content generation assignment intwo sections of a senior computer science and engineering (CSCE) capstone course. In these twosections, 49 students were asked how interactive ethics assignments helped them becomeknowledgeable about ethical issues, analyze the ethical implications of their projects, and thevalue of choosing their own ethics topics. Students in both sections on average rated the ethicsassignments highly for learning ethics issues and being able to choose topics, with more mixedratings of the ability to analyze their own capstone projects. From written responses, we foundthat students valued assignments for bringing awareness of relevant ethical issues in society, forproviding opportunities to learn with and from peers, and for
professional and ethical responsibilities. Thisportrayal can lead students to perceive ethical behavior as exceptional rather than expected. Afinal limitation is the passive nature of the learning process in this approach. Students engagewith these cases by writing analyses or taking tests, rather than by actively grappling with theethical dilemmas presented. This passive engagement reduces opportunities for personalreflection and the development of critical thinking skills required in the students’ future careers.In recognition of the limitations described above, educators have recommended several strategiesfor increasing student engagement in engineering ethics: Some recommend electronic bulletinboards and chat rooms, which encourage students to
ethics by using a blended style of independent tasks and a peer-learning activity. Specifically, this paper investigates three main questions: 1. Does microlearning increase student engagement? 2. Does increased engagement result in higher performance on ethics assessments? 3. Is a blended approach of independent microlearning and an in-class team case study effective in bridging the lower order of memorizing ethical terms to applying ethical principles to a dilemma?The question on engagement was evaluated through an end of semester Likert style survey, andthe impact of the learning approach was assessed by comparing student participation in themicrolearning modules to performance in an end of semester ethics quiz. The Likert
members are then expected to watch the recorded presentation and write a paragraph summarizing the content. This method promotes collaborative learning among students, encouraging them to grasp their solutions thoroughly to effectively communicate these solutions to their peers. These assignment formats have been successfully implemented in various courses, including Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Python, and other computing-related topics. • Answer questions related to diagrams in exams and quizzes. For example, the activation function is an important part of the design of every layer in the deep learning neural network and there are many of them, as shown in Figure 2. For instance, a sigmoid
the complex professional environment.Engineers interface daily with non-technical peers - clients, managers, directors, executives,stakeholders, government or policy makers, marketing, etc. - and thus an even greater need todemonstrate an excellent ability of communicating their ideas (Norback et al., 2009).The changes made as a result of ABET EC2000 promoted greater curricular emphasis on oraland written communication skills within engineering education (National Academies, 2018).Although many engineering faculty cited a lack of incentives existing, more than two thirds wereinvolved in teaching professional skills across diverse engineering coursework (NationalAcademies, 2018). While great strides have been made in the last two decades of
entire class and was very effective atrevealing perspectives that were otherwise not shared through case studies and groupdiscussions. With arguments coming from their own peers, students seemed willing to expandtheir perspective on each issue and even change their mind. Interestingly, students described theexperience as less “formal” than group discussions, permitting the sharing of more personaltruths.Modified Pisces GameThe modified Pisces Game was primarily mentioned by students in tutorial deliverables and finalreflective essays. It was a very impactful activity in the course and was often highlighted bystudents in their reflections and writing after participating in the tutorial. Five themes emergedfrom a review of sources.Theme 1: Leaving
), and individualuniversity professors [4, 14]. At present, the paradigm of primarily using ethical theories andcodes of ethics has been challenged (e.g. [15]) and seems to be in decline [16, 17], and ethicspedagogies additionally include the development of case studies, codes of ethics, or decision-making processes by students, community-based engagement and learning, peer mentoring,critiquing ethical theories, and gamification of ethics education [18]. Specific strategies forpositioning course activities and modules further include stakeholders and the perspective-taking, communication, and engagement process surrounding different participant roles [19, 20,1 ABET requires continuous improvement of engineering programs and in the long run
achieved when informed byethically motivated technology experts, including engineers, as injecting ethics into theformation of policy begins with those who write it. For these reasons, it would be valuable tounderstand the relationship between the variables that may influence a technology expert in theirpursuance of a policy career path, such as the development of their various identities (personaland social, engineering, and ethical identities) of these engineers. Discussions have taken placeregarding public policy engineering workforce expectations and development and the use ofthese various identities, particularly ethics identity, in establishing a policy career pathway forengineers. There is not an explicit connection between the influence of
write the same word (e.g.,“male”) for both their self-described gender and sexual identities. It is unclear whether thesestudents were indicating they were attracted to the same gender or if they misunderstood whatwe meant by “sexual identity.”The survey also asks if the student is “an active member or veteran of the U.S. Armed Forces,Reserves, or National Guard” and if they are a U.S. Citizen. These identities are particularlyinfluential in aerospace engineering because of the connections between the field and nationaldefense. It would not be surprising if military service were to, for example, influence students’perceptions on the MIC. Furthermore, many non-U.S. Citizens have difficulty securing a job inthe aerospace industry because of
main content is divided into three modules: “EngineeringEthics”, “Information Retrieval and Technology Writing”, and “Psychological Health”. Eachmodule is independent of each other, but the content of each module is helpful for improvingstudents’ basic qualities and engineering ethics literacy.2.2.1.2 The Activities to Increase Student’s Interests Compulsory courses can enhance students’ awareness of engineering ethics, whilepractical activities in engineering ethics can enhance their subjective initiative and fullymobilize the enthusiasm of each student. Beijing Institute of Technology organizes a debate competition with the theme of“engineering ethics” to stimulate students’ engineering ethics thinking. By simulating realengineering