one standard error increase for thegroup after the Fellowship ended. These results suggest that multidisciplinary undergraduatescience communication fellowships with a cohort model may increase students’ confidence andself-efficacy in research. Other qualitative successes included students continuing theirextracurricular involvement in career-focused work after the program ended. The next step forthis research study is to conduct interviews with the students from prior cohorts to gainadditional insight into the potential broader impact of the program on student’s confidencewithin academia and in preparation for their future profession. We will continue to collect surveydata on future cohorts to grow our data set and get a more comprehensive
respective contexts, faculty describedchallenges with sharing communication SME with colleagues and students. Finally, many challengesdescribed in our reflections related to “pedagogy”—fundamentally how we teach communicationskills situated within diverse learning environments. Based on our reflections, we concluded thatoutreach and relevance, SME, and pedagogy must work together to help students actualize thecommunication skills needed for their engineering careers. Table 2 provides a cross-case analysis toidentify themes that emerged with challenges across our cases. 5 Table 2. Cross-Case Analysis for Emergent Themes in Challenges Described by Faculty Outreach & Relevance: Subject
success and wellbeing [24, 25].The objective of this study is to explore the supports embedded in the gender-diverse socialnetworks of nonbinary engineering students. Specifically, we ask the question, how arenonbinary engineering students receiving supports from cisgender and transgender altersthat witness and mirror them as nonbinary engineers? We are interested in who supportsnonbinary engineers in their academic careers and how these individuals provide support that isaffirming to nonbinary individuals using a framework we developed for understanding nonbinaryindividuals’ social supports based on two existing frameworks.Conceptual FrameworkWe propose a conceptual framework for exploring the supporting roles of cisgender and trans*alters using
Paper ID #41476Navigating Transformational Resistance: Exploring Humanitarian EngineeringStudents’ Capacities for Addressing Systemic Causes of Infrastructure ServiceDisparitiesMs. Emma Sophie Stine, University of Colorado Boulder Emma Stine is pursuing a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado, Boulder, where she is researching student experiences before, during, and after attending a graduate program in humanitarian engineering, focusing on how these experiences influence career goals and outcome expectations. She is interested in how these goals align with social justice movements, including if and how
contributed to the training and development of faculty in developing and evaluating various engineering curriculum and courses at UPRM, applying the outcome-based educational framework. She has also incorporated theories on social cognitive career choices and student attrition mitigation to investigate the effectiveness of institutional interventions in increasing the retention and academic success of talented engineering students from economically disadvantaged families. She’s also involved in a project that explores the relationship between the institutional policies at UPRM and faculty and graduate students’ motivation to create good relationships between advisors and advisees.Dr. Christopher Papadopoulos, University of
, Civil Engineering,Chemical Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Ethno-Botany. From 2009 until the onset ofthe covid-19 pandemic, a total of sixty-one US students participated in the Colombia basedprograms, with twenty in Cali at Uni Del Valle and forty-one in Cartagena at Uni Cartagena andUniversity of San Buenaventura Cartagena. The paper will cover the inception and developmentof both project sites, the different approaches to Global Engagement, the best practices,outcomes, program duplication, career outcomes of participants, and post covid-19 opportunities.Introduction - U.S. Students Studying AbroadThe integration of a Study Abroad/International Research internship at the undergraduate andgraduate level is increasingly being seen as a
graduatestudents build community, such as Bridge programs [11],[12],[13], Alliances for GraduateEducation and the Professoriate (AGEP), the Louis Stokes Bridges to the Doctorate (BD) [6], theAlliances for the Inclusion Across the Nation of Communities of Learners of UnderrepresentedDiscoverers in Engineering and Science (INCLUDES) [14], CGS PhD Completion Project [15],Gates Millennium Scholars Program [16], and others. These programs help set students up forsuccess in their careers, complete their graduate degrees, and contribute to the advancement ofknowledge and innovation.Additionally, connecting students to opportunities earlier in the educational pipeline plays a keyrole in the diversification of graduate student populations as well as their
further improve teamwork efficacy. Policies shouldalso focus on developing interdisciplinary teams and soft skills. Encouraging engagement withURP alumni as well as the industry can provide current participants with networkingopportunities, career advice, and insights into the long-term benefits of URPs. Finally, researchcan be demanding, therefore, providing mental health support and stress management resourcesfor students participating in URPs can help students maintain a healthy work-life balance.Keywords: undergraduate research, teamwork, collaborative learning, group developmenttheory, engineering education, URP, research program, NSF, REU, Tuckman1. Introduction1.1 Undergraduate Research Programs (URP)Undergraduate Research Programs (URPs
