Paper ID #42588Using Micromoments and Concept Maps to Enhance Entrepreneurially MindedLearning of Indoor Air Pollution ControlProf. Jean M. Andino Ph.D., P.E., Arizona State University Jean M. Andino is a faculty member in Chemical Engineering and Civil, Environmental, and Sustainable Engineering at Arizona State University (ASU). She earned a Bachelor’s degree in Engineering Sciences at Harvard University and a PhD in Chemical Engineering at the California Institute of Technology. She is a registered Professional Engineer.Prof. Erick S. Vasquez-Guardado, University of Dayton Erick S. Vasquez-Guardado (Erick S. Vasquez
; andshare the responses of students discussing the strengths, weaknesses, and suggestedimprovements for the course. The work presented in this article is part of an overall line ofresearch with the intent of demonstrating qualitative community-based participatory research isan essential skill of the nurse+engineer.MethodsInstitutional context. Today’s Missouri University of Science and Technology (S&T) wasestablished in 1870 as the Missouri School of Mines and Metallurgy. Located in Rolla, Missouri,S&T is a comprehensive public research university, which offers approximately 100 degreeprograms. With an undergraduate student enrollment of approximately 5,500 students, a graduatestudent enrollment of approximately 1,500 students, and average
):There's no significant change in the mean scores for Section 2 from the pre-survey (M=4.4899,SD=0.87228) to the post-survey (M=4.4880, SD=0.86049), t(82) = 0.016, p = 0.987. This indicatesthat the intervention did not have a statistically significant impact on the scores for this section.Pair 3 (PreS3 - PostS3):There's also no significant change in Section 3's mean scores from pre (M=4.3317, SD=0.95488)to post (M=4.3673, SD=0.91948), t(82) = -0.269, p = 0.788.Pair 4 (PreS4 - PostS4):No significant change is observed in Section 4's mean scores from pre (M=5.6790, SD=0.56833)to post (M=5.7693, SD=0.67441), t(82) = -0.931, p = 0.355.Pair 5 (PreS5 - PostS5):A slight, but not statistically significant, increase is noted in the mean scores for Section
approach in an undergraduate engineering mechanics course," in 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2021: IEEE, pp. 1-5.[6] P. Buckley and E. Fahrenkrug, "The Flint, Michigan water crisis as a case study to introduce concepts of equity and power into an analytical chemistry curriculum," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 1327-1335, 2020.[7] G. A. Lasker, K. E. Mellor, M. L. Mullins, S. M. Nesmith, and N. J. Simcox, "Social and environmental justice in the chemistry classroom," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 94, no. 8, pp. 983-987, 2017.[8] A. Miller and A. Gift, "Community awareness and service learning in Analytical Chemistry laboratories," Journal of Chemical
concern Assessment Assess action taken to improve learning None; Change/ Change in/confirmation of one’s thinking (about Vague; Confirmation learning strategy or learning concern) as a result Sufficiently Goals Description of clear goal Detailed; Planning Steps Articulate action(s) to be taken Justification Explain/Justifies choices made to move forward OR Planning- Transfer Description of application of learning strategy/ Transfer skill/content to futureVI. ResultsThe levels of students’ engagement
#1915615, titled “Adapting an Experiment-centric Teaching Approach to Increase StudentAchievement in Multiple STEM Disciplines”. It should be noted that the opinions, results andconclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] F. Commodore, M. Gasman, C. Conrad, and T.-H. Nguyen, “Coming Together: A Case Study of Collaboration Between Student Affairs and Faculty at Norfolk State University,” Front. Educ., vol. 3, May 2018, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00039.[2] O. S. Tan, Problem-based Learning Innovation: Using Problems to Power Learning in the 21st Century. Thomson, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com
required additional prompting through clarification question(s)(Question 4). While four students did present an HLC-indicating evaluation that included costand efficiency (80%), three of the students also mis-evaluated and/or mis-applied concepts (60%IU), displaying mixed outcomes. Several answers alluded to concepts related to the build projectbut less relevant to the broader context of large-scale water treatment operations (i.e. “overflow,running out of chemicals, or not adding in things at the correct time”). This disconnectedresponse may be indicative of students thinking that all project concepts correlate with real life, apotential issue of PBL. It is unclear if these answers show an incorrect or merely an incompleteunderstanding of full
