adult inform their research work.Dr. Kirsten A. Davis, Purdue University Kirsten Davis is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research explores the intentional design and assessment of global engineering programs, student development through experiential learning, and approaches for teaching and assessing systems thinking skills. Kirsten holds a B.S. in Engineering & Management from Clarkson University and an M.A.Ed. in Higher Education, M.S. in Systems Engineering, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Virginia Tech.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University Senay Purzer is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research is
and 2019 have completed their engineering degreeprogram. We assessed their experiences through exit interviews and report in this paper asummary of their responses. The students noted that being able to identify themselves asbelonging to the RAMP community was a positive outcome of their participation during thesummer, an identity they appreciated throughout their engineering program. The potential forsummer bridge programs to create community and sense of belonging has been discussed insurveys of STEM summer bridge programs [8,9]. Characterized as a psychosocial goal of theprogram, improving student sense of belonging to a community has been found to influencestudent motivation, academic achievement, and well-being [8]. The Meyerhoff
common goal.6. The workshops and speakers were valuable too.7. The community-centered research.The student responses above indicate what elements participants found valuable about ROLE,confirming the importance of interacting with others, shared values through their culture, andcommunity building. When participants were interviewed, they reflected on more specificexamples. For instance, participants were aware of ROLE’s research space created to encourageresearch activities among minority and underrepresented students in engineering. Someparticipants reflected on their ethnic and engineering identities. Troy vented, “Being a Latinoengineer, it's definitely a minority in the engineering field…it made me sort of form more of abond if I see
. Kajfez and L. McNair, “Graduate student identity: A balancing act between roles,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2014.[4] D. L. Liddell, M. E. Wilson, K. Pasquesi, A. S. Hirschy, and K. M. Boyle, “Development of professional identity through socialization in graduate school,” J Stud Aff Res Pract, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 69–84, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1515/JSARP-2014-0006/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS.[5] T. Luft and R. Roughly, “Engaging the Reflexive Self: The Role of Reflective Practice for Supporting Professional Identity Development in Graduate Students,” Supporting the Success of Adult and Online Students Proven Practices in Higher Education, pp. 53–62, 2016.[6] H. L. Perkins, M. Bahnson, M. A
G.P. Berdanier is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research expertise lies in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Exploring the evolution of engineering doctoral students’ academic and career goals in the first year of graduate schoolABSTRACT The purpose of this
Development. He graduated from the University of Alabama in August 2012 with a PhD ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Teaching Social Justice in Infrastructure: A Community of Practice Framework for the use of Case StudiesAbstractThe Center for Infrastructure Transformation and Education (CIT-E) was created in 2013 as acommunity of practice (CoP) for those interested in the scholarship of infrastructure educationand has developed a model introductory infrastructure course with over 40 lessons available toany instructor to use or modify. In the summer of 2023 CIT-E held a workshop “TeachingStudents about Equitable Infrastructure”. As a result of that workshop, one of the ongoing
those traditionally underrepresented in rigorous courses and programs in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). She knows that an education in a STEM field leads students to life enriching, family supporting, and community building careers. Morrell brings an entrepreneurial spirit to every effort she undertakes. From developing and leading a research center for advancing women and IT at the University of Maryland Baltimore County to creating an international effort on behalf of women and Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for the United Nations and the World Bank to serving as the Chief Operations Officer for the National Alliance for Partnerships in Equity (NAPE). Morrell has developed
, takeaways for future development of this and other comparable communitiesof practice for student participants in engineering education are considered.1.1 BackgroundThe EECS Design Student Community of Practice Program at Oregon State University in theSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science was originally developed and piloted in2017 as a means to interweave aspects of academic, extracurricular, career preparation, andprofessional identity-building in the engineering discipline based upon the model presented byWenger [1]. Over the 6 years since the pilot, program leaders have conducted developmentresearch that has guided advancements in basic organization, educational practice, resourcefocus and overall implementation methodology [2-4
