- Conference Session
- College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP) Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
J. Eliseo De León, New Mexico State University; Patricia A. Sullivan, New Mexico State University; Sara Patricolo, New Mexico State University
- Tagged Divisions
-
College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP)
provides the REPs with masterydigital badges. The curriculum guides REPs on utilizing mentoring as a leadership developmenttool that helps navigate career advancement in their respective engineering fields. Integrated intoeach of the three courses are best-practices designed to positively influence the development of aself-directed learning mindset and building leadership capacity among REPs as future engineeringleaders.Mentors often cite the ability to increase their professional skills as personal benefits gainedthrough the mentoring process, stating that serving as mentors caused them to reflect on andsharpen their own skills, including coaching, communicating, and introspection.2 We report on ourongoing efforts to scale a novel leadership
- Conference Session
- College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP) Technical Session 1
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Chun Kit Chan, The University of Hong Kong; H.H. Cheung, University of Hong Kong; Match Ko, University of Hong Kong; Chun Kit Chui, University of Hong Kong; LEI YANG, The University of Hong Kong
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP)
System(ROS), localization, auto-piloting, computer vision, object recognition, LiDAR control, andGPS. Following this training, these students were then paired with a local railway company,collaborating with professional engineers on the exploration of robotic solutions to addressvarious maintenance challenges in modern railway operation.The practice paper analyzes students' written reflections collected during the pilot run of theIES framework in 2023/24, revealing the impact of the framework and its various learningcomponents in preparing students for industrial collaboration. The insights from this studyoffer valuable lessons that can be applied to adapt to other technology domains in upcomingcohorts.KeywordsIndustrial collaboration
- Conference Session
- College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP) Technical Session 2
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Eileen Fong, Nanyang Technological University; Ibrahim H. Yeter, Nanyang Technological University; Shamita Venkatesh, Nanyang Technological University
- Tagged Divisions
-
College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP)
a stratified random sampling technique to select one female and one male from eachteam. A total of 16 students (8 females, 8 males) were invited to respond to several open-endedquestions as part of a self-reflection assignment at the end of the course. Specifically, theparticipants were asked the question, “How has industrial collaboration impacted you in thiscourse? Please discuss how the industrial collaboration (a) influenced your perception towardsproblem-solving, (b) influenced your opinion on ethics, and (c) affected your confidence as anengineer, i.e., self-efficacy.”Data AnalysisWe employed a qualitative inductive approach to analyze the data. Using an open-codingtechnique, two coders created descriptive codes to ascertain emerging
- Conference Session
- College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP) Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Ryan C Cooper, University of Connecticut
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP)
Collegesand Employers (NACE) Career Competencies framework into engineering courses. More thanthree quarters of engineering students are seeking career advancement or career changes withengineering degrees. The integration of NACE Career Competencies helps translate ABETstudent outcomes into practicable career readiness strategies. The courses used projects andguided reflection students to practice eight career competencies: Career and Self Development,Communication, Critical Thinking, Equity and Inclusion, Leadership, Professionalism,Teamwork, and Technology. Preliminary observations from student reflections and advisinginterviews suggest students are intrinsically motivated to connect course exercises to careercompetencies. This study provides a
- Conference Session
- College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP) Technical Session 2
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Kerrie Danielle Hooper, Florida International University; Trina L. Fletcher, Florida International University; Edward Collins, National Society of Black Engineers; Rochelle L Williams, Graduate Fellowships for STEM Diversity; Ahlam Alharbi, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP)
ormilestones. Then we describe how we had applied various theoretical constructs to our project andhow it helped to shape our thinking and propel the project forward. Next, we reflected on lessonslearned and presented a roadmap of the steps we took to achieve our project milestones. Wedemonstrate the realities and practicality of conducting our collaborative research process andbridging gaps between theory and practice, and this is a common principle communicatedthroughout the paper.BackgroundThis paper represents a derivative exploration within the broader context of a comprehensivelongitudinal study examining the Summer Engineering Experience for Kids (SEEK), an initiativedelivered by the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE). NSBE has
- Conference Session
- College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP) Technical Session 1
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Reem Khojah, University of California, San Diego; Alyssa Catherine Taylor, University of California, San Diego; Isgard S. Hueck, University of California, San Diego
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP)
solutions,career motivation, personal life attributes (e.g. persistence, adaptability), ethics, and professionalbehavior [3], [11]-[15].Particularly in engineering capstone senior design projects, activities with industry feedbackhave been identified as effective mechanisms to stimulate students’ motivation, improveprofessional skills, and to reflect on realistic contexts or limitations of proposed design solutions[16], [17]. Shah and Gillen [4] provided a systematic overview of university-industrypartnerships in capstone projects across engineering education and suggested identifying skillswith low performance indicators and improving those with additional focus in the curriculum.Although various ways of soliciting industry feedback on senior
- Conference Session
- College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP) Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Christina A. Pantoja, Campbell University; Joyce B. Main, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP)
) of the unfolding model of turnover.By creating and reflecting on Louise’s interpreted narrative and career journey map, we gain adeeper understanding of the tensions and difficult decisions Louise had to make along herengineering career journey. Without role models or career guidance, Louise experienced tensionin balancing the needs of her work and growing family. She felt pressure to decide between herfamily and work. She chose to stay home with her family and pursue part-time, flexibleengineering work; however, was unable to find a long-term position. Furthermore, she sought are-entry path into engineering for years, yet has never found a pathway back. If she could havefound a long-term, part-time engineering position she would likely
- Conference Session
- College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP) Technical Session 2
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Walter W Schilling Jr., Milwaukee School of Engineering; Derek David Riley, Milwaukee School of Engineering
- Tagged Divisions
-
College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP)
work in progress. This increased IAC engagement withcampus was spoken of favorably during the next advisory board meeting. Overall, the responsefrom the IAC members who participated was quite enthusiastic, and most have committed torepeating the process again.The technique is being repeated with the next set of students who started one term later. This setis a much smaller set of students, but again can help to refine the process.Going forward, the intent is to roll the assessment out to all senior design teams and then lookcloser at how this approach impacts the validity of the internal assessment. There is alsoconsideration of having students complete a follow-up reflection on the IAC feedback.References[1] M. El-Sayed and J. El-Sayed
- Conference Session
- College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP) Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Florence Emilia Castillo, University of Texas at Dallas; Yvette E. Pearson P.E., University of Texas at Dallas; Sherri S Frizell, Prairie View A&M University; Sheryl Skaggs, University of Texas at Dallas; Tiffany Bisbey, The George Washington University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP)
) program under award number 2130515 to Rice University via a subaward to TheUniversity of Texas at Dallas and under award number 2130328 to Prairie View A&MUniversity. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References [1] L.N.P Campbell Lauren, E.M. Torres, S.J. Zaccaro, S. Zhou, K.N. Hedrick, D.M. Wallace, C.R. Luning, and J.E. Zakzewski, “Examining multiteam systems across context and type: A historiometric analysis of failed MTS performance,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol 13, 2022. DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813624 [2] R. Asencio and L.A. DeChurch, Assessing collaboration within and