, J.H. (1985). “Humanities in an engineering program.” 1985 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Vol. 3, 1598-1601. 4. Fourie, A. (1994). “Will civil engineering look any different in the year 2001?” Civil Engineering, published by South African Institute of Civil Engineers, 2(12), 19-21. Page 15.660.11 5. Ansari, A. (2001). “The Greening of Engineers: A Cross-Cultural Experience.” Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(1), 105-15.6. Van Treuren, K. and Eisenbarth, S. (2002). “Engineering education in a liberal arts environment at Baylor University.” 2002 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 16-19 June
, Albuquerque, NM. 7. Barger, M. and Hall, M.W. (1998). “Sustainability in environmental engineering education.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, June 28 - July 1, 1998, Seattle, WA. 8. Robinson, M. and Sutterer, K. (2003). “Integrating sustainability into civil engineering curricula.” Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Conference, June 22-25, 2003, Nashville, TN. 9. Hansen, K. and Vanegas, J. (2006). “A guiding vision, road map, and principles for researching and teaching sustainable design and construction.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 18-21, 2006, Chicago, IL. 10. Freyne, S., Hale, M., and Durham, S. (2007). “Incorporating
accessed Jan. 1, 2010 http://www.advance.iastate.edu/resources/fac_search.shtml.15. Iowa State University’s ADVANCE Website Resources for Work Life Balance http://www.advance.iastate.edu/worklife/worklife.shtml16. Iowa State University’s ADVANCE Website Resources for Pathways to Promotion http://www.advance.iastate.edu/17. Bird, Sharon R. in press. (March 2011, volume 18, issue 2). “Unsettling the University’s ‘Incongruous, Gendered Bureaucratic Structures’: A Case Study Approach.” Gender, Work and Organization. Page 15.817.1018. Iowa State University’s ADVANCE Website, National Conference Presentations by S. Carlson and
, K., Fung, C., and Khine, M., “The Relationship between Game Genres, Learning Techniques, and Learning Styles in Educational Computer Games,” Edutainment 2008, LNCS 5093, 2008, pp. 497-508.4. Hsieh, S. J., and Kim, H., “Web-Based Problem-Solving Environment for Line Balancing Automated Manufacturing Systems,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2005.5. Corti, K., “Games-Based Learning; a Serious Business Application,” PIXELearning Limited, February 2006.6. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edutainment, last accessed on May 1, 2006.7. Xu, Y., Miekas, C., Siddique, Z., Ling, C., Chowhury, S., and Geng, X., “Gaming and interactive visualization for education, A multi
structuring twopairings, one of 'architecture and engineering' and the other of 'practice and the academy',significant dimensions could be added to the Rensselaer education of an architect and anengineer; dimensions that would have strategic impact on both the perspectives and practices ofRensselaer graduates. Such initiatives are not new. Modern era joint architecture andengineering educational initiatives have been pursued as far back as the 1970's when TedHappold, founder of Buro Happold, directed the interdisciplinary program for architecture andcivil engineering at the University of Bath which was successful in producing a generation ofcreative architects and innovative building engineers.2Components and History of the Bedford ProgramThe Bedford
Company, New York, 1959 3. Clebsch, A. Theorie der Elasticitat Fester Korper. Teubner, Leipzig, 1862. 4. Pilkey, W. D., “Clebsch’s Method for Beam Deflection”, Journal of Engineering Education, January 1964, p. 170. 5. Soutas-Little, R. W., Inman, D. J. and Balint, D. S., Engineering Mechanics, Statics; Computational Edition, Cengage Learning (Thomson), 2008 6. Niedenfuhr, F. W., “The Elementary Torsion Problem.” J. Eng. Ed. Vol. 50 91960), pp. 662-665. 7. Soutas-Little, R. W., Inman, D. J. and Balint, D. S., Engineering Mechanics, Dynamics, Computational Edition, Cengage Learning (Thomson), 2008, Sample Problem 2.10, pp. 128-129. 8. Soutas-Little, R. W. and Inman, D. J., ”Mechanics Reform” Symposium Workshop on
this paper are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We thank the faculty membersand students at IIT Madras who provided the data and assistance in conducting this project.1 Chamberlain, J. (2008) “Multidisciplinary design of student projects in developing countries,” 2008 ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, pp. 1-14.2 Hsu, K., Lin, S., Lin, Y., Yeh, S. (2008). “Exploring the Eco-Pedagogy of an Urban Eco-Tourism Hill PathDesign,” 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, pp. 1-11.3 Montgomery, G., Sankar, C.S., and Raju, P.K. (2007). “Design and Implementation of a Case Study and
