arestudents who identify issues with courses and want to have more courses that integratesustainable practices supposed to encourage or force classes to be updated?As my role changed from undergraduate to graduate, I began to see the challenges from theprofessor's viewpoint, where in R1 institutions, research is more highly valued than teaching.Advocating for student voices on campus must come from a loud group of students who canforce or encourage these changes and show them the success of pilot cases within and outsidetheir institution. As I became involved with EOP and learned about the ASEE mini-grantprogram, I met not only professors and deans dedicated to sustainability but also saw a way tolegitimize this push in a way universities understand
informed design decisions. As anapplication of collecting human-centered information, students learn about community needsassessments and evaluate the culture and community-focused content of the assessmentchecklists provided in the Sphere Handbook for humanitarian response [16]. As a follow-upassignment, students are asked to create and complete a community needs assessment on theirown, either for a location in which they live or, as best as they are able, for an internationalcommunity that is significantly different from their own.Discipline-Specific Communication & Teamwork ModulesCommunication and teamwork are acknowledged by the EOP framework to be necessary skillsfor designers to be effective advocates for sustainable practices. Students
Paper ID #42624Oral Examinations in Environmental Engineering Design CoursesProf. James N. Jensen, University at Buffalo James N. Jensen is professor and chair of the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. Dr. Jensen received a BS degree in environmental engineering from Caltech in 1980 and MSPH and PhD degrees from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1983 and 1988, respectively. His research and teaching interests are in assessment, problem-based learning, and drinking water treatment in low-resource environments. He has received numerous teaching and research awards, including the
develop the EOP initiative began with a qualitative study to understand the barriersand opportunities for integrating environmental responsibility (ER) in higher education. At thattime, The Lemelson Foundation was strategically focused on ER and “inventing green” vs.EOP’s now broader scope of sustainability and related professional skills across all engineeringeducation. In 2017, The Lemelson Foundation commissioned a study through asustainability-focused consultancy, Alula Consulting [12], where two experts in sustainability,sustainable design, and engineering education were hired to conduct, analyze, and report thefollowing specific objectives: ● Identify best practices. ● Determine best ways to introduce and maximize ER integration in
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Integrating Sustainability in Higher Education: Curricular Review and Opportunities for Future DevelopmentAbstractRose-Hulman Institute of Technology (RHIT) is renowned for its commitment to providing thefinest undergraduate education in science, engineering, and mathematics. With a missiondedicated to support students in an individualized learning experience, RHIT strives to be aglobal leader of engineering and science education. In line with its vision, the institution aims toproduce graduates who are not only inspired and prepared for success but also equipped toaddress the complex challenges facing our global society. We have comprehensively exploredRHIT's sustainability
(education; engineering; public affairs; arts andsciences; food, agriculture, and environmental sciences; business; law). The OhioState EmPOWERment Program in convergent graduate training for a sustainableenergy future enrolls Ph.D. students studying any aspect of energy from degreeprograms any college in Ohio State and engages them in several curricular andco-curricular elements that are designed to dovetail with their Ph.D. degreeprogram requirements in ways that do not extend their time to graduate. TheOhio State EmPOWERment Program established at Ohio State an energy StudentCommunity of Practice and Engagement (SCOPE), a Graduate InterdisciplinarySpecialization (GIS), and an undergraduate Research in Sustainable Energy(RISE) summer research
Paper ID #41859Evaluating the Efficacy of Project-Based Approach for Teaching HumanitiesCourses to Engineering StudentsDr. Brainerd Prince, Plaksha University Brainerd Prince is Associate Professor and the Director of the Center for Thinking, Language and Communication at Plaksha University. He teaches courses such as Reimagining Technology and Society, Ethics of Technological Innovation, and Art of Thinking for undergraduate engineering students and Research Design for PhD scholars. He completed his PhD on Sri Aurobindo’s Integral Philosophy from OCMS, Oxford – Middlesex University, London. He was formerly a Research
advancing human and ecosystem health. She considers civil and environmental engineering as a space for Christians to meet the physical needs of our neighbors while showing Christ to the world.Dr. David Brian Dittenber P.E., Cedarville University David Dittenber is an associate professor of civil engineering at Cedarville University, where he has served since 2020. Prior to joining the faculty at Cedarville, David taught at his alma mater, LeTourneau University, for seven years, serving as an associate professor and chair of civil and environmental engineering. He completed his master’s and doctoral graduate studies in civil engineering at West Virginia University. David believes that being a Christian and a civil
and attitudestowards uncertainty and robust decision making for climate change adaptation and riskmanagement.The first author of this paper is a PhD student, an EED member, and would like to self-nominatethis paper for the best student paper award. Thank you for your consideration.Key words:climate change adaptation, robust decision making, game-based learning, innovative pedagogy,uncertainty, risk1.0 Introduction1.1 Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty (DMDU) Problems can be defined as deeply uncertain when impact analysts cannot agree on theconceptual models that could be used to represent probable futures, the probability distributionsrepresenting uncertainty of parameters in the future, and/or how to value the different outcomes[1
research tenure-track appointment. Dr. Plymesser joined the Civil Engineering Department at Montana State University in 2016. Her research is focused in ecohydraulics and fish passage with a particular fondness for the application of hydraulic and fluid dynamic models to answer research questions in natural settings. Dr. Plymesser currently teaches Introduction to Environmental Engineering Design and Sustainability, Open Channel Hydrualics, and River Modeling.Ellen Lauchnor, Montana State University Ellen Lauchnor is an Associate Professor of Environmental Engineering in the Civil Engineering Department at Montana State University.Amanda Hohner, Montana State University Dr. Amanda Hohner is an Assistant Professor in