ability to flexibly handle difficult decision-makingproblems in engineering activities. In the University’s training objectives, it is explicitlystipulated that students majoring in science and engineering not only need to master scientificknowledge such as mathematics and chemistry, as well as basic engineering techniques, butalso need to understand the development trends of modern engineering [7]. To ensure that theyhave moral integrity and a sense of responsibility in their future careers, and can consciouslyprotect the environment and achieve sustainable development while considering economic andsocial benefits. The University also provides technical ethics and personal value orientationeducation to engineering students, requiring future
ChatGPT by first year studentson coding assessments, as well as students’ reasoning about why they choose to use (or not use)AI within an introductory engineering course. Future work could continue to characterizeproductive and unproductive usage of AI by first year students, or by students throughout theiracademic careers. As AI becomes increasingly prevalent in our daily lives, student proficiencywith the tool will likely change, inviting more study. Additionally, research could explorecurricular interventions to teach students how to use AI as a learning aid. We are also curiousabout the long-term impacts of ChatGPT usage on student learning trajectories (e.g. do studentsthat use ChatGPT for coding get hired at the same rate, how do they
as Research Engineer at Korea Electronics Technology Institute (KETI) from 1993 to 1997. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2004 and was given the WCU (World Class University) Visiting Professorship under the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korea in 2009. He is currently leading the NSF-supported HSI Implementation and Evaluation Project: Enhancing Student Success in Engineering Curriculum through Active e-Learning and High Impact Teaching Practices (ESSEnCe).Michelle Taub, University of Central Florida Michelle Taub, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor of Learning Sciences and Educational Research and Core Faculty of the Faculty Cluster Initiative’s Learning Sciences Cluster at the University of
within education for historically excluded individuals, with a particular focus on women in engineering and computing and STEM education at HBCUs. Additionally, Dr. Fletcher is researching economic equity, and the impact of finances on students’ success and academic persistence. She is a 2022 recipient of the NSF Early CAREER award and has received several awards at the institutional and national levels. Prior to academia, Dr. Fletcher served as the Director of Pre-college for the National Society of Black Engineers and worked for two Fortune 500 companies. You can follow Dr. Fletcher on Twitter @trinalfletcher and LinkedIn.Simone Nicholson, Florida International University I am a second year doctoral student at
course.Implementation of Mastery-Based Learning (MBL):An MBL course prioritizes depth over breadth, so begin by viewing your course in terms of theskills you want your students to learn and demonstrate—the key skills and outcomes thatstudents need to be successful in their future courses and careers. While these outcomes can spanBloom’s Taxonomy [14], in practice there is a limit to the number of skills students can beassessed (and reassessed) on, so skills based on the apply, analyze, evaluate or create outcomelevels are generally more appropriate. The goal of this section is to describe the process throughwhich we transitioned our traditional assessment course (fall 2022, Circuit Analysis) to amastery-based course (fall 2023) with enough details and tips
earn about 13.6% of bachelor’s degrees inengineering up from 7.0% in 2010 [1] but the Hispanic population in the U.S. has increased overthat same time period from a little over 35 million individuals (12.2% of the U.S. population) toover 62 million (18.8% of the general population) [4].The underrepresentation problem is not just about how many individuals from underrepresentedgroups (URGs) pursue engineering degrees but also about how many drop out along the waytoward a degree and career in their chosen discipline. Many studies have investigated the leakypipeline in engineering and other STEM fields and found that the drop-out rate among womenand minorities leads to disproportionate losses in URGs compared to majority populations. Forexample
Recognition, and induction into the Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi, placing her among the top 10% of Purdue Graduate students. Her academic journey reflects a commitment to advancing knowledge and contributing to technological innovation in XR control systems. Her professional aspirations include applying for an Assistant Professor position upon completing her Ph.D. This career trajectory aligns with her desire to leverage her accumulated experience and knowledge to mentor and guide emerging talents. A central component of her vision is inspiring and supporting aspiring scholars in pursuing academic and professional excellence, facilitating impactful change within our field.Dr. Farid Breidi, Purdue University, West
