Programming", Proceedings of the 2022 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, ASEE, 9-11 Feb 2022, Tempe, AZ.[4] Al Atwa, Abdullah, Ian Bumgardner, Mohammed Bushlaibi, Steven Castello, Joshua Erickson, Aleksandr Sergeyev, and Mohsen Azizi. "Capstone Project: PLC Control System with Integrated PID Controller for Control System Optimization," Proceedings of the 2014 IAJC-ISAM International Conference, ISBN 978-1-60643-379-9.[5] Y. Fukuzawa, Z. Wang, Y. Mori and S. Kawamura, "A Robotic System Capable of Recognition, Grasping, and Suction for Dishwashing Automation," 2021 27th International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice (M2VIP), 2021, pp. 369-374, doi: 10.1109
, “A step toward nurturing infrastructure sustainability and rating systems through construction management curricula,” Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1878–1897, 2023, doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-09-2022- 0296.[8] M. Wolfram and N. Frantzeskaki, “Cities and systemic change for sustainability: Prevailing epistemologies and an emerging research agenda,” Sustain., vol. 8, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.3390/su8020144.[9] ISI, “Envision: Sustainable Infrastructure Framework Guidance Manual.” Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure, Washington DC, USA, p. 192, 2018.[10] T. Tanner, A. Bahadur, C. Simonet, and H. Betts, “Resilience scan | 2014,” 2016.[11] B. G. Celik, M. E. Ozbek, S. Attaran, and M
in soft skills by working in aninterdisciplinary team.AcknowledgementsThis project was supported by USDA NIFA funding, award number 2019-38422-30259. Wewould like to acknowledge Evelyn Martinez and Misael Calderon for the germination graphincluded in this document. We would also like to acknowledge all the previous SUSTAINstudents whose work is photographed in this paper. The external evaluation of the grant programwas conducted by Integrated Learning Innovations, Inc.References[1] Bogoslowski, S., Geng, F., Gao, Z., Rajabzadeh, A.R., Srinivasan, S., “Integrated Thinking -A Cross-Disciplinary Project-Based Engineering Education” in Auer, M.E., Centea, D. (eds)Visions and Concepts for Education 4.0. ICBL 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems
empower faculty mentors, strengthen mentoring relationships, and foster a moresupportive and enriching learning environment for undergraduate engineering students.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant S-STEM-2030894. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. ReferencesAnafarta, A., & Apaydin, C. (2016). The effect of faculty mentoring on career success and career satisfaction. International Education Studies, 9(6), 22. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n6p22AuCoin, D. J., & Wright
[3], researchers found the ten-year completion rate for engineeringPh.D.’s is only around 62%. Studies have indicated many factors within engineering graduateschool culture that lead to attrition from graduate school, especially relating to students’expectations, goals, and quality of work and life [4]-[6]. Specifically, Zerbe et al. [6] identifiedthat mismatched expectations and preconceptions for graduate school directly led students toquestion or depart from their programs. Recognizing the challenges related to pursuing anengineering graduate degree, undergraduate students motivated to pursue graduate degrees wouldgreatly benefit from additional preparation for the culture and expectations for graduate students. Socialization
Sigma's ability to enhance efficiencyand quality is a sought-after skill, making students invaluable assets in organizations striving foroperational excellence.2.3 Module 2: Mastering Statistical Control (Day 5-6)Students are guided through control charting for variables for individual measurements (I-MRand X-bar R chart) and for the distribution of measurements (X-bar S chart). These activitiesmirror the real-life practice of monitoring production processes to ensure consistency and detectanomalies. The practicality of constructing control charts for variables, reinforced with hands-onactivities, deepens understanding and equips students to drive quality improvements in amanufacturing environment.2.4 Module 4: Exploring Quality Tools (Day 7
. Each lesson first introduces concepts in slides with vocabulary, emphasizingconnections to previous knowledge. Vocabulary is then used in the lesson's video(s) and again inlesson activities to enhance understanding in context and provide repetition.By and large, these educational tools were effective for building basic microbiologicalknowledge in the first elementary cohort. During the first lesson, instructors observed studentresponses to questions about general microbiological concepts (relative size of microorganisms,types of organisms, potential habitats, etc.) and used this discussion as a base to understandknowledge gains. Student instructor, Interviewee 4, observed that by the end of the coursestudents had achieved an "entry-level
