. • Once the semester commences, the course coordinator provides a steady stream of materials and information to instructors and students. These materials cover a wide range, including project assignment, submission deadlines, example problems, and innovative ways to present the material. • The coordinator posts course content information to online platforms (MS Teams and D2L) to ensure proposed materials are shared among the instructors for peer review and comment, confirming the product is ready for students well in advance. Assessment: Course coordinator is also responsible for course assessment including selection of assignments for assessment, and the development and implementation of
learning objectives, which students should be able todo upon the completion of the course: A. Explain the value of managing stress in achieving optimal health/well-being. B. Identify one's personal coping style and strengths for transforming stress into a positive factor. C. Explain key strategies to flourish in a challenging environment through optimistic and resilient thinking. D. Describe how to use the concept of “failure” to learn and grow. E. Identify how to use emotional intelligence to prevent stress and fatigue and improve one’s health/well-being.Students were made aware of the learning objectives through the course syllabus that wasdistributed at the beginning of each course. Appendix A contains the course
-Discipline: Student Adaptation to Emergency Remote Teaching in an Integrated Engineering Energy Course during COVID-19,” Education Sciences, vol. 10, 2020, Accessed: Feb. 05, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1277023[6] L. E. Gin, R. A. Scott, L. D. Pfeiffer, Y. Zheng, K. M. Cooper, and S. E. Brownell, “It’s in the syllabus … or is it? How biology syllabi can serve as communication tools for creating inclusive classrooms at a large-enrollment research institution,” Advances in Physiology Education, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 224–240, 2021, doi: 10.1152/advan.00119.2020.[7] C. J. Stanny, M. Gonzalez, and B. McGowan, “Assessing the culture of teaching and learning through a syllabus review,” Assessment & Evaluation in
27-114 2023 4(3,0,0,0,1) 19(14,0,0,0,5) 20 32-86a Number of courses(In-person, Asynchronous, Online Synchronous, Hybrid, No Information)b Up until midspring 2020 all courses were in-personB. Data CollectionLMS feature use data was collected from each Canvas course for spring semesters from 2019 to2023. This data included LMS feature use at two points in time each semester: mid-Spring and atthe end of the semester. For comparison purposes to Spring 2020, mid-Spring (denoted m19-m23) LMS feature use data were recorded at the end of the 9th week of the semester (i.e., whenin-person instruction stopped). Spring data accounts for all LMS feature use across the semester.LMS feature use data were provided
inadvertentlyadvantaged students of their own background [6]. Some schools have developed programs thatattempt to increase the feeling of belonging for historically marginalized groups, but most ofthese interactions occur outside the classroom [3]. The purpose of this study is to quantify andevaluate the efficacy of a clinical observations and needs-finding course on historicallymarginalized groups, to create a more welcoming and equal learning environment.Methods:To measure students’ perceptions before and after completing the course, a Qualtrics survey wascreated with Likert scale questions and open-response questions that directly aligned with thecourse objectives as stated in the syllabus. The survey was administered to all 75 junior-levelundergraduate
collected through these tools to improve the class experience. Figure 1. Screenshots for “PrimeBot” and “WebDeveloperBot”The instructor made adaptations to his course along the way to better support students’ use ofgenerative AI and also demonstrated that he was tinkering with generative AI along with thestudents. For example, after the second session of the course, the instructor found that thestudents were asking many questions regarding the syllabus in “GeneralBot”. However, because“GeneralBot” was the same as ChatGPT and the syllabus was not included in the training data,“GeneralBot” was unable to provide students with answers. Seeing this phenomenon, theinstructor and the team created “SyllabusBot” and introduced it in the next
they need to be effective learners. A syllabus may reflect the instructor’sbeliefs and attitudes about the subject matter and students, making it a guide for the instructor aswell as to the students. Cullen and Harris argue that “a syllabus is more than an outline of course.It represents the mindset, that is the professor’s philosophy of teaching and learning as well ashis or her attitudes toward students, and conceptualization of the course [8].” Cullen and Harrisfurther argue that a review of course syllabi can reveal much about an instructor’s learner-centered practices and have developed a rubric for assessing learner-center qualities of coursesyllabi. Eslami, et al., analyzed undergraduate STEM syllabi and found students enrolled
