, andMr. Darren Taillie (all from UMCP) did a splendid job over the summer; their efforts are alsogratefully acknowledged.Bibliography1. Birdsong, C., and Schuster, P., “Research in the Undergraduate Environment”, Proceedings of 2006 Annual Conference and Exposition of American Society for Engineering Education, June, 2006, Chicago, Illinois, USA.2. Eisenman. S., and List, G., “The Undergraduate Research Advantage : The Split Perspective” Proceedings of 2004 Annual Conference and Exposition of American Society for Engineering Education, June, 2004, Salt lake City, Utah, USA. Page 15.245.143. Peten, G., Sawhney, A
portal. Medical professionals can view the patient’s information andrespond to the patient and the nearest doctor(s) with their recommendations. Validation effortsprove that numerous entities are willing to purchase Mashavu stations. They can chargecustomers a small fee, thereby making Mashavu economically sustainable and creating anadditional revenue stream.12The Mashavu team aims to: 1. Design, prototype and test inexpensive computer-based biomedical devices (Mashavu station) and the networked system (Mashavu network). 2. Perform preliminary on-the-ground testing of the Mashavu stations, Mashavu network and the business plan. 3. Implement the system in a top-down manner and bottom-up manner and craft the final scale-up
, 2007.McKenna, A. F. and P. Hirsch. 2005. Evaluating Student Confidence in Engineering Design,Teamwork and Communication. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference & Exposition, 2005.National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting EngineeringEducation to the New Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Olds, B. M. and R. Miller. 2004. The effect of a First-Year Integrated Engineering Curriculumon Graduation Rates and Student Satisfaction: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of EngineeringEducation 93 (1): 23-35.Ponton, M. K., J. H. Edmister, L. S. Ukeiley, and J. M. Seiner. 2001. Understanding the role ofself-efficacy in engineering education. Journal of Engineering
sulfated zirconia (S-ZrO2) additive to hinder methanol crossover.Due to the segregated nature of the composite membrane expectations were low for theperformance of these membranes. Upon actual fuel cell performance, it was found that hismembrane, while not reducing fuel crossover, unexpectedly significantly enhanced fuel cellperformance. It appears that the unintentional segregation of the composite membrane enhancesperformance and has induced a shift in the project focus towards the understanding of theperformance enhancement and optimization. We are in the final stages of manuscriptpreparation, highlighting his direct methanol fuel cell performance.Both teachers were also involved in a 4 day fuel cell workshop that I was running for high
applicable history, culture, and constraints, or the full extentof contributions of existing faculty. Web sites now make it easy for applicants tofamiliarize themselves with the university and current professors’ professional histories(for example, research record or teaching innovations), and if not meeting the newperson’s standards, it is possible for him/her to develop a marginal superiority complex.If perceiving approval from the chair or dean, they may, with good motives, propose newideas, proposals, and concerns about the status quo. They may consciously orsubconsciously try to mold the program into the image of their preceding institution(s).However, they may be perceived by senior faculty as not showing respect and deference.This causes
Engineering at the Missouri University of Science and Technology. His research interests are GIS applications in civil engineering especially traffic safety with emphasis on statistical analysis of crash data and identification of high crash locations.Ronaldo Luna, Missouri University of Science and Technology Dr. Ronaldo Luna is an associate professor of Civil Engineering at the Missouri S&T, Rolla. He received his PhD from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1995. His research interests include: engineering education, geotechnical and earthquake engineering, and hazard mitigation. Page 15.1114.1
(s) as possible. Some of the questions addressed in this study included:What role might distance education play in the future of technical/engineering graphicseducation? Will professional development soon be required to ensure instructors obtain trainingrelated to changes in the field of technical/engineering graphics education? The five maincategories researched in this study were: course offerings, student populations, professionaldevelopment, technical/engineering graphics education, and future research plans5. Somecategories looked at the present status of technical/engineering graphics education, to see whatparts of the previous generation of topics were still taught and to what magnitude. Some surveyquestions offered graphic