easilyextend to several hours for the remote student.Changes could include breaking down an exercise procedure into smaller, less overwhelmingparts, that can be completed in fifteen to twenty minutes. Alternatively, a shorter introduction andexercise procedure video, with additional short videos explaining specific parts of the procedurefor more involved or complicated procedures. Finally having a scheduled meeting or recitationfor the students to work on their labs and have immediate access to assistance could be part ofthe course schedule in future iterations.References[1] Alexander, D. G., Anderson, T. J., Beyerlein, S. W., Blackketter, D. M., Crepeau, J. C., andSmelser, R. E., “Online Instrumentation and Engineering Laboratories For Distance
disagreement with those that werenegatively worded.In summary, peer review has the potential to teach students how to deliver high-quality feedback,may improve draft quality, may require additional instruction, and is viewed favorably bystudents.IRB Statement: This work has been deemed exempt from continuing oversight by the universityIRB (STU00214218).REFERENCES[1] B. Dewsbury and C. J. Brame, “Inclusive Teaching,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 18, no. 2, p. fe2, 2019, doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-01-0021.[2] S. Blum, Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to Do Instead), 1st ed. West Virginia University Press, 2020.[3] M. E. Ko, “Revolutionizing Grading: Implications on Power, Agency, and Equity,” in American Society
. Singelmann and S. Shie Ng, "Innovation-based Learning: A New Way to Educate Innovation," in ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Virtual, 2021.[7] E. M. Swartz, R. Striker, L. Singelmann, E. Alvarez Vazquez, M. Pearson and S. Shie Ng, "Innovating Assessment: Using Innovative Impact as a Metric to Evaluate Student Outcomes in an Innovation-Based Learning Course," in ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Virtual, 2021. 9[8] E. Alvarez Vazquez, R. Striker, L. Singelmann, M. Pearson, E. M. Swartz, S. Shie Ng and D. Ewert, "The MOOCIBL Platform: A Custom-made Software Solution to Track the Innovation Process with Blockchain Learning Tokens
Paper ID #42204Engagement in Practice: The Development of Skills and Competencies throughCommunity Outreach ActivitiesProf. Rodrigo Cutri, Maua Institute of Techonology Cutri holds a degree in Electrical Engineering from Maua Institute of Technology (2001), MSc (2004) ˜ Paulo. He is currently Titular Professor and Ph.D. (2007) in Electrical Engineering - University of SA£o of Maua Institute of Technology, Professor of theDr. Hector Alexandre Chaves Gil, Instituto Mau´a de Tecnologia Physical Chemistry PhD by Universidade of S˜ao Paulo - USP, MSc degree and
coordinates ISUˆa C™s reDr. Amy Kaleita, Iowa State University Amy L. Kaleita is Professor and Chair of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering at Iowa State University, and a licensed professional engineer. She has a B.S. in Agricultural Engineering from Penn State University, an M.S. in Civil and Environmental Engineering and Ph.D. in Agricultural Engineering from the University of Illinois.Prof. Sergio Horacio Lence Professor of EconomicsCynthia Lidtke, Iowa State UniversityCameron Alexander MacKenzie, Iowa State UniversityDr. Michelle Lynn Soupir, Iowa State University Dr. Soupir’s research focuses on soil and water quality, nonpoint source pollution control, watershed management, and water quality monitoring. She uses
. Walker, "Impacts of a Summer Bridge Program in Engineering on Student Retention and Graduation," Journal of STEM Education, vol. 19, no. 2, 2018.[4] D. Wood, A. Gura, and J. Brockman, "Critical Findings in the Development of the Community- Engaged Educational Ecosystem," in American Society for Engineering Education proceedings: ASEE, 2020.[5] D. Wood, A. Gura, J. Brockman, A. Rayna Carolan-Silva, S. Boukdad, and J. C. Alarcon, "Informing Replication of the Bowman Creek Educational Ecosystem Pilot," in American Society for Engineering Education proceedings, A. Genau Ed.: ASEE, 2019.[6] D. Wood, A. Gura, J. Brockman, and S. Alptekin, "Student Outcomes in Academic Community Engaged STEM projects with
views of the National ScienceFoundation. References[1] S. M. Lord et al., “MIDFIELD: A Resource for Longitudinal Student Record Research,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 245–256, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TE.2021.3137086.[2] G. L. Heileman, C. T. Abdallah, A. Slim, and M. Hickman, “Curricular Analytics: A Framework for Quantifying the Impact of Curricular Reforms and Pedagogical Innovations,” ArXiv181109676 Phys., Nov. 2018, Accessed: Aug. 04, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.09676[3] R. Layton, R. Long, M. Ohland, M. Orr, and S. Lord, “midfielddata: MIDFIELD data sample.” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://midfieldr.github.io
