o Table 6-2. Faculty Analysis • ABET Course Notebook Contents Page 15.1271.6 o Sample Course Syllabus o Course Assessment Form o Record of Course Updates o Sample 1 - Course Update Rubric o Sample 2 - Course Changes • Program Assessment Materials o Program Educational Objectives o Curriculum Grid o Program Outcomes o Documentation Responsibilities o Program Outcome-based Assessment Plans • Assessment Forms & Tools o Outcome-Based Assessment Forms & Rubrics o Numerical Grade Distribution o Team Skills
will be presented infuture publications.During the two workdays, faculty members are given time and resources to develop coursecontent for one of their STEM courses. The initial implementation is a single lecture using theCBI methods built on the Legacy Cycle. The CBI lecture content exposes the faculty andstudents to CBI and provides data to the faculty on the effectiveness and efficiency of thepedagogical method. Several CBI examples were presented to faculty from former participantswho served as mentors during the workdays. The workdays were scheduled in a computer lab onthe UTPA campus where the faculty members were provided with training and access to anumber of online tools helpful in the development of CBI content and delivery. The CBI
Engineering course (taken by juniors), sometimes in Engineering Geology (asophomore/junior level course), and in the senior capstone design course. The capstone designcourse reaches Bloom’s level 3 analysis; per the syllabus: “Students synthesize technicalknowledge from prior courses, incorporating aspects of ethics, sustainability and safety. The Page 15.803.4course will consider multiple constraints, including economics and engineering standards as wellas social and political issues.”It was also of interest to determine if focusing on sustainability might appeal to groupstraditionally under-represented in engineering. This has been proposed in
, ASIC development, system electronics and architecture, program management, and senior hardware development manager. Currently, Dr. Liddicoat is the Assistant Vice President for Academic Personnel and the Forbes Professor of Computer and Electrical Engineering at Cal Poly State University in San Luis Obispo. He teaches digital design and embedded systems courses. His research interests include computer architecture, computer arithmetic, networks, re-configurable computing and engineering education. Dr. Liddicoat received the Professional Achievement Award from the College of Engineering at California Polytechnic State University in 2003, and he is a Senior Member of
valuable experience of workingwith their peers to accomplish a common goal. 11 Page 15.236.4 Table 1. Class syllabus for Structural Aspects of Biomaterials.This course covers the structure and mechanical function of load bearing tissues and theirreplacements. Biocompatibility of biomaterials and host response to structural implants areexamined. Quantitative treatment of biomechanical issues and constitutive relationships ofmaterials are covered in order to design implants for structural function. Material selection for loadbearing applications including reconstructive surgery, orthopedics, dentistry and cardiology areaddressed. Case
observed by Iridescent staff in each session and given feedbackon how to improve their communication. The course syllabus with weekly training details andthe lesson plan template can be accessed from our website (www.IridescentLearning.org), under“Programs” and “Engineer Training”. Page 15.500.6 Page 15.500.7Figure 1: First page of completed sample lesson plan on Animal Locomotion: ViscosityFeedback and SupportThroughout the 16 week training, participating engineers practice teach their lessons in front ofthe rest of the class and elicit feedback. They present
project management space to ask questions ofany of the TEL project team. This created a repository of new learning abouteCOW2/Moodle and project documentation so all of the courses were developed withthe shared knowledge of the entire TEL team.Based upon the needs of the faculty, different development strategies were adopted todesign a sample course implementing eCOW2/Moodle technologies. For example,some faculty wanted to see all of the features of eCOW2 and determine if they wereeffective teaching and learning tools for their courses. Others who had exploredeCOW2 previously and had used the CMS as an online syllabus were now interestedin seeing some of the more advanced features. When the course ideas were in placeand ready to show to the
betterunderstanding of the general university requirements (GUR’s) and overall degree requirementswas obtained. Prior to this, lack of available time and exposure to programs outside of our ownhas precluded a complete comprehension of program requirements outside of our functionaldepartment. While university requirements are typically indicated in course catalogs or online, aset of standard guidelines or an SOP could benefit the less experienced teacher and help makethe process more efficient. Additionally, the development of an organizational “flow chart” forthe overall advising process may be helpful when facing questions that are outside of theimmediate program jurisdiction, to aid students and advisors in determining the most effectivepath to follow for
track REU students 1999-2009, as well as a study on same-sex camps effects on course choice in high school and college. Dr. Dixon is also an adjunct instructor at Flagler College, developing their Science Methods for Elementary Teachers syllabus and teaching the course since 2001. In addition to overseeing all educational programs K-20 at the Magnet Lab, Dr. Dixon is actively engaged in educational research on the effects of programs from national laboratories on students and teachers.Sharon Schulze, North Carolina State University Dr. Sharon K. Schulze is the Director of The Science House and an Associate Faculty member of the Physics Department. She manages the day-to-day operations
course syllabi are individually modified to specifically incorporatewriting assignments that match the designated IDM progression. These specified assignments arecalled “signature assignments.” At NU, course syllabi are the fundamental documents controllingcourse content and course learning objectives (CLOs). (CLOs are appropriately related andlinked to the overall PLOs for a program.) The inclusion of a specific writing assignment in acourse syllabus ensures that this ”signature assignment” will be included every time the course istaught, regardless of instructor or location. This is especially important for multi-campus systemsand institutions such as NU that provide both multiple locations and multiple modes of programdelivery – such as both