responses were primarily derived from weekly submissions ofstudents throughout the course that correlated with the themes discussed during each week of thecourse. The final reflective essay encouraged students to reflect on the course and their learningin the form of a 1500–2500-word essay addressing a series of prompts about (i) the engineering profession (e.g. - ‘In light of upcoming challenges to humankind and biodiversity, do you think that the role of engineering, or the meaning of "engineer" or "professional", should change in the future?’); (ii) their ethical positionality (e.g. - ‘How do you see equity, diversity, and inclusion intersecting with engineering, both in general, and in your personal life/career
Department of Computer Science for the academic years 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16. Furthermore, he was a shortlisted candidate for the UGC Teaching Award (Early Career Faculty Member). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Nurturing Student Innovation and Leadership through Student-Initiated Interest GroupsAbstractTo prepare students with strong technical skills and leadership abilities, the engineering facultyat the University of Hong Kong has established the Tam Wing Fan Innovation Wing (a.k.a. theHKU Inno Wing) and a program that supports student-initiated interest groups (SIGs) focused ontechnology and project-based learning. The SIG program
forVLSI design and distance learning [6]. Similarly, the Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingCompany (TSMC), a leading semiconductor manufacturer in Taiwan, has started off the TSMCSemiconductor Programs at local research universities in Taiwan, offering various tracks such asDevice/Integration, Process/Module, and Equipment Engineering [7].Noting the key role for industry involvement, our focus shifts to research-intensive universities,to focus on their roles in preparing students for exploring career paths in the semiconductorindustry? What expertise and knowledge do students need to acquire to become semiconductorengineers? How can we best ready our students for a smooth transition into the chips industry
has a PhD from Purdue University in Engineering Education.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Ms. Leslie Bondaryk, The Concord Consortium Leslie Bondaryk received the B.S. degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the M.S. degree from the University of California, Santa Barbara, both in electrical engineering. She is currently the Chief Technology Officer with the Concord Consortium, Concord, MA, USA. Over her career, Ms. Bondaryk has introduced new technologies to
other instructional sessions. She strives to create authentic and accessible learning experiences while incorporating maker and information competencies into the curriculum. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A Collaborative Approach to Implementing Design Thinking and Rapid Prototyping in a High School Engineering CampAbstractDesign thinking and rapid prototyping can be used to engage high school students and get themexcited about pursuing a career in engineering. Engineering educators and a librarian at theUniversity of Nevada, Reno collaborated to explore this concept and develop a makerspaceactivity that emphasized creative problem-solving and hands-on
shift is evident in the discussion andimplementation of various ‘non-traditional’ grading models such as standards-based grading[15], student self-assessment and grading [16], and the adoption of other “ungrading” [17]approaches or recommendations.Engineering education is an exciting field in which we are often encouraged and rewarded forclassroom and assessment innovations that break the mold of traditional engineering education.Early-career engineering faculty members are uniquely positioned such that they are newlyresponsible for design and delivery of engineering courses while also not being so far removedfrom our own educational experience that we can remember our personal educationalexperiences and the impact that various aspects of our
construction industry. Furthermore, the study aims to gauge students' overall learning experience, focusing on the course content's engagement, challenges, and practicality. Understanding students' perceptions is crucial as it directly influences their motivation, learning outcomes, and overall satisfaction with the course. ● Graduates' evaluation of the course's contribution to job placement: Another key area of interest is to evaluate the course's effectiveness from the graduates' perspective. This includes assessing how well the course has prepared them for their careers and its impact on their job placement. The study seeks to understand the graduates' views on the course's role in
Network (KEEN).References1 Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., van Baalen, S.,Klaassen, R., and Boon, M.: ‘Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision,teaching, and support’, Journal of Engineering Education, 2020, 109, (3), pp. 508-5552 Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., Vallejo Guevara, A., Tudón Martínez, J.C., HernándezAlcántara, D., and Morales-Menendez, R.: ‘Active learning in engineering education. A reviewof fundamentals, best practices and experiences’, International Journal on Interactive Design andManufacturing (IJIDeM), 2019, 13, (3), pp. 909-9223 Makki, B.I., Feng, F., Waqar, M.A., and Adhikari, I.M.: ‘Work Readiness, Decision-Making Self-Efficacy, and Career Exploration among