pictures and later post-process them to generate a 3D model of the area with the aid of computer software. The model is generated based on predetermined features provided by the instructor. Students are provided information on field surveying and drone piloting before going to the field. • Smashing M&Ms: Students are provided with M&Ms, pieces of paper, and s gel pad. They are asked to fill out a handout describing their experience crushing M&Ms using their fist under different conditions: (1) no protection, (2) a piece of paper, and (3) a gel pad. Students experience the effect of impact energy and how it can be related to a large scale. Students debrief at the end on their experience and
include the EnvE discipline itself (cross-disciplinary but faculty largely embedded indepartments where their work is at the edge); challenges of race, ethnicity, gender (e.g.,Misogynoir [40]); parenting (e.g., [41], [42]); and those who engage in CER. In this time whenDEI activities are under particular scrutiny and attacks, the work is especially critical.AcknowledgementsThe authors thank the following individuals for their contributions to our ADVANCE project:Gabriela Chavira, David Sul, and Lilia Abron. This material is based upon work supported bythe National Science Foundation under Award No. 2204550, 2204099, 2204552, and 2245181.Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s
require careful calibration of new algorithms created withinTranscriptto and other AI APIs that would allow us to perform that complex functionality.References[1] F. Martin, A. Ritzhaupt, S. Kumar, and K. Budhrani, “Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 42, pp. 34–43, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.001.[2] M. Kebritchi, A. Lipschuetz, and L. Santiague, “Issues and Challenges for Teaching Successful Online Courses in Higher Education: A Literature Review,” J. Educ. Technol. Syst., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 4–29, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0047239516661713.[3] C.-S. Li and B. Irby, “An Overview of Online Education: Attractiveness
Paper ID #42804Design of an Aerospace Industry-Informed Technical Writing and CommunicationCourseGlen Roderic Coates, Pennsylvania State University Glen R Coates received his B. S. degree in Environmental Engineering from Penn State University. He then went on to receive an M. S. degree in Mechanical Engineering at Penn State and a second M. S. degree in Management of Technology from Rensselaer Polytechnical Institute. Working in the Aerospace industry as a Senior Analytical Engineer for the past 45 years, he also has taught undergraduate mathematics and physics at several institutions as an adjunct professor. These
should improve student outcomesrelative to the expected student default behavior with the original assignment of taking the firstlink(s) from a generic internet search of an ethical theory. This priming may also benefit studentsin subsequent FRCI courses or Core 350 if they have not yet reached those courses.ResultsAn assessment rubric for evaluating the student learning outcomes was previously developed bythe department as part of the launching of the engineering degree for ABET accreditation. Twoperformance indicators re assessed for this assignment, and the corresponding rating descriptionsare shown in Table 2. Performance Aggregate Rating Indicators Weak Developing
’ perceptions on the use of ChatGPT in engineering. Further studies can be conducted todetermine the factors influencing the undergraduate and graduate students’ perceptions on the useof ChatGPT in engineering considering different demographic parameters such as gender identity,race/ethnicity, class standing, engineering major, etc.AcknowledgementThe authors would like to thank the content experts and potential participants for providingfeedback on the survey instrument. Thank you to all the respondents. This project was supportedby the Provost’s Summer Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities (UReCA) Fellowship.Its contents, including findings, conclusions, opinions, and recommendations, are solely attributedto the author(s) and do not
theirvaluable assistance in incorporating the badge architecture into our LMS and their contributionsto the graphic design process. Finally, our thanks go to the reviewers for their constructivecomments.6. References[1] R. Portillo, C. Andersson, A. Alvarado, G. Kroisandt, and D. Logofatu, “Guatemala vs. Germany-A cross-cultural study of students9 motivation in basic mathematics courses,” in 2022 IEEE World Engineering Education Conference (EDUNINE), IEEE, 2022.[2] Jung Yeop Lee, Chong Un Pyon, Jiyoung Woo, “Digital Twin for Math Education: A Study on the Utilization of Games and Gamification for University Mathematics Education,” https://www.mdpi.com/journal/electronics, 2023.[3] K. Davis and S. Singh, “Digital badges in
: 10.3991/ijoe.v16i03.12849. [9] V. S. Katz, A. B. Jordan, and K. Ognyanova. Digital inequality, faculty communication, and remote learning experiences during the covid-19 pandemic: A survey of us undergraduates. Plos one, 16(2):e0246641, 2021.[10] Marcos Inonan, Pablo Ordu˜na, and Rania Hussein. Adapting a remote sdr lab to analyze digital inequalities in radiofrequency education in latin america. Revista Innovaciones Educativas, 2023. In press.[11] L. M. Cerd´a-Su´arez, K. N´un˜ ez-Vald´es, and S. Quir´os y Alpera. A systemic perspective for understanding digital transformation in higher education: Overview and subregional context in latin america as evidence. Sustainability, 13(23):12956, 2021. doi: 10.3390