Design Project mentioned previously. 15The students used a four step process to develop their module: 1. Use of their own experience 2. Formation of design idea(s) 3. Development of predicted behavior based on that idea(s) Page 15.1372.8 4. Testing of the design constructOne of the team members had worked on the Green Campus Enterprise and had participated inwriting the campus wind energy report. 16 Much of their background knowledge of wind energytechnologies came from this report. Other background information came from a 2006 AFG WindEnergy study of the local area. 17 During this preliminary research phase, the students
Exposition. Paper AC 2009-752.8. Atman, C. and S. Sheppard. 2009. Women in engineering: Interests, perspectives, confidence... andexperiences. Presentation at the WEPAN National Conference, June 18. Page 15.1119.129. Parikh, S., H. Chen, K. Donaldson, and S. Sheppard. 2009. Does major matter? A look at what motivatesengineering students in different majors. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Paper AC 2009-1304.10. Chubin, D., K. Donaldson, B. Olds, and L. Fleming. 2008. Educating generation Net – can U.S. engineeringwoo and win the competition for talent? Journal of Engineering Education, July, 245-257.11. Atman, C. 2009. Educating the
Engineering Design Course.” EduTech Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology. 1995.3. Keller, C. and J. Keller. Cognition and Tool Use: The Blacksmith at Work. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1996.4. Malicky, D., Kohl, J., and Huang, M. “Integrating a Machine Shop Class into the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum: Experiential and Inductive Learning.” ASEE National Conference, 2007.5. Bailey, D. and S. Barley. “Return to Work: Toward Post-industrial Engineering.” IIE Transactions 37, 737- 752. 2004.6. Brown, S., Collins, A., and P. Duguid. “Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning.” Educational Researcher, 32-42, January-February, 1989.7. Salomon, G., Perkins, D., and T. Globerson. “Partners in
for the first CIRC program lasted for five years and a total of 67 studentsparticipated, 40.3% women and 25.8% underrepresented minority students. The program had97% retention to graduation and over 40% of the students went on to graduate school.2 A$500,000 S-STEM NSF grant (#0728695) has allowed the CIRC program to continue withacademic scholarships at $4,000. The first CIRC/METS program ran from 2003-2008 andsupported 76 students with over a 92% retention and graduation rate. Diversity was an emphasisand 65% of the students in the program were either female (38.2%) or underrepresented minority(39.5%). 3The CIRC/METS program continues with a $600,000 NSF S-STEM grant (#0836050), so the
Lundeberg, M. A., B. B. Levin and H. L. Harrington, eds., Who Learns What From Cases and How? The Research Base for Teaching and Learning with Cases, 1999, pp. 3-23.6. Chinowsky, P. S. and J. Robinson, “Enhancing Civil Engineering Education Through Case Studies”, Journal of Engineering Education, 86, 1, 1997, 45-49.7. Russell, J. S. and B. G. McCullouch, “Civil Engineering Education: Case Study Approach”, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering, 116, 2, 1990, pp. 164-174.8. Raju, P. K. and C. S. Sankar, “Teaching Real-World Issues through Case Studies”, Journal of Engineering Education, 88, 4, 1999, pp. 501-508.9. Richards, L. G., M. Gorman, W. T. Scherer and R. D. Landel, “Promoting Active Learning with
AC 2010-2114: INTEGRATING CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT INTO AMULTI-DISCIPLINARY SEMINAR COURSE: BROADENING THE STUDENTHORIZON TO BETTER FUNCTION AND APPRECIATE GLOBAL,CONTEMPORARY ISSUESDavid Cottrell, University of North Carolina, Charlotte DR. DAVID S. COTTRELL is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He graduated from the United States Military Academy in 1978 and retired in 2000 after more than 22 years of service with the US Army Corps of Engineers. Studies at Texas A&M University resulted in an MS Degree in Civil Engineering in 1987 and a PhD in 1995. He is a registered Professional Engineer with the Commonwealth of Virginia
immensely to the nurturing of the students. External support is essentialincluding industry participation in variety of forms such as sponsoring student projects,donations of parts, mentoring of the project teams, and active involvement during thefinal project presentations and evaluations. Finally, a supportive administration andfaculty is a must.References[1] Kelley, Benjamin S., Walter L. Bradley and Brian J. Thomas,“Student-Aimed Appropriate Technology Engineering Projects in Kenya,”Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, Southern University and A&MCollege, TX.[2] Dubinsky, Yael and Ort Hazzan, “The Role of a Project-Based Capstone Course,” ICSE'05, May 15-21,2005, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Learning Program: A Pioneering Learning Environment for d1st Century Engineering Education", in Proceedings: Realizing the New Paradigm for Engineering Education, 1998. 3. Davis, F. "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly), 1989, pp. 323-340 4. Domagk, S., Hessel, S., & Niegemann, H. M. (2004). How do you get the information you need? Triangulation in usability testing: Two explorative studies. In S. Banks, P. Goodyear, V. Hodgson, C. Jones, V. Lally, D. McConnell & C. Steeples (Eds.), Networked Learning 2004. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference (pp. 749-750). Lancaster: Lancaster University. 5. Felder