, enrollment in the physicsadvanced composition courses was approximately 60% of the number of senior physicsmajors. Figure 1: Courses in the core physics curriculum at University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.For this work, we collected course materials that were publicly available through course websites.For the majority of courses, the materials consisted of the syllabus and assignment details. Wechose to analyze more materials from the lab (401 and 403) and advanced composition classes,because these courses require the most writing, despite the imbalance this introduces whencomparing across the full set of courses.2.2 AnalysisWe drew on systematic methods for qualitative coding of the course materials [20, 21].References to writing or written
include in their syllabi?” J. Excellence in College Teach., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 29-61, 2010.[7] J. Parkes and M. B. Harris, “The purposes of a syllabus,” College Teach., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 55-61, 2002, doi: 10.1080/87567550209595875.[8] E. Karanja and D. M. Grant, “Evaluating learner-centeredness course pedagogy in project management syllabi using a content analysis approach,” J. Inf. Syst. Educ., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 131-146, 2020. [Online] Available: https://jise.org/Volume31/n2/JISEv31n2p131.html[9] H.A. Diefes-Dux and G. Panther, “Instructor adaptability and the course complexity typology as tools for faculty development,” in Proc. ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo.., Minneapolis, MN, Jun 2022.[10
focus on community building within engineering. Thenuances of my experiences inside and outside of the classroom over the course of my four yearsat this university inform my following recommendations and speak to the impact of positive andnegative teaching experiences encountered during my educational journey.Preliminary Findings and RecommendationsOur analysis of the instructors’ guide revealed that several policies have been implemented withthe intent of supporting student learning, but their impact falls short in terms of aligning withhigh-impact teaching practices and fostering inclusive learning environments. Syllabus languagewas the first item addressed in the instructors’ guide, with the following recommendationsstanding out to us: 1
-020-09532-8.[17] J. L. Hsu, M. Rowland-Goldsmith, and E. B. Schwartz, “Student Motivations and Barriers toward Online and In-Person Office Hours in STEM Courses,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 21, no. 4, Dec. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-03- 0048.[18] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, Jan. 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x.[19] E. Dubicki, “Mapping curriculum learning outcomes to ACRL’s Framework threshold concepts: A syllabus study,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 288–298, May 2019, doi: https
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 There's a Textbook for this Class? Scaffolding Reading and Notetaking in a Digital AgeAbstractInnovative engineers depend on technical reading as a primary means of lifelong learning.Several scaffolded course activities encourage the practice of reading and notetaking in acollaborative learning environment. In lower-level courses, students receive brief instruction inHow to Read a Book[1], Cornell notes[2], and Sketchnoting[3]. Student Note assignmentsrequire students to take hand-written notes while reading the textbook and post a picture of theirreading and class notes to an online discussion board. In later courses, students, well trained inthe Student Notes
, the official university guidance was released. Within thefirst click of navigating this guidance, the university offers “considerations for your syllabus andcourse” that includes a wide array of example syllabus language and a general position that theuse of AI can help students explore their own learning as long as faculty and transparent andclear in their expectations. This guidance goes on to include how assessment and evaluation areimpacted by AI, and how the development of discipline-specific expertise can be fosteredthrough intentional AI usage. Finally, multiple examples of creative pedagogy with AI areoffered to faculty for integration into their course. These integrations included supporting the useof AI to help frame faculty’s
Group. She has contributed to educational initiatives as a teaching fellow at Teach For India.Mrs. Belen A Garcia, University of Michigan, Dearborn Belen A. Garcia is an instructional designer at the University of Michigan Dearborn. She earned her Ph.D. in Learning Design and Technology with a focus on engineering education from Purdue University. In her dissertation research, she investigated how middle school students built sustainable virtual cities and the effect on their environmental attitudes. She has taught college courses in interdisciplinary studies, educational technology and Spanish. Previously, she taught German at the high school level. Her research interests lie at the intersection of online learning
. • State and Review Late Submission Policies at the beginning of their classes (requirements by immigration law and school academic policy) and read the course syllabus. Understanding the policies related to late submissions in your course and institution is essential. This policy can be in the course syllabus, online classroom, and the instructor's policies regarding late submissions. It is practical to clearly state that any late submission or missing deadline can cause instructors to deduct a certain percentage of the grade each day until zero. • Policy execution matters. Instructors must stay calm and assess the situation when late submission or missing deadline occurs. Working with international
