potential clients to determine their needs • Work