]. UREs come in many modalities, such as traditional faculty-student collaborations, project-basedinitiatives, community-based projects, capstone projects, internships, co-ops, course-based undergraduateresearch experiences, international research opportunities, and programs like Vertically IntegratedProjects (VIP). These initiatives provide students with versatile chances to participate in hands-onexperiences, acquire methodological expertise, and make meaningful contributions to advancingknowledge in their respective disciplines. [1], [4], [5]. Moreover, the scholarly literature reveals thatparticipation in UREs yields substantial benefits for students pursuing STEM careers. Research findingsshow that UREs can lead to a better understanding of
literature on conflict in engineering student project teams which found conflictin capstone design teams around design decisions, workload imbalances, and personalityconflicts [14]. The students described both process and relationship conflicts within their projectteam. From our limited research, it does not appear that there is a clear relationship betweenconflict (a)symmetry and conflict type. Future research should be conducted to explore thisfurther. It should be noted that all of these conflicts were generally low intensity and no majorissues (such as a complete lack of participation from one or more team members) were present.The students felt that they were able to manage these conflicts within the team and did notattempt to utilize the
Translational Science, 6(6), 490-492.MacGregor, J., & Smith, B. L. (2005). Where are learning communities? Now: National leaders take stock. About Campus, 10(2), 2-8.Magnanti, T. L., & Natarajan, K. (2018). Allocating students to multidisciplinary capstone projects using discrete optimization. Interfaces, 48(3), 204-216.Manlove, D., Milne, D., & Olaosebikan, S. (2018). An integer programming approach to the student-project allocation problem with preferences over projects. International Symposium on Combinatorial Optimization,Minkler, M. (2005). Community-based research partnerships: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of urban health, 82, ii3-ii12.Modi, S., M Shagari, N., & Wadata, B. (2018
peer feedback comments? 2. What are the components of quality peer feedback, and how effective are existing rubrics in measuring the quality of peer feedback comments?II. Background A. Role of Feedback in PBL Courses Project-based learning (PBL) courses are a common pedagogical approach used to teach engineering design [13], especially in senior capstone and first-year cornerstones. The team- and project-focused nature of PBL courses helps students develop essential professional skills such as communication [14], conflict management [15], and collaboration with diverse team members [16]. Another unique aspect of the PBL format is the team dynamics in every project group. Each team forms a culture and workflow unique
Paper ID #42934Integrating a Design Project to Bridge Experiment for Statics learning inGeneral Engineering EducationDr. Yingxiao Song, Muskingum University Assistant Professor in Physics and Engineering Department of Muskingum University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Integrating a Design Project to Bridge Experiment for Statics learning inGeneral Engineering EducationAbstractEngineering Statics, a foundational course for most engineering students, is typically undertakenearly in their academic careers. Integrating hands-on experiments, such as the classic bridgeexperiment, is essential not only for a
participated in our neighborhood revitalization program. Students can beinvolved through various avenues, including internships, capstone projects, thesis projects, andby registering in a civil engineering elective course titled “Principles of SustainableDevelopment”. Regardless of the pathway chosen, it's essential to provide students withmentorship, guidance, and support throughout their involvement in the program. Faculty mentorsoffer supervision, feedback, and resources to help students navigate their roles and maximizetheir impact on community projects.To successfully engage students in this initiative, we established a program with the followingsteps: 1. Develop Student Projects: Identify specific tasks for each project where students can
Paper ID #43938An Investigation of Psychological Safety in Student-Led Undergraduate EngineeringDesign Projects through Student InterviewsTara Esfahani, University of California, IrvineIsra Malabeh, University of California, IrvineDr. Mark E. Walter, University of California, Irvine Dr. Walter received his PhD in Applied Mechanics from Caltech. He spent a year as a Fulbright Postdoctoral Fellow doing materials science research at the Universitaet Karlsruhe. He joined the Ohio State University in January of 1997 and spent 17 years theDr. David A. Copp, University of California, Irvine David A. Copp received the B.S. degree in
expose the students to the tech-nical topics in AI. We teach technical topics in deep learning using applied research projects toreal-world healthcare datasets (such as tumor growth, cancer, and more). Other than teachingtechnical skills, the program was also aimed to enable students to produce novel contributions tothe domain of diagnostic artificial intelligence. The program required students to present their re-search projects in a capstone seminar and submit a research report similar to a conference paper.To accomplish these goals, discussions on research practices and academic communication wereincluded in the course design, facilitated by a dedicated communication TA for these aspects.The 5E approach used in course: The 5Es approach [24