. Higher Education, 35(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003145613005Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. John Wiley & Sons.Ford, J. K., Smith, E. M., Weissbein, D. A., Gully, S. M., & Salas, E. (1998). Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.218Khachikian, C. S., Guillaume, D. W., & Pham, T. K. (2011). Changes in student effort and grade expectation in the course of a term. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(6), 595–605. https://doi.org
3. Students submit first two assignments 3rd year (Individual) (ME) semester) as part of a design team and submit 4. Revision of Design Proposal last two assignments as individuals (Individual) 4. Seven senior ME mentors help cri que dra s and mark submissions*Assignment with heaviest
, facilitating the sharing ofinformation between faculty, and for bringing the authors together to work on this project.References[1] K. L. Sanford, P. J. Parker, M. W. Roberts, C. M. D. Wilson, M. R. Penn, R. Valdes- Vasquez and F. Paige, "Infrastructure Education in Unprecedented Times: Strengthening a Community of Practice," American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2021.[2] J. Lucena, Ed., Engineering Education for Social Justice: Critical Explorations and Opportunities, Springer Netherlands, 2013.[3] P. Hancock and S. Turner, "Actioning social justice into the engineering curriculum," International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1-37, 22 August 2023.[4] ABET
, designing it to institutionalize the lessons learned as a diversity practitioner and engineering professor. She is a Fellow of the IEEE and ASEE and has been recognized with the PAESMEM award. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Toward a theoretical model of a successful WMEP programWith the emergence of engineering education programs, there is at last a structure and approachto train engineering professors for the university and college levels. But engineering diversityadministrators generally learn their job as they do it. The first women in engineering programwas founded at Purdue in 1969, and programs for minority engineers or multiculturalengineering in the 1970’s. The leaders of
). Environmental Justice in the 21st Century: Race Still Matters. Phylon,49(3/4), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/3132626Caballero, G. W., Wells, E. C., Echols, S. A., & Peaslee, E. H. (2024). Environmental justicefrom the ground (water) up: coping with contamination in Tallevast, Florida. Local Environment,1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2024.2325080Cutter, S. L. (1995). Race, Class and Environmental Justice. Progress in Human Geography,19(1), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F030913259501900111del Puerto, C. L., Cavallin, H. E., Perdomo, J. L., Barreto, J. M., Suarez, O. M., & Andrade, F.(2019, June). Developing a collaborative undergraduate STEM program in resilient andsustainable infrastructure. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &
Video [16] 11:50am – 11:55am Reflection Minute Papers 11:55am – 12:55pm LUNCH 12:55pm – 1:00pm Group Agreement Reminder 1:00pm – 1:45pm Activities and Discussion How We Learn Video [17]s and Activity 1:45pm – 1:55pm BREAK 1:55pm – 3:05pm Peer Observation Tool https://ecostem.calstatela.edu/wiki/index.php Overview /Peer_Observation 3:05pm – 3:50pm Critically Reflective Dialogue 3:50pm – 4:00pm Closing and Reflection Minute-papersTable 2: Session 2 Agenda Time Agenda Item Details 9:00am – 9:20am Check-ins 9:20am – 9:25am Agenda and Group
minoritizedcommunities, SIRI offers a unique opportunity to explore how greater intentionality in programrecruitment and ensuring diversity across all aspects of programming supports the graduatementoring experience.Acknowledgements:The SIRI program and this material are based upon work supported by the National ScienceFoundation under NSF Grant Numbers CNS-1836900 and CNS-1836952. Any opinions,findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors anddo not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We thank all of theundergraduates, graduate mentors, and faculty mentors for participating in the SIRI program andlead PI Meeko Oishi for her leadership on the project.References[1] L. S. Behar
the end, she changes her system to match what theproblem is suggesting, without going back and adjusting her understanding of the physicalsystem.The specific wording she uses during this transition is also significant. The student talks aboutwhat she “can’t” do or what she “should” do in reference to information the problem provides.The problem itself is referred to as both “it” and “they”, demonstrating the fuzziness of theboundary between problem and creator(s).DiscussionIn this moment, the student is using the intentional stance to view the problem as an epistemicagent in the problem solving process. There is full dialogue and shared agency between the twointerlocutors. One represents the student; she is attempting to engage with the