Professional Engineer (Alaska), Project Management Professional, LEED Accredited Professional in Building Design and Construction, and Envision Sustainability Professional. His research interests include engineering education; infrastructure; sustainable design; and clean, renewable energy. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Integrating Professional Credentialing in Sustainability into Civil Engineering Curriculum: A Case StudyAbstractThe concept of sustainable development rose to prominence with the publication of OurCommon Future as an output of the United Nations’ Brundtland Commission. Recently,increased emphasis on the impacts of climate change and globalization has
inengineering [6, 7]. Their review of inductive methods includes case studies, discovery learning,and project-based learning. Their case for project-based learning throughout the engineeringcurriculum is compelling. It has been proven that students participating in PBL show moreenthusiasm for the course, are highly motivated, demonstrate better communication andteamwork skills, and develop critical thinking skills to apply their learning to realistic problems[8,9].Considering the advantages of PBL, this paper describes an approach to integrate PBL into asophomore-level course, Surveying, at the Civil & Environmental Engineering Department ofRowan University. By incorporating PBL into the curriculum, this study explores the benefitsassociated with
deeper understanding of mechanical concepts and theoriesbut also for fostering active learning. While the traditional use of commercial bridge modelingkits, like the Pasco Bridge set ME-6991, has been standard, this approach often falls short ineffectively engaging students in learning the principles of static equilibrium and truss analysis.This paper introduces an innovative design project that enhances the conventional bridgeexperiment. It involves students optimizing and 3D printing truss member dimensions, replacingthem in the model, and evaluating performance. This hands-on approach in design andmanufacturing significantly enriches the learning experience in truss analysis. Additionally, thepaper discusses the integration of this project
university levels. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Designing a New Civil Engineering Curriculum to Prepare Tomorrow’s EngineerAbstractToday, the infrastructure challenges civil engineers face are complicated not only by acceleratingtechnological progress, rapidly evolving societal needs and expectations, and complex globalenvironmental challenges, but also by swiftly changing demographics. Changing demographicsrequire inclusive perspectives both in the formulation of engineering solutions and therecruitment and training of an increasingly diverse pool of aspiring engineers. The developmentof diverse civil engineers, as stewards of technology, the natural and built
this to be an iterative research project wherein the curriculum design project isoffered in future summer offerings of MoM with integrated lessons learned from previousofferings. Identifying themes from this first round of five participants and subsequentparticipants will help inform how to continuously improve implementing such a project with thegoal that some of these lessons learned are informative for other educators wishing to offerstudent-led curriculum development projects in their engineering courses and contexts.Results As a work in progress, the plan is to continue collecting data from future MoM summerstudents to provide a richer description of the student experience with this project and toiteratively improve the
identify gaps in teaching related to timber,creating an outline of the current state of timber-focused curriculum within civil engineering.Second is to assess where there are needs and opportunities to improve available resources tosupport programs interested in integrating mass timber structural design into their curriculum. Toachieve the first objective, this research identifies and documents existing timber engineeringcourses available to undergraduate and graduate students and instructors in the United States.The two largest higher educational institutions by enrollment in each state were assessed toinventory courses related to engineering design that mentioned “timber” or “wood” in theircourse description, resulting in 63 total identified
EACCriterion 5, stipulating expanded incorporation of DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) intocurricula. While these topics have begun to enter the broader civil and environmentalengineering curriculum and have made monumental gains in coverage [1], they have less oftenbeen integrated into structural engineering. The current undergraduate structural engineeringcurriculum at our institution lacks the incorporation and facilitation of the necessary skills tosupport the entrepreneurial mindset development needed for multi-faceted disaster riskmanagement. As many structural engineers begin their practice after undergraduate education, itis critical to begin to integrate and build these skills before they enter practice [2], [3]. Therefore,we develop an
Paper ID #41153Incorporating Evidence-based Teaching Practices in an Engineering Courseto Improve LearningJulie Anne Wildschut, Calvin University Julie Anne Wildschut is an assistant professor in the Engineering Department. She teaches undergraduate classes related to water resources, hydraulics, sustainability, and environmental engineering. Her research interests include stream stabilization to reduce sedimentation, improving access to clean drinking water, reducing human impacts to waterways, and designing a more sustainable built environment. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