acknowledgement, a policy on academic integrity,family education rights and privacy act (FERPA), mental health resources, disability resourcesand services, policies on religious observances, and sexual misconduct reporting obligations.Each institution may have their own recommended syllabus statements and instructors caninquire about recommended or required statements. An example instructor philosophy isincluded below. Your success and development throughout this course is my priority. Below you will find several beliefs that are paramount to achieving this goal: • All students are valuable and important; this course is designed to be accessible and inclusive. • Student-centered active learning is key to mastery and
and lower the barriers to QISTentry? As outlined in the literature [11]–[16], various factors, such as learning environment, design andorganization of the curriculum, assessment, feedback, and learning new tools outside thestudent's comfort zone can impede learning. This research focused explicitly on identifyingfactors that could serve as barriers within the newly designed modules for the Introduction toQuantum Computing course (EEE 4423).Course Structure of Introduction to Quantum Computing (EEE 4423)The course syllabus was designed to cover the 9 key concepts for Quantum Information Science(QIS) learners [17]. This course aims to provide engineering students with an in-depthunderstanding of quantum computing software as well as some
education (based on Fall 2022 enrollment data) were considered ineach state (n=100). The research team recognizes that there are other institutions beyond these100 teaching civil engineering and that using this set of institutions does not encompass allcoursework offered to students in the U.S. However, following this method enables a reasonablescope while still supporting evaluation of a broad cross-section of civil engineering programs.For the educational institutions identified, the online course catalogs were reviewed forundergraduate- and graduate-level engineering courses related to timber or wood. Course titlesand descriptions were screened for keywords, including “wood,” “timber,” “design,” and“engineering.” General civil engineering
– as students were prepared for cross-cultural immersion Tanzania • reflection activities to consider how embodiment of sustainability ideals and actions may differ across cultures and lived experiences Introduction to • formal presentation on EOP Humanitarian • course activity wherein students critically review the syllabus for Engineering alignment with EOP framework (Lecture and Lab • addition of sustainability-centric verbiage in the learning outcomes sections) • reflection activities about sustainability • content about stakeholder dynamics, indigenous ways of knowing; the history of the
assimilate. The course also included an interactive workbook, and fiveweekly group coaching class sessions hosted by course instructors; these coaching sessions weredone synchronously or in-person as allowed by COVID precautions.A new Canvas course site was developed for the five week course. The homepage for the coursewas the course schedule and course syllabus. As an example, the course schedule and syllabuslearning objectives from Winter 2023 is available in the Appendix (Figure A1). The coursecontent was separated into weekly modules that included a weekly page summary for theexpected micro-learning content, in-class activities, and homework assignments. Course goalsand learning objectives as communicated to the students are below: By the
, and efficiency of grading [4].The following discussion will highlight more specific examples of related advantages and someperceived disadvantages.The transition to Canvas for EM411 offered significant advantages to students and faculty.Foremost for students, they would not require disparate LMSs across their diverse curriculum.For example, a student taking a social science course may have been directed to utilize theBlackboard LMS, while a student taking an engineering course may have utilized the MS TeamsLMS. With Canvas, students now have a single integration point for their curriculum acrossevery department at USMA, which neatly displays each of their respective courses via cards inan online dashboard. Second, the ability to create a
-Based Systems Engineering’ Course OverviewThe ‘Model-Based Systems Engineering’ course takes place over 15 weeks and is split into threemodules. There are two classes each week, and each class has a duration of 1h15m. The courselearning outcomes are presented in Table 1 and the course structure is displayed in Table 2. Thecourse is open to senior undergraduate and graduate students. This paper focuses on the deliveryof the course during the spring semester of the 2023 academic year. In 2023, the course wasoffered as a hybrid course - students were able to attend in person (the class was hosted in a smallclassroom setting) or online over Zoom. There were 44 registered students, and attendance wassplit approximately equally between in-person and
/if/I7_Handbook_3.pdf. [Accessed 11 January 2024].[32] "Homestead," Swiss Community Historical Society, [Online]. Available: https://swisshistorical.org/the- homestead/. [Accessed 11 January 2024].[33] T. Buckell, "Tobias S. Buckell Online," [Online]. Available: https://tobiasbuckell.com/. [Accessed 11 January 2024].[34] S. Rennick, M. Clinton, E. Ioannidou, L. Oh, C. Clooney, E. T., E. Healy, and S. G. Roberts, "Gender bias in video game dialogue," Royal Society Open Science, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1-12, May 2023.[35] Ohio History Connection, "Ohio History Journal," [Online]. Available: https://resources.ohiohistory.org/ohj. [Accessed 11 January 2024].[36] Ohio Northern University, "ONU Computer Programming Course that Focuses
