the students and the community partners.Course background and evolutionThe first offering of Engineers in the Community centered on an intensive curriculum overSpring Break 2016 in Ferguson, Missouri, one of the flashpoint cities of the Black Lives Mattermovement. We selected speakers that embodied leadership in the community and explored broadthemes of ethics. In this course, we exposed undergraduate engineers to systemic problems in theSt. Louis region, encouraging them to apply their engineering skills to these challenges. Before2020, this course was community-connected, and students found it impactful to (1) get outside ofthe “campus bubble” by visiting locations around St. Louis, and (2) meet people from ourcommunity. The Covid pandemic
relationships within education, teachers, community partners, and the learningprocess. Using a multiple case study design to investigate teachers’ perspectives on theintegration of community-based learning in the classroom, two primary questions guided thisstudy: 1. How do case study teachers integrate community-based learning in applied STEM classrooms? 2. How does the integration of community-based learning impact case study teachers’ perspectives on STEM education and curriculum design?Participants and contextTwo former public high school teachers from an urban school district were identified asparticipants in this study. Participant selection was convenient but purposeful, formed of teachersconnected to the researcher through a
, we sought to identity engineering teachers in rural schools to teachthe curriculum we developed. However, teacher attrition became a problem. Over time, two “digitalliteracy coaches” at the school – one who was a prior history teacher and another who was a priorcareer and technical education teacher – became the primary engineering design course teachers ateach school. As they taught the engineering curriculum as an elective course, they also bothcontinued to serve their schools as digital literacy coaches.Data Collection and AnalysisFocus groups were conducted with student participants (n=8) and served as an opportunity for us toschedule conversations with multiple participants at one time in order to not take up too muchinstructional time
frequency should these educational contextsbe woven throughout an already overloaded curriculum?Community-engaged service learning has the dual goal of enriching student learning andgenerating value for communities [11] . Students that participate in community-engaged learningoften benefit from a number of additional learning opportunities, including increased criticalthinking and intercultural skills, increased communication skills, ability to engage with a varietyof stakeholders during the design process, identifying unmet user needs, integrating informationfrom many sources to gain insight and assessing and managing risk. Because of the complexitiesof students learning through projects engaged with real-world communities, faculty aresometimes
experiences.Yet, an essential step for amplifying the method’s tools in pre-college and college engineeringclassrooms is developing research on the disciplinary practices of human-centered engineeringdesign, including their conceptualizations, applications, and pedagogy.As human constructions, disciplines are social spaces in which knowledge intertwines withnorms, cultural conventions, discourses, and social purposes to integrate negotiated disciplinarypractices [9], [10], [11]. Central to those practices are the literacies or specialized and regular useof language and texts that doers of the discipline share. Recognizing and teaching the specificlanguage and ways of reading, writing, and reasoning with media and texts in any discipline isfundamental to
years.Dr. William ”Bill” C. Oakes, Purdue University William (Bill) Oakes is the Assistant Dean for Experiential Learning, a 150th Anniversary Professor, Director of the EPICS Program, Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University, and a registered professional engineer. He is one of the founding faculty in the School of Engineering Education having courtesy appointments in Mechanical, Environmental and Ecological Engineering and Curriculum and Instruction. He was the first engineer to receive the U.S. Campus Compact Thomas Ehrlich Faculty Award for Service-Learning and a co-recipient of the U.S. National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education. He
, and NLP models to enhance human-in-the-loop sustainability solutions. Leading to an impact by implementing new policies for bridging the digital equity gap. I have a unique blend of expertise to build impactful experiences for enhancing education engagement.Peyman Yousefi, Merck Group Peyman is a senior User Experience Researcher at Merck Group. He specializes in using mixed methods to explore human-computer interaction and human-centered artificial intelligence. During his Ph.D. at Purdue University, Peyman adopted an ecological approach that integrates engineering and science concepts to address significant environmental challenges. His research methodology included agent-based modeling, crowdsourced human