Analysis of Practitioners and EducatorsThe National Council of Structural Engineers Association (NCSEA) Basic Education Committee(BEC) recently conducted two wide-reaching surveys asking practitioners about skills andeducational requirements they value in new hires. Structures Magazine has reported on the 2016and 2021 survey results in [12] and [13]. Additional details from the 2021 survey results wereprovided by Dong and Francis in [14]. The NCSEA BEC also conducted an educator survey in2019 focused on the structural engineering curriculum of 168 undergraduate programs, [15].Here, only the survey data on structural analysis is reported and is compared in a way that it wasnot originally presented in order to draw conclusions more directly about
guiding the learningprocess. This learning format provides various benefits for the instructors as well as students. Some of those potential benefits includeflexibility [3], increased peers’ interaction [4] and increased interaction with instructor [5]. Based on the benefits identified inprevious studies, a freshman level civil engineering course was converted into a partial flipped format. This paper aims to evaluatestudent perspectives on partial flipped geographic information system (GIS) course.Geographic Information system (GIS) is a freshman-level software-based course in the civil engineering undergraduate curriculum atthe Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. This two-credit course provides an introduction to GIS software, basic principles
. Specifically,the proficiency of students to identify and apply learned skills to a different setting and situation,and the ability of students to converge different learned skill sets and apply in a new situation areevaluated.2. BackgroundA new undergraduate civil engineering curriculum was implemented at the Kerala TechnologicalUniversity prior to this study. This section provides an overview of the underlying vision guidingthe introduction of Design and Engineering and Group Project courses within the newcurriculum. Figure 1 illustrates the stages of competence expected in the students undergoing thefour-year undergraduate civil engineering degree course as per the new curriculum. Theknowledge component integrated into the course envelopes all the
responded to students’isolation through an increase in office hours in the subsequent semester following initial reportsof student isolation. The trends in the data are used to make recommendations for civilengineering instructors on how to integrate learning communities into the classroom experienceduring normal and disrupted times.Keywords: Sophomore, Junior, Syllabi, Document Analysis, Civil EngineeringIntroductionLearning communities in classroom settings act as support systems for students, facilitatingincreased motivation, student success, and feelings of belonging. Instructors create learningcommunities in the classroom by incorporating teamwork and group projects into their coursedesigns as well as making themselves available, by way of
resourceconstraints. With over 400 students and only one dedicated communication instructor, providingpersonalized coaching was not feasible.We incorporated PitchVantage, an AI-driven public speaking software, into our program toaddress this gap. This tool offered a solution by delivering tailored feedback, enabling morefrequent practice, and providing mini-lectures on various aspects of communication. This paperexplores the effectiveness of such technological interventions in honing the communication skillsof engineering students.We aim to share insights and add to the ongoing dialogue about integrating communication skillstraining within the engineering curriculum. We theorize that an early introduction to these skillsand consistent practice will equip the
., "Integrating Innovation and Entrepreneurship Principles into the Civil Engineering Curriculum," J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract,, vol. 141, no. 3, 2025.[6] KFF, "The Kern Family Foundation," 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.kffdn.org.[7] G. Michelsen, "Sustainable Development as a Challenge for Undergraduate Students: The Module 'Science Bears Responsibility' in the Leuphana Bachelor's Programme Commentary on "A Case Study of Teaching Social Responsibility to Doctoral Students in the Climate Sciences""," Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1505-1511, 2013.[8] G. S. a. S. Srinivasan, "Integration of Ethics, Sustainability, and Social Responsibility Components in an Undergraduate Engineering
investigate strategies for integrating AI intocivil engineering education. While this integration could be done using new elective courses onAI and civil engineering (see [11]), we were interested in relevant topics that could incorporatedinto existing coursework. Our assumption is that the technical details of using AI would becovered in other courses (e.g., data science). Here, we were interested in demonstratingapplications, providing opportunities to interact with and use AI efficiently, and providing clarityaround the ethical issues of AI.AI in the curriculum: Infrastructure monitoringAs civil infrastructure systems age there is an increasing need for methods and tools that allowowners to efficiently monitor and maintain these systems over time