with numbers to find the hidden treasure. Additionally, an alternative encryption approachinvolved Secret Decoder Wheel created by INL, where letters were matched with symbols, allow-ing for encoding messages to describe the treasure locations in symbols for students to decode andfind.Similarly, in 14 was developed exclusively for grades third to eight where the students had to solveCaesar shift encryption algorithm. The author designed a worksheet and organized a scavengerhunt for an all-girls STEM-careers camp, catering to ages 6-12. They facilitated the completion ofthe worksheet collectively and split the participants into two age-based groups for the scavengerhunt. The author reflects that the activity effectively introduces children to
of communication difficultieswithin various types of groups and develop targeted interventions to facilitate better teamdialogue. Since the data originated from first-year engineering courses, one plausible solutionwould be to start the intervention in high school. Additionally, longitudinal studies may providedeeper insights into how team experiences evolve throughout a student's academic career andhow early interventions can have long-term benefits. Lastly, examining the intersectionality ofstudents' identities and experiences will enhance our understanding of the multidimensionalnature of team dynamics. Such research could be useful for Tandem so that it can be tailored tothe unique strengths and preferences of individual
-related learning activities, enjoyment of learning, and their intendedchoice of a future STEM career," International Journal of Science Education, 43, no. 1, pp. 157-178, 2021.[12] J. Lavonen, and S. Laaksonen, "Context of teaching and learning school science in Finland:Reflections on PISA 2006 results," Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The OfficialJournal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46, no. 8, pp. 922-944,2009.[13] M. Tighezza, "Modeling relationships among learning, attitude, self-perception, and scienceachievement for grade 8 Saudi students," International Journal of Science and MathematicsEducation, 12, pp. 721-740, 2014.[14] M. A. Hutchison, D. K. Follman, M. Sumpter, and G. M. Bodner, "Factors
Paper ID #44216Application of African Indigenous Knowledge Systems to AI Ethics Researchand Education: A Conceptual OverviewKerrie Danielle Hooper, Florida International University Kerrie Hooper is currently an Engineering and Computing Education Ph.D. student at Florida International University. She obtained her Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from the University of Guyana in 2019 and then worked for two years in the industry as a Data Analyst & Systems Administrator, before pursuing her doctoral degree. Her research interests are in AI ethics, responsible technology in education, women’s careers in computing
ofinterdisciplinary courses in engineering education and the co-delivery of curriculum byprofessors from different fields using dialogical pedagogy for effective student learningexperiences. The findings attest that there is significant value in this approach. Therefore,future research on such pedagogies should be conducted to ascertain the efficacy of thesepedagogies on student learning outcomes, career choices, and their ability to bridgedisciplinary divides in their professional practice. We also can use different measurementtools and methodologies to capture student engagement more effectively in future studies.References[1] M. Bucchi, Beyond Technocracy: Science, Politics and Citizens. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.[2] R. L. Porter and
how many students know about CSopportunities in the community and their schools.Experience, the final component of CAPE, relates to students’ outcomes from CS courses andactivities. Examples of these outcomes include cognitive gains, interest, and awareness ofcomputing careers. Equitable Experience means that these outcomes are equitable across studentsubgroups [8]. Prior research in Experience investigated student content in an introductory CScourses [26–28], interest in computing [29], attitudes [24], and relevance of computing in thelives of underrepresented students [30]. Although this is the most studied component of CAPE,there are also gaps in areas that have been shown to impact academic achievement [31].3 Research MethodsTo answer our
courseserves as a narrative thread, illustrating the profound impact of AI on the dynamic canvas of theautomotive landscape. Through this immersive experience, the aim is to equip students with theskills and insights necessary to navigate and excel in their future careers within the automotiverealm.Introduction:The automotive industry is undergoing a transformative revolution, driven by the rapidadvancements in EV technologies coupled with the ever-growing influence of AI. Thesedisruptive forces are fundamentally reshaping the landscape of vehicle design, manufacturing,and operation, presenting both exciting opportunities and significant challenges for the nextgeneration of automotive engineers.In line with these industry trends, there is a critical
/03043797.2023.2248819Nguyen, T. L., Nguyen, H. T., Nguyen, N. H., Nguyen, D. L., Nguyen, T. T. D., & Le, D. L. (2023). Factors affecting students’ career choice in economics majors in the COVID-19 post-pandemic period: A case study of a private university in Vietnam. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100338Nunes, I., Moreira, A., & Araujo, J. (2023). GIRE: Gender-Inclusive Requirements Engineering. Data & Knowledge Engineering. 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2022.102108Polat, Z., & Ekren, N. (2023). Remote laboratory trends for Distance Vocational Education and Training (D-VET): A real-time lighting application. International Journal of