effective way to assess learning of the coursematerial as a whole. It also provided no mechanism for assessing individual learning orleadership development.In 2017, the original midterm and final projects were replaced with the Leadership PracticeProject (LPP). This new project was designed to help students apply their learning in real time.Each student identifies a team-based project on which they are already participating and thatrequires application of leadership concepts and skills learned in the course. Typical examplesinclude design competitions, capstone projects, and service activities through campusorganizations. In an effort to accommodate students with family and professional demands, wealso accept other types of projects, such as
Paper ID #42243Exploring Equity and Resilience Perceptions of Marginalized Architecture,Engineering, and Construction (AEC) Students in Infrastructure ProjectsMiss Rubaya Rahat, Florida International University Rubaya Rahat grew up in Bangladesh, where she pursued her Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering at the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). After graduating she worked for two years in a construction management company in Dhaka, Bangladesh. She was involved in various residential and infrastructure projects. Rubaya now is a Ph.D. student at Department of Civil and Environmental
-social-justice [2] Mingqian Zhang, Cheryl Newton, Jason Grove, Mark Pritzker, Marios Ioannidis, Design and assessment of a hybrid chemical engineering laboratory course with theincorporation of student-centred experiential learning, Education for Chemical Engineers, 2020, 30, 1-8, [3] Alvaro Orjuela, Paulo César Narváez-Rincón, Gabriel E. Rocha, A capstone laboratorycourse on separations, reactions and control operations, Education for Chemical Engineers 2023 44, 1-13 [4] A. M. R. P. Bopegedera and Christopher L. Coughenour, An Interdisciplinary, Project-BasedInquiry into the Chemistry and Geology of Alkaline Surface Lake Waters in the General ChemistryLaboratory, Journal of Chemical Education 2021 98 (4), 1352
teachingsocial scientists to think like engineers, which will better prepare all of them to develop solutionsfor major societal problems.Community-engaged design projectsThe integrative capstone experience is the yearlong design project, where multidisciplinaryteams work together with community partners on problems at the intersection of health, society,and technology (Fig. 2). Teams are composed of 4-5 graduate students from different disciplinesand local community partners invested in solving big societal challenges. Graduate students areimmersed within community settings, challenging the traditional hierarchies between researchersand participants by engaging community stakeholders as full participants in the research process[10]. Over the year, these
, "Sustainability Funding in Higher Education: A Literature-Based Review," International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 441-464, 2020. [9] L. L. Peterson, J. C. Tiernan, J. A. M. Álvarez, R. E. Lopez, and K. A. Schug, "Focus on Sustainability in STEP Grant– Funded Initiatives," in Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[10] J. Su, Z. Nie, J. Wang, and Y. Lin, "Lessons Learned from Multidisciplinary Senior Capstone Design Projects," in Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016.[11] B. Meerbeek, T. van Druenen, M. Aarts, E. van Loenen, and E. Aarts, "Impact of blinds usage on energy consumption: automatic versus
participants to recall events in different sequences, can unearth moreaccurate and detailed information.Now that the core details of the project have been developed, the instructors plan to gatherfeedback from future project groups to bolster the preliminary data presented here. Refinementof the survey and additional surveys will be needed to document how well the educationalobjectives are being met. Additionally, the instructors will study how the perception of thedesign process changes over the course of the project and how students perceive the newtechnology.List of References[1] J. Retherford, B. L. Hartmann, R. Al-Hammoud, and G. A. Hunt, “Civil engineering capstone inventory: Standards of practice & the ASCE body of knowledge,” ASEE
experiences with the Earned Value Management(EVM) simulator, understanding the team members' roles and agile development process to gainthe PM experiences. Gilbuena et al. [10] adopt the ethnographic approach to assess how final-year undergraduate students in chemical, biological, or environmental engineering gainprofessional skills through capstone projects, and they [10] found frequent faculty feedback isessential in enhancing their activities in technical training.The majority of research on PM skills has been focused at the undergraduate level [9], [10], [11],[12]. Research on PM training at the graduate level has been limited to Master’s level education[13], [14]. For example, Do Amaral et al. [13] highlighted Project Management (PM
