. She explores how the integration of school safety strategies with disciplinary practices, often under zero-tolerance policies, blurs the lines between them, suggesting that both are byproducts of the school-to-prison pipeline.Dr. Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers Roberta Rincon, Ph.D., is the Director of Research and Impact for the Society of Women Engineers. She is responsible for overseeing the research activities for the organization, including collaborative research projects with external researchers and dissemination of SWE research through academic conferences, the SWE Research website, and the annual SWE State of Women in Engineering magazine issue. She is the Principal Investigator for the NSF
in addition to the financial assistance totruly support students during their transitions. The high-impact practices designed forEMPOWER to influence each of Schlossberg’s transition factors include: ● A month-long summer preparatory program to prepare students in both technical and professional skills for internship applications. EMPOWER Scholars at the two community college partners are encouraged to enroll. The summer program implemented was highlighted by Truong et al. in [20]. ● A multi-year research and mentoring program that introduces students to research experience with faculty in Engineering departments at UCSD. The students are encouraged to explore graduate studies in the BS/MS, MS, or PhD program
identitiesshould be explored, as giving students a safe space to exist in a classroom may allow them astronger connection to the major. It is easier on Zoom, as was discussed, but methods that allowstudents to engage with the classroom content anonymously in person and online should be studiedin relation to creating a stronger engineering identity, as there may be a stronger benefit and astandard to ensure students feel safe being connected.Additional research should be done on finding a standard for making an accessible human-centeredengineering education approach. Underrepresented students take well to that teaching approachbut standardizing it for all forms of underrepresented students will be helpful for the generalinclusive classroom. Additionally
improve their competitiveness in the market[3,4,5,6,7]. Whereas, the higher education institution may see the value-added source of grantto conduct their research. However, for a typical non-research U.S. senior design capstoneproject, the industry funding amount is usually low [20,22], like $5,000.00 or less per semesterproject. This may be one of the reasons why faculty is not too motivated to coach undergraduatesenior design project.For industry, it is common to charge client with $20,000 per single management consultant for aweek (not included airline ticket, rental car, hotel, and food) a decade ago. Obviously, anycapstone project student would not be eligible to work 50 hours a week, nevertheless, it dependson what value that one could
reliability, risk assessment, systems modeling, and probabilistic methods with social science approaches. She is a recipient of the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship and a 2023-2024 Mavis Future Faculty Fellow. She is a member of the NIST Center of Excellence for Community Resilience and collaborates with engineers, economists, social scientists, and planners on the development of tools to support community resilience decision-making. She has been recognized for her research at multiple international conferences with a Student Best Paper Award at ICOSSAR 2021/2022 and CERRA Student Recognition Award at ICASP 2023.Prof. Eun Jeong Cha, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Eun Jeong Cha is an associate professor in the
Paper ID #42551An Ecosystem Analysis of Engineering Thriving with Emergent Properties atthe Micro, Meso, and Macro LevelsDr. Julianna Gesun, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Julianna Gesun, Ph.D., is currently a postdoctoral research scholar at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Her research broadly focuses on understanding and supporting the process by which engineering programs facilitate the environments for students to develop optimal functioning in undergraduate engineering programs. Her research interests intersect the fields of positive psychology, engineering education, and human development to understand
overcome any obstacles that they might havefaced. This is evident when looking for reasons why engineering students drop out. To nosurprise, there are a plethora of pitfalls an individual can make, with no recognition of theinstitutional hurdles that act as gatekeepers in perpetuating the current makeup of engineering as“pale and male” [62, p. 9]. As listed by industry and blogger articles, reasons that students dropout of engineering programs include: poor work ethic, inability to deal with failure, and lackingthe engineering mindset [63]. It is common talk among engineers that when trying to explain the dearth of women andPOC in engineering, meritocracy is used to justify by stating things such as “they aren’t cut outto be an engineer” or
