to learners with disabilities. She is supported by the Knight-Hennessy Scholarship and the RAISE Doctoral Fellowship.Trisha Kulkarni, Stanford UniversityDr. Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard teaches both undergraduate and graduate design-related classes, conducts research on fracture mechanics and finite element analysis, and on how people become engineers. From 1999 to 2008, she was a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading its engineering study. Sheppard has contributed to significant educational projects, including the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education and the National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter
to increase students’ technical skills as related to the design process, it also aims to buildconfidence and develop students’ abilities to work not only with their peers but also withinstructors and local clinicians. During the students’ senior years, they are required to take SeniorDesign 1 during the fall semester and Senior Design 2 during the spring semester. As aprerequisite to Senior Design, the Clinical Observations and Needs Finding course is intended tointroduce students to the design process. Projects that are initially developed in ClinicalObservations are intended to be carried to Senior Design, where prototype creation occurs. Thiscourse fits logically into the undergraduate biomedical engineering curriculum, but the
learningexperience in Computer Architecture and Engineering education, specifically in the areas ofsingle cycle and pipelined datapath design. The approach improves student performance,enhancing learning outcomes in Computer Architecture and Engineering curriculum.1 IntroductionIn engineering education, there is a significant thrust towards crafting students into capableprofessionals. Pursuing this goal has involved delving into and embracing various pedagogicalapproaches, including differentiated learning [1–6], project-based [7–10], inquiry-based[11–14, 24], and collaborative [15–19]. Each approach imparts a distinctive flavor to theeducational experience, thereby enriching the academic journey for those studyingengineering.Differentiated Learning
].According to Minerick [24], advanced research skills include "Safety, Research and thelaboratory, How to maintain a lab notebook; Literature searches and article applicability to yourresearch; Dissection of a research article; Effective scientific presentations; Preparing an abstractof your research project, and Preparing a scientific poster" (p. 6). The National ScienceFoundation (NSF) funds Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REUs), which are programsdedicated to increasing the number of STEM students who pursue advanced degrees, focused onrecruiting traditionally underrepresented students in the field [24], [32]. Students who are offereda position in an REU program at a university are provided with housing, meals, and a stipend for,commonly
andlearning from the senses. In this work, a completely refurbished dynamic systems laboratorycourse is implemented into an undergraduate mechanical engineering program for the purpose ofproducing excellence in student learning and engagement. The new laboratory assignmentsinvolve physical experimentation, which is a modification to the previous course that includedonly simulation projects. Custom-made exercises include physical measurement and analysis ofsound pressure signals, and reverse engineering of products using the Raspberry Pi computeplatform. Coding of Raspberry Pi boards is accomplished using MATLAB Online and SimulinkOnline. Student engagement with both the new hardware-based course and previoussimulation-based course are assessed using
dimensions of engineering practice. This frameworkhelps to clarify how “sociotechnical integration” is in fact a high bar for engineering designpractice (or, for that matter, any formalized inquiry practice). The following section provides anoverview and justification of our Design Engineering program’s curricular structure, built as it isaround a “design spine”—that is, open-ended project-based design every semester—alongsidemore traditional engineering curricular requirements. After reviewing our curriculum, we turnattention to the design of our program’s ABET assessment infrastructure and how we have usedABET requirements to ensure we hold ourselves accountable to a high-bar of sociotechnicalintegration across our design spine. Before concluding
experiencing logistical challenges. In what follows, we shareideas from the literature and from our own observations about engagement-related conflict ondesign teams, and then address the use of MR simulations in educational environments.Engagement-Related Conflict on Engineering Design TeamsTeam-based work is a fundamental tenant of design thinking and the work of an engineer; it iscritical that undergraduate engineering programs include team-based design projects throughoutthe curriculum [1]. The literature has reported on the benefits of and best practices for studentsengaged in team-based design projects [2-4]. Also addressed in the literature are challengesrelated to teamwork, especially with respect to conflicts related to interpersonal dynamics