Paper ID #43145A Data-gathering Effort on STEM v. Non-STEM Faculty for Assessing Equityin Recruitment, Retention, and Promotion at a Large R1 InstitutionMilagros Rivera, George Mason UniversitySupriya Baily, George Mason University Professor and Co-Director, Center for International EducationPatrick Willette Healey, George Mason UniversityDr. Trish Wonch Hill, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Dr. Trish Wonch Hill is an applied sociologist who collaborates with scientists across STEM disciplines to investigate how to spark STEM career interests during childhood and adolescence. She is particularly interested in how to find STEM
consulting experience spanned eight years and included extensive work with the US military in Japan, Korea, and Hawaii. In 2008 Elizabeth shifted the focus of her career to education and academia, later receiving her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Arizona State University. Prior to her position at Cal Poly Dr. Adams taught engineering for 13 years in community colleges in Arizona and California. Her work highlights a commitment to undergraduate engineering education and its improvement through best teaching practices. Her research efforts are focused on increasing transfer student success.Dr. Nihal Orfi, Fresno City College Dr. Nihal Orfi teaches full time as an Engineering faculty at Fresno City College. She obtained her
1. Briefly, the centerpiece of the program is our quarterly Success inSTEM seminar, which students take every quarter for their first two years at University ofWashington Tacoma. Through these weekly sessions, students connect with each other and withtheir faculty cohort mentor, learning to support each other through challenging times,developing a growth mindset towards their academic journey, understanding barriers that leadto equity gaps in STEM such as stereotype threat and imposter syndrome, and building a senseof belonging and self-efficacy. The seminar allows participants to explore co-curricularopportunities (e.g., student clubs), campus resources such as disability services and financial aidoffices, and career preparation, while
organization. Engineering-focused companies require a diverse workforce that is capable of innovation and many studentswill not join these types of firms in as their first employer post-college. Intrapreneurial skillshave been shown to facilitate career progression and improve managerial skills andopportunities. In order to address the need for more STEM workers to have intrapreneurial skills,TIP recruited and enrolled academically talented and diverse electrical and computer engineeringundergraduate students. TIP provided a multi-faceted approach to improve entrepreneurshipskills. Specifically, the program combined faculty and industry mentorship, workforcedevelopment seminars, an industrial internship, entrepreneurship programs, and scholarships
interviews included topics such asprofessional history, including career backgrounds; details of the classes they teach, including size,format, structure, and support; course design considerations; assessment practices; goals andchallenges for students; professional development experiences, especially around teaching andlearning; and impressions of faculty incentive structures, especially tenure and promotion, whereapplicable. Student interviews included topics such as motivation for choosing the major; studentlearning goals, including both skills and perspectives; student beliefs about their instructors’ goalsand priorities; experiences with assessment; and alignment between instruction and learning goals.The interviewer asked follow-up questions
copingmechanisms in minoritized undergraduate students in STEM higher education.MentoringSome college students arrive on campus already with coping skills gleaned from family or otherexperiences. How can colleges ensure that all students have the ability to learn and apply coping skills toensure academic and career success? Scholarship on communities of practice (for example, the computerscience department) detail that new members or outsiders can only become a part of the community whenthe elders of the community (i.e., faculty, advanced students) accept and indoctrinate them in the cultureof the community (Wenger, 1998). This concept can be executed through mentoring. Mentoring is therelationship between a more experienced individual and a less
popular textbook, Wavelets & Filter Banks, Wellesley-Cambridge Press, 1997, and the author of several matlab-based toolboxes on image compression, electrocardiogram compression and filter bank design. He also holds a patent on an efficient design method for wavelets and filter banks and several patents on wavelet applications including compression and signal analysis. He received the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Transaction in Signal Processing Paper Award (Image and Multidimensional Processing area) for the paper he co-wrote with Prof. P. P. Vaidyanathan on linear-phase perfect-reconstruction filter banks (1992). He received the National Science Foundation Career Award in 1995 and