.” Review of Educational Research, 76, 413-448.[49] Zimmerman, W., Kang, H. B., Kim. K., Gao, M., Johnson, G., Clariana, R. B., & Zhang, F. (2017). “Computer-automated approach for scoring short essays in an introductory statistics course.” Journal of Statistics Education, 25, 40-47.[50] Tawfik, A. A., Law, V., Ge, X., Xing, W., & Kim, K. (2018). “The effect of sustained vs. faded scaffolding on students’ argumentation in ill-structured problem solving.” Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 436-449.[51] Kim, K., & Tawfik, A. A. (2021). “Different approaches to collaborative problem solving between successful versus less successful problem solvers: Tracking changes of knowledge structure.” Journal of
students grow. He has a masters in Civil Engineering. Before Purdue, he received an Erasmus scholarship for an exchange program at the University of Jaen, Spain. He had his undergraduate degree in Civil Engineering at the University of Ibadan, Nigeria.Siddhant Sanjay Joshi, Purdue University, West Lafayette Siddhant is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University, West Lafayette. His research interests include understanding how GenAI can facilitate better student learning in computing and engineering education.Dr. Kirsten A. Davis, Purdue University, West Lafayette Kirsten Davis is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research explores
and qualitative methods were utilized in this study. Factor Analysis (FA) was used to assess the validity of using CT scales in an HBCU environment, and to help investigate the impact of immersive technology on participants CT skill levels. The results of the FA aligned with previous research findings and provided the research team with a more refined set of CT scales for use in an HBCU environment. Semi-structured student interviews were used to gain insight into students’ perceptions and attitudes toward the incorporation of VR into an engineering curriculum, and to further explore the relationship between VR fidelity and scalability of a
Study Focus – ME310Stanford University’s ME310: Project-Based Engineering Design Innovation & Developmentcourse challenges students to work in teams to explore design innovation opportunities inareas of interest to partner companies from diverse industries. This year-long course sequencehas engaged graduate engineering students in industry-sponsored projects where they learn tonavigate various phases of integrated design since 1967. More on the evolution of the coursecan be found in [31]–[36].The contexts, needs and requirements of each project are open for student teams to discoverand specify for themselves. The learning journey includes iterating the processes of studyingpotential contexts, need finding, benchmarking, ideation
, and ethnic diversity. Among its 3100 undergraduate students,around 39% are recipients of Pell grants, and 29% are pursuing majors in STEM fields. Thecampus faces challenges as a significant number of students come from K-12 systems thathaven't adequately prepared them for college-level math and science. Additionally, manystudents work over 20 hours per week, often off-campus, and spend an average of 2 hours dailycommuting on public transportation.These circumstances contribute to lower retention and graduation rates, particularly affectingstudents from racial and ethnic minorities who are already underrepresented in the STEMworkforce. Notably, recent data shows that only about 45% of all majors manage to graduatewith a bachelor's degree
Table 5: Stakeholder Requirementsstrategies, the MRC lab will cultivate an educational setting that prepares graduates to makemeaningful contributions as soon as they enter the workforce.This approach to the design, of the MRC Lab reflects a multidisciplinary perspective, integrat-ing aspects of mechatronics, robotics, and control to create a dynamic environment for learningand innovation. Here, students, researchers, and practitioners can engage in practical problem-solving, collaborate across disciplines, and develop new technologies and solutions focused onrobotic dexterity and precision.Furthermore, the Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs) for the MRC Lab, as detailed in Table6, are defined and related to the stakeholder requirements. They are
earned a Doctor of Philosophy in Policy and Governance at the Australian National University in Canberra, a Bachelor of Engineering (Mechanical) from Carleton University in Ottawa; a Certificate of Graduate Studies in Natural Resources Organization Management from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor; and Master of Arts in Environmental Security and Peace from the University for Peace in Costa Rica. For approximately a decade, Sergio worked on sustainable energy policy and finance throughout Latin America and collaborated with leading U.S. government agencies, multilateral banks, and public interest organizations involved in international clean energy policy and rural electrification, including the
directconnection to chemical engineering topics, where the majority of participants (graduate students,post-docs, and faculty) are conducting research in related areas. These case studies providedconcrete examples of analyses of research topics with social justice in mind, ideally givingparticipants a framework for similarly analyzing their own research. Additionally, by placingparticipants in case studies with topic areas distinct from that of their research, we aimed toeliminate any preconceived notions about the topic, minimize thoughts of personal relationshipor guilt during the workshop, and maximize the value to participants. We note that a fewparticipants (6/102, 6%) indicated that they would have preferred to be in case studies related totheir own