, sustainability, and community engagement. She is also a licensed professional engineer in Colorado. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Neurodivergent and Neurotypical Students in a First-Year Engineering Design Course: Identity, Self-Efficacy, and ExperiencesAbstractThis Complete Research paper explores the attitudes and experiences of neurodivergent (ND)and neurotypical (NT) students in the context of a first-year engineering design (FYED) coursewhere students work in teams on open-ended projects. The data set includes post-survey datafrom Spring 2023 and pre- and post-survey data from Fall 2023. The end of the survey asked ifstudents self
‘threads’: Autonomous Machines, Climate &Sustainability Systems, Digital Cities, and Living Machines. Each thread equips students withthe ability to develop, operate, design, and test novel technologies and/or conduct novel scientificresearch through cross-departmental teamwork and hands-on projects, leveraging cutting-edgemethodologies and tools.Distinct from experiential learning programs at MIT, NEET is characterized by its multi-yearduration and interdisciplinary nature, facilitating collaboration on progressively complexprojects. These attributes enable students to acquire specialized proficiencies aligned with theirchosen NEET thread. Participation in NEET is voluntary and does not confer a degree orconstitute a major or minor at MIT
health and wellbeing in engineering education and their behavioral and cognitive problem-solving capabilities. He is actively involved in research related to the integration of positive psychological tools and methods in engineering education practice and research. Muhammad is also interested in the development and use of new technological and non-technological methods to enhance the learning processes of undergraduate engineering students. He is currently leading a second research project related to use of mobile learning technologies in undergraduate engineering education. This research is exploring available empirical evidence about the role mobile learning technologies may play in improving student accessibility
becoming a focal point in research addressingequity and social justice in higher education [9], but not yet in most peer assessment work.In this project, we apply intersectionality as a critical theory and approach [10] to guide ourexamination to identify marginalized engineering students in college course teams, recognize theinequalities they potentially experience in teamwork and peer assessment, and improve theirlearning experiences and well-being. Following Else-Quest and Hyde’s three essential elementsfor intersectional research, our study simultaneously examines multiple social categories (e.g.,gender and race), delves into power dynamics and inequality rooted in interconnected socialcategories, and recognizes the fluidity of these
design projects. Students were required to incorporate ethicsinto their design projects by developing and applying ethics-based and standards-based requirements fortheir projects and explain how the concept of equity applied to their designs. While this case study did notemploy systematic qualitative data collection, researchers observed that students in this cohort hadincreased empathetic design decision making skills compared to students in previous iterations of thecourse. More research specifically examining student empathy development due to these instructionalmethods would support the efficacy of the pedagogy, however, Howcroft et al. [5] present an interestingway to embed empathy instruction in a common BME course. In fact, Howcroft et al
San Carlos in Guatemala, and before that, an elementary teacher. His research centers on the intersection of bilingual/multilingual education and technology (in particular, Mayan languages), literacy programs in Indigenous languages, pedagogy of tenderness, and artificial intelligence for education.Amy Millmier Schmidt, University of Nebraska, LincolnMara Zelt, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Mara Zelt is the program manager for the Schmidt Research and Extension Team at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in the Department of Biological Systems Engineering. In her role Mara is responsible for supporting the team’s outreach and research programs including the nationwide iAMResponsible project, a partnership of multi
, 2024 NSF RED: Transformative Change through the Capability ApproachAbstractOne of the future challenges facing academic disciplines—traditional STEM as well as the socialsciences and humanities—is how to prepare students to address complex socio-technicalproblems that require a range of disciplinary perspectives to address. The National ScienceFoundation RED project at Bucknell University is focused on enabling students to gain a moreintersectional engineering education by expanding individual pathways for students through anelectrical and computer engineering degree program. Towards this end the departmentundertook significant curricular reform prior from 2014 to 2017 to seeking support from theRED program in 2019.While there has been
NSF-funded projects, Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (NSF:RED) ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation” and Innovations in Graduate Education (NSF:IGE) ”Encouraging the Participation of Neurodiverse Students in STEM Graduate Programs to Radically Enhance the Creativity of the Professional Workforce”. As a graduate researcher, she is conducting qualitative research related to the experiences of neurodiverse graduate students in STEM fields. Previously, she spent eight years as a K-12 teacher in Connecticut, where she maintained a focus on providing a varied learning environment and differentiated instruction for all types of learners. She is currently pursuing a doctoral