universitypresentations and one conference presentation to share his research strategy and findings (1.3).The interdisciplinarity of his work also made it relevant for a variety of practitioners, leading himto share his findings with an engineering firm, a gold trading company, a small-scale goldmining consultancy, a lawyer specialized in small-scale gold mining, an NGO that empowersstudents to carry out community-development projects in vulnerable communities, and a numberof national government agencies (the Colombian Defensoría del Pueblo, Agencia Nacional deMinería, Ministerio de Minas y Energía, and Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje). (2.3)Rojas’ experiences translating his research for diverse audiences illuminated barriers forsystematically integrating
inneighborhood revitalization projects, students gain real-world experience, develop practicalskills, and build meaningful relationships with the community and with professionals andorganizations involved in the project. Furthermore, students have the opportunity to see thetangible results of their efforts, motivating them to pursue careers in civil engineering with acommitment to make a positive impact on society.This paper describes the framework developed for neighborhood revitalization projects,emphasizing the community engagement initiatives and student involvement efforts.Additionally, we discuss the methodology developed to assess the success of this program andhow we plan to integrate community-based projects into the engineering curriculum
potential funding is important incase one source of funding ends.K-12 Outreach Program ExamplesThis paper highlights six K-12 outreach programs that educate students about STEM disciplines.The outreach programs are facilitated by undergraduate programs at three higher educationinstitutions and one STEM related employer. Institutional context, an overview of each program,a description of the program’s curriculum and learning goals, program outcomes, and challengesencountered are discussed for each outreach program.Programs #1 and #2Institutional ContextElon University is a selective, mid-sized private university known for engaged undergraduateinstruction and experiential learning. The curriculum is grounded in the traditional liberal artsand
opportunity for the agency to gather insightsfrom experts in an array of fields, and it also challenged NASA participants to consider how theymight introduce the ideas shared to colleagues who could benefit from and apply these insightsdirectly. Some of these challenges have been long discussed by the engineering ethicscommunity: at what level are engineers responsible for their products? How can projectmanagers and engineers effectively integrate societal considerations in workaday efforts? Otherswere more unique to the Artemis mission, including space sustainability, balancing access tolocations on the moon, and sharing the benefits of space activities. 3. Workshop Concepts in Dialogue with Engineering Education and Ethics ResearchAs stated
. Communicate effectively with stakeholders and broad audiences. 5. Work productively on diverse multidisciplinary teams.This training involves an individualized interdisciplinary curriculum, scaffolded by laboratoryrotations and hands-on workshops, a year-long community-engaged design project, and trainingin entrepreneurship, communication skills, and team science. Individualized curriculums aretailored to trainees to comply with the requirements of their home graduate degree programs.Our traineeship program began in the 2019-2020 academic year as a result of a National ScienceFoundation Research Traineeship award. This traineeship program is meant to prepare at least100 STEM graduate students to address major societal challenges within our local
, no. 1, p. 189, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1057/s41599-021-00871-1.[8] G. Bixler, J. Campbell, R. Dzwonczyk, H. L. Greene, J. Merrill, and K. M. Passino, “Humanitarian Engineering at The Ohio State University: Lessons Learned in Enriching Education While Helping People,” IJSLE, pp. 78–96, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.24908/ijsle.v0i0.5545.[9] K. Conroy and P. Sours, “Engagement in Practice: Better preparing students for community-engaged engineering by restructuring an academic program, minor, and curriculum,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, 2023.[10] A. Parkinson, J. Harb, and S. Magleby, “Developing Global Competence In Engineers: What Does It Mean? What Is Most Important?,” in 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
very relational. How can we prioritize very meaningful relationships over projects that come and go? And how do we base (projects) on our very local cultures and ways of knowing?I n this passage, the student underscores how discussions on decolonization within humanitarian engineering class often remain confined to improving power imbalances and relationships between community members and HE practitioners. However, these initiatives tend to be top-down or centralized changes across the sector, which fall short of addressing the goals of decolonization as articulated in Indigenous studies. Indigenous studies emphasize dismantling central control as an integral piece of decolonization, making this