Engineering Technologycurricula specifically needs further attention. This gap highlights the need for enhancingentrepreneurship education in this field, considering the industry's demand for graduates whoare both technically skilled and entrepreneurially minded. This research explores theintegration of entrepreneurship into an Engineering Technology (ET) program, with a focus ona sustainable building course. It employs innovative educational strategies such as micro-moments, bisociation, virtual reality, entrepreneurial tasks, and a project-based approach todevelop real-world problem-solving skills. The effectiveness of this approach was assessedthrough a quantitative and qualitative survey to understand student perceptions. Findings revealstudents
equitable development within a particular community. Theredesigned curriculum provides broader educational training to address environmentalengineering challenges, meets community identified needs, and considers the impacts of structuralracism. Collaborations between university researchers and community leaders and members ledto an expansion of community-based research in civil and environmental engineering. This projectstudies the impacts of the new curriculum on student perceptions of racism and justice and onfaculty interest and capacity for catalyzing additional curricular and co-curricular change. Initialcollaborations from the community-based research have included diverse communication tools toshare information with and about the community
shouldalso explore the program's weaknesses from the students' perspective and utilize prompts to identifyopportunities for continuous improvement.AcknowledgmentsThe authors acknowledge support from NASA Cooperative agreement 80NSSC19M0227 (NAMER),NSF Awards -2122195 (VENTURES) and -2126060 (IMMERSE), and NNSA DE-NA0004018(PAMER).References[1] Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, "Doctor's Degrees Conferred by Postsecondary institutions, By Race/Ethnicity and Field of Study: 2017-18 and 2018- 19," 2021. [Online]. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/2020menu_tables.asp. [Accessed 28 03 2023].[2] National Action Council For Minority in Engineering, Research & Policy, "Trends in the U.S
curiosity for exploration via scientific trials.Peer Learning and CollaborationThe longitudinal result (Table 2 and Figure 1) shows decreased collaborative learning behaviorsamong students after introducing an experiment-focused teaching method. The mean collaborationscores of the last two items in Table 2 showed a slight increase from Spring 2022 to Fall 2022,followed by a decrease over the next two semesters, reaching the lowest score in Fall 2023. Clearly,using personalized instruments does not strengthen the development of peer learning andcollaboration among the learners.Decreasing trends were observed in all three survey items related to peer explanation, group work,and discussion of course content. This suggests that the initial increase in
practical ideas and classroom units for the upcoming school year. 2. Conducting research and expanding knowledge in robotics courses. 3. Spending significant time in a lab environment to solve problems and inform curriculum development. 4. Creating engaging content for students. 5. Learning from experts on specific topics and collaboratively creating materials for their classes. 6. To experience 3-D design and delving deeper into the process and implementation. 7. Exploring logistics and supply chain automation.Among the potential avenues to improve classroom instruction, educators included the following: 1. Identifying learning objectives, planning specific learning activities, and starting with a broader perspective
employability in a dynamic and evolving job market.Moreover, CPS education fosters critical thinking, creativity, and collaborative skills, which areessential in addressing the interdisciplinary and complex problems of the 21st century [19].Thus, the addition of CPS modules in electrical engineering education is not only beneficial butimperative for preparing students to meet the demands and challenges of their future professionalcareers.ConclusionsThis research emphasizes the importance of understanding student perspectives through surveysto effectively integrate CPS modules into electrical engineering education. The findings reveal aclear demand for CPS knowledge among students, highlighting its relevance to their futurecareers and the engineering
. in Electrical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.Dr. Jessica R TerBush, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Jessica received her B.S.E, M.S.E., and PhD in Materials Science and Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. After graduation, she worked as a post-doc for approximately three years at Monash University in Clayton, Victoria, Australia. She then spent three years working as a Senior Research Specialist at the Missouri University of Science and Technology in Rolla, Missouri, where she trained users on the focused ion beam (FIB), scanning electron microscope (SEM), and transmission electron microscope (TEM). In 2016, she moved to the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