consistent with the bifurcation suggested in theGrinter Report. The rationale for this recommendation includes a ‘flattening of the engineeringhierarchy’ and the development of a ‘legitimized and equal pathway to engineering careers formany African Americans’ [8].Rebranding ET as applied engineering in an attempt to ‘elevate’ its position in the engineeringhierarchy does not address the systemic issues and racial inequities that contribute to the racialstratification of the engineering profession. In this project, we aim to not only understand thereasons Black students choose ET in college and the potential ramifications of this choice onthe attainment of their career goals, but also to contribute to the dismantling of the racialinequities that
development expert, along withinstructions about what makes LOs well-constructed in terms of three main parts: Behaviour (theobservable action of the student), Conditions (in what context the student will perform theaction), and Degree (how well the behavior must be performed). Moreover, the prompt containsexamples of what conceptual LOs (which they define as Remembering and Understanding inBloom's Taxonomy) and project LOs (based on the remaining levels of Bloom's taxonomy) are togive the model a basis for what output to produce. The authors include the criteria that need to besatisfied for LOs to be effective; readers are strongly encouraged to borrow the checklist fromKennedy [37] to expand on their list. Lastly, they list what the user input
Paper ID #43697Cultivating a Budding Engineer: A Marginalized Female High Schooler’sJourney Towards an Engineering Career (Fundamental)Dr. Cristina Diordieva, Nanyang Technological University Cristina Diordieva is the Project Coordinator for the World MOON Project. Previously, she served as a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Imperial College London (LKCMedicine) and Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. Cristina is a co-author of a report published by the World Health Organization (WHO) in Switzerland. Her research focuses on inclusivity in STEM, educational technology, massive open online courses (MOOCs), and
mathematics for engineering, which has led him to obtain multiple excellent teaching awards. His research area is engineering education, where he has worked on numerous research projects to improve students’ academic performance and motivation. Additionally, he collaborates with the SENACYT (National Secretariat of Science and Technology) as the National Contact Point (NCP) in the CELAC (Latin American Countries Research Group) group to promote research infrastructure collaborations between countries in Latin America and the European Union (EU).Byron Haroldo Linares Roman ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Design and Implementation of a Badge Architecture to Motivate Students
contributed to the development of an interdisciplinary grand challenges focused course and introduction to engineering course in both in-person and online (MOOC) formats at ASU. She is also actively involved in the ASU Kern project and Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), focused on students’ development of entrepreneurial mindset. Amy received the national 2019 KEEN Rising Star award from KEEN for her efforts in encouraging students in developing an entrepreneurial mindset. She is also a member of the current interim Executive Committee for the international GCSP Network, and mentors schools to develop GCSPs as part of the GCSP New Programs committee.Dr. Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University Dr. Haolin Zhu
professor at Cal Poly, SLO in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. She has been teaching for 22 years and has continued to develop innovative pedagogy such as project based, flipped classroom and competency grading. Through the SUSTAINDr. Yilin Feng, California State University, Los Angeles Yilin Feng is an assistant professor at California State University, Los Angeles. She received her Ph.D. degree from Purdue University. Her research interest is in airport simulation, operation, and management.Dr. Gustavo B Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles Menezes is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Cal State LA. His specialization is in Environmental and Water Resources Engineering. Since becoming part of the
to participate in more international collaborations andactivities, thus leading to the creation of a research program abroad.The concept of the summer research abroad was to involve a small number of students (7-9 peryear) in a full-fledged research experience at a university or research center abroad. The targetgroup for this activity was students who had participated in a summer research program at one ofthe University of Texas System (UT) universities. These students would have previouslycompleted a high-impact research project and be prepared for advanced laboratory work. Thesestudents would apply online, collect a letter of recommendation from their past research mentor,and if selected participate in a weekly online seminar led by the