. Building on her background in physics, sculpture, art history, and high-school physics teaching, Dr. Shirey is passionate about using integrative-STEAM education to reach more students, engaging students in real-world explorations using science and math content, and helping teachers and students to grapple with complex problems in novel ways.Dr. Lisa Bosman, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Bosman holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering. Her engineering education research interests include entrepreneurially minded learning, energy education, interdisciplinary education, and faculty professional development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Motivating Students to
identity is still in development, as he feels the need for more hands-on experience to fully embrace the title of 'engineer'. This perspective highlights the importance of real-world experience in defining one's professional identity in engineering. Omar's views align with a common understanding in the field that engineering is not just about theoretical knowledge but also about applying that knowledge in practical, often team- based, contexts. Initially, he had a vague understanding of engineering, which evolved through coursework, especially in [Engineering Course XY], to a clearer view of engineering as design and problem-solving. Omar's teamwork experience in [Engineering Course ST] was positive, characterized by camaraderie
leveraging the NSF INCLUDES Alliance awards (NSF #1834628 and #1834608),Engineering Momentum builds on the success and knowledge gained from the current STEM CoreExpansion initiative by developing a sustainable and replicable program to broaden participationin STEM, both in education programs and the workplace. Engineering Momentum also includesthe implementation of the STEM Core model at each their five community college partners. Figure 1. The Engineering Momentum pathways project.The initial three-year program design and intervention activities (Phase 1) will include five cohortsof approximately 25 students each (125 students total). During Phase 2, years 4-6, the project plansto scale to three additional colleges and include
, ‘Developing a Grounded Framework for Implementing Ungrading in a Disciplinary Context’, ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2023.[12] S. Ghosh and S. Coppola, ‘This Class Isn’t Designed For Me: Recognizing Ableist Trends In Design Education, And Redesigning For An Inclusive And Sustainable Future’. arXiv, 2024.[13] M. Bahnson et al., ‘Inequity in graduate engineering identity: Disciplinary differences and opportunity structures’, J. Eng. Educ., vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 949–976, 2021 [Online]. Available: 10.1002/jee.20427.[14] A. M. York et al., ‘Gender inequity in individual participation within physics and science, technology, engineering, and math courses’, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 17, no. 2, p. 020140, Dec. 2021 [Online]. Available
Paper ID #42733Faculty Perspectives on Undergraduate Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence(GAI) Assistance: A Work-in-ProgressMichaela Harper, Utah State University Michaela Harper is a graduate student at Utah State University specializing in engineering education with a background in Environmental Studies, focusing on STEM and non-traditional education. Her interest predominantly lies in understanding the underlying nature of things, bringing an exploratory and explanatory approach to her research, including the impacts of disruptive technology on engineering, a field popularly deemed as ”tech-savvy.”Dr. Cassandra
white male faculty and administrators engage in ally work. Race Ethnicity and Education, 18(4), 488-514.Plummer, D. L., & Slane, S. (1996). Patterns of coping in racially stressful situations. Journal of Black Psychology, 22(3), 302-315.Pierceall, E. A., & Keim, M. C. (2007). Stress and coping strategies among community college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 31(9), 703-712.Riley, D. (2017). Rigor/Us: Building boundaries and disciplining diversity with standards of merit. Engineering Studies, 9(3), 249-265. Russo‐Tait, T. (2022). Color‐blind or racially conscious? How college science faculty make sense of racial/ethnic underrepresentation in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59
budgets for public education, specifically K12 [3] (Figure 1).There are approximately 800 separate institutions on the NASA Minority Serving Institution(MSI) list [4], which make up about 10% of post-secondary institutions and 26% of students [5].MSIs have been identified through a series of Executive Actions by which the U.S. Departmentof Commerce, the U.S. Department of Education, and the U.S. Department of the Interiorallocate specific funding to MSI institutions. However, while federal funding is available, about59.3% of MSIs are funded [6]. It is critical to determine if students graduating from these MSIsare employed in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) fields, especially asworkforce shortages continue [7]. Further, students
