-efficacy, lack of engineering identity, and low perceived levels of careerpreparedness have all been shown to play a major role in the loss of potential engineers [1]-[3].One factor that may be contributing to this dilemma is that many engineering programs focus onteaching only technical knowledge rather than a combination of technical and professional skillsand empathetic design. Students in such programs are often left feeling unprepared to work in aprofessional business environment where they are tasked with creating effective solutions forreal customers [4]-[5]. To promote more confidence in engineering students and improvestudents’ success in engineering careers, many degree programs have explored the incorporationof entrepreneurial
Paper ID #41963Sustainable Innovation and Entrepreneurship Short Course in EcuadorDr. Pritpal Singh, Villanova University Dr. Pritpal Singh is Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Villanova University. He received a BSc in Physics from the University of Birmingham, UK in 1978, and Masters and Ph.D. degrees in Applied Sciences/Electrical Engineering from the University of Delaware. He joined Villanova University in 1984 and has been faculty member there ever since. He has served as the Chair of the Middle Atlantic Section of ASEE, Zone 1 Chair, and has organized and hosted three regional ASEE conferences
attractive to underrepresented groups in engineering.The purpose of this paper is to describe the course and assess its effectiveness both in terms ofimplementation and in terms of student learning. Specifically, this paper will: (1) describe thecourse objectives, course topics, and course assignments, (2) describe what has worked well andidentify areas for improvement, (3) provide recommendations for other faculty interested inimplementing a similar course or incorporating these themes into already-existing courses, and(4) summarize students’ perceptions of and learning within the course. To evaluate studentlearning and feedback on the course, a final reflection assignment, as well as comments withinteaching evaluation surveys, both completed by
onengineeringThroughout the co-development process, we made space and time to gather the opinions andinsights of stakeholders. We were intentional about everyone bringing their own interdisciplinaryknowledge, as well as disciplinary knowledge, to the discussion. The co-development processincluded six steps. These steps are delineated and articulated below.first stepFirst, we worked with industry stakeholders and industry funders to define the skills, knowledgeand dispositions needed to become a successful entrepreneur whose business model emerges atthe intersection of social entrepreneurship and engineering. We did the following: 1. Started with a research-based list of competencies and gathered feedback from industry stakeholders on that list 2
Site in 2017, continuous trainings (courses)are offered to undergraduate and graduate engineering students. During spring, summer and fallsemesters, students are guided to conduct interviews with potential users of their innovations andrefine their entrepreneurship skills. After seven years of successfully impacting students (blindfor review 1 and 2) a team of investigators is looking into aspects of the training that might havebeen unperceived during prior assessments. In this study, we analyze via quantitative andqualitative methods, the answer to the research question: What aspects of the I-Corps Siteprogram experience could be enhanced or modified based on performance and perceptions ofparticipants? To answer this question, we focused on
career frame of mind thatundergraduate students may lack. Mitchell et al. describes entrepreneurial mindset (EM) in terms of itscognitive aspect as, “the knowledge structures that people use to make assessments, judgments, ordecisions involving opportunity evaluation, venture creation, and growth” [1].The purpose of this research is to improve computer science student's understanding of the entrepreneurialmindset and how it affects STEM undergraduate students. Through an activity presented in multiplecomputer science courses, students were exposed to the method of concept mapping as a way to developmetacognition. The activity goal was to improve their understanding of the entrepreneurial mindset andwhat that means to computer scientists and
mindset. To achieve thisobjective during the first offering, this course utilized active learning techniques, personalreflection, and the development of an individualized career-impact roadmap by each student. Inorder to work in conjunction with programming available from existing career centers andacademic advising, this interdisciplinary course placed an emphasis on personal reflection andthe roles of innovation and technology commercialization in creating societal impact. This paperdescribes the logistics of developing and implementing this 1-credit hour course and providesdetails of the assignments used to assess student learning. This course can serve as an example toother institutions who seek to more fully empower their students to