] Algorithms and problem-solving [8] Data structures [13] Recursion [5] Object-oriented programming Event-driven and concurrent programming Using APIs Figure 2 An example of an area in computer engineering and the topics included in that areaAn instructor who wants to use an open-ended project for a class completes an online formwhich includes the course information, project title, a project description, and a checklist whichclassifies the project using the BOK classification data. This form becomes part of the data thatis used for assessment of the course.All
nature topics. ways to teach the course Such a course may improve the content teaching style to make the course content more interesting and understandableThe concept of spiral It is not subject specific and More number of hands on kitscurriculum applicable to all branches ofDemonstration of engineering. In my opinion allLabVIEW experiments faculty must attend this coursethrough remote controlProcessing knowledgemaps scientificallyExperimentation skills on Importance to laboratory, Study of syllabus of some ofMechatronics
Sustainable Community Development. Our project is acritical pedagogy, one aimed at enhancing students’ knowledge, skills and attitudes to reflect onthe historical and political location of engineering, question the authority and relevance ofengineering problem-solving and design methods, and “examine their education, includinglearning objectives, the course syllabus, and the textbook itself” (Riley, 2008, p. 113).Specifically, our project is aimed at engineering education as it relates to a diversity of theseefforts, which we call “Engineering to Help” (ETH). ETH initiatives often exist under namessuch as community service, humanitarian engineering, service learning, Engineers WithoutBorders (EWB), Engineers for a Sustainable World (ESW) and
engineering students due to the fact that it may or may not be possibleto change a person’s ethical values . Page 15.906.84. Incorporating a Real World Case Study into the Syllabus of a Senior ConstructionEngineering Course, Eli FiniCase Study Used: Mauritius Auditorium Design Case StudyThis paper investigates the effect of bringing real world case studies on college students’self efficacy, their confidence, and their motivation toward an engineering field. It wasfound that working with real cases increases student’s motivation and maximizes theirlearning by becoming personally committed to course and program goals. As a result oftrying to address the problem
collaborative manner typically without the need for registration and webmasterinvolvement5. Users are allowed to post their information on these wikis with little training orcomputer experience, making it easier for the free flow of information. But with this free flow ofunregulated information the possibility of proliferation of misinformation is also possible.The use of wikis in an academic setting, specifically in the construction education arena, is fairlynew. The use of the KM tools such as wikis for use in the classroom is becoming more evident.A recent study identified seven possible uses of wikis in education, with items ranging fromusing the wiki to publish the course syllabus to students using the wiki to develop researchprojects1.Another
a certain part of the pattern. (S. C.) This student had a left, visual and tactile super link, and it is easy to see her using the left hemispheric strategy of linear, step-by-step thinking to determine her answer to the question.(3) Finally, the responses to the journal assignments revealed information about the students’ efforts and growth in the course that the professor otherwise would have never known. Some students reported really struggling with some of the concepts and repeatedly seeking additional outside help or conducting online research. Many of the students’ responses revealed sudden engagement with the mathematical concepts as students discovered a relationship to their interests and passions. For example
. 384-395.9. Miller, R. B., DeBacker, T. K., Greene, B. A., Perceived instrumentality and academics: The link to task valuing. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 26(4), pp. 250-261, 1999.10. Husman, J. & Hilpert, J., The intersection of students’ perceptions of instrumentality, self-efficacy, and goal orientations in an online mathematics course. Zeitschrift fűr Pädagogische Psychologie. 21(3/4), pp. 229-239, 2007.11. Seginer, R., Future Orientation: Developmental and Ecological Perspectives. New York: Springer., 200912. Authors, Validating measures of future time perspective for engineering students: steps toward improving engineering education. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference
Center Figure 1: The Virtual Training Environment (VTE) system overview.2.2 – Simulation and Animation for Interactive EducationThe VTE system supports multiple sessions and classrooms. Each course needs to have its ownpackage of model components to be integrated into the syllabus. To facilitate describing thissection we us a pilot course like Data Communications and Networking as an example. When amessage is sent from point A to B, the simulated model can project animation of the flowbetween the two points. Depending which portion of the course is under focus, the details of thecommunication pattern are projected. For example, the routing mechanism in the network andthe congestion handling process when part of the network becomes
be permanently archived online. Authors are strongly encouraged butare not required to utilize such supporting material as animation, audio, graphics and video inaddition to text in order to best demonstrate their educational achievements. The journal includesdescriptions of innovative curricula, courses, and teaching practices both within and outside theclassroom that are clearly built upon a foundation of accepted learning science principles.Completed and documented studies are published as full articles; work in progress that showsdistinct promise of eventual success may be published as educational briefs. By focusing oneducational developments and practice, Advances in Engineering Education complements theJournal of Engineering Education
International Journal of Engineering Education on applications of engineering education research.Kelley Walczak, University of Michigan Kelley Walczak is a doctoral student in the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education at U-M. Her research interests include student development, campus culture, learning styles, and qualitative methodology. She is currently a member of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, American Educational Research Association, and ACPA-College Student Educators International.Trevor Harding, California Polytechnic State University Trevor Harding, Ph.D., is Professor and Chair of Materials Engineering at California Poly, where he teaches courses