integration of an entrepreneurial mindset (EM) into engineering education has become18 increasingly prevalent, reflecting a paradigm shift in how engineering problems are approached19 and solved. This project, serving as the capstone of an Introduction to Engineering course, was20 designed to instill EM in a diverse group of engineering students, equipping them to tackle21 multidisciplinary challenges innovatively. Historically, EM has been a staple in business education22 but has only recently begun to permeate engineering curricula globally over the past few decades23 (3). The Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), established in 2005, has been pivotal24 in promoting EM within undergraduate engineering programs across the
University of Nigeria, Nigeria and the University of Cape Town, South Africa. Currently, His research focus is in the field of Computing and Engineering Education where he is involved with investigating team-based computational projects using qualitative, quantitative, and artificial intelligence-based tools. He is also involved with developing and redesigning a Team-Based transdisciplinary graduate course under the Purdue University EMBRIO Innovation Hub Grant project, where He has contributed by applying computational fluid dynamics methods in the development of partial differential equation (PDE) models to implement cell cytokinesis. His ongoing Ph.D. research broadly investigates teamwork interactions and
engineering students are required to complete a one- or two-semesterlong capstone course sequence that emphasizes integration of concepts and material fromprevious classes in the completion of a substantial design project. Education researchers havealso recognized the potential benefits design experiences can offer at earlier stages of anengineering curriculum, including introductory level courses [24, 35]. An important benefit ishelping to make clear to students at an early stage the importance of and linkage between thesupporting math and science courses they are required to take and the engineering field whichthey have chosen to study [10, 25, 32]. Design experiences completed early in the engineeringcurriculum can also make technical course
Paper ID #41521A Multi-institution Design Project on Sustainable Cities: The Sustainabilityand Social Entrepreneurship FellowshipMr. Christopher Rennick, University of Waterloo Mr. Christopher Rennick received his B.A.Sc., Honours Electrical Engineering in 2007 and his M.A.Sc. in Electrical Engineering in 2009, both from the University of Windsor, in Windsor, Ontario, Canada. Chris is the Engineering Educational Developer in the Pearl Sullivan Engineering Ideas Clinic at the University of Waterloo, where he focuses on implementing hands-on, real-world design experiences across Waterloo’s engineering programs. Chris is
Paper ID #41083Generative-AI Assisted Feedback Provisioning for Project-Based Learning inCS CoursesVenkata Alekhya Kusam, University of Michigan, Dearborn Venkata Alekhya Kusam is currently pursuing a Master’s degree in Computer and Information Science at the University of Michigan-Dearborn. She has always been fascinated by the transformative power of technology. Her research interests lie in generative AI, large language models, and natural language processing (NLP).Larnell Moore, University of Michigan, Dearborn Larnell Moore is an undergraduate student in his final year pursuing a Bachelor’s degree in Computer and
in person, including people who hadpreviously worked on the project and people who will work on it in the future, through effectivedocumentation.”Through the project, students learned and refined a variety of skills, such as computer aideddesign, 3-D printing, silicone molding, manufacturing processes, computer programming, datacollection and analysis, attention to detail, and many others. Of special note is 3-D printing.Entering the project, very few of the students had any experience with 3-D printing. However,they left the project with significant 3-D printing expertise and many went on to use those skillsin course and Capstone projects, personal projects, entrepreneurial endeavors and in futureemployment. This is a skill that our
undertaken via observations by the researchers. Essentialexperiential elements of each course were observed, with the researchers observing small groupsof students in the context of their projects (e.g., capstone for EDII, school outreach for SL).These observations triangulate the analysis of innovative teaching practices through studentlearning outcomes.Findings Six generative processing strategies were present in the experiential learning courses (seeTable 1) particularly through the course design in both EDII and SL. Both courses were found tobe rooted in contextual generative learning, particularly learning by teaching and enacting,considered the most high-leverage generative processes [3]. To further examine the context inwhich these
solve real-world engineering problems. These courses often involve complex 2projects requiring teamwork, communication, problem-solving, critical thinking, and timemanagement. Students also learn to present their work effectively and defend their solutions in aprofessional setting. Capstone courses are project-based and faculty guided and will often requirea multidisciplinary approach to problem-solving and team collaboration to leverage each other'sstrengths. Project management skills, critical thinking and team collaboration are keycharacteristics of the capstone.A large volume of literature exists that describes lab and project activities in engineering andscience courses and how it helped in