McCullough [7].Transitions for transfer students in, through, and out of community college and in, through, andout of the university system are more rapid than their 4-year university peers [1]. Transferstudents are often the first generation in their families to attend college and can come fromlow-income backgrounds [8, 9, 10]. Many transfer students have faced adversity that their 4-yearpeers have not experienced. Transfer students also have a shortened time to repositionthemselves, identify resources, and build confidence to continue their studies [11].Transfer students pursuing engineering careers, more specifically, are presented with additionalchallenges [12, 13]. Ogilvie [13] reviews the literature detailing many transfer
M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research expertise lies in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development.Dr. Kim-Doang Nguyen, Florida Institute of Technology Dr. Kim-Doang Nguyen is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the Florida Institute of Technology. His research interests include engineering education research, data science, machine learning, robotics, and dynamical systems. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024How Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate
Paper ID #42394Initial Validity Evidence for a Survey of Skill and Attitude Development onEngineering TeamsDr. Justin Charles Major, Rowan University Dr. Justin C. Major (he/him) is an Assistant Professor of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University where he leads ASPIRE Lab (Advancing Student Pathways through Inequality Research in Engineering). Justin’s research focuses on engineering belonging and marginalization mechanisms, adverse childhood experiences, and feminist approaches to EER, and connects these topics to broader understandings of student success in engineering. Justin completed his Ph.D. in
College of Engineering at the University of Michigan engaged in an multi-yearexperiential learning initiative to develop a framework to support students to intentionally explorelearning opportunities, engage meaningfully in experiences, reflect on what they have learned,and communicate the value of the core competencies they have developed [9]. Experientiallearning has been identified as a high-impact educational practice [12], and provides theopportunity for the student to develop and practice competencies in authentic settings [13]. Tosupport experiential learning, the College of Engineering developed a set of key professionalcompetencies (Table 1) through a strategic vision process involving faculty, staff, students,alumni, and industry
-efficacy to embed engineering in their curricula in ways that meaningfullyconnect to students’ lives and communities [2]. Traditional “engineering” building tasks candisenfranchise students from non-dominant groups, particularly Indigenous communities, becausethere is a lack of connection to multiple epistemologies, specifically those focusing on culturalcompetency, identity, and relationships with the natural world [6]. Focusing on how engineeringeducation can be reframed as equity-centered, inclusive of diverse voices and ways of learning, isessential to increasing participation and outcomes in engineering.Supporting teachers in employing a culturally relevant approach to engineering requires new andimproved professional development (PD
% growth rate in new engineering faculty opportunities over the next 10 years, not keeping upwith the rate of Ph.D. engineering graduates [2]. As a result, graduate students will need to seeknon-academic roles in industry or the government upon graduation.As part of a research study funded through the NSF Innovations in Graduate Education (IGE),we are seeking to build upon an existing transportation engineering graduate program throughthe integration of a research-to-practice model based upon cognitive apprenticeship. As part ofthis model, we include practical experiences that we believe will prepare students for non-academic roles while maintaining the program’s current level of scientific rigor. We willevaluate the success of the new graduate
' learningexperiences and professional identity development, specifically their progression towardsbecoming engineers through experiential learning. WIL internships provide students withopportunities to learn through enculturation into the CoP and its norms, and to understand itwithin the context of their sociocultural histories, including their previous experiences andidentities in other CoPs (Eames & Coll, 2006). This aspect is particularly pertinent to thisstudy as it also aims to explore the interaction between students' prior academic trainingbased on a French engineering education model and their learning experiences and identityformation within the Chinese workplace setting. It not only assists students in comprehendingthe CoP but also facilitates
Paper ID #41431A Multi-Institutional Assessment of Entrepreneurial Mindset Perceptions ofStudents Participating in Entrepreneurial REU Programs Through ConceptMapsMs. Alexandra Mary Jackson, Rowan University Alexandra Jackson is a third year PhD candidate at Rowan University in Engineering Education. She began her research in Rowan’s Experiential Engineering Education Department in the Fall of 2019, and has developed interests in entrepreneurial mindset and student development. In particular, she is interested in assessment of entrepreneurial mindset through both quantitative and qualitative methods, and is currently
