otherpopulations there was a higher than base salary for nondisabled professionals, and at least $9,000lower than base salary for disabled professionals. With the largest gaps in salary amongst femaleparticipants being disabled White women ($14,633) and amongst male participants being disabledAmerican Indian/Alaska Native men ($18,376). However, with Hispanic, Black, and AmericanIndian/Alaska Native women having the lowest base, disabled, and nondisabled salaries onaverage, the $13,732, $11,398, and $13,695 gaps between disabled and nondisabled pay has moreimpact than the gaps on higher salaries.Conclusion This work in progress demonstrates the necessity for considering intersectionality in ouranalysis of engineering career outcomes. While
student experiences, computing education, fostering mastery-based learning mindsets, and assessments. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 (Re)visions: Approaches to Teaching Technical Communications and Professional Development in a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Course1. IntroductionIntegrating writing pedagogy-based practices and instruction into capstone curriculumdemonstrates the interconnectedness of the disciplines. While engineering programs and alumniof those programs report a need for technical and professional communication skills as part oftheir career success [1]. Success in their careers will depend on their ability to
referred to as Homefront Factor studies, local institution communitymile linkages, out of state community outreach and our preparation of in-person Saturday academy thatincludes a series of weekly hands-on activities. Students have been engaged in a variety of "hands-on,minds-on" STEAM activities that are aligned to the National Math, Science, and Technology standardsand learn about different Nuclear Energy University Program (NEUP) careers in STEAM as they delve intoeach grade level project.Key Words: Supporting Strategic Training of Adaptable and Integrated Nuclear Workforce (SUSTAIN);Nuclear Energy University Program (NEUP); Local Institution Community Linkages and Outreach;Pipeline Development; Family Forum Café; Historically Black College
Paper ID #42586Engagement in Practice: A Road Map for Academia and Non-Profit CollaborationKerrie Danielle Hooper, Florida International University Kerrie Hooper is currently an Engineering and Computing Education Ph.D. student at Florida International University. She obtained her Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from the University of Guyana in 2019 and then worked for two years in the industry as a Data Analyst & Systems Administrator, before pursuing her doctoral degree. Her research interests are in AI ethics, responsible technology in education, women’s careers in computing, and arts-based approach to STEM
informed by established theoretical frameworks and previousresearch to ensure a comprehensive assessment of students' understanding and attitudes. Section 1: Knowledge Assessment (S1) This section employed a series of multiple-choice questions aimed at assessing students'foundational understanding of renewable energy and environmental protection concepts. Thequestions were consistent across the pre- and post-survey phases, with slight modifications inphrasing or numerical values where applicable to maintain the integrity of the evaluation and allowfor a direct comparison of knowledge acquisition (Anthony, 1996; Cattaneo, 2017; Grabinger &Dunlap, 1995). Sections 2-5: Attitudes, Behaviors, Career Decisions, and Abilities These
featuring partnership acrossthree urban universities to develop effective interventions, in combination with financial support,for improving academic outcomes for engineering students. The Urban STEM project wasdesigned to address challenges faced at the three urban institutions collaborating for the project,and in particular the need for many of the engineering students to work a significant number ofhours each week, resulting in them taking fewer course hours each semester and beingdisconnected from their peers, faculty, and campus. These factors are especially concerning forstudents who are underrepresented in engineering majors, as they already leave engineeringmajors and careers at higher rates. Thus, the Urban STEM Collaboratory was designed
community.IntroductionEngineering Technology programs, including both two year and four year tracks, continue togrow. Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers [3] published that there were14,312 degrees awarded in the year 2019 alone. These degrees come from 111 institutions thatgrant Engineering Technology degrees [3]. Despite the considerable number of degrees awardedin Engineering Technology disciplines, there is little research conducted on the experiences ofEngineering Technology students.Like Engineering Science degree earners, Engineering Technology students may test forprofessional engineering licensure in 35 states. Although the procedures in testing for a licensemay vary, Engineering Technology graduates may pursue careers as professional engineers
Post University.Dr. Buket D. Barkana, The University of Akron Dr. Barkana is the Margaret F. Donovan Chair for Women in Engineering and associate professor of Biomedical Engineering at The University of Akron (UA) since 2023. She received her B.Sc. in electrical and electronics engineering from the Anadolu University in 1994 and her M.Sc. and Ph.D. from the Eskisehir Osmangazi University (ESOGU), Turkey in 1997 and 2005, respectively. Before UA, she was a professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Bridgeport between 2007 and 2023, a faculty member at Anadolu University between 1995 and 1999, and at the ESOGU from 1999 to 2001 in Turkey. Throughout her career, she has developed and taught undergraduate