, skills, content, and knowledge contained in the instruction are appropriate for Indiana Academic Standard(s) 2 All components - example samples, explanations, graphic illustrations - are appropriate for a broad spectrum of students in the designated grade level. 3 The level and methods of interaction are effective for teaching. 4 The presentation encourages effective and/or active learning. 5 The instructional technology has a clear and engaging representation/interface. 6 Using this technology has a significant advantage over traditional classroom methods. 7 Scores, reports, diagnostic results
computer languages that have been developed for use inautomating sequence of ‘computations’. Some older computer languages such as FORTRAN &BASIC (developed in 1950’s) have given understanding to the development of modern object-oriented languages such as Visual Basic, C++ and JAVA. Of course, these are not the onlyknown exhaustive set of computer languages. There are many other computer languages ofspecial purpose significance and are used in select scientific environment.In particular, the students today are taught some computer language programming constructs andthe associated program creation to help solve science and engineering problems, with some built-in graphical user interface convenience. In fact, many schools and college curricula
attain several areas in engineering, for this reason is importantfor all the future professionals be familiarize with this kind of technology. Page 15.401.8References[1] M. Chang. J. He, Enrique Castro-Leon, Service-Orientation in the Computing Infrastructure,2nd IEEE International Symposium on Service Oriented System Engineering, Shanghai, Oct2006, pp 27-33[2] Chen, Y. & Bai, X. (2008), On robotics applications in Service-Oriented Architecture, The28th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops proceedings;Beijing, China, 551-556[3] S. Kant Vajpayee (1995), Principles of Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Prentice Hall
preferences for learning?We will seek to answer these questions with further investigation through engineering studentinquiry. The next step is to survey women and men students in the ARCE major to discern ifboth genders are influenced by the proximity of the program within the College of Architectureand Environmental Design versus the College of Engineering. Along with focused questionsregarding perceived strengths in technical topics as well as communication and collaboration,existing measures of learning style modes will be used including identify students learningpreferences in relation to the major. Possible assessments include the Kolb Learning StyleInventory, Myer-Briggs Type Indicator and Felder ‘s Index of Learning Styles. We hope toshow why
, Austin, TX.3. Komives, S.R., Lucas, N., McMahon, T.R. (2007) Exploring Leadership – For College Students Who Want to Make a Difference. 2nd Ed. Jossey-Bass, John Wiley & Sons.4. Komives, S. R., Owen, J. E., Longerbeam, S. D., Mainella, F.C., and Osteen, L. (2005) “Developing a leadership identity: A grounded theory.” Journal of College Student Development. Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 593- 611.5. Komives, S. R., Longerbeam, S.D., Owen, J.E., S. D., Mainella, F.C., and Osteen, L. (2006) “A Leadership Identity Development Model: Applications from a Grounded Theory.” Journal of College Student Development, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 401-418.6. Karnes, F. A. & Chauvin, J. C. (1985) Leadership Skills Inventory
Advanced”, Prentice Hall, 2004, pp. 623-643.[5] Henry, Paul S., “Interference Characteristics of Broadband Power Line Communication Systems Using Ariel Medium Voltage Wires” IEEE Communications Magazine, April 2005, pp. 92-98[6] Burke, Gerald J., “Numerical Electromagnetics Code – NEC-4, Method of Moments, Part I: User’s Manual”.AcknowledgementsI thank EiF for its grant that provided some pieces of equipment one of which, the Protek3201 RF Field Analyzer has been valuable in the experimental measurements. Myappreciation also goes to Prof. Mohsen Kavehrad for his encouragement in this work. Page 15.123.8
from it. There is no doubt that it is a great idea toteach a data mining course in computer science curriculum. As you can tell, students taking adata mining course need to have background in quite a few areas to be successful. Not everystudent taking this course may have the background required in all these areas. The question ishow can an instructor remedy the challenge of teaching a group of students with widely-rangingbackgrounds, and at what level should this course be taught. Furthermore, the issue of groupwork arises, specifically as to whether data mining course projects should be accomplishedindividually or as teams.Studies show that many universities are teaching data mining course(s) within their computersscience curriculum. Each
