students’ experiences of support mechanisms to enhance wellbeing on an engineering programme in the UK,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2020.1835828.[2] B. J. Sottile, L. E. Cruz, Y.-A. Lo Burleson, and K. Mclain, “It’s About Time: An Analysis of Student Activities Under Remote Learning,” 2021, [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/37412.[3] J. Armstrong, “Workload in Engineering Courses and How To Reduce It,” 1996, [Online]. Available: https://aaee.net.au/wp- content/uploads/2020/07/AAEE2019_Annual_Conference_paper_72.pdf.[4] S. Mansouri, M. Wai, J. Li, and J. Lamborn, “A quantitative method to evaluate student workload,” in Proceedings of the
. Dyehouse, “The role of authenticity in design- based learning environments: The case of engineering education,” Comput. Educ., vol. 64, pp. 143–152, May 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.026.[4] K. Reid, D. Reeping, and E. Spingola, “A Taxonomy for Introduction to Engineering Courses,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 34, no. 1, p. 18, 2018.[5] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein, and T. W. Knott, “An Analysis of Motivation Constructs with First-Year Engineering Students: Relationships Among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, and Career Plans,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 319–336, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01066.x.[6] J. B. Hylton, P. J. Herak, T. France, and S. Youssef, “Towards Development of an
Bit (LSB) of the opcode governs theselection between two results within the same category (logic or arithmetic). In Fig. 2, theopcode is set to “11,” indicating the operation Y = A – B. Initially, the input B undergoes theconversion to its 2’s complement format, followed by addition to A, and the result is showcasedin the hex-display on the right. Modifying the opcode will accordingly reflect the correspondingresults. Opcode Operation 00 AND 01 OR
) expenditures in science and engineering (S&E) 2) R&D expenditures in non-science and engineering fields 3) Science and engineering research staff (postdoctoral appointees and other non-faculty research staff with doctorates) 4) Doctoral degrees conferred in humanities, social science, STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) fields as well as other non-STEM fieldsConsidering this data, each institution was given a principal component analysis to create twoindices of research activity, one representing an aggregate level and the other representing per-capita research activity. Organizations with high metrics for both indices were designated as R1:Doctoral Universities with very high research activity. At the time
. 13–21, 2004. [4] S. H. Johnson, W. L. Luyben, and D. L. Talhelm, “Undergraduate interdisciplinary controls laboratory,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 133–136, 1995. [5] K. A. Flack and R. J. Volino, “A series-parallel heat exchanger experiment,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 27–30, 1999. [6] A. M. Bisantz and V. L. Paquet, “Implementation and evaluation of a multi-course case study for framing laboratory exercises,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 299–307, 2002. [7] D. J. Olinger and J. C. Hermanson, “Integrated thermal-fluid experiments in WPI’s discovery classroom,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 239–243, 2002. [8] A. M. Okamura
/2442106.2442109.[5] A. Sastha Kumar, K. Han, Y. Ham, and H. Yoon, "Development of a Student-Centric Cyber-Physical System (SCPS): An Android App for Interactive Learning of Structural Analysis and Dynamics," in Computing in Civil Engineering 2021, 2022, pp. 334-341.[6] M. D. Caballero et al., "Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study," American Journal of Physics, vol. 80, no. 7, pp. 638-644, 2012, doi: 10.1119/1.3703517.[7] P. S. Steif and J. A. Dantzler, "A Statics Concept Inventory: Development and Psychometric Analysis," Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 363-371, 2005.[8] P. S. Steif, A. Dollar, and J. A. Dantzler, "Results from a Statics Concept
. Military Academy in 1997, where he majored in Civil Engineering. He has served in a variety of assignments around the world, including Afghanistan, the Sinai Peninsula, Bosnia, and Croatia. COL Hill served in the department from 2006-2009 and from 2016 to the present. Along the way, he earned Master’s degrees in Engineering Management (Missouri S&T) and Civil Engineering (Virginia Tech) and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering (The University of Texas at Austin). He has taught several courses in the civil engineering curriculum ranging from structural engineering and steel design to infrastructure systems and construction management. Each spring, he co-teaches Project Management Professional prep classes to the West Point
might live around these systems and facilities and be impacted bytheir presence for decades. While these logics may have served the field for decades, we are ofthe view that moving forward, particularly in the nuclear (and other energy) field(s), these logicsare going to become increasingly impractical. This is because of the growing interest in smallerscale (eventually perhaps even personalized) energy systems sited in