students were referring to was not clear it was kept as a separate code under communication ratherthan coded as interpersonal or written communication. Also, students would occasionally include the termprofessional or “soft” skills to refer to all of the skills. These instances were coded as “General.”FindingsParticipants contributed a myriad of professional skills to each activity system category. The objectivecategory contained the most skills at 18, followed by work division (14), team members (11), tools (10),rules (9), and community (6) as shown in Table I. The numbers in the table represent the number ofdiagrams where students had written the skill in connection with a specific activity system category. Thenumbers are only used to represent
design process to freshmen through game-based learning?Nine publications meeting inclusion criteria from 2013 to 2023 underwent a thorough synthesisphase in our review process. These publications are categorized into four themes: studentmotivation and engagement, technical/soft skills, feedback, and assessment. The paper extensivelydiscusses findings within each theme, offering insights into their implications for both researchand practical applications.Furthermore, the paper includes a descriptive analysis of current trends in game-based engineeringeducation research. Key observations include the similarity in research questions and objectives,the applicability of game-based learning in the context of engineering design, and a
dynamics in a team.The importance of teamwork in STEM education is underscored by Criteria 3 of theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) [2]. This criterion mandates thatstudent learning outcomes must include “an ability to function effectively as a member of atechnical team.” This requirement is rooted in the understanding that the future workforce mustbe adept not only in technical knowledge but also in interpersonal and collaborative skills. Byincorporating teamwork into their curricula, educational institutions help bridge the gap betweenacademic learning and professional requirements.Prior research has shown that effective teamwork is an important soft skill for building a set ofskills that are essential in the modern
teaching how to teach (engineering education faculty members)”Question 4: In regard to explaining their answer for why their experience in the PhD programhas/has not helped them feel prepared to teach, Tables 8 and 9 show how the responses fell undertwo groups: experiential factors and structural factors. Experiential factors are those that aredirectly related to the experiences of taking part in a PhD program, such as understanding differentmethods of learning through being exposed to several different instructors with unique prioritiesand styles and the development of soft skills (such as time management and presentation skills).Structural factors are those that relate to organization of academia, such as the rules regardingteaching
further improve teamwork efficacy. Policies shouldalso focus on developing interdisciplinary teams and soft skills. Encouraging engagement withURP alumni as well as the industry can provide current participants with networkingopportunities, career advice, and insights into the long-term benefits of URPs. Finally, researchcan be demanding, therefore, providing mental health support and stress management resourcesfor students participating in URPs can help students maintain a healthy work-life balance.Keywords: undergraduate research, teamwork, collaborative learning, group developmenttheory, engineering education, URP, research program, NSF, REU, Tuckman1. Introduction1.1 Undergraduate Research Programs (URP)Undergraduate Research Programs (URPs
research skills but also soft skills likecommunication, teamwork, and time management. The combination of practical research andtheoretical learning prepares students for future academic and professional pursuits.3. Educational SeminarsEach seminar is carefully structured to cover key aspects of research that are vital for anyaspiring researcher. These sessions delve into a range of topics, each chosen for its relevance andimportance in the field of research. The seminars begin with an introduction to the ResponsibleConduct of Research Training, a crucial topic that lays the foundation for ethical researchpractices. This training encompasses various aspects of research ethics, including datamanagement, conflict of interest, collaborative research
Engineering Criteria, as well as various other accreditation models [2]. When reshapingcontemporary engineering education, several elements deserve attention. These decisions areinfluenced by evolving industry needs and societal context. Interdisciplinary learning, integratingfields like data science and entrepreneurship, is crucial for holistic problem–solving. Soft skills suchas communication, teamwork, and leadership are essential for effective collaboration [3].Notably, the emphasis on the evaluation of students' engagement and performance through moderntechnological means, including the analysis of facial expressions, signifies a substantial evolution inengineering education. This transformation constitutes the fifth major paradigm shift within
engineering education," EnvironmentTechnology Resources Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, vol.3, p. 253, 2019, doi: 10.17770/etr2019vol3.4118. [11] G. Gidion and R. O. Buchal, "Fostering teamwork skills using collaboration software in engineering design education," Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), 2013, doi: 10.24908/pceea.v0i0.4845. [12] J. Schleiss, M. Bieber, A. Manukjan, L. Kellner, and S. Stober, "An Interdisciplinary Competence Profile for AI in Engineering," 2022, doi: 10.5821/conference- 9788412322262.1288. [13] S. Nicola, C. Pinto, and J. Mendonca, "The role of education on the acquisition of 21st century soft skills by
engineers," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 1367-1370, 2000.[2] L. Small, K. Shacklock, and T. Marchant, "Employability: a contemporary review for higher education stakeholders," Journal of Vocational Education & Training, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 148-166, 2018.[3] R. J. Marandi, B. K. Smith, R. F. Burch, and S. C. Vick, "Engineering soft skills vs. engineering entrepreneurial skills," The International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 988-998, 2019.[4] H. Jang, "Identifying 21st century STEM competencies using workplace data," Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 25, pp. 284-301, 2016.[5] L. Ballesteros-Sanchez, I. Ortiz-Marcos, and R. Rodriguez-Rivero
students and maintaining enrollment. SI programs are not unique to theUniversity of South Alabama and other universities, but the adaptations made during SIprograms and training during the unprecedented COVID period are of quiet value. and Theunderstanding of factors and their impact on retention and academic unit costs can be applied toother similarly sized state institutions.Background At the University of South Alabama, the chosen student instructors delivering SI areindividuals who have previously taken the course, demonstrated great academic performance,and possess exceptional soft skills. Great academic achievement is indicated by the achievementof an “A” (90-100) in the course, and typically, a faculty member identifies these
Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) stresses the significance of incorporating criticalthinking instruction, along with other general engineering expertise (e.g., soft skills) inengineering curriculum through their published student outcomes (Claris and Riley, Email: mshokrolahshirazi@marian.edu2012). Since the connection between CT and problem-solving in engineering is a recurringtheme in the literature, teaching and learning critical thinking should equip differentlevels of problems with varied features that involve appropriate hypotheses, methodsfor experiments, and structuring open design problems (Ahern, Dominguez, McNally,O’Sullivan, and Pedrosa, 2019). On the other hand, the challenging level of the problems is another key
this study have implications forimproving engineering education and future laboratory development.Keywords: Engineering education, undergraduate students, laboratory use,perspectives, attitudesIntroductionThis study delves into the diverse perspectives of engineering students regarding thethree types of laboratories, recognizing the background and significance of laboratoryexperiences in engineering education. In a hands-on lab, both the instructor andstudents operate the machine directly in the laboratory (Ma & Nickerson, 2006).Additionally, hands-on laboratories can provide an engaging session for students todemonstrate their content and soft skills (Yeter et al., 2023). Furthermore, involvingdirect machinery operation within a physical
Values, vol 39, no. 1, pp. 42-72, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43671164[10] V. V. Bracho Perez, A. Nuñez Abreu, A. A. Khan, L. E. Guardia, I. M. Hasbún, and A. C. Strong, “Mechanical Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Design Skills Throughout a Senior Design Course Sequence,” 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, http://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--36523[11] D. B. de Campos, L. M. M. de Resende, and A. B. Fagundes, “The Importance of Soft Skills for the Engineering.”, Creative Education, vol. 11, pp. 1504-1520, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.118109[12] J. Saldaña, The Coding Manual Qualitative Researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Inc., 2016
steps:1. Recruitment of Student Observers: During Fall 2022 semester, the chair of the EEdepartment sent an invitation to undergraduate students participating in the ProfessionalFormation of Engineers (PFE) courses to become student observers. PFE Courses, a three-coursesequence for undergraduate students at the EE department that includes sections on soft skills,were also part of the NSF grant. Interested students’ names were collected via a Qualtrics survey.The initiative was marketed to students as a research opportunity. Starting Fall 2023 semester,the invitation was extended to all graduate students at the EE department as well. There was nocompensation for students who participated in this process.2. Pre-Program Survey: Before training
. Theseinteractions cultivate a sense of community and mutual responsibility among students, whichis crucial for their holistic development [30]. Active engagement in team-based activities notonly enhances academic skills but also nurtures essential soft skills like communication,leadership, and empathy, which are vital in today’s interconnected and collaborativeprofessional world [27], [31]. Additionally, the diversity of perspectives within a teamenriches the research process, fostering a more inclusive and comprehensive approach toproblem-solving and learning [28]. This aligns with Vygotsky's [32] social developmenttheory, which states that social interaction plays a fundamental role in the development ofcognition, emphasizing the value of collaborative