becomes imperative as it not only cultivates proficiencyacross varied career trajectories but also furnishes learners with the cognitive prowess essential forproblem-solving, innovation, and creativity in diverse contexts. 1.2 Design ThinkingIn addition to spatial visualization, adequately performing engineering design tasks through anefficient design thinking process is another important skill for the success of engineering students.The engineering design thinking process is intricate, involving elements such as divergence-convergence, a systems perspective, ambiguity, and collaboration [13, 14]. The inclusion ofengineering design as one of ABET’s seven student outcomes highlights its importance forgraduation, ensuring that graduates are well
entrepreneurship research, vol. 1999, no. 1, pp. 73–87, 1999.[15] A. Naktiyok, C. Nur Karabey, and A. Caglar Gulluce, “Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention: the Turkish case,” International entrepreneurship and management journal, vol. 6, pp. 419–435, 2010.[16] F. Wilson, J. Kickul, and D. Marlino, “Gender, entrepreneurial self–efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: Implications for entrepreneurship education,” Entrepreneurship theory and practice, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 387–406, 2007.[17] J. Kickul, F. Wilson, D. Marlino, and S. D. Barbosa, “Are misalignments of perceptions and self‐efficacy causing gender gaps in entrepreneurial intentions among our nation’s teens?,” Journal of Small Business and
committee members - Adriana Kezar, Christine Alvarado, and SheriShepherd for their feedback and suggestions to our project.References[1] M. D. Sorcinelli, Principles of Good Practice: Supporting Early-Career Faculty. Guidance for Deans, Department Chairs, and Other Academic Leaders. Washington, DC: Association of Higher Education, Jan. 2000.[2] A. M. Perez, J. McShannon, and P. Hynes, “Community College Faculty Development Program and Student Achievement,” Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 379–385, Feb. 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920902813469.[3] R. Ambrosino and J. Peel, “Faculty Development Programs: Assessing the Impact on Instructional Practices, and
, computer engineering, psychology, and neuroscience. Due to the nature of the BCItopic, projects with hands-on experiences could be designed to facilitate practical, experientiallearning that will engage students and leave a lasting impact. Students will be exposed to cutting-edge technology and research areas through BCI courses which will ignite innovation andencourage them to contribute to the evolving field of neuro-engineering. Moreover, the nextgeneration of technologies will follow the user-centric design as there is more emphasis on humanneeds interacting with technology, so BCI courses will be aligned with modern engineeringpractices, which will open doors to diverse career opportunities in gaming, assistive technologies,healthcare
contexts.Problem-solving, Teamwork, and Critical Thinking (21.43%): Collaborative problem-solving and critical thinking were recognized as key strengths. Working in teams and applyinganalytical skills were highly regarded.Mechatronics Implementation and Career Preparation (7.14%): Although less frequent, theinclusion of mechatronics intrigued some participants. They saw it as a pathway to future careersteps.Our findings highlight the importance of sustainability, hands-on experiences, and practicalapplication in collaborative learning. Educators can leverage these insights to enhance coursedesign and foster meaningful student engagement. Future research could explore the impact ofthese strengths on long-term learning outcomes.For the second question, we
in 36 children are diagnosedwith autism in the United States, with 12% of students ages 3–21 being served in schools under theIndividuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in the 2021–22 school year6-7. As a spectrum disorder,no one autistic person is alike. This heterogeneous population varies in severity with social skills, verbaland nonverbal communication, and restrictive and repetitive behavior, and sensitivity to environmentalstimuli8-9. Approximately 80% of autistic individuals are unemployed, which impacts financial outcomes andquality of life10-11. In addition to employment and stability that could be provided through a career inengineering, engaging in engineering education ensures that this population develops
System.[4] This system groups majors into three tiers. Tier 1 includes engineering courses that directly relate to military operations (Systems Engineering and Civil Engineering were the only engineering disciplines excluded). Tier 2 includes all sciences and engineering majors not listed in Tier 1. Tier 3 is all the humanities, and most importantly for ERAU specifically, Homeland Security. ERAU ROTC has a large number of Cadets enrolled in the Homeland Security program and many of those Cadets are high performers focused on a long career in the military. Using a different sorting method that put Homeland Security in a separate bin may produce different results for the ERAU program. Army ROTC does not have a tiered system