. His research interests include graduate student mentorship, faculty development, mental health and well-being, teamwork and group dynamics, and the design of project-based learning classes.Dr. Karin Jensen, University of Michigan Karin Jensen, Ph.D. (she/her) is an assistant professor in biomedical engineering and engineering education research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: Design and Preliminary Results of a Survey to Explore Relationships
reviewed and considered efforts toredesign first-year engineering experiences at colleges and universities across the country andidentified skills that would better prepare first-year students for success in their future coursesand careers. A major recommendation was the adoption of a new two-course sequence for first-year students. This sequence will replace the current one-unit introductory seminar course forfirst-year engineering and computer science students.A backward design process — that began with student learning outcomes and produced contentand assignments that would support these outcomes — was used by a subsequent summerworking group to develop plans for the two-course sequence. This backward course design wasfacilitated using the TiLT
teams to work on real-world problems in our community, we also anticipate that thistraineeship program will foster new convergence research opportunities (Objective 2). Further,by strategically bringing together students recruited from various departments on campus, wehope to increase our university’s capacity to produce diverse cohorts of interdisciplinary STEMprofessionals with skills essential to a range of research and innovation-related careers withinand outside of academia (Objective 3).Recruitment and OrientationTrainees participate in the training program using a cohort model. Each year we recruit around20 students to participate as a cohort, intending to recruit at least 100 students over 5 cohorts.Trainees must be enrolled in a
face in thearray of organizations they will be a part of, the diversity of teams they will be part of, and thediverse roles they will play in work environments. “Leadership, creativity, communication,management, professionalism, ethics, agility, resilience and flexibility are some examples ofskills that go beyond the technical competence and which give professionals more ability to takeownership of their own career and deal with the current market’s demands” (de Campos et al.,2020).Educating the Whole Engineer implicates learning and competencies that go beyond the deeptechnical engineering knowledge that fill-up most engineering curricula. Whole engineereducation involves competencies like communication skills, ethics, leadership
importance, but did not studythe actual use of these collections or services. For example, while 69% of faculty in their studyindicated that library databases were important or very important, there was no correspondingassessment of these faculty members' actual use of library databases.A multi-institution interview study organized by Ithaka S+R of civil and environmentalengineering faculty found that researchers preferred to use Google and Google Scholar for arange of information needs including finding datasets, gray literature, and scholarly articles(Cooper et al., 2019). Similarly, in an interview-based study with early career life sciences andengineering faculty at a single institution, researchers found that faculty in their study
of shafts, graph and figure development, technical communication andprofessional presentation. This is an intensive, all-inclusive learning activity for which studentshave reported a great deal of enthusiasm and appreciation.Forensic engineering classes are typically taught at the graduate level due to themultidisciplinary range of skills and knowledge. As such, it is uncommon for undergraduatestudents to have sufficient exposure to determine if forensic engineering is a personal area ofinterest. The engineering forensic investigation experience is a rare opportunity forundergraduate students to discover the oft-overlooked forensic engineering career path.Student’s have expressed enthusiasm for the learning module through favorable feedback
faculty positions, asgraduate students and postdoctoral researchers face tremendous pressure to select research-focused careers (Tudor, 2018). We need to learn more about the experiences of teaching-focused Latine and Hispanicfaculty who have participated in the teaching-focused faculty job search process as it currentlyexists. Over the past 15 years, the number of Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs) in the U.S. hasmore than doubled from 245 in 2005 to 569 in 2020. While the designation of an HSI is based onundergraduate enrollment criteria, higher education institutions must provide adequate service tothe students that they admit (Garcia, 2019). One way of providing service to the growing numberof Latine and Hispanic students is to