Reverse Engineering – The Stimulu”, 2002 ASEE Conference Proceedings, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.7. Robertson, J., Wales, B., Weihmeir, J.,“Reverse Engineering as a Means to Understand Complex Tool Design”, 2004 ASEE Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake City, UT.8. Forsman, D., “Reverse Engineering and Rapid Prototyping: A Senior Level Technical Elective for Mechanical Engineering Students and Much More”, 2004 ASEE Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake City, UT.9. Orta, P., Medoza, R. R., Elizalde, H., Guerra, D., “Engineering Education Through Reverse Engineering”, 2006 ASEE Conference Proceedings, Chicago, IL .10. Shooter, S., “Reverse Engineering to Design Forward: An Introduction to Engineering Experiential Learning
, and computer science.Linda Hirsch, New Jersey Institute of Technology LINDA S. HIRSCH is the Program Evaluator in the Center for Pre-College programs. She has a doctoral degree in educational psychology with a specialty in psychometrics and a Masters degree in statistics. She has been involved in all aspects of educational and psychological research for 15 years. Dr. Hirsch has extensive experience conducting longitudinal research studies and is proficient in database management, experimental design, instrument development, psychometrics and statistical programming.John Carpinelli, New Jersey Institute of Technology JOHN D. CARPINELLI is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Page 15.32.6Literacy, National Academy of Engineering; National Research Council; Greg Pearson and A. Thomas Young,Editors (2002), p. 3.2 Linda S. Hirsch, Siobhán J. Gibbons, Howard Kimmel, Ronald Rockland, and Joel Bloom, “High School Students’Attitudes To And Knowledge About Engineering,” 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2003.Paper #1145 Page 15.32.7
circuits. Students discover the utility of parameter sweeps to optimize theirdesign instead of guessing different values and the utility of their ideal design as astarting point for their finished design. Students were able to use chapters 10 and 11from the SONNET ™ User’s Manual to learn about parameterization. The concept of de-embedding a circuit from connectors and feed lines was introduced. Students readchapters 7 and 8 of the User’s Manual and use SONNET™ ’s de-embedding capability Page 15.850.4during the laboratory exercise. In addition students discover the efficacy of using aSmith Chart rather than a linear graph to display their simulation
switch to full-time research after final exams.The research completed by the exchange students is a collaborative project between theprofessors in the United States and Karlsruhe. Because the duration of each student’s timeabroad is roughly one and a half semesters, consisting of one academic semester and part of thesemester break(s), German and American students overlap at both universities. This interactionoccurs both in the classroom and in the laboratory, and facilitates continuity in the researchprojects.The students and faculty have enjoyed early success with this arrangement. Two of thecollaborative research projects have led to publications in a respected materials science journal.The exchange has also fostered further collaboration
. Mizukami, Student Assessment of a Problem- Based Learning Experiment in Civil Engineering Education. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 2005. 131(1): p. 13-18.22. Downey, G.L., et al., The globally competent engineer: working effectively with people who define problems differently. Journal of Engineering Education, 2006. 95(2): p. 107- 122.23. Hennessey, M.P. and S. Kumar, Integrated graphical game and simulation-type problem- based learning in kinematics. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 2006. 34(3): p. 220-451.24. Butler, A.B., Effects of Solution Elicitation Aids and Need for Cognition on the Generation of Solutions to Ill-Structured Problems
-44.de Camargo Ribeiro, L. R. (2008). Electrical engineering students evaluate problem-based learning (PBL). International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 45(2), 152- 161.Hung, W., D. Jonassen, and R. Liu. 2008. Problem-based learning. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, eds. J.M. Spector, M.D. Merrill, J.V. Merriënboer, M.P. Driscoll, 485-506. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Eberlein, T., Kampmeier, J., Minderhout, V., Moog, R. S., Platt, T., Varma-Nelson, P., et al. (2008). Pedagogies of engagement in science. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 36(4), 262-273.Ehrlich, T. 1998. Reinventing John Dewey’s “pedagogy as a university
Surface 70 60 Temperature (deg. C) 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 Time (s) Figure 3: Temperature distribution of acrylic cylinder with time.ExperimentThis heat transfer study was revisited by the same set of students the following semester in theirSystems and Measurement course. There students experimentally measured the cooling at thecenterline