, 2014-15, and 2015-16. Furthermore, he was a shortlisted candidate for the UGC Teaching Award (Early Career Faculty Member).Prof. Norman C. Tien, University of Hong Kong Norman C. Tien is the Taikoo Professor of Engineering and Chair Professor of Microsystems Technology at the University of Hong Kong (HKU). He is also currently the Head of Innovation Academy of Faculty of Engineering and the Managing Director of the Centre for Transformative Garment Production. He served as the Dean of Engineering from 2012 to 2018, and as the Vice-President and Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Institutional Advancement) from 2019 to 2021 at HKU. Prior to joining HKU, Professor Tien was the Nord Professor of Engineering at Case Western Reserve
for graduation. With the advancements in technology, moreflexibility became available for distance learning, which facilitated a more timely delivery of thecourses for the military student population and at the same time started to attract new studentpopulation, in particular returning students, who were at different stages in their careers and intheir lives, and had to balance schedule between work, family, and study. In 1994, ODU investedin satellite technology for course delivery and TELETECHNET was developed in partnershipwith the Virginia Community College System (VCCS) [12]. This facilitated broadcast instructionvia satellite, a form of interactive television. Outgoing audio and video were broadcast viasatellite, and audio from the
will bepresented here.Table 1: Scheduled topics with brief descriptions of what is covered by the seminar. Week Topic Description Introducing the class to the instructor, brief description of 1 Introduction the topics covered in the course, illuminating some of the possible career pathways for mechanical engineers. Description of how, where, and why formal engineering International Beginnings of 2 education came to be with emphasis on the military origins Formal Engineering Education
collaboration involving public educational systems and science and engineering companies. Their embedded multiple case study design consisted of three cases: (1) South County and Cornerstone Industry, (2) Springfield County and EchoCorp, and (3) New County and Deltax Corporation. Data collection: 76 semi structured interview from 49 participants. Analysis: Within the case analysis though holistic coding techniques. Cross-case analysis to mapping similarities and differences across cases.Table 4 Example of a multiple case study investigating the role of social capital in theexperiences of Hispanic woman in engineering majors [28] Context: A better understanding of factors influencing female and minority engineering students’ academic and career
that women, students from groups historically underrepresented inSTEM, and first-generation college students are more drawn to fields that they perceive asaltruistic and can lead to careers in which they can help others [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13].Therefore, by using this project to situate MSE as a field in which students could impact theircommunities, we hope to increase interest in MSE. Finally, there is evidence to support thatcampus-related projects improve student outcomes by providing real-world experience [14],[15], [16], and can also provide a benefit to the university [17].In this work, we seek to understand the impacts of a campus-focused design project on students’1) sense of belonging in the field of MSE, 2) sense of
Denver-Metro Engineering Consortium),funded by the US Department of Defense1 is a pathways model designed to introduceunderrepresented community college students to engineering bachelor’s degree programs andentry into the engineering workforce. As part of this six-year-long program to encourage studentsinto and through a pathway that prepares them for an engineering career, the EngineeringMomentum initiative incorporates multiple programs that foster engineering awareness, includinga robust summer internship which allows students to gain valuable engineering researchexperience. The program anticipates 425 students will participate in Engineering Momentumthroughout the six years of the grant (see Table 1), with a subset of ~300 of these
graduating with an engineeringdegree [1], [2], [4], [6], [7] and career certainty [8]. To address research questions regardingstudents’ engineering role identity, researchers have been using the survey measure “I see myselfas an engineer” to represent students’ holistic view of their identity as engineers [2], [4], [6], [9],[10]. However, there are debates among researchers concerning the use of a single-item measureto capture complex and abstract psychological or affective concepts such as engineering roleidentity (e.g., [11], [12], [13]). Specifically, some arguments against using single-item measuresare that they lack depth and provide limited insights into the abstract constructs of interest.Additionally, single-item measures cause concern for
of higher education remains underrepresented in the literature, this paper alsohighlights the need for more studies in this area.Mentorship is an important topic in STEMM education due to its role in a student’s professionalformation. Defined as “a professional, working alliance in which individuals work together overtime to support the personal and professional growth, development, and success of the relationalpartners through the provision of career and psychosocial support,” mentorship may “enhancestudent outcomes, experiences, and retention” and “help with workforce development byincreasing access, equity, and inclusion in STEMM” [1]. A mentorship relationship can lastanywhere from three months to a lifetime and is most effective when
