Conference Session

Student Division (STDT) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tahlia Altgold, The Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

equal partners in the engineering process, rather than people theengineers are ‘helping’. Following these two pillars, ethical and empathetic decision making are the thirdpillar, encouraging engineers to base decisions beyond traditional resource justifications, such as cost andtime. Howcroft et al. emphasize that these pillars need to be continuously integrated over the course of adegree program to be impactful.Figure 1: Empathy models adapted from their source literature on a continuum from decontextualized tocontext-driven.DiscussionEach model reflects the context in which it was created and can each aid engineering educators inimplementing empathy in their curricula. Zaki’s [6] model developed by a psychologist, is the mostdecontextualized

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 5: Self- Efficacy

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xinyi Ma, University of Toronto; Janet Lam, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

is your expected score for this course? 90-100 80-89 70-79 60-69 50-59 0-49As our research focuses on the cognitive perspective rather than programming ability, we do notcollect students’ real grades for this course. Instead, we ask for their expected score for thiscourse at mid and end of the term and match this perceived performance with their otherresponses. The data collection methodology has been approved by the Research Ethics Board(REB) at the University of Toronto.The first survey has a total of N = 83 responses, where 47 are industrial engineering students, 23are mechanical engineering students, and there are also 12 materials science engineering studentsand 1 chemical engineering student included in the responses. Due to the

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 5: Self- Efficacy

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey Luke Morrison, University of South Florida; Chris S Ferekides, University of South Florida; Dhinesh Balaji Radhakrishnan, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

engineering course Itook. In this course, students were put into groups and had to complete an engineering task (inmy case, build a simple robot); however, the class’s primary learning outcomes focused on non-technical concepts like engineering ethics, which made this course like a mini capstone wherestudents had to find the information themselves to complete their projects. Reflecting on thisproject, I realized that researching and building circuitry for robots was the primary reason forselecting Electrical Engineering. Therefore, when I look at the department’s RED program, I seea similar ideology: an attempt to teach students more about the professional side of engineeringand empower students to take responsibility for learning. I still have not

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 6: Belonging

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University; Julie P Martin, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

without a license’,” PRISM, vol. 24, no. 1, p.10, 2014.[20] S.L.Titus and J.M. Ballou, “Faculty members’ perceptions of advising versus mentoring: Does the name matter?” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 19, no 3, p.1267–1281, 2013.[21] B. J. Barnes and A. E. Austin, “The role of doctoral advisors: A look at advising from the advisor’s perspective,” Innovative Higher Ed., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 297–315, 2009.[22] A. Lee, “How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision,” Studies in Higher Ed., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 267–281, 2008.[23] B. A. Burt, “Toward a theory of engineering professorial intentions: The role of research group experiences,” Am. Ed. Res. J., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 289–332, 2019

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 2: Career Development and Employability

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mandana Ashouripashaki, The Ohio State University; Krista M Kecskemety, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

meaningful career journey. For engineers, whosework often involves complex problem-solving and innovative contributions, aligning careerdecisions with personal values can lead to a more fulfilling professional journey. VBCDMencourages engineers to reflect on their core beliefs and principles, guiding them to make careerchoices that resonate with their intrinsic values. By considering the ethical dimensions, societalimpact, and personal fulfillment in engineering endeavors, individuals can navigate their careersin a way that not only aligns with their values but also contributes to a meaningful and rewardingimpact in their professional lives.Social Cognitive Career and Motivation TheoryThe Social Cognitive Career and Motivation Theory (SCCMT

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 3: Student Experiences and Support

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Herman Ronald Clements III, Purdue University; Alexander V Struck Jannini, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

are critical in grounding findings [23].In considering the ethical validity of this study, we followed concepts used to indicate andmaintain quality qualitative research more generally [24], and in narrative inquiry specifically[25]: (1) centering of the data used to generate knowledge between the participant andresearcher; (2) capturing events that seem commonplace in a way that shows underlyingsignificance or profundity; (3) ensuring ample context has been provided to the reader so theycan judge for themselves the applicability to other scenarios and contexts; (4) providing enoughinformation to ensure the reader of the authenticity of the narrative; (5) transparency anddevelopment of trustworthiness through open disclosure of researcher