- Conference Session
- Student Division Technical Session 6: Belonging
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University; Julie P Martin, University of Georgia
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
direction, but provided a mechanism for each of us todiscuss, vent, and work on solutions collaboratively.Rachel: Similarly, I had co-writing meetings in my early years with peer faculty from outside myunit. These were truly accountability sessions where we could each make progress on ourindividual and collective projects (when applicable). While the focus was writing, these types ofsessions also provided opportunities to discuss institutional challenges and understand how otherorganizations approached the issues.Rachel: While I received strong disciplinary peer support, I was in a new department and did nothave near peer faculty within my own unit (i.e., there were no recently tenured faculty). Thus, itwas immensely valuable that I engaged with
- Conference Session
- Student Division Technical Session 5: Self- Efficacy
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Karen Elizabeth Nortz, Cornell University; Allison Godwin, Cornell University; Linda DeAngelo, University of Pittsburgh; Danielle V. Lewis; Kevin Jay Kaufman-Ortiz, Purdue University; Charlie Díaz, University of Pittsburgh; Carlie Laton Cooper, University of Georgia
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
these issues are not aresult of aptitude or preparation for foundational skills such as mathematics [3]. As such,researchers have focused more on examining differences in women’s attitudinal andpsychological variables than their men peers in areas of self-concept, confidence in theirengineering skills and ability to succeed, belonging, and career goals, among other factors [4],[5], [6]. These studies have created a descriptive understanding of gender differences and haveprovided numerous suggestions for support for women to navigate an often “chilly climate” inengineering [7]. Recent research points to the double threat of negative stereotypes about womenin STEM and being underrepresented presents to academic and career experiences
- Conference Session
- Student Division Technical Session 7: Teaching and Learning Practices
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Caroline Cresap, Louisiana Tech University; Ashtyne Klair Monceaux; David Hall, Louisiana Tech University; Krystal Corbett Cruse, Louisiana Tech University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
professionaldevelopment opportunities, including career/internship preparation such as interview skills,writing a resume, and applying for jobs.Mentors. The cohort was assigned two peer mentors at the beginning of our S-STEM Program.The students were also assigned a faculty mentor toward the end of their first year based on theirchosen discipline. “Peer mentors have a greater impact in the early years of an S-STEM student’sacademic career, while faculty mentors become more influential in later years [22].” Facultymentors have proven to be successful in helping students achieve their academic goals [23]. Thegoal was that the students would interact regularly with their peer mentors during the first yearand then be supported more heavily by their faculty mentor
- Conference Session
- Student Division (STDT) Poster Session
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Eliot Nathaniel Wachtel, University of California, Santa Cruz; Qingyuan Cao, University of California, Santa Cruz; Matthew Kaltman, University of California, Santa Cruz; Khanh Tran, University of California, Santa Cruz; Miguel Robles Hernandez, University of California, Santa Cruz; Tela Favaloro, University of California, Santa Cruz
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
Paper ID #44485Board 174: Fostering Inclusivity and Engagement while Learning by Doing:A New Paradigm in Engineering Education Based on Student-Designed, Student-TaughtCoursesMr. Eliot Nathaniel Wachtel, University of California, Santa Cruz Eliot Wachtel is a fourth year Robotics Engineering Student, Student Instructor, Undergraduate Researcher, and Club leader at UC Santa Cruz. He has been involved in teaching and mentoring undergraduate peers in engineering concepts for three years, acting as the formal lead instructor for two undergraduate courses. When not teaching, or learning, he is doing research in the Braingeneers
- Conference Session
- Student Division Technical Session 5: Self- Efficacy
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
David Myers, Rowan University; Matthew Currey, Rowan University; Luciano Miles Miletta, Rowan University; Darby Rose Riley, Rowan University; Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
-efficacy is likely significantbecause having a network of study buddies can provide mutual support. Previous research hasfound that “social support from peers will make individuals more resilient in dealing withproblems and foster academic self-confidence” [21]. This suggests that individuals feelsupported and encouraged by their study buddies, leading to a belief in their academic abilities.Furthermore, interacting with study buddies can facilitate constructive criticism and feedback.Interactions with colleagues around teaching and learning, including conversations aboutinstruction, peer observation and feedback, and advice seeking about instruction, illustrate thatcollaborative interactions with study buddies can increase an individual's belief
- Conference Session
- Student Division Technical Session 1: Student Experiences and Support
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Katelyn Churakos, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Jayden Mitchell, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Jessica E S Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
examines the student perception and experience of solving open-endedmodeling problems (OEMPs) through an autoethnographic account of the student-authors’personal reflections about an OEMP completed during an introductory level statics course.Currently, the student perspective is not represented in literature about engineering problemsolving. This is significant as the student perspective is integral to understanding how studentslearn and develop an engineering mindset. By incorporating the student voice throughautoethnographic techniques, this study can begin to fill this gap and provide meaningful insightsabout the student experience and perceived benefits surrounding an OEMP.Autoethnography is an approach to research and writing that
- Conference Session
- Student Division Technical Session 4: Project-based Learning
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
James Chengda Lu, BASIS Shavano; Vincent Liu, Brandeis High School; Justin Jin; Parker Olkowski; Yu-Fang Jin, The University of Texas at San Antonio
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
, for every meeting.Practice of Non-Technical Knowledge and Skills from Learning SessionsThe team's business manager oversaw fundraising activities and delegated a team member toengage and follow up with potential donors. Communication templates, including initial contact,follow-up, and appreciation letters, were developed for team members to use. A team memberdocumented a report for each team event, capturing event objectives, activities, attendeenumbers, volunteer/service hours dedicated to event preparation, event photos, outcomes, andfollow-up arrangements. Team members took turns writing event reports.For judge room presentations and interviews, the team collaborated on organizing event reports,refining engineering notebooks, evaluating
- Conference Session
- Student Division Technical Session 3: Student Experiences and Support
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Leslie Anna Brown, Utah State University; Marissa A Tsugawa, Utah State University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
students visualize code more effectively compared to their 2Dcounterparts (e.g. Scratch) [13], [14]. Not only was the visualization of components effective, butstudents reported higher levels of active listening, active learning, and peer collaboration whenusing LEGO® robotics.Using a LEGO® SPIKE™ robot and block-based coding, teachers can overcome challenges theyface such as motivating students by giving them a physical tool that represents visual codingpractices [13], [14]. This physical and visual tool can also assist in structuring game-basedproblem-solving challenges while minimizing syntax and code structure difficulties [15]. Using aproper game-based approach to teaching computer science using a LEGO® SPIKE™ robot, willsupport high school
- Conference Session
- Student Division Technical Session 1: Student Experiences and Support
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Tiffany Chan, University of California, Davis; Tate L Chatfield, University of California, Davis; Xianglong Wang, University of California, Davis
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student Division (STDT)
initial survey where students were given prescribed topics ofinterest such as undergraduate research, career advice, or graduate school. Students were giventhe option to write their own topics of interest in case the prescribed ones did not match what thestudents would like to discuss during the lunch. Confirmed students completed an anonymouspre-intervention survey of ten (10) questions, with 8 Likert-scale questions (1: strongly disagree,5: strongly agree) derived from the Driscoll model [14] and Leibowitz et al.’s validated survey[22] and 2 free response questions to understand the students’ motivation for attending the lunch.The 8 Likert-scale questions (shown in Table 2) explore dimensions of belonging includingknowledge and satisfaction of