funding this work,with special thanks to our mentors Cindy Anderson and Bayo Ogundipe. Thank you to WNEU’s Collegeof Engineering administrative staff, Patty Reiley, for tabulating data from the IRB-approved surveys.7. REFERENCES: [1] M. Rosen and H. Kishawy. "Sustainable Manufacturing and Design: Concepts, Practices and Needs" Sustainability 4, no. 2: 154-174, 2012. [2] Garetti, M. and Taisch, M. “Sustainable manufacturing: trends and research challenges”. Production planning & control, 23(2-3), 83-104, 2012. [3] Bello, A. S., Al-Ghouti, M. A., and Abu-Dieyeh, M. H. “Sustainable and long-term management of municipal solid waste: A review”. Bioresource Technology Reports, 18, 101067, 2022. [4
, doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2017.07.009.[8] S. Dooling, J. K. Graybill, and V. Shandas, “Doctoral Student and Early CareerAcademic Perspectives on Interdisciplinarity,” in The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity,2nd ed., R. Frodeman, Ed., Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 573–585. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.46.[9] B. S. Selznick and M. J. Mayhew, “Measuring Undergraduates’ Innovation Capacities,”Res High Educ, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 744–764, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11162-017-9486-7.[10] N. Swayne, B. Selznick, S. McCarthy, and K. A. Fisher, “Uncoupling innovation andentrepreneurship to improve undergraduate education,” JSBED, vol. 26, no. 6/7, pp. 783–796,Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1108/JSBED-04-2019-0122.[11] C. Bock, D. Dilmetz, B. S
, with the added benefit of building community and a sense ofservice for the students.References 1. Dvorak, B. and Volder, A. (2010). Green roof vegetation for North American ecoregions: a literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning 96: 197-213. 2. Shafique, M., Kim, R., and Rafiq, M. (2018). Green roof benefits, opportunities and challenges – a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 90: 757-773. 3. Brenneisen, S. (2006). Space for urban wildlife: designing green roofs as habitats in Switzerland. Urban Habitats 4: 27-36. 4. Castleton, H.F., Stovin, V., Beck, S.B.M., and Davison, J.B. (2010). Green Roofs; Building Energy Savings and the Potential for Retrofit. Energy and Buildings 42(1
significant.REFERENCES[1] R.M. Felder, D.R. Woods, J.E. Stice, and A. Rugarcia, “The Future of Engineering Education II. Teaching Methods that Work,” Chemical Engineering Education, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 26-39, 2000.[2] A. L. Darling and D.P. Dannels, “Practicing Engineers Talk About the Importance of Talk: A Report on the Role of Oral Communication in the Workplace,” Communication Education, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 1-16, 2003.[3] V. Villarroel, D. Boud, S. Bloxham, D. Bruna, and C. Bruna, “Using principles of authentic assessment to redesign written examinations and tests,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 38-49, 2020.[4] Engineering Professor’s Council Working Party on Assessment
). Environmental Justice in the 21st Century: Race Still Matters. Phylon,49(3/4), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/3132626Caballero, G. W., Wells, E. C., Echols, S. A., & Peaslee, E. H. (2024). Environmental justicefrom the ground (water) up: coping with contamination in Tallevast, Florida. Local Environment,1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2024.2325080Cutter, S. L. (1995). Race, Class and Environmental Justice. Progress in Human Geography,19(1), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F030913259501900111del Puerto, C. L., Cavallin, H. E., Perdomo, J. L., Barreto, J. M., Suarez, O. M., & Andrade, F.(2019, June). Developing a collaborative undergraduate STEM program in resilient andsustainable infrastructure. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &
]. Available: https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv:63792[9] L. J. Ball, J. St.B.T. Evans, I. Dennis, and T. C. Ormerod, “Problem-solving Strategies and Expertise in Engineering Design,” Thinking & Reasoning, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 247–270, Nov. 1997, doi: 10.1080/135467897394284.[10] G. Downey, “Are Engineers Losing Control of Technology?,” Chemical Engineering Research and Design, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 583–595, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1205/cherd.05095.[11] E. S. Klochkova, M. V. Bolsunovskaya, and S. V. Shirokova, “The Significance of Humanities for Engineering Education,” in 2018 XVII Russian Scientific and Practical Conference on Planning and Teaching Engineering Staff for the Industrial and Economic Complex of the Region (PTES), Nov