profession. Journal of Engineering Education 91, no. 4 (2002): 419-20.8. Harihareswara, S. Politics in modern science fiction [Course Syllabus]. Harihareswara.net. http://harihareswara.net/.html (accessed December 28, 2009).9. Harihareswara, S. Politics in modern science fiction [Course Content]. Harihareswara.net. http://harihareswara.net/.html (accessed December 28, 2009).10. Spinks, C. W. Prophecy, pulp, or punt: Science fiction, scenarios, and values. Paper presented at 5th Annual Conference of the World Future Education Society, Dallas, February, 1983. ERIC Database. http://www.eric.ed.gov///sql/_storage_01/b////.pdf (accessed December 28, 2009).11. Baringer, P., and McKitterick, C. Science, technology, and society [Course
opportunities and be able to apply it to various projectsthroughout the whole curriculum including the senior capstone research project.Bibliography1. P. D. Galloway, The 21st-Century Engineer: A Proposal for Engineering Education Reform, ASCE (2008).2. B. Barron, “Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning.” Journalof the Learning Sciences. v.7, pp.271-311 (1998).3. J. R. Meredith and S. J. Mantel Jr., Project Management: A Managerial Approach, Sixth Edition. Wiley (2003).4. P. Sanger, C. Ferguson, and W. Stone, “Integrating Project Management, Product Development and SeniorCapstone into a Course Sequence that Creates New Products and Patents for Students.” ASEE Annual Conference,paper AC2009-888 (2009).5
-7.10 Bogue, B., & Litzinger, M. E. (2004). Wellness strategies for women engineers: An interdisciplinary course designed to help women engineers succeed. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.11 Chaturvedi, S., Crossman, G., Swart. W., & Betit, J. (2001). Global engineering in an interconnected world: An upper division general education cluster at Old Dominion University. Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.12 Herkert, J. R. (1997). STS for engineers: Integrating engineering, humanities, and social sciences. Proceedings of the 1997 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
that include narrativeinquiry, phenomenology, grounded theory, and ethnogrophy12. Creswell13, describes case studies Page 15.182.6as follows: Case studies, in which the researcher explores in depth a program, an event, an activity, a process, or one or more individuals. The case(s) are bounded by time and activity, and researchers collect detailed information using a variety of data collection procedures over a sustained period of time (Stake, 1995).Elliot and Luke14, however, argue that case studies are not a method of inquiry but rather a toolfor data generation and interpretation that, most likely, cannot be generalized. In fact
) 2. Attention to detail (1-10 points) 3. Use of provided material(s) (1-10 points) 4. Oral presentation (1-25 points) 5. Enthusiasm (1-10 points) 6. Reason for participation (1-10 points) 7. Bonus points (Judge must state reason) (1-10 points) Students constructing their projectsEach grade level is awarded prizes for first, second and third place. Prizes awarded include toolboxes, tools, toy construction equipment, hats, pizza coupons, and gift cards. Then all the firstplace winners are judged to determine first, second and third overall. The prizes for overallwinners have been $100, $75, and $50 U. S. savings bonds
kits that are never truly tackled within science instruction classroom experience.References1. Barger, M., Gilbert, R., Little, R., et al, Teaching Elementary School Teachers Basic Engineering Concepts. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2007.2. Engstrom, D., AC 2008-641: Invention, Innovation, and Inquiry—Engineering Design for Children. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2008.3. Etheredge, S., et al., To Pop or Not to Pop: Elementary Teachers Explore Engineering Design with Pop-up Books. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. 2005.4. NRC, National Research Council., National Academy of Sciences. National Science Education Standards
/paper.pdf5. Hoar, Robert H., “The College Algebra E-tutor”, Teaching with Technology today, Volume 8, Number 9: June 27, 20026. “Interactive College Algebra: A Web-Based Course, Student Guide with Student CD”, M2 Presswire; Nov 3, 20097. Hauk, Shandy, Powers, Robert A. , Safer, Alan, and Segalla, Angelo, “A comparison of web-based and paper and pencil homework on student performance in college algebra”, at http://hopper.unco.edu/hauk/segalla/WBWquan_060307.pdf8. Hagerty, Gary and Smith, S, “Using The Web-Based Interactive Software Aleks To Enhance College Algebra”, Page 15.317.14 Mathematics and Computer
, and problem solving skills.Although the goal of the SGER JagBot project was to design and build a tour guide robot, themain result was enhancement of engineering and computer science education at the University ofSouth Alabama.6. References[1] Fritsch WB J, Sagerer G. “Bringing it all together: Integration to study embodied interaction with a robotcompanion.” In: AISB 2005 Symposium – Robot Companions: Hard Problems and Open Challenges in Robot-Human Interaction; 2005.[2] Pineau J, Montemerlo M, Pollack M, Roy N and Thrun S. “Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes:Challenges and results.” Special issue on Socially Interactive Robots, Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 2003; 42:271-281.[3] Birgit G, Matthias H, and Rolf S