]. Outside ofthe classroom however, this becomes an issue as engineering students have significantexperience with the mathematical and scientific side of problem solving and little to noexperience developing critical design thinking skills that can be applied to any range ofproblems. This lack of experience in design thinking can lead students to doubt their abilities andprofessional place in their industry [4, 5]. The problems presented to engineers in industry often cannot be solved using the familiarpath taught in lecture. Thus, recently graduated engineering students who have learned solelythrough lecture based courses are underprepared for a career in engineering that utilizes creativedesign thinking on a day to day basis [4]. This study
were evaluated through surveys at the start, mid-pointand end of the program by an external program evaluator. Through these numerous surveys wedocumented student self-assessment of their change in knowledge and skills. After a year in theprogram most students (usually seven out of eight or eight out of eight) reported the programinfluenced their career area and their level of confidence pursuing a career area. Students as acohort dramatically increased their confidence in how to prepare an academic poster, participatein a professional meeting, plan a controlled experiment, engage in an effective mentoringrelationship, find an internship that matched their interests and explore graduate degrees thatinterest them. At the start of the program
qualitativefactors that often drive decisions [17]. Let that analysis start in mid- to late-career when more isknown.The Language of Social Security and Designing the Case StudyCommunicating about social security relies heavily on key concepts and the acronyms used todescribe them. The starting point is Average Indexed Monthly Earnings (AIME), which is theaverage of an individual's highest 35 years of earnings, adjusted for wage inflation. The AIME isused to determine the Primary Insurance Amount (PIA), which is the monthly benefit anindividual will receive if they start benefits at their normal retirement age (NRA). The NRA is 67for those born after 1960. Until recently the NRA was labeled as the full retirement age (FRA).The Average Wage Index (AWI) is
the University Relations / Marketing (URM) office and shared it with high school senior career counselors across West Virginia. Also, the team obtained a list of science and math teachers for Southern West Virginia and contacted them about this opportunity. The WV Department of Education also helped the team reach more teachers and counselors.❖ The Project team posted the flyer on social media and across campus on bulletin boards.❖ The team developed a website and a special email account for the project.After getting regular applications to Figure 1: S-STEM Flyerthe ECE and CSIS departments forFall 2021, the team started contacting those students by email and postcards
understanding of the components, that is, each organization’s culture andpriorities, and how – or if – they align for the success of the collaborative [4]. When cultures andpriorities are taken for granted, ambiguous, or interpreted differently by individuals acrossorganizations, misunderstandings or differential experiences can lead to issues arising in MTS.This is further compounded by individual team member’s experiences within the sameorganization [5].Project BackgroundWe created a multisector MTS to develop and implement a project funded by the NationalScience Foundation’s (NSF’s) Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics (S-STEM) program titled “Improving Access to Career and EducationalDevelopment (I-ACED) for Talented, Low
activities and interaction with peers, instructors, and academic advisors, on 4-point Likert-type scale from not at all to 5 or more times. • FYS objectives on 5-point Likert-type scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree; and changes in confidence and motivation in educational and career areas on 5-point Likert- type scale from decreased greatly to increased greatly. • Pre- and post-FYS major choice.Non-Student Stakeholder SurveyA short survey about the current and future options for FYS courses was administered to 38 COEnon-student stakeholders identified by the Penn State’s COE Taskforce on First-YearEngagement. Specially, stakeholders were asked about their initial thoughts regarding convertingthe current 1
emphasizing essential ethical virtues. Through this, we foster anappreciation among students and faculty on ethical codes of conduct and character traits we hopebiomedical engineers will uphold in their careers, preparing them to navigate complex ethicaldilemmas with confidence and integrity.The journey commences in Year 1 with a focus on humility. Students are encouraged to balancethe inherent challenges of failure with the pursuit of truth, laying the foundation for a humbleand resilient ethical mindset. Year 2 amplifies the journey with curiosity, urging students toexplore the origins of materials and contemplate the consequences of their use, irrespective ofutility. This curiosity fosters a deep understanding of ethical implications, encouraging
historically marginalized populations at higher education institutions. Currently, Dr. Rodriguez is involved with several large-scale interdisciplinary research projects focused on institutional environments and STEM identity development are sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Kapor Center. In recent years, she was selected as an Early Career Awardee and Faculty Fellow with the American Association of Hispanics in Higher Education (AAHHE) and a NASPA Emerging Faculty Leader. She also received the Barbara Townsend Early Career Scholar Award by the Council for the Study of Community Colleges (CSCC) and gave the distinguished ASHE-CAHEP Barbara Townsend Lecture. To learn more about her current projects