AcknowledgmentsWe thank C.O. for his contribution to the Python code used for conducting thematic analysis.8.0 References[1] V. A. W. J. Marchau, W. E. Walker, P. J. T. M. Bloemen, and S. W. Popper, “Introduction,” in Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty, Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 1–20.[2] S. Hallegatte, “Decision Making for Disaster Risk Management in a Changing Climate,” in Natural Disasters and Climate Change, Springer International Publishing, 2014, pp. 177–194.[3] S. Hallegatte, A. Shah, R. Lempert, C. Brown, and S. Gill, “Investment Decision Making Under Deep Uncertainty: Application to Climate Change,” 2012. doi: 10.1596/1813-9450- 6193.[4] M. K. Webber and C. Samaras, “A Review of Decision
collaboration inengineering education reform.References[1] C. Woolard, C. Kirkland, K. Plymesser, A. Phillips, Lauchnor, E., O. Stein, W. Schell, S. Gallagher, M. Miley, P. Gannon, E. Austin, K. Intemann. “Developing an Integrated Environmental Engineering Curriculum,” in Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, July 2022.[2] S. Gallagher, A. Phillips, E. Lauchnor, A. Hohner, O.R. Stein, C.R. Woolard, C.M. Kirkland, and K. Plymesser, “Implementing Integrated Project-Based Learning Outcomes in a 21st Century Environmental Engineering Curriculum,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, MD, June 2023.[3] E.K. Talley and R.B. Hull
form (Table 2) in the EOP Activity Worksheet todocument the core LO they chose, the reason they selected that LO, and which ABET studentoutcome(s) would be achieved with this LO, as denoted by the orange circle icon and associatednumbers at the end of each LO (see Appendix 2).Step 4: EOP prompted teams to utilize the physical copies of the EOP Framework:Comprehensive Guide to Teaching Core Learning Outcomes [12] for inspiration and ideas forclassroom activities and resources that they could bring into their selected engineering course tointroduce sustainability to students or to suggest their own ideas of activities/assignments.Example activities provided by EOP included a reading and discussion question, a video thatintroduces a
Georgia Tech, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://sustain.gatech.edu/sustainabilitynext-plan.[8] Colorado School of Mines, Sustainability Curricula and Programs at Mines, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mines.edu/sustainability/sustainability-curricula/.[9] Rochester Institute of Technology, Sustainability, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.rit.edu/sustainability.[10] United Nations, “Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” Department of Economic and Social Affairs: Sustainable Development, 2015.[11] S. Rahimifard and H. Trollman, "UN Sustainable Development Goals: an engineering perspective," International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-3, 2018.[12] The Lemelson
SDGs in light ofBiblical principles. Finally, students work in small groups to research one or several SDGs todetermine the importance of each topic, current progress toward each topic’s achievement, andprogress yet needed. As a follow-up assignment, students are asked to write a short paper orcreate a poster highlighting the SDG(s) they studied.Discipline-Specific Systems Thinking ModulesWith the final three topic areas (systems thinking, design, and communication & teamwork),multiple learning modules were developed for each relating the topics to specific applicationswithin the field of civil engineering. The first five modules of the SaS framework wereconstructed was to allow them to remain the same for any design discipline, while
sustainability.Environmental Sustainability and Social Responsibility in Engineering, Science, and Technologyis pending approval. This course invites students to explore the intersection(s) betweenengineering, technology, science, the environment, human health and welfare, and social justice.Students will critically examine how the practice and application of engineering solutions cancontribute to (and potentially alleviate) societal inequality, thus affecting the resilience andsustainability of our ecosystem. Students will undertake a rigorous examination of circumstancesoutside of their lived experiences in relation to the natural environment. This course will besubmitted for approval as a General Education course in the Sustainability Theme.Additions to the