-doctoral fellow in the Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering at the University of New Mexico. His Ph.D. is in Engineering Education from Purdue University, and he has worked as a K-16 STEM instructor and curriculum designer using various evidence-based active and passive learning strategies. In 2015, Ruben earned an M.S. in Chemical Engineering at Universidad de los Andes in Colombia, where he also received the title of Chemical Engineer in 2012. His research interests are grounded in the learning sciences and include how K-16 students develop engineering thinking and professional skills when addressing complex socio-technical problems. He aims to apply his research to the design of better educational
students’ perceptions of Equity in Developing Infrastructure ResilienceAbstractRecent years have seen a substantial shift in the field of civil engineering (CE) and constructionmanagement (CM) education and workforce development, with an increased emphasis onsustainability and resilience. Sustainability considers economic, ecological, and social aspectswhile addressing problems pertaining to human welfare, the environment, and communityimpact. Resilient infrastructure maintains both structural and functional integrity whilesupporting interdependent social, transportation, water, and energy systems, even aftercatastrophic disasters. Although many civil engineering programs address sustainability,resiliency is
engineering decision curriculum look like? While another, more specificstudy should be done to determine the most effective way to educate civil engineering studentson biases and how to reduce them in professional practice, we can form an initial idea, basing thecurriculum on existing courses [7],[8],[9],[10]. Using these studies, primarily focused in themedical field, we can extrapolate a few key components of educational curriculum. The maincomponents we found in these studies were: curriculum that had students identify biases incertain case studies or clinical trials [8],[9], small group discussion [9],[10], and evaluation ofstudents ability to reduce bias post-curriculum. In these studies, researchers looked into thecurrent bias training for
Research, School of Engineering, and Human Rights Institute to promote and advance interdisciplinary research in engineering with a clear focus on societal outcomes. Davis is working with several faculty on campus to develop research and curriculum at the intersection of human rights and engineering, such as the one discussed herein. Davis completed his Ph.D. in Transportation and Infrastructure Systems at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, in 2018. His research interests include transportation equity, human rights, environmental justice, and economic resilience. He grew up in Cusco, Per´u, where he obtained his B.S. in civil engineering at the University of San Antonio Abad of Cusco. He also earned an MSCE
, allnecessary data was available in geospatial repositories, such as PASDA2 (Pennsylvania SpatialData Access), which did not provide a practice of planning and collecting data for suchapplications. Due to the fact that orbital imagery and aerial missions are labor and expensive foreducational purposes, the authors proposed the development and usage of an CS-TMMS forapplications related to parcels.Figure 1 provides an explanation of the steps carried out during the process of implementing thisteaching/learning strategy.1 https://naip-usdaonline.hub.arcgis.com/2 https://www.pasda.psu.edu/ Step 1: The development of the system (sensor integration and software development
challenges of the engineeringprofession. Through equipping the educators with this resource, we aim to reinforce the ethicalfoundation of young engineers, ensuring they are well-prepared to uphold the highest standardsof integrity as they embark on their professional journeys.IntroductionEngineers have a major responsibility for protection of public welfare and the environment dueto the nature of engineering projects and designs being closely related to both (Bielefeldt, 2022).Engineering education has long recognized the importance of integrating ethics instruction intothe curriculum to prepare future engineers for the ethical challenges they may face in theirprofessional careers. For this reason engineering educators have been developing modules
among students toward the subject matter [9].Undergraduate education faces substantial challenges, notably observed in expansive universitylecture classes [10, 11]. These challenges stem from increasing class sizes that make itprogressively arduous for college instructors to motivate students for class preparation andparticipation in discussions. To address this issue, integrating student-led group lecture deliveriesinto the curriculum has been proposed as a potential solution in this study. The importance ofstudent engagement, especially within group interactions, is instrumental in cultivating essentialskills crucial for academic success and holistic development [10]. This emphasis on activestudent involvement spurred further investigation
Conference, Session 1315, 2001.[19] Jaksic, N., “Pair-to-Pair Peer Learning,” Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE AnnualConference, Paper #31373, 2020.[20] Martinazzi, R., “IMPLEMENTING “STUDENT LEARNING TEAMS” IN ENGINEERINGECONOMICS,” Proceedings of the 1998 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 1639, 1998.[21] Feland, J., Fisher, C., “Cramming Twenty Pounds into a Five-Pound Bag: IncreasingCurricular Loads On Design Students And Enjoying It!” Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE AnnualConference, Session 2125, 2002.[22] Renshaw, S., Dockter, A., Helps, C., Ekstrom, J., “Experiences Using UndergraduateStudents to Develop Information Technology Course Curriculum, “Proceedings of the 2003ASEE Annual Conference, Session 2558, 2003.[23] Bailey, J., “Exploring an Inquiry