students in STEM[8], [9], [10]. Additionally, first year mentorshipprograms have previously been implemented successfully in both the biomedical engineering andchemical engineering departments at UT [11], [12]. Peer mentorship programs, or programs thatmatch students at different stages of the same degree, are shown to positively affect graduatestudents’ academic, social, psychological, and career development [13]. Fostering this additionalform of mentorship can act as a safety net for students with insufficient institutionalizedmentorship (e.g. research advisor) which can reduce feelings of isolation. Developing a programfor peers, especially around the same identity, can form a sense of community, between mentorshippairs and across pairs [13]. A
, sustainability courses were notintegrated into prescribed undergraduate or graduate engineering curricula, and in some cases this mayhave been due to a lack of resources. Rather, students independently sought ‘special topics’ to supporttheir interest in sustainability. This lack of emphasis on sustainability contrasts the descriptions ofin-person exposure to sustainable technology which ultimately steered those individuals towardsustainable engineering careers. The instructor’s sentiment that “people are willing to learn but you needto show them why it’s important,” echoes McCormick et al.'s work from 2015 [21]. They found that“participation in more experiential, enriching learning,” improved the value students place on sustainableengineering and their
background in his future career in veterinary medicine via research and development in this field.Dr. Mostafa Elsaadany, University of Arkansas Dr. Mostafa Elsaadany is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Arkansas. Dr. Elsaadany teaches Introduction to Biomedical Engineering, Biomechanical Engineering, Biomolecular Engineering, Senior Design, and Entrepreneurial Bioengineering. He is active in Engineering Education Research, where he studies different mentoring strategies to ensure historically marginalized groups’ academic and professional success. Further, he studies strategies for instilling the entrepreneurial mindset in engineering students and innovative
. Studentsvalue professors who are approachable, accessible, and have practical experience in the field.They appreciate staff who are helpful with administrative matters and technical support.Networking Opportunities. Students often recognize the importance of networking for theirfuture careers. They appreciate opportunities to interact with industry professionals, attendconferences, participate in internships, and engage with alumni.Flexibility and Adaptability. Given the rapidly evolving nature of technology and engineeringfields, students may value a learning environment that fosters adaptability. This could includeexposure to emerging technologies, cross-disciplinary learning, and a curriculum that can adaptto industry shifts.Safety and Compliance
Kanazawa Technical College and Future Faculty Fellow teaching First-Year Engineering at Purdue University. She focused on integrated STEM curriculum development as part of an NSF STEM+C grant as a Postdoctoral Research Assistant through INSPIRE in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her current research interests focus on pathways into engineering and identity development.Dr. Christina A. Pantoja, Campbell University Christina Pantoja is a postdoctoral researcher in the School of Engineering at Campbell University. Her research interests include career choices, pathways, and retention of women and underrepresented minorities in engineering. Her other interests include the topics of mentoring, job
[7]in expecting rewarding AI careers. Therefore, we propose healthcare-motivated research projectsin our course design to foster challenging yet rewarding experiences in learning and applying AImethods.1.1 Related workAI education at the high school level has diverse goals — building foundational knowledge, stim-ulating student interest in technology, broadening participation in CS, and as an alternative wayto develop problem solving and critical thinking skills. Successful precedents from other areasexist for these educational aims at the high-school level. Many robotics and system design com-petitions, such as the FIRST Robotics Competition, the Solar Car Challenge, and the InternationalGenetically Engineered Machine (iGEM), have spurred
States through a series of vignettes. Thevignettes were meant to capture the experiences during the several transitional points thatinternational women of color often go through, for example, their first experience of studying ata US institution, their entry in the United States, then completion of their degree, deciding to goin academia, industry or other career path, immigration challenges, etc. Those stories will workas a first stepping stone so that those women can be retained within the workforce and mentoredeffectively, and their well being are also taken care of.2. Guiding FrameworkTransnational Feminism [6] is used here to frame the global cultural contexts of internationalwomen’s experiences within the US-based engineering education