integrate their technical and professional skills to positively impact society and she is excited to contribute to the educational journey of engineering students.Dr. Isgard S. Hueck, University of California, San Diego Dr. Isgard Hueck (Ph.D. in Higher Ed/ Leadership & Policy; M.Sc. in Bioengineering; M. Phil. in Education) Affiliations: UCSD - Dept of Bioengineering, Whitaker Institute of Biomedical Engineering & UCSD School of Medicine; Moores Cancer Center. Born and raised in Germany, Isgard Hueck studied Biology at the Wilhelms- University in Munster and received her license as Cyto-Pathologist in Cologne, Germany, in 1987. After years of clinical work in hematology, cancer diagnosis and therapy, Isgard
. Sherri S Frizell, Prairie View A&M University Dr. Sherri S. Frizell is a Professor in the Computer Science Department at Prairie View A&M University. She holds a B.S. in Computer Science from Jackson State University and a Ph.D. in Computer Science and Software Engineering from Auburn University. Her research interests include responsible computing, STEM education, and the persistence of minorities and women in engineering.Sheryl Skaggs, University of Texas at DallasDr. Tiffany Bisbey, The George Washington University Dr. Tiffany Bisbey is an Assistant Professor of Industrial-Organizational Psychology at The George Washington University in Washington DC. She has a B.S. in Psychology from the University of Central
sustainability, further studies with amore deliberate focus and a larger sample population are necessary.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the EdeX Teaching and Learning Grant atNanyang Technological University (NTU) in Singapore. This work was approved by NTUInstitutional Review Board (reference number IRB-2021-483). Any opinions, findings,conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the EdeX program. We would like to acknowledge all theresearchers, data collectors, and students who participated in the study.ReferencesBailey, Thomas R. (1995). Learning to work: Employer involvement in school-to-work transition programs. Washington, D.C
” identifiednot only from our interviews but also documentary analysis, which was implemented in theSchool of Future Technology (SFT) at BUAA (Fig. 1.). This channel refers to the projectthreads driven by joint mentor groups to synergize collaborative efforts with aim to facilitatehigh-quality research and teaching, as well as engage students in up-to-date research andprepare them for industry-working competencies to satisfy the long-term human capitalaccumulation motivation.As shown in Fig. 1., the “S” represents students’ supervisor, which refers to a mentor groupincluding a distinguished industry supervisor, an industry supervisor among the distinguishedsupervisor’s team, and one university supervisor whose research field is similar orcomplementary
continue to identify new ways to address theunderrepresentation of women in engineering and STEM. No woman should have to choosebetween work and family. We can’t change the past, but as educators, employers, advocates, andfriends, we can impact the future, one career story at a time. Let’s partner together to helpwomen like Louise find a pathway back to engineering.References[1] C. Pantoja, “Women’s engineering career stories: Perspectives on leaving,” Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University Graduate School, 2022.[2] S. Hewlett, C, Luce, L. Servon, L. Sherbin, P. Shiller, E. Sosnovich, and K. Sumberg, “The Athena Factor: Reversing the Brain Drain in Science, Engineering, and Technology,” Boston, MA: Harvard Business Publishing
learning and student success,” 2013.[4] R. Korte, S. Sheppard, and W. Jordan, “A Qualitative Study Of The Early Work Experiences Of Recent Graduates In Engineering.,” in 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, 2008, pp. 13–94.[5] E. Goold, “Engineering students’ perceptions of their preparation for engineering practice,” in The 6th Research in Engineering Education Symposium, 2015.[6] E. F. Crawley, D. R. Brodeur, and D. H. Soderholm, “The education of future aeronautical engineers: conceiving, designing, implementing and operating,” J Sci Educ Technol, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 138–151, 2008.[7] D. Heaslip, “Bridging The Gap Between Post Graduate Engineering Education And Industry Needs,” in
-1853, 2008.[3] S. R. Brunhaver, R. F. Korte, S. R. Barley and S. D. Sheppard, "Bridging the gaps between engineering education and practice," in US engineering in a global economy, University of Chicago Press, 2017.[4] M. Iansiti, J. West, David and i. Horii, "Technology integration: Turning great research into great products," in Magazine, Harvard Business School, 1997.[5] R. C. Yam, W. Lo, E. P. Tang and A. K. Lau, "Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: An empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries," Research policy, vol. 40, pp. 391-402, 2011.[6] J. J. Vauterin, K.-E. Michelsen and L. Linnanen, "Attracting and retaining student talent from around the world: the
/working-papers (accessed October, 2023).[10] C. S. Stocco, R. H. Thompson, J. M. Hart, and H. L. Soriano, "Improving the interview skills of college students using behavioral skills training," Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 495-510, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.385.[11] J. Akpan and C. Notar, "How to write a professional knockout resume to differentiate yourself," College Student Journal, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 880-891, 2012.[12] S. B. Knouse, "Impressions of the resume: The effects of applicant education, experience, and impression management," Journal of Business and Psychology, vol. 9, pp. 33-45, 1994.[13] I. Hunt, R. Taylor, and W. Oberman, "Advisory board engagement
enough to be funded funded.and would you fund it?Based upon the presentation given, what are the first two or three follow-up questions you would ask thepresenter about the project?Based upon your experience, are there any areas of improvement the student should think about if givinga similar pitch in the future?A more optional question: Based upon your technical expertise, are there any technical risks that you feelthe student(s) should be aware of related to this project? (Given your varied technical areas and thevarious domains of these projects, this may not be as easy to answer.)Figure 6 Elevator pitch assessment rubric and free form questions.Elevator pitches were evaluated
relevance and its relations to successful group work”, EJEE, vol 48, no. 6, 1165-1185.[16] Holt Zaugg and Randall S. Davies, (2013), “Communication skills to develop trusting relationshipson global virtual engineering capstone teams”, EJEE, vol 38, no.2, 228-233.[17] R. Shah and A.L. Gillen, (2023), “A systematic literature review of university-industry partnershipsin engineering education”, EJEE, vol 48, no.6, 1-27.[18] L. Senevirathna, K. KrishnaPillai, et la., (2023), “An innovative engineering curriculum to train nextgeneration water engineers: a successful case study”, EJEE, vol 48, no.6, 1213-1228[19] N.H. Ben Fong, (2022), “An Innovative Professional Master’s Program to Improve IndustrialReadiness” (Presentation), IISE Annual Conference &
Journal of Construction Management 2022;10,doi:10.1080/15623599.2022.21311335. Kricorian K, Seu M, Lopez D, et al. Factors influencing participation of underrepresented studentsin STEM fields: matched mentors and mindsets. International Journal of Stem Education 2020;7(1):9,doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00219-26. Hartmann BL, Jahren CT. Leadership: Industry Needs for Entry-Level Engineering Positions.Journal of STEM education : innovations and research 16(3):13 87. Chakraborty S, Gonzalez-Triana Y, Mendoza J, et al. Insights on mapping Industry 4.0 andEducation 4.0. Frontiers in Education 2023;8(19, doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.11501908
; Fox, D. L. (1994). Collaboration as political action. Journal of Advanced Composition, 14, 53-71.Foster, M. K. (2021). Design thinking: A creative approach to problem solving. Management Teaching Review, 6(2), 123-140.Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.Henderson, R. & Midgley, W. (2010). The questions of ethics in collaborative research. In Sustaining synergies: Collaborative research and researching collaboration. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:150751904Huppatz, D. J. (2015). Revisiting Herbert Simon's" Science of Design