. 16 Appendix A: Syllabus for ITDE 710: Research Lifecycle and Publication in Engineering Course Information Course Number: ITDE 710 Course Title: Research Lifecycle and Publication in Engineering Section No: TBD Time: TBD Location: Online - synchronous Credit Hours: 3 (3-0)Course Description Development and trends in publishing and scholarly communication for disciplinary andinterdisciplinary engineering; effective reading and writing of research; research methods such asevidence synthesis in engineering; the research lifecycle, publication trends, conference andjournal impact and selection; protocol for evidence synthesis
topics. For these reasons and at the author’srecommendation, the Wright State University College of Engineering and Computer Science(CECS) Undergraduate Policy and Curriculum Committee selected these two linear systemscourses to include in a year-long, university-wide initiative to improve student success.Although originally designed for online/hybrid implementation, many of the innovativestrategies on creating learning communities reported here port seamlessly to in-person classesand benefit students regardless of content or modality. Such ideas were implemented in theauthor’s Summer 2023 online/hybrid course and Fall 2023 in-person/hybrid offering of DiscreteLinear Systems with promising results.The section following provides additional
practices, and tools of UDL. We included aplethora of links: 20 Accessibility Tips, lecture-related software, UDL Guide from Yale,Interactive Module on UDL from Vanderbilt University, Cornell UDL resources, links to the latestresearch, an encouragement to hear from practitioners and join available UDL communities(CITL, UDL Team, UDL Podcast, Canvas Commons).03/19/2024, “Join Us for Canvas Accessibility Training, Dedicate Time to Learn AboutAccessibility in Canvas”This message contained a welcome back from spring break and an invitation for a co-hostedworkshop on accessibility tools built into Canvas.03/26/2024, #13 “Course Organization - Syllabus/Organize your course with an effectivesyllabus”We covered topics of syllabus formatting, the use of
awarded once an individual completes a set of tasks, and in aneducational setting these tasks demonstrate mastery of a particular topic or skill. The digitalbadge, which is a new term, is a badge that is awarded and stored online as opposed to made,given, and displayed on a uniform. Gibson et. al. article [13] provides a good introduction to theemergence of the badge as a micro-credential.Our course organization and the idea of badge-based learning for an entire course in many ways issimilar to mastery learning [20] and tangentially to specifications grading [21]. We, for the sakeof this paper, will continue to call our approach badge-based learning, but as practitioners asopposed to theorists, we understand that our approach might be categorized
least usedpractices also included classroom techniques that could encourage participation from all studentsmore often, which could also improve the in-classroom experience. Some of the most usedpractices from the menu included not judging student responses which directly contributes to theclassroom climate. However, some of the other highly used strategies focused on elements of thecourse outside of the classroom experience such as creating availability to meet with studentsand having explicit goals in the course syllabus. The open-ended responses from the facultysurvey expressed that faculty were grateful for the experience, but they also wanted moreinclusive teaching resources which could help them employ some of the practices that
instructional models and strategies for capstone designcourses [12, 13] including evaluation of learning outcomes [14, 15, 16]. While this literaturedoes inform practice, literature specific to graduate-level engineering course use of capstones isseverely limited. Therefore, this paper hopes to provide suggestions and recommendations forcapstone project use within graduate level online contexts.Capstone Project OverviewStudents are required to complete an individual capstone project under the guidance of aninstructor and steering committee members from their company or industry in their second year.The project is a 9-month long effort to apply the key learnings from the program and bring valueto the sponsor companies. The project focuses on a narrow
coursework offered out of thedepartment begins in the spring of the first-year with a required introductory course, with eachsubsequent semester having one to three required chemical engineering courses. The coursesconsidered in this paper are three required courses: an introduction to chemical engineering inthe first year, a chemical engineering statistics course in the second year, and a fluid mechanicscourse in the third year. One faculty member was consistently instructor of record for each ofthese courses, though sometimes the course was co-taught with either another faculty member oran advanced graduate student completing a teaching fellowship [1]. Courses in Spring 2021 wereoffered entirely online and synchronously, while all other courses