continued at Franciscan University.Ms. Megan Elizabeth Mericle Megan Mericle is a PhD student in Writing Studies. She is a member of a research team focused on writing in STEM, where she works with faculty to develop and implement learning objectives for writing in undergraduate science and engineering courses. In heJessica Raley, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Jessica Raley is the outreach coordinator for the Illinois Center for Advanced Studies of the Universe (ICASU) at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. She is also the adviser for the P.O.I.N.T. VR program.Julie L Zilles, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Dr. Zilles is a Research Associate Professor in the Department of Crop Sciences at
Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. She was the first doctoral student to get a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from the University of Cincinnati. She also has a Master’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Cincinnati and a Bachelor’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from SRM University, India. Her research areas of interest are graduate student professional development for a career in academia, preparing future faculty, and using AI tools to solve non-traditional problems in engineering education. She is currently also furthering work on the agency of engineering students through open-ended problems. She has published in several international conferences.Dr. P.K. Imbrie, University of
improvestudent achievement, engagement, and have helped students develop conceptual understandingand problem-solving skills [4] - [14]. Additionally, when students are asked to write short-answer responses to explain their reasoning to concept questions, it has been observed toimprove student performance, engagement, and prepare students for group discussion [15], [16].These responses provide instructors and researchers with a wealth of information regardingstudent thinking [17]. Still, often, it is difficult for instructors and researchers to process all ofthis written information. Machine learning researchers have applied natural language processing(NLP) and large language models (LLMs) to automate the grading and scoring of textualresponses from
the Duration of InterventionV. DiscussionWe identified and reviewed 32 ASEE conference papers comprising of 44 studies oninterventions in teaching circuits published over the last 10 years. Through this work, weaddressed the following research questions, What kind of interventions were conducted incircuits education and what impact did these interventions have on student performance? anddiscussed findings based on the coding schemes.Class Modes and COVID-19We expect that the main reason for 69% of the interventions identified to be conducted for in-person classrooms compared to online and hybrid classrooms is the dates of the articles electedto study: 2014 to 2023. Since COVID-19 happened at the end of this period, most of theinterventions
Paper ID #41306Syllabi Indicators of Learning Community Supports in Civil EngineeringClassroomsJessica Momanyi, William Paterson University Jessica Momanyi is a recent graduate of William Paterson University, where she was a Psychology major with a minor in Music - Classical Voice. She was involved in Engineering Education Research during the summer of 2023 as a scholar through an NSF-funded Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln, in the Engineering Education lab under the supervision of Dr. Grace Panther and Dr. Heidi Diefes-Dux. As an Honors College student at William
) [33], and ATLAS.tiAI Coding [34].In our overall project, we aim to answer the following research questions: 1. What ideas do students use to explain their reasoning when writing short answer responses to conceptually challenging questions? 2. How well do transformer-based machine learning models replicate the human-coded data? 3. For two isomorphic question pairs, how similar is the human coding of one question relative to the other? How well do the machine learning models trained on the first question’s explanations perform on the second question?Our end goal is to create a generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tool that can supplement theCW and give instructors and researchers a way to understand
that are embedded in how students train in the field and practice of nuclear engineering.We present here an analysis of embedded value systems in core textbooks typically used inundergraduate and graduate nuclear engineering studies in the US, specifically looking at what isconsidered essential to being a nuclear engineer. Key themes discussed are engineering asproblem solving, the relevance of multidisciplinarity, and the authoritative nature of knowledge.The analysis considers the context in which the textbooks were written and how the embeddedworldview found in the textbook shapes the current landscape of nuclear engineering education,research, and practice. We analyze what nuclear engineering students are implicitly taught abouttheir roles