theseprojects and exposes students to Principles of Development of Appropriate and SustainableTechnologies. The redesign of the device to control costs and with end-user feedback is avaluable lesson for students, which cannot be taught in traditional engineering classes butthrough such Experiential Learning courses. The benefits to students include learning the designprocess, learning about traditions and constraints in developing countries, developing devicesthat will be beneficial to a large number of end users, and the joy derived from lending a helpinghand to people around the globe.Bibliography1 Dewey, J. Experience and Education, NY, Collier, 19382 Weil, S. and McGill, I. A Framework for Making Sense of Experiential Learning In S. Weil and I
. Keating, T. G. Stanford, A. L. McHenry, E. M. DeLoatch, D. R. Depew, N. Latif, G. R. Bertoline, S. J. Tricamo, H. J. Palmer, K. Gonzalez-Landis, E. Segner, J. P. Tidwell, D. H. Quick, J. M. Snellenberger, R. N. Olson, J. O’Brien, L. A. Hammon, J. Spencer, J. Sargent, “Enabling a Strong U.S. Engineering Workforce for Leadership of Technology Development and Innovation in Industry: Critical Skill- Sets for Early Career Development Leading to the Professional Master of Engineering,” Proceedings of the 2006 National Meeting of ASEE, Chicago, IL, June, 2006.5. Dunlap, D. D., D. A. Keating, T. G. Stanford, A. L. McHenry, E. M. DeLoatch, P. Y. Lee, D. R. Depew, G. R. Bertoline, M. J. Dyrenfurth, S. J. Tricamo, I. T. Davis, J. P
. Page 15.607.9References1. Titman, S. and Martin, J.D. (2007) Valuation, Pearson Addison Wesley, Boston.2. Newnan, D.G.; Lavelle, J.P.; and Eschenbach, T.G. (2009) Engineering Economic Analysis, 10th edition, Oxford University Press, New York.3. Sullivan, W.G.; Wicks, E.M.; and Koelling, C.P. (2009) Engineering Economy, 14th edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.4. Hartman, J.C. (2007) Engineering Economy and the Decision-Making Process, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.5. Park, C.S. (2007) Contemporary Engineering Economic Analysis, 4th edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.6. Blank, L.T. and Tarquin, A.J. (2005) Engineering Economy, 6th edition, McGraw Hill, Boston.7. Canada, J.R
authors would like to thank the orchestra of The College of New Jersey and its conductorDr. Philip Tate for their collaboration and support. This work was supported by the NationalScience Foundation under Grant No. 0855973.References1. Holley, K. A, 2009. Understanding Interdisciplinary Challenges and Opportunities in Higher Education, ASHE Higher Education Report, 35(2), 1-129.2. Klein, J.T. 1990. Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press. Page 15.166.143. Moran, J. 2002. Interdisciplinarity, New York: Routledge4. Rhoten, D., and Pfirman, S. 2007. Women in
2007.8. C. Elliott, V. Vijayakumar, W. Zink and R. Hansen, National Instruments LabVIEW: AProgramming Environment for Laboratory Automation and Measurement, Journal of the Associationfor Laboratory Automation, Volume 12, Issue 1, February 2007.9. R. Krishnan, A. Bharadwaj, and P. Materu, Computer aided design of Electrical machine forvariable speed applications, IEEE Trans. Ind.Electron., vol. 35, no. 4, Nov. 1988.10. S. Linke, J. Torgeson, and J. Au, An interactive computer-graphics program to aid instruction inelectric machinery, IEEE Comput. Applicat.Power, July 1989.11. N. Kehtarnavaz and N. Kim, LabVIEW Programming Environment, Digital Signal ProcessingSystem-Level Design Using LabVIEW, 2005.12. N. Kehtarnavaz and N. Kim, Getting Familiar
AC 2010-408: INTEGRATING COMPUTER PROGRAMMING TECHNOLOGIESINTO THE INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUMJorge Valenzuela, Auburn University Jorge Valenzuela received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in the year 2000. He is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Auburn University. His recent research involves stochastic models for the evaluation of production costs and optimization of electric power generation. He teaches courses on Operations Research and Information Technology.Jeffrey Smith, Auburn University Jeffrey S. Smith is Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Auburn University. Prior to
paradigm.Bibliography1. Brickell, J. L., Porter, D. B., Reynolds, M. F., and Cosgrove, R. D. Assigning Students to Groups forEngineering Design Projects: A Comparison of Five Methods. July 1994 Journal of Engineering Education, pp.259-262.2. Seat, E., and Lord, S. Enabling Effective Engineering Teams: A Program for Teaching Interaction Skills.October 1999 Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 385-390.3. Haag, S. Teaming Backlash: Reframing Female Engineering Students. Proceedings, 2000 ASEE Conference,St. Louis, MO, June 18-21, 2000.4. Kanter, E. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: skewed sex ratios and responses in tokenwomen. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965-990.5. Cohen, L.L., & Swim, J.K. (1995). The differential impact of