different between femaleand male students, except for black/white shading in the cartoon drawings. There were nosignificant differences between the AE scores for female versus male students. Our results do notsupport the existence of a correlation between multilingualism and travel with artistic creativityand innovation self-efficacy attributes. Overall, we did not find that the students’ artisticcreativity or life experiences revealed through the self-portrait activity provided insights intoinnovation attitudes.IntroductionCreativity and innovation are crucial skills for engineers, as they enable the development ofnovel solutions to complex problems and drive technological advancements [1-4]. The NationalAcademy of Engineering (NAE) in the United
International Experiences on the Development of Students’ Entrepreneurial MindsetAbstractInternational experiences, including collaborative online international learning (COIL)experiences that naturally increase accessibility, are of interest to many undergraduate students.These experiences provide educators a unique opportunity to develop a student's entrepreneurialmindset (EM). Additionally, hands-on experiences aligned with the National Academy ofEngineering’s (NAE) grand challenge themes (Sustainability, Security, Health, and Joy ofLiving) support connections between the experience, disciplinary knowledge, multiculturalawareness, and EM. Through this Work-in-Progress (WiP) study, we seek to answer: 1) How dointernational
Paper ID #42495Active Learning Experience Incorporating Entrepreneurial Mindset in EngineeringMechanics CourseDr. Lynn Dudash, University of Mount Union ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Active Learning Experience Incorporating Entrepreneurial Mindset in Engineering Mechanics CourseIntroduction An increasing number of engineering professors have been using active learningexperiences to engage students. Moreover, active learning techniques have been shown toincrease student performance in several settings [1], [2], [3], [4] and may help close achievementgaps for underrepresented
1 awarded by the Associated Schools of Construction. She is geared toward modernizing the architecture, engineering, and construction management curricula by integrating VDC/BIM, AI, and other cutting-edge technologies into architecture and engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 An Assessment of Students’ Perceptions in Curriculum Development Integrating Entrepreneurship and STEAM with Designing Green (Bio-inspired) RoofsSTRUCTURED ABSTRACTCONTEXT: Over the past several decades, sustainability has reshaped engineering educationand motivated scholars to implement it into academic curricula and research. Educatingengineering students
' heightened interest in innovation and entrepreneurship, improved businessopportunity development skills, and an enhanced understanding of value proposition andmarket relevance. Quantitative data supported these insights, with a significant percentage ofstudents reporting high satisfaction with the course's impact on their problem-solving andinnovative capabilities. This curriculum enhancement contributes to job creation and economicgrowth across various sectors. By progressively integrating entrepreneurial thinking into theircourses, ET faculty are pivotal in shaping engineers who are well-prepared to meet the complexchallenges of the modern engineering landscape. 1. IntroductionEngineering Technology (ET) graduates are pivotal in driving applied
college studentsdescribe experiencing moderate to high stress levels [1], [2]. As students are busy and feelingoverwhelmed, they have limited structured opportunities for reflecting on and developing theirpurpose and professional identities. In STEM environments, students may find that they do notfit into a predominant narrative of just “being good at math” and thus lack an adequatejustification for entering an engineering field. Similarly, they may find that they areunderrepresented demographically, underresourced compared to some peers, or unsure how theybelong in general, even if they are interested in their field of study. These students may find itdifficult to feel comfortable taking advantage of opportunities available to them on campus
. This research introduces the innovative concept of using these tokens asan analytical tool for quality control. To investigate the impact of learning tokens on theassessment of ABET student outcomes, students were tasked with classifying their tokens intogeneral and program criteria student outcomes. At the commencement of the semester, studentswere prompted to self-assess their progress in achieving student outcomes for years 1-3 of theirundergraduate education, initially providing a percentage of their attainment. Subsequently, theycategorized their tokens and adjusted their free learning experiences to address identified gaps.At the semester's conclusion, students reassessed the completeness of their attainment, withinstructor validation of
, 2024Embracing a Fail-Forward Mindset: Enhancing Engineering Innovation through Reflective Failure Journaling 1. IntroductionIn the evolving landscape of engineering education, the imperative to nurture innovation andresilience among budding engineers has never been more critical [1]. As global challengesbecome more complex and multifaceted, engineering educators are called upon to devisepedagogical strategies that not only impart technical knowledge but also foster the soft skillsnecessary for students to thrive in unpredictable environments. This study introduces aninnovative educational approach employed in the "Innovation Through Making" course atWorcester Polytechnic Institute, designed to cultivate a 'fail-forward learn-fast
