Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacquelynn Ann Horsey, University of Arkansas; Thomas Hudnall McGehee, University of Arkansas; Mostafa Elsaadany, University of Arkansas; Timothy J. Muldoon, University of Arkansas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

context of such available resources isof broad interest to the engineering community. This study sought to measure the effectivenessof a junior-level clinical observations course designed for a major land-grant, public universitywithout proximity to a medical school. We compared IP generation and pre- and post-classsurveys were used to quantify students’ self-efficacy, motivations, and ability to makeconnections to real-world problems. The total number of IP applications increased more thantwo-fold following the adoption of the course, and survey results indicated students’ collectiveimproving understanding of the design process and increased confidence in engineering-relatedskills. This study included a sample size of 75 undergraduate students

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marcia Pool, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Rohit Bhargava; H. Rex Gaskins, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

’ college teaching self-efficacy," CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 17, no. 1, p. ar14, 2018/03/01 2018, doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-02- 0039.[3] E. E. Shortlidge and S. L. Eddy, "The trade-off between graduate student research and teaching: A myth?," PLOS ONE, vol. 13, no. 6, p. e0199576, 2018, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199576.[4] N. Davidson and C. H. Major, "Boundary crossings: Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and problem-based learning," Journal on excellence in college teaching, vol. 25, 2014.

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Postcard Session (Best of WIPs)

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Delaware; Shameeka M Jelenewicz, University of Delaware

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

Year EngineeringStudents” in 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), San Jose, CA, USA, 2018, pp.1-8, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2018.8659311.[13] M.L. Riggs, J. Warka, B. Babasa, R. Betancourt, S. Hooker. “Development and validation ofself-efficacy and outcome expectancy scales for job-related applications,” Educational andPsychological Measurement, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 793–802, 1994, doi:10.1177/0013164494054003026[14] A.R. Carberry, H.S. Lee, M.W. Ohland. “Measuring engineering design self-efficacy,”Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 71-79, 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01043.x.[15] D.B. Yarbrough, L.M. Shulha, R.K. Hopson, F.A. Caruthers, The program evaluationstandards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Postcard Session (Best of WIPs)

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer M Hatch, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis; Steven Higbee, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis; Danka Maric, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis; Sharon Miller, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

supporting STEM faculty on STEM education research projects.Dr. Sharon Miller, Purdue University Sharon Miller, PhD, is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering at Purdue University. She received a BS degree in Materials Science and Engineering from Purdue University and MS and PhD degrees in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Michigan. Her educational efforts focus on biomedical engineering discipline-based educational research, including design self-efficacy, project-based learning, critical reflection in ethics, and high-impact practices. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work in Progress: A Multi-level Undergraduate Curricular

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Technical Session 3

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Casey Jane Ankeny, Northwestern University; David P O'Neill, Northwestern University; Ken Gentry, Northwestern University; Philippa Eshun, Northwestern University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

surveys versus “reflection while doing” in the form of notebooks. Although thestudy was not definitive, these reflective notebooks may promote increased achievement earlierin the quarter. Further, the students viewed the reflective practice favorably.To increase student engagement with the SBG system, we implemented a co-creation processwith the rubric [15]. The use of co-created rubrics is an inclusive teaching practice that canimprove confidence and self-efficacy [5]. It speeds up future detailed feedback, as the studentsand instructors have a similar understanding about the elements of the rubric and may enhanceself-regulated learning [5]. In our course, proficiency in the standards was evaluated accordingto the co-created rubric (as shown in