dedication from these students, along with their rigorousresearch endeavors, equates to the workload typically associated with two high school coursesper year. This level of commitment could readily qualify as capstone projects or independentstudy credits. Regrettably, very few school districts presently accommodate such research creditswithin their established curricula. Addressing this issue presents an emerging challenge foreducators and administrators: how to design supportive and flexible school curricula thatseamlessly integrate project-based and service-based learning initiatives into students' academiceducation. By developing an advanced school curriculum that incorporates these learningmethodologies, a ripple effect can occur, benefiting a
. Additionally, CPPs offer several student benefits includingacquiring and applying new knowledge, improving skills in problem-solving, building aconnection with the community partner, etc. CPPs are found in many engineering capstone coursestaught at senior year; however, little research lies in CPPs when implemented within first-yearengineering courses. In this research study, we are interested in assessing students’ perceptions ofworking on a community-partnered project in their first year of engineering. At a large publicuniversity in the United States, we have designed a first-year engineering course that providesopportunities for students to work with CPP. In this course, students are tasked with solving aproblem that arises somewhere in the local
inthe Introduction to Feedback Control course for several different projects, including linefollowing robot, ball levitator, ball balancer, and inverted pendulum self-balancing robot.Without learning Arduino in Digital Circuits Fundamentals, they would not be able to completethese course projects in just a few weeks. They have also used Arduino in their capstone seniordesign projects to build line following tennis ball shooter, remote controlled mobile trebuchet,robotic cat, robotic dog, Rubik’s cube solving machine, hovercraft, submarine, etc. Prior tolearning Arduino in Digital Circuits Fundamentals, students had to learn Arduino themselveswhile doing capstone senior design. As a result, they often could not build the working prototypeuntil
Paper ID #42283Tinkercad—Not Just for KidsProf. Branimir Pejcinovic, Portland State University Branimir Pejcinovic received his Ph.D. degree from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. He is a Professor and former Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education at Portland State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering department. He has led department-wide changes in curriculum with emphasis on project- and lab-based instruction and learning. He was awarded the best paper award by the ECE division of ASEE in 2017 for his work on freshman engineering course development. His research interests are in the areas of
]. Depending on the length of the course, the level of thestudent, and the focus of the course, instructors may “source” the needs or problems from thecommunity, including local industry and non-profits. In other courses, students or student teamsmay take responsibility for identifying the problem that drives the design project [2].Engineering faculty at Duke University recognizes the skills of sourcing and specifying problemsand their related needs statements can also be important for students themselves to learn, assolutions to well-articulated and important needs can create value for our society. For example,in biomedical engineering capstone courses at Duke University, senior-level students may eitheridentify a need from their personal experiences
why engineering schools are workingon providing courses in which students must engage in solving open-ended problems to facilitatereaching these learning outcomes. However, most of those courses are typically at the end of thecareer path (Capstone design project) and maybe an introductory design course in their first year.In these courses, students must find a problem and work on defining a specific problem, whichgets them closer to what the outcome expects. On the other hand, most of the coursesengineering students take in their first year ask them to solve well-defined problems with a rightanswer (they might be able to take different paths to get to that answer, but there is still one rightanswer). Several engineering education thought
“immunity” theydevelop against unethical and unprofessional conduct (Beever, Kuebler, & Collins, 2021). Twolimitations are identified in this approach by the research team: (1) their work only examined theexplicit, formal curriculum not implicit, informal curriculum, and (2) certain course were notincluded in the data (e.g., graduate courses, capstones, independent studies, study abroadcourses, and internships) (Beever, Kuebler, & Collins, 2021).IT #6, a more recently awarded project, has limited information available online. Based on itsNSF public summary page and one conceptual paper published on Arxiv.org, we found that theirapproach to generating institutional impact is based on ideas similar to a virtual community ofpractice (Pang