soon as possible after the class visit. Student observers were givenoptions for the submission of their reports. They could email the reports to the facilitator, emailthe reports directly to the observed faculty, or contact the observed faculty and set up a meetingto go over the reports with them.7. Post-Completion Survey: The questions in the pre-survey were reused for students, exceptfor the last one. Instead, they were asked this: “How has being part of this project helped youpersonally?” Faculty also gave feedback before the semester ended (only in Fall 2023; when ahigher number of faculty were involved) on how the student observer’s feedback was on targetand how helpful the process was, using a Qualtrics survey.Results and
ofinterdisciplinarity and stakeholder engagement. We will close with both a section on “lessonslearned” throughout this process, as well as a section on the “deliverables” that have emergedfrom this process thus far. These ‘deliverables’ tie to benefits that, we believe, will enhancecareer preparation for students.theories of interdisciplinaritySeveral theories could have supported our work on developing a program in SocialEntrepreneurship. We are aware of the literature suggesting that theories of community-engagement (Tekic et al., 2022; Wallerstein et al. 2020), and even collaborative building () couldhave been used to guide this project. However, the development of this project was madepossible by a grant from funders who have a particular interest in
district and is in the process of creating a mentorship program to help high school students transition to university. His research interests include first-year university students’ experience, high school students’ transition to university, peer-to-peer mentorship, and student support networks.Ms. Sarah Huizar, University of Texas at El Paso Sarah Huizar is a Program Manager for UTEP’s Center for Research in Engineering and Technology Education (CREATE). She develops, implements, and manages a wide range of activities through the center’s STEMShine grant. She specializes in mentorship, essential skills building for freshman engineering students, project planning, community building through eSports, writing and design.Dr
. He obtained his MS and Ph.D. degrees from the Rice University in 1997 and 1999, respectively. He currently serves as the Associate Chair for the Mechanical Engineering department at UTRGV. Among his research interests are engineering education, materials, stress and thermal finite element analysis, dynamic response analysis.Dr. Javier Ortega, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Dr. Javier A. Ortega is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (UTRGV). His research interests include Tribology, Lubrication, Biomaterials, Additive Manufacturing, and Engineering Education. Dr. Ortega has been involved in different research projects, including
Paper ID #42566An Investigation of Engineering Students’ Information Sorting ApproachesUsing an Open-Ended Design ScenarioChijhi Chang, Purdue University Chijhi is an undergraduate student at Purdue University, majoring in Mechanical Engineering. She has served as a research assistant for Dr. Robert P. Loweth in the School of Engineering Education, focusing on how engineering students and practitioners engage stakeholders in their projects and she works as a research assistant in the Convergence Design Lab for Dr. Min Liu in the School of Mechanical Engineering, where her focus is on computational geometries for
them to positive careeroutcomes.Building from synergistic resources we developed and presented at the ASEE annual meeting in2023, we seek to connect these findings to continued resource development for engineeringstudents and faculty. With tools and worksheets created on the basis of this and related research,our aim is to equip soon-to-be-professionals, and their mentors and teachers, with insights toadvocate for better and more equitable workplace practice.2.0 Background of the Study2.1 Stretch assignments: Definition and dimensionsIn a larger employment context where workers, especially technical knowledge workers, areexpected to manage their own ‘portfolio careers’ and are increasingly commodified as the sum oftheir projects, developmental
project teams in planning and development, through external evaluation, and as publication support. Most of his workDr. David Hicks David Hicks is an Associate Professor in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. Before joining TAMU-K he served as Associate Professor and Department Head at Aalborg University in Esbjerg, Denmark. He has also held positions in research labs in the U.S. as well as Europe, and spent time as a researcher in the software industry.Dr. Breanna Michelle Weir Bailey P.E., Texas A&M University, Kingsville I am a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Texas. I currently serve as the chair for the Department of Civil and
Riddle Aeronautical UniversityKatrina Robertson, Embry Riddle Aeronautical UniversityTrey Talko, Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Small Shifts: New Methods for Improving Communication Experiences for Women in Early Engineering Courses Abstract: This paper outlines methods and initial data from an educational intervention based on previous research published at ASEE. Students in introductory engineering courses face challenges communicating and integrating their ideas in team projects. Often these challenges with team communication fall along gendered lines, where women students experience marginalization in team settings. This paper builds from previous research in the field of engineering education which integrated