to students'performance in campus environment [7]. Essentially, how students perceive the culture withinSTEM and their belonging within that culture is not contingent but does correlate with facultysupport through interactions during their academic careers [8]. As a result of this correlation,students describe feelings such as hostility and lack of caring when characterizing the instructor-student relationship [9]. Report from previous studies shows that there is still negative form ofinteraction between faculty and students like discrimination from instructors [10]. This reckoninghas allowed scholars to conclude that there is a beneficial connection between facultyrelationships and student’s self-efficacy and their persistence in STEM
;).Who is in a makerspace?Makerspaces are often staffed by university and students representing varies degrees of studentrun experiences. Student staff are inherently important in the culture and operations of thesespaces (Andrews and Boklage, under review). Despite this recognized importance, little isknown about how these student staff are recruited and hired to work in these spaces.Importance of mentorsStudents hired in makerspaces provide the opportunity serve as peer mentors in the space. Recentresearch outlines domains peer mentors can support including: psychological and emotionalsupport, goal setting and career path support, academic subject knowledge support, existence of arole model. (Ogle, Bolding, Lloyd, and Wade, 2020
consistsprimarily of adult learners with a majority of them either military veterans or still serving in themilitary. The research was conducted in various undergraduate courses that historically havepresented greater challenges to students, such as statics, dynamics, digital circuit design, andaerodynamics. The research supports engineering education and the support interventionsinvestigated have potential to increase persistence in the associated engineering disciplines. Theprogram also offers professional development to the peer leaders who are recruited fromprevious course offerings and participate in peer leader training to best support other students intheir acclimation to engineering and commitment to engineering career pathways. Initial yearone
in Table 5 show that participants found the workshop relevant with practicalstrategies for expanding/enhancing electricity and sustainable business education. In the firstoffering of this workshop, participants had asked for more opportunities for interaction. Thus,we are pleased that in this offering, all participants agreed or strongly agreed that they weregiven such opportunities. Most participants said that the workshop improved their understandingof skills and experiences that students need to pursue careers in electricity access although theresults show that there is room for improvement in this area since 8 participants were neutral ordisagreed.Table 5 Participant Responses about Workshop
manuals, textbooks, or a NCEES FEpractice exam. A start-up style question is defined as one that is given at the beginning of a classto help review past topics and reinforce foundational concepts to students. The start-up questionsin this study were brief, presented at the beginning of a class period as a quiz, and served to bothreview previous material and provide immediate student feedback related to their performance.This type of FE-style start-up quiz review was incorporated in classes that occurred earlier in astudents’ career, typically prior to their senior year. Furthermore, this style of reviewincorporated FE topics continuously throughout the term, rather than solely at the end of thecourse. The goal was to help students become
, and diverse strategies used by universities [1].Craney et al. [2] surveyed 465 undergraduate research participants from varied disciplines andbackgrounds, discovering high satisfaction and significant gains in professional development,deeper subject understanding, and better preparedness for graduate studies and careers. Similarly,Lopatto [3] found that 85% of UR participants in science continued to postgraduate education,with those not pursuing further studies reporting lesser gains. Haddad and Kalaani [4] introduceda model to integrate research into traditional curriculums via summer workshops and designatedcourses, aiming to boost participation through the creation of an Undergraduate Research Office.Lopatto's further research [5
addition, studies on students’ experiences ingraduate programs stress that interdisciplinary graduate students often struggle to developpositive senses of identity, belonging, and motivation necessary for pursuing interdisciplinarywork as early-career academics [25], [26], [27]. They are challenged to understand and integratediscipline-based expectations of Ph.D.s [15] and to find and sustain the kinds of collaborativeinterdisciplinary experiences necessary for their persistence in interdisciplinary engineering anddesign careers, often with little support [9], [17], [26], [28], [29]. These barriers suggest that weneed to develop more robust understandings first of how students conceptualize interdisciplinarywork, which in turn can help inform