Potential of 'Innovation Through Making' in Engineering Education 1. Introduction:In the rapidly evolving landscape of engineering education, there is a pressing need to producegraduates equipped to navigate the complexities of a dynamic global environment. Withtechnology advancing at an unprecedented pace, it is predicted that 85% of jobs that will exist in2030 have not yet been invented [1]. This evolution demands a learning paradigm whereindividuals acquire skills "in-the-moment," leverage new technologies to adapt quickly, embracefailure, and develop timeless competencies for lifelong learning.Despite these evolving educational demands, a considerable gap remains in adequately preparingstudents with the requisite skills for the
-curricular training fellowship offers the skill-building, cohort-based peer-support, 8+ semesters of time, and life experiences to help address this challenge.The rise in entrepreneurship education at the university level is rooted in student and faculty desireto teach abstract and applied STEM knowledge in a deeper way that delivers value for real-worldstakeholders. Students learn dynamism and adaptability while simultaneously obtaining thefundamentals [1]. While entrepreneurship education typically rose out of business school roots,engineering programs increasingly look to integrate those activities in their curricula due to naturalsynergies around the design process [2], customer/product fit, student demand for purpose-drivenwork, self-efficacy
technical competence and a broader array of technical skills that come with increased participation of underrepresented populations in engineering disciplines[1]. By being conscious of those attributesthrough the development of the 10-week summer research program, the intentionality is to create a cohort of burgeoning engineers who are prepared both academically and experientially for a lifetime of innovation and commitment to their field. Combining this varied topics approach with experiential learning opportunities results in scholars producing electronic portfolios (e-portfolios) that are comprehensive and include all five completed competencies of Talent (Research), Interdisciplinary, Entrepreneurship
, Pedagogies for Engagement, Mixed-Methods Research, Entrepreneurship, Intrapreneurship, Educational Impact, Project-BasedLearning, Innovation Management1 IntroductionIn an era where engineering increasingly intersects with modern society’s economic andsocial foundations, the role of the engineer is rapidly evolving. No longer limited to technicalanalytical prowess, practical ingenuity, and advanced technical skills – today’s engineers arecalled to be highly creative, capable of invention, innovation and thinking outside of the box.They should be equipped with business and management acumen and be capable ofdynamism, agility, resilience, and flexibility [1]. These are all qualities that resonate withbeing innovative and entrepreneurial; as such
engineering faculty’s lack offamiliarity with non-ABET professional skills, like entrepreneurial mindset and cultural agility,the difficulty of making changes in technical classes, and the limitations in assessing professionalskills. The researcher aims for the recommendations derived from this pilot study to raiseawareness of professional skill development within engineering curricula, fostering collaborationwith industry, and stimulating further research into enhancing the engineering curriculum with afocus on these essential skills.IntroductionTo succeed in the 21st-century workplace, engineering graduates need more than technical skillsor risk losing their jobs to automation [1, 2]. Professional skills complement a technicaleducation and are part
, manufacturing, and engineering design. I ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: Evaluating Entrepreneurial-minded Learning in Course- based Undergraduate Research ExperiencesIntroductionEngineering challenges are increasing in scope, scale, and complexity. Now, more than ever,future engineers must be equipped with the skills necessary to ensure solutions to thesechallenges are impactful and scalable across the various facets of society [1]. Scale and impactare the main epistemological tenets of entrepreneurially-minded learning (EML) [2], [3]. EMLrepresents a specific kind of applied learning where one understands and connects a societal needwith an engineering solution that
. Currently, MiguelAndres is working on a framework to support and conduct undergraduate research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Testing a Pedagogical method to Develop Collaborative Entrepreneurship Competences for Technical Majors Blanca Esthela Moscoso1, Miguel Andrés Guerra2*1 Associate Professor, Universidad Central del Ecuador UCE, Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas. Quito, Ecuador.2 Associate Professor, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Programa de Ingeniería Civil, Casilla Postal 17-1200-841, Quito 170901, Ecuador.* Correspondence: Blanca Esthela Moscoso, bemoscoso