paper.Specifically, for each of the programs’ learning objectives the students had to identify anddescribe an experience (or collection of experiences) and examine how the experience(s) ledthem to accomplish the objective. For those learning objectives not met, the students describedhow their experiences fell short of meeting the objective. In addition, students had to describehow the course is likely to impact their future and their professional careers.Assessment of the CourseIn addition to the assessment of the students by the faculty, an assessment of the course by thestudents was undertaken. The exact assessment tools used varied from year to year given thenumerous faculty involved and the varied venues for the course. In total, three different types
on their support of student learning.More importantly the techniques were found to be quite easy to adapt and required minimalpreparation before teaching, in fact the day-to-day teaching was fun! Gone were the days ofputting one self to sleep at the board and on top of all of this, they were so easy a “caveperson”could do it! Page 15.1390.12Bibliography1. Vygotsky, L. S. Thought and Language, Cambridge Massachusetts, The M.I.T., 19622. Von Glaserfield, E. Learning as a constructive activity. In C. Janvier (Ed.),Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics, Hillsdale New Jersey, 19873. James H. Fetzer Journal
Learned course. Two former,distinguished NASA engineers/managers review and critique more than 30 aerospaceengineering examples in the classroom. Through the use of case histories such as Apollo 13 andthe Space Shuttle Challenger “Normalization of Deviance” concept2 to lesser-known examplesfrom archives throughout the Agency, NASA engineers learn first hand from these highlyexperienced thought leaders who were there since the 1960’s, and worked through difficult featsand challenges to acquire invaluable experience.The goal of the SSD course is to examine the root causes of aerospace-specific mishaps, and theapplicable lessons that can be derived from these historical incidents. The majority of spacemishaps can be traced to easily recognizable and
standard. The document provides interesting and important background material related to Content match Background the standard. The grade level of this material is appropriate for this task or else I can easily adapt Object match Grade level the materials in this document to my grade level. I can use a non-textual component(s); e.g., figures, tables, images, videos orSituational match Non-textuals graphics, etc.Situational match Examples I can use the real-world examples provided in the
access to typical laboratorymaterials to use during the construction of their design projects, whatever they may be. Iknow for a fact that this acquired knowledge of fluid machinery will aid them greatly intheir upper level engineering classes, especially fluid dynamics. Page 15.93.10References: 1. Rice, J., T. M. Bayles, G. Russ, and J. Ross, “Preparing Freshmen for Future Energy Issues”, Paper AC 2007-1748 published in the 2007 ASEE proceedings and presented in the Hands-on & Real World Studies Session in The Freshman Programs Division Session. 2. Carletta, J., Bayles T.M., Kalveram, K., Khorbotly, S., Macnab, C
RoboWaiter: ____ Contestant ___ SupporterContestant details: Robot name(s) ____________________Contest division(s) _____________________Institution _____________________________ Professional or student position _______________________Form of your participation in the RoboWaiter: ____ Curricular ____ ExtracurricularSupporter details: ___ Individual ___ Organization member (specify)___________________________________Forms of support: Current ______________________________ Future__________________________________Your experience with assistive technology & assistive robotics___________________________________________2. GoalsPlease present your view of the goals of the assistive robotics
/ 314.0 89.1 278.3 / 314.0 88.6 264.3 / 314.0 84.2 274.1 / 314.0 87.3 9e 132.2 / 163.2 81.0 120.0 / 163.2 73.5 130.9 / 163.2 80.2 127.7 / 163.2 78.2 Page 15.260.11 104.0 ConclusionsDoes a program need to include industry partners in their senior design course to besuccessful? Obviously not, since few programs use industry partners; however, manyprograms have gone to using adjuncts with large amounts of industry design experienceto teach their senior design course (meet ABET requirements) since not all full timefaculty are P.E.’s and
20, Issue 5, 1983.7. Cawelti, G. (editor), Handbook of Research on Improving Student Achievement, 2nd edition. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service, 1999.8. Committee on Science and Mathematics Teacher Preparation, National Research Council, Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics and Technology: New Practices for the New Millennium, National Academies Press, 2000.9. Wenglinsky, H., How Teaching Matters: Bringing the Classroom Back into Discussions of Teacher Quality. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 2000.10. Loucks-Horsley, S., P. W. Hewson, N. Love, and K. E. Stiles, Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 1998.11