, the PtD idea has gradually gained acceptance in the U.S. [3]. However,the traditional curriculum offered by civil engineering programs in the United States does notintegrate PtD concepts [4]. It has been suggested that the engineering community will notincorporate PtD into the curriculum until the accrediting body, ABET, includes it in either aGeneral Criteria or the Program Critera. The majority of civil engineering programs in theUnited States are accredited by ABET. Recently, ASCE’s Civil Engineering Program CriteriaTask Committee (CEPCTC) added a requirement for the curriculum to include an explanationof safety, effective for the 2024-2025 accreditation cycle. Specifically, CEPCTC suggests ninelecture topics that can be used to comply
students identify weak areas to aid in theirpreparation for the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) Exam, and assess the impact of changesmade to the curriculum year to year.The results of the diagnostic exam showed integrating concepts into multiple courses improvedperformance, identifying the type of problem was essential for students to be successful, andinstructors had a difficult time assessing student conceptual understanding when students hadmultiple compounding errors [1]. The latter conclusion was the most significant. To improvestudent performance, it is necessary to understand why the errors occurred. Unless an instructoridentified whether an error was due to a simple calculation mistake or a conceptual gap inknowledge, the instructor was
-incomepeople and/or persons of color [2]. Considering equity as an integral dimension of infrastructureis becoming more common, particularly in transportation [3, 4] and water [5]. The current ASCECode of Ethics [6] implies that civil engineers should strive for equitable infrastructure. Forexample, under the society stakeholder, civil engineers should “acknowledge the community'sdiverse historical, social, and cultural needs and incorporate these considerations in their work.”The idea of equitable infrastructure also aligns with the new ABET civil engineering programcriteria (CEPC). Specifically, in November 2023 the Engineering Accreditation Commission(EAC) of ABET approved new civil engineering criteria that state: “The curriculum mustinclude: A
engagement in social topicsmore than a traditional approach [20]. This outcome shows how new design methods can helpengineers build better products and systems. Similarly, they can also help engineers to buildpersonal confidence. A study at Lafayette College found through emphasizing morals in theengineering classroom, students were more confident in their abilities to develop solutions insocially complex situations [21]. In another study at Loyola University in Chicago, it was seenthat by including social justice topics across the engineering curriculum, retention rates ofminority engineering students increased [17]..Students who have been negatively affected orseen their community impacted by an engineering project, may feel left out and
study the subject. Turkanet al. [3] launched an iOS marker-based app for third year undergraduates that recognizedtextbook and assignment examples and displayed pre-calculated deflections and loads. Whilestudents reported an improved learning experience, students were also overwhelmed and foundthe app difficult to use.Given the limited integration of AR in structural engineering courses and its potential benefit tostudents who struggle with visualizing complex structural phenomena, this study presentsSTRUCT-AR, as a continuation of previous work by the authors [13, 14] as part of an ongoingstudy on the formation of engineering intuition in structural engineering. STRUCT-AR is amarker-less AR application designed to address the limitations in
well to thedesign of a module in a course, the design of an entire course, design of a sequence of courses, andultimately to the design of an entire curriculum. For this paper, (4) components of the Model wereprioritized in deliberately guiding the upgrades of the course mindful of intentional changes all seeking toimprove the quality of both teaching and learning.Structured organization & appropriate use of technologyThe technical communications course (CE205) required minimal refinement related to structuredorganization compliant with the ExCEEd Teaching Model’s Structured Organization criteria. The course’slearning objectives were reviewed and confirmed to align with the course assignments and weekly lessoncontent designed for the
: Graduates demonstrate the capability and desire to pursue progressive and continued intellectual development. 4. Ethical Reasoning: Graduates recognize ethical issues and apply ethical perspectives and concepts in decision making. 5. Science/Technology/Engineering/Mathematics (STEM): Graduates apply science, technology, engineering, and mathematics concepts and processes to solve complex problems. 6. Humanities and Social Sciences: Graduates apply concepts from the humanities and social sciences to understand and analyze the human condition. 7. Disciplinary Depth: Graduates integrate and apply knowledge and methodological approaches gained through in-depth study of an academic discipline.Each of the top-level