retention inengineering the above samples suggests retention rates, a critical metric in assessing theeffectiveness of educational programs, vary when reflecting each institution’s unique curricula,challenges, data collection methods, and statistical processes.Many US mechanical engineering programs implement innovative pedagogies to engage theirfirst-year students. US Coast Guard Academy introduced cyber-physical system design andrealization by integrating a Bilge Pump design project. The first-year students were exposed tovarious engineering skills, including SolidWorks, machining, sheet metal work, 3-D printing,and programming using Arduino to build and test pumps [5]. Virginia Military Instituteimplemented a nine-week Arduino-controlled Potato
Gulf conflict, in support of the Global War on Terrorism in Iraq, and during peace enforcement operations in Bosnia-Herzegovina. He was awarded three Bronze Star Medals for leadership and service during wartime operations. He earned his commission through ROTC and was a Distinguished Military Graduate, He is a graduate of the U.S. Army Ranger School and the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College. He earned a M.S. in leadership development and counseling from Long Island University and a B.A. in psychology from Boston University. He is a member of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). Leo is an avid hiker, and when not at work can usually be found on a New Hampshire White Mountains high
California, Irvine and is working on a Masters in Science Education at California State University Long Beach. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Breaking Through the Obstacles: Strategies and Support Helping Students Succeed in Computer ScienceIntroduction and MotivationNot only that there is a continuously growing number of students who want to study computerscience (CS) but also there is a large need for CS graduates. The computing jobs are crucial forthe development and growth of the economy worldwide. For example, the data from theIntegrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) [1] by the U.S. Department ofEducation’s National Center for Education Statistics
of students,who, through involvement in the formal college curriculum and extracurricular activities, cannurture and apply these innovation capacities. This perspective underscores the importance ofdemographic and educational factors that may influence the development of these capacities.Several studies have investigated collegiate mechanisms or individual characteristics that maydevelop innovation capacities in undergraduate students. Key factors include engagement ininnovation-related coursework [10] and positive interactions with faculty [11]. Yet there is anotable emphasis on the importance of educational practices that are inclusive and considerstudent identities and academic majors [12], [13]. These studies highlight the crucial role
linguistic diversity of these facultymembers, we aim to enhance the academic community's capacity for innovation and globalengagement. This exploration is more than a mere examination of the challenges at hand; it is anacknowledgment and celebration of the rich, diverse contributions that international faculty maketo U.S. higher education. Through this comprehensive analysis, we seek to offer meaningfulinsights into professional development for international faculty, contributing to the evolution ofglobal engineering and humanitarian design in a world that is increasingly interconnected.3. Theoretical Framework a. Community Of Cultural Wealth Framework: We framed different cultural backgroundsfrom the asset-based perspective, not from the
this multi-tiered mentoring community experience wouldaid in the development of the students’ STEM identity, evidenced by their feedback and decisionsto pursue additional research opportunities. Students who achieve four-year degrees in STEM are typically White cisgender men withconnections and resources that guide them through the process. Students outside of thisdemographic dealing with more complex circumstances tend to have more difficulty completingfour-year STEM degrees. This group of students is referred to as “disadvantaged”, and includesUnderrepresented Minority (URM) students, first-generation college students, and studentsreturning to school at an older age [1]. URM groups are defined by the NSF as “individuals ofraces or
://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133766[4] E. A. Cech, “Engineering’s Systemic Marginalization and Devaluation of Students andProfessionals With Disabilities”.[5] M. J. Erickson and K. H. Larwin, “The Potential Impact of Online/Distance Education forStudents with Disabilities in Higher Education,” vol. 5, no. 1.[6] P. Golding et al., “Building STEM Pathways for Students with Special Abilities,” in 2018ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah: ASEE Conferences,Jun. 2018, p. 30165. doi: 10.18260/1-2--30165.[7] C. Groen, L. McNair, M. Paretti, D. Simmons, and A. Shew, “Board 52: ExploringProfessional Identity Development in Undergraduate Civil Engineering Students WhoExperience Disabilities,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference &