ASEE National Conference, June 2016. Today’s paperalso addresses how the course has evolved responding to student feedback, changing studentdemographics, and MEM program restructuring.IntroductionDo you have a course that prepares me for senior leadership roles in technical organizations?And how have those leadership roles and your courses evolved to address the challenges andopportunities of educating new generations of engineering leaders for jobs of the future? Thesequestions have been asked by many of our working professional part-time Master of EngineeringManagement students. They are not looking for their first job out of college; they are looking toadvance into leadership roles in their professional career, and maybe even to senior
device prototyping and innovation center that he co-founded in 2013. He has served as a faculty member of general and mechanical engineering for 12 years with the UW-Platteville Engineering Partnership and worked as an industrial consultant and research affiliate through his company Critical Flux LLC. In 2016, Ranen was invited to the Wisconsin State Capitol to give a workshop on Solidarity to the Wisconsin Legislators. Topics from this workshop became his 2019 book, The Science of Solidarity. Over his career, Ranen has earned multiple educational awards and nominations for his teaching, outreach, and innovation.Dr. Stephanie M. Gillespie, University of New Haven Stephanie Gillespie is the Associate Dean at the
Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. She was the first doctoral student to get a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from the University of Cincinnati. She also has a Master’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Cincinnati and a Bachelor’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from SRM University, India. Her research areas of interest are graduate student professional development for a career in academia, preparing future faculty, and using AI tools to solve non-traditional problems in engineering education. She is currently also furthering work on the agency of engineering students through open-ended problems. She has published in several international conferences.Dr. P.K. Imbrie, University of
develop and iterate upon a mixed-methods survey that seeks to understandstudents’ perceptions of ethical issues within the aerospace discipline. In the most recent versionof our survey instrument, thirty-one Likert-scale questions asked about students’ feelingstowards the current state of aerospace engineering and their ideal state of the aerospace field.Within this survey, eight Likert-scale prompts are followed by open-ended questions askingstudents to explain their answers in-depth. For instance, if students agreed or strongly agreedwith the statement ‘It is important to me to use my career as an aerospace engineer to make apositive difference in the world.’, a follow-up item asked students to explain what positivedifferences they would like
for women to choose a CS career. Orthogonally, Wang [43] correlatedfinancial aid with STEM major selection. While our student participants witnessed the impact ofexposure, staff support, and supportive policies, we did not explicitly investigate financial factors.We propose to investigate the influence of financial aid and other SES factors using quantitativeanalysis and to recount the population of varied SES.Gender and Race/Ethnicity: Students from minoritized groups in CS, as defined in [44], areunderrepresented due to both entry and high attrition (switching majors or dropping altogether).For example, women are less represented in the CS field due to pre-entry, institutional, andsocietal factors [45]. Oftentimes, minoritized CS students
, E. J., Harper, S., Cashion, T., Palacios-Abrantes, J., Blythe, J., Daly, J., Eger, S., Hoover, C., Talloni-Alvarez, N., Teh, L., Bennett, N., Epstein, G., Knott, C., Newell, S. L., & Whitney, C. K. (2020). Supporting early career researchers: Insights from interdisciplinary marine scientists. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 77(2), 476–485. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz247Anna (Kia) Nobre. (2017). Neuron, 96(1), 11–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.09.023Announcements11Announcements are published free of charge for members of The American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG). Please e-mail announcements to ajhg@ajhg.net. Submission must be received at least 7 weeks before the month of
Deweyan Pragmatist who focuses on student-centered teaching and reflection. She also is working toward making higher education a more socially just and safe space for all and uses writing, speaking, and research to address each of these important aspects of her academic career. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Research Initiation in Engineering Formation: Literature Review and Research Plan for an Engineering Specific Empathy ScaleAbstract Engineers are societal caregivers, solving problems for the betterment of society.However, both practitioners and students of engineering struggle to make concrete connectionsbetween empathy and their role as engineers. While
and ability to teach course content. Instead, the SPVEL connects students’ 1)appreciation for laboratory discipline content and relevance to their career aspirations, 2)engineering role identity development as a function of participation within the lab, and studentsociocultural identities (race, ethnicity, and gender).Research QuestionSPVEL was used to answer two research questions. How do student’s sociocultural identitycharacteristics relate to their perceptions of value in a virtual engineering lab? How are students’perceptions of virtual lab value related to the sociocultural identities and lab report grades?Research Methodology and EnvironmentThis study was conducted in a capstone senior Mechanical and Aerospace engineering
forthe sake of the institution’s reputation, the desire to protect their most prolific and well-knownscientists, and the fear of being sued by the targets of bullying” 31 . Furthermore, the kind of negativerelationship between PhD student and advisor discussed in Narrative 3 can be a major contributingfactor to a students’ decision to either leave the PhD program or to complete the PhD programbut abandon a faculty career 32 . A 2018 Nature editiorial stated “[we] will never know how manypromising scientific careers around the world have been brought to a premature end because youngresearchers felt they could not continue to work under a bullying senior figure” 33 . Another author of this work had a very similar experience in their previous
advanced coursework of engineering students can be predicted by theiracademic performance in first-year courses [9]. In addition, these courses can help studentsidentify areas of engineering that interest them and guide their career choices [10]. Thus, thesignificance of the first-year engineering courses extends beyond mere academic introduction;they are integral in shaping the future academic journeys of aspiring engineers.Understanding how instructors' pedagogical knowledge affects their classroom practices iscrucial. Pedagogical knowledge includes a wide range of pedagogical strategies to effectivelymanage a classroom and engage students [11]. This includes the use of instructional strategiesthat accommodate diverse student needs, the design
the intersection of multidisciplinary system design optimization and emergent computing approaches including evolutionary computing and machine learning. He has authored over 300 papers and articles and co-authored/edited 4 books on structural and multidisciplinary optimization. A recipient of the AIAA’s Biennial Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Award in 2004, Hajela is a Fellow of AIAA, ASME, and Aeronautical Society of India.Prof. Luca Carlone, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Luca Carlone is the Boeing Career Development Associate Professor in the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and a Principal Investigator in the Laboratory for Information &
because they were more efficient at problem-solving. Additionally, to address bothtechnical and personal disagreements, interviewees said they were comfortable speaking openlyin meetings and after incidents occurred, indicating good psychological safety with teammates.We hope to use the results of this work to develop recommendations and best practices forstudent-organized engineering design project teams to provide a welcoming and effective learningenvironment for all students involved.IntroductionEngineering design teams are common in the industry, so students need to have experientialdesign team experiences to learn and develop critical skills needed for their careers. These skillsgo beyond the technical content in core engineering courses and
and clear referencing of each study participant.Regarding gender, the table shows 14% women (P1 and P12) and twelve men (86%). As foryears of experience, these range from 6 to 24 years, with an average of 13.6 years. Thisdiversity in experience provides a rich analysis perspective, including seasoned professionalsand those in the earlier stages of their careers. Finally, the current position of eachinterviewee reveals an interesting mix of roles within the construction sector. Thedesignations of each participant can also be seen in Table 1, ranging from "Technical OfficeManager" to "Project Manager," including "Construction Manager" and "TechnicalInspection Project Lead." Additionally, one interviewee (P14) representing a
potential for improving learningoutcomes for diverse students by helping them connect theoretical concepts with practicalengineering applications [28]. When utilized in introductory level engineering courses, project-based learning has been shown to be beneficial for student performance in subsequentengineering courses [28]. The social component of project-based learning has also beenobserved to be an effective tool in helping students develop and refine soft skills such ascommunication, collaboration, creativity, and critical thinking that will be very important to theirfuture success in a career [3].Assessment MethodsPre- and Post-Participation SurveysPre- and post-participation surveys were developed by the project’s evaluator based
finding himself, coming to terms with his engineering identity. So, I like to tell people that when I went to Germany, I had no idea what I wanted to do as an engineer. Going through my one year in Germany I walked out of there knowing exactly what I want to do. […] the biggest positive I got of going abroad was figuring out what I want to do as a career in my engineering field […]. It was the research what, like, sparked it. JD, originally reserved and not used to advocating for himself, then developed theconfidence to ask his internship supervisor whether he could work on a project related to hisnewly found area of interest: “At Siemens, I asked my boss, if it was possible for me to do somehardware tests
, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including tDr. Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University Angela (Angie) Minichiello is a military veteran, licensed mechanical engineer, and associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. Her research examines issues of access, equity, and identity in the formation of engineers and a diverse, transdisciplinary 21st century engineering workforce. Angie received an NSF CAREER award in 2021 for her work with student veterans and service members in engineering.Dr. Ronald W. Welch P.E., The Citadel Ron Welch (P.E.) received his B.S. degree in Engineering Mechanics from the United States Military Academy in 1982. He
. He earned his PhD in Educational Psychology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with a focus in Engineering Education. His interests are centered around mentorship, mental health, and retention in STEM students and faculty. Additionally, he helps support the development of new engineering education scholars and researches quality in mixed methods research methodologies.Dr. Karin Jensen, University of Michigan Karin Jensen, Ph.D. (she/her) is an assistant professor in biomedical engineering and engineering education research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering
technologies and environmental changes.Step 4: By having categories, considering the number of respondents per category was beimportant. For instance, all the respondents should not only be from industry – there should bea balance between industry, government, and academia. Based on these numbers, theconsensus building function is equipped to attach confidence levels to the categorymodifications. For example, if the curriculum is for undergraduates with the goal of makingthem prepared for industry and government careers, then perhaps a larger number of industryand government respondents should be emphasized / weighed / required (requested for input).However, if the curriculum is geared towards PhD students, then a larger respondent pool ofacademics
on the development, implementation, and assessment of modeling and design activities with authentic engineering contexts; the design and implementation of learning objective-based grading for transparent and fair assessment; and the integration of reflection to develop self-directed learners.Grace Panther, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Dr. Grace Panther is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Nebraska – Lincoln where she conducts discipline-based education research. Her research interests include faculty change, 3D spatial visualization, gender inclusive teamwork, and studying authentic engineering practice. Dr. Panther was awarded an NSF CAREER
, no. 3, pp. 362– 383, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20324.[2] H. M. Matusovich, R. A. Streveler, and R. L. Miller, “Why Do Students Choose Engineering? A Qualitative, Longitudinal Investigation of Students’ Motivational Values,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 289–303, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01064.x.[3] M. Paretti and L. McNair, “Analyzing the intersections of institutional and discourse identities in engineering work at the local level,” Eng. Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 55–78, 2012.[4] A. Godwin, G. Potvin, and Z. Hazari, “The development of critical engineering agency, identity, and the impact on engineering career choices,” in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
introduces globalization and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [14]. Thegoal of this module is to help students recognize the implications their design decisions mayhave outside of their immediate community and identify ways their careers as designers couldinclude work toward addressing some of the SDGs.The lesson plan for this module first introduces the concept of globalization, including bothpositive aspects like economic growth and cultural exchange and negative aspects likeoverconsumption and exploitation. The UN SDGs are then presented as an international effort toalign countries and major organizations toward positive globalization outcomes. After a briefhistory of the development of the SDGs, students are encouraged to evaluate the
comprehensionand problem-solving abilities. As STEM research focuses more on workforce developmentand students’ career visions rather than content learning, Takeuchi et al. [1] emphasize theneed to examine current learners, target learners, and their positions with respect to STEM.They argue that improving the rate of learning transfer across STEM education requiresgreater focus on spatial skills as a part of STEM integration applicable and relevant toindustry context. Literature suggests that visuospatial skills contribute to success in STEMdisciplines [2]–[4]. Children with good visuospatial skills performed better on numeric tasks,such as estimating the values on a number line, while children with poor visuospatial skillswere less accurate in their
energy and conversion to electricity in high school students in a rural community, remotely implementing the teaching-learning process through STEM-oriented project-based Learning (PBL)? 2) What is the change in attitudes towards STEM careers of high school students in a rural community who remotely implement the teaching-learning process through STEM-oriented Project-Based Learning (PBL)?4.1 Design of the Content ExamTo answer the first question, the project designed an exam of 20 multiple-choice questions following thetopics covered in the Didactic Sequence. To validate the exam, the project followed the ValidationProcess (Coral, 2009) [16]. After developing the first draft, the exam was presented to two
usingtrial and error to fine tune their IM selections over time (Go It Alone). We also found complexPower dynamics were involved. Instructors often teach more than one course over an academicyear or a career, and thus we expected to see multiple strategies mentioned. As noted earlier,there is expected overlap between responses and instructors in the Power and the Peers andColleagues themes. However, we did not see overlap between instructors with responses in thePower or the Go It Alone themes. Perhaps those who employ a Go It Alone strategy for their IMselection also opt to teach courses without a strong Power dynamic at play. Also, one instructor'sresponses are in both the Go It Alone and the Peers and Colleagues themes, as they use a mix ofself
practices by recognizing the richness of students' emphasizes storytelling, reflection, and stories and experiences and how it contributes to the creation of a shared vision. student outcomes. The anticipatory principle aligns with asset-based practices by focusing on the potential formation The anticipatory principle involves of professional identities among students. For envisioning and actively anticipating a instance, students' visions of their future careers positive future. or contributions
Socially Engaged Design.Vibhavari Vempala, University of Michigan Vibhavari (Vibha) Vempala is a PhD student in Engineering Education Research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include access to opportunities, social networks, and career management of engineering students. Vibha received her B.S. in Engineering from the joint department of Biomedical Engineering at The North Carolina State University and The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a M.S. in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Michigan.Dr. Jingfeng Wu, University of Michigan Jingfeng Wu is currently a PhD student at the University of Michigan majoring in Engineering Education Research. She holds a PhD in Chemical
, and to take students to women in computing events. Dr. Villani has been active publishing and presenting these experiences in an effort to share within the research community and to ultimately broaden participation. Dr. Villani is the co-advisor of the Supporting Women in Computing Club where she has mentored many women students in the program. Dr. Villani is the recipient of the Chancellor’s Award for Teaching Excellence, 2012. Prior to joining FSC, Dr. Villani had a 15 year computer consulting career in the Risk Management and Insurance Industry.Dr. Lisa Cullington, Sacred Heart University Lisa Cullington, Ph.D. is an educational researcher with expertise in academic program development, learning outcomes and
with a deep knowledge of this borderland area as a localinhabitant, a first-generation student, and a Mexican American mixed-race person. My educationin history, anthropology, and technology education along with my professional experiences inSTEM focused on K-12 and higher education informs my approach to supporting undergraduatestudents in STEM. I know how to connect with students and enjoy interacting with them in myrole as a graduate research assistant.Author3. I am a Hispanic engineer eager to provide mentoring and guidance to minorityundergraduate students, interest them in scientific careers, and encourage them to pursuegraduate studies. I have experience in advising student organizations, such as the Society ofHispanic Professional
physical and sensorydisabilities may feel hesitant to request accommodations, or how there are still gaps present inthe design and provision of these accommodations.Challenges in the Engineering Field. Certain students with disabilities in engineering programsthink about leaving their careers or they do not see themselves working as engineers in the nearfuture [4] [9] [11]. Some of these students find engineering education “as individualistic andcompetitive” and encounter barriers in the engineering curricula, such as struggling to passmandatory courses or experiencing a waning interest in the curriculum's content [11]. Additionalhurdles in engineering include students with disabilities facing a lack of readiness for college-level coursework after