entrepreneurial efforts successfully. This concept is critical in the business world. Itplays a crucial role in initiating and developing new ventures, which is essential for economicgrowth, innovation, job creation, and individual empowerment. Fostering and supportingentrepreneurial intention is critical for developing a prosperous and dynamic society [1].Entrepreneurial IntentionEntrepreneurial intention (EI) is a key concept in entrepreneurship research, focusing on the factorsinfluencing the decision to start a business. This decision is often based on deliberate reasoningthat mediates between personal reasons and actions, shaped by various internal and external factors[3]. EI represents an individual's inclination to initiate and develop a new
communicating ideas to an audience. Inventioneducation provides a platform for students to identify real-world challenges and devise novel andinnovative solutions, fostering a sense of self-efficacy. Encouraging invention, innovation, andan entrepreneurial mindset helps students become more self-determined and contributes tostudents’ acquiring the skills needed to shape their own future [1].Students’ sense of belonging, psychological safety, and decision-making processes about theirfuture often align with their interests and curiosity, but anxiety can negatively influence theseperceptions. The aim of this study is to examine the constructs of interest and anxiety, withrespect to science and math and specifically to inventing. Prior research efforts in
inquisitive mind throughactive, experiential, and problem-based learning. By emphasizing innovation and value creation,EML aims to equip learners not only to comprehend entrepreneurial thinking but also to activelyidentify opportunities, calculatedly accept risks, and proactively solve problems [1]. The KernEntrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) plays a crucial role in developing EMLcurriculum, tools, and a supportive community for educators.KEEN uses the 3C framework to characterize the entrepreneurial mindset: curiosity, connections,and creating value [1]. EML activities are intentionally designed to cultivate curiosity andenhance learners' ability to synthesize information from diverse sources, ultimately fosteringinsightful problem-solving
, a creation method of source media was utilized where the participants wereinvited to look at the inherent performativity of various objects and how in a devised processthose objects could be used to create a totally new performance. In practice, the same principleswere used, but instead, the emphasis was placed on how those objects could be used as a startingpoint to innovatively create an enhanced or completely new object that could function moreeffectively than the original object. The workshop was completed in three main steps:1. Introduction: The participating artist introduced themselves and showed a few brief YouTube videos that demonstrate the use of a source object to inform performance. The source object the artist focused on
between a Failure Mindset and course performance.IntroductionThe positive benefits of fostering a Growth Mindset in our students have been widely reported [1].In our engineering curriculum, we hope to train our students to develop the skill of persistingthrough and learning from failure [2]. This is a key skill in developing the EntrepreneurialMindset, as framed by Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) [3]. As part of theKEEN, we have realized that our Mastery-Based Assessment model could be an important toolfor developing our students’ Failure Mindset [4]. We defined a positive Failure Mindset as onethat looks at failure as a positive outcome that enhances one’s opportunities for learning. In thisstudy, we explored a more focused study
innovative approach combines engineering skillsets with the three C's –curiosity, connections, and creating value [1]. By implementing EM into engineering education,students are provided with opportunities to make a meaningful impact through their designs,fostering a holistic and forward-thinking approach to their learning experience [1].In collaboration with KEEN, two universities recently added EM elements to their existing first-year engineering courses and the learning outcomes were assessed using student grades. As partof the assessment, student surveys were also collected, and their responses indicatedimprovement in their social curiosity after being exposed to EML [2]. Research fromGrzybowski et al. and Desing et al. showed that integration
in 2007. In 2012, Krista completed her Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering at Ohio State. Her engineering education research interests include investigating first-year engineering student experiences, faculty experiences, and the research to practice cycle within first-year engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024The First-Year Engineering Student Entrepreneurial Mindset: A Longitudinal Investigation Utilizing Indirect Assessment Scores1. IntroductionSince the turn of the century, global and national calls have been made to develop a moreinnovative and entrepreneurial society to support economic growth [1]. Such calls haveemphasized the development of entrepreneurial concepts