be addressed, which is partially open-ending [2,3].Recognizing the efficacy of project-based lab designs in fostering creative engagement anddeep learning, this modification aims to bridge the gap between traditional, instruction-centriclabs and student-directed projects. The project-based laboratory design is intended to motivatestudents towards deep learning, advanced engineering skills, and high-level learning outcomeswhile preparing them well for open-ended labs at the senior level [4,5]. In addition, studentswill work as a group and focus on provided materials (i.e., graphene oxide membrane, aerogel)in this project-based lab to encourage communication and peer learning. Moreover, theselection of materials for the project is drawn from
materials science courses.Dr. Elvin Beach, The Ohio State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Integrating Computational and Physical Lab Modules in MaterialsScience and EngineeringAbstractComputational tools play an ever-expanding role in the careers of practicing engineers. As such,in addition to physical labs, our program requires all undergraduate students to take a two-semester sequence in computational materials science called “modeling and simulation” (orModSim) focusing on practical programming skills and use of commercial CALPHAD and FEAsoftware. These courses are taught in the spring semesters of the sophomore and junior years andformatted as hands-on computational laboratory courses
classrooms and reaching engineeringprofessionals. While virtual and remote laboratories are not new to engineering education, thereis an increasing need for these alternate methods of teaching due to decreased availability of labtime (from increased undergraduate classes) and the rise of remote higher education programs,such as remote graduate degrees and continuing education [4], [5].In this study, we perform a scoping literature review to explore the tools and labs available toPSET educators. Specifically, we focus on virtual and remote tools that might aid in theeducation of continuing education students and programs with rigid curriculums that do notallow for additional lab time. We were guided by the two following research questions
has included some laboratory courses, these experiments were run largely as equipment demonstrations and/or operations. The design of experiments (DOE) concept was absent and students were merely acting as operators. Thus, the older laboratory courses were retired and/or integrated as laboratory demos during tutorial classes of relevant core courses. New laboratory courses ought to be designed where students are trained to perform their own Design of Experiments (DOE). In one of the new laboratory courses proposed, students are required to prepare their own samples, identify the types of testing and characterisations required, plan their own experimental flow/sequence, choose appropriate machines/equipment for testing and
professionals. This article examines the guest presentationsdelivered by materials manufacturers in two undergraduate lab courses within the field ofMaterials Science and Engineering (MSE). Additionally, it presents findings from a survey studyconducted to evaluate the impact of the guest lecture initiative, involving an average class size of55 undergraduate students in each of the two courses.In Fall and Spring of 2022 and 2023, industry presentations were integrated into MSE 3021 andMSE 4022 materials properties and processing laboratory courses to enhancethe students' understanding of real-world applications and industry practices. Presenters wereinvited from diverse sectors of industry, including metal, ceramic and polymer processing(Applied
graduation, she spent five years as a Principal Scientist at Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory in Schenectady, NY researching welding and the thermal stability of structural alloys. In 2013, she joined the School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering at Oregon State University and was recently promoted to Full Professor. Dr. Tucker served as the Materials Science Interdisciplinary Graduate Program Director for five years and recently became the Director for the Design for Social Impact Program. Her research focuses on degradation of materials in extreme environments using both modeling and experimental approaches to gain fundamental understanding of materials performance.Dr. Milo Koretsky, Tufts University
-Champaign I am currently the Associate Director of Assessment and Research team at the Siebel Center for Design (SCD) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I work with a group of wonderful and talented people at SCD’s Assessment and Research Laboratory to conduct research that informs and evaluates our practice of teaching and learning human-centered design in formal and informal learning environments. My Research focuses on studying students’ collaborative problem solving processes and the role of the teacher in facilitating these processes in STEM classrooms.Nicholas Robert PozzaDr. Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Dr. Blake Everett Johnson is a Teaching Assistant Professor
, offering animmersive educational journey that bridges MSE education with elements of popular Televisionseries. Figure 2: TMEG Game protagonist, “Dr. Sterling”3.3 TMEG Game Narrative (Edu-tainment)The instructional content and the game characteristics identified above were integrated to developthe pilot game named "Crystalline Conundrums,". In this game, players step into the shoes of abrilliant young scientist named Dr. Ava Sterling, working in a high-tech laboratory that mirrors thecomplex worlds of "The Boys" and "Breaking Bad." The game's narrative weaves a story ofdiscovery, strategy, and application of Materials Science and Engineering principles, specificallyfocusing on Crystal Structures.Journey through the
research fellow at the same institution. During this time, he combined research in computational material sciences with teaching duties in undergraduate laboratories. He then served as an assistant lecturer at the Dundalk Institute of Technology in Dundalk, Ireland, before joining the Institute of Technology Sligo (now ATU Sligo). Akinlolu is a Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy (SFHEA), a recognition of his expertise in teaching and learning in higher education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Teaching basic concepts in machine learning to engineering students: A hands-on approachDavid O. Obada1,2,10,11*, Simeon A. Abolade2, Shittu B
. Bielefeldt, “Challenges And Rewards Of On Campus Projects In Capstone Design,” presented at the 2005 Annual Conference, Jun. 2005, p. 10.297.1-10.297.10. Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/challenges-and-rewards-of-on-campus- projects-in-capstone-design[16] A. Lundström, J. Savolainen, and E. Kostiainen, “Case study: developing campus spaces through co-creation,” Archit. Eng. Des. Manag., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 409–426, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1080/17452007.2016.1208077.[17] L. Klotz et al., “Campus Construction as a Research Laboratory: Model for Intracampus Collaboration,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 135, no. 4, pp. 122–128, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2009)135:4(122).[18
engineering education: A survey of trends and needs,” JOM, vol. 61, no. 10, p. 12, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s11837-009-0142-3.[3] K. Thornton and M. Asta, “Current status and outlook of computational materials science education in the US,” Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 13, no. 2, p. R53, 2005, doi: 10.1088/0965-0393/13/2/R01.[4] National Science and Technology Council, “Materials Genome Initiative Strategic Plan,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.mgi.gov/sites/default/files/documents/MGI-2021- Strategic-Plan.pdf[5] S. P. Brophy, A. J. Magana, and A. Strachan, “Lectures and Simulation Laboratories to Improve Learners’ Conceptual Understanding,” Adv. Eng. Educ., vol. 3, no. 3, 2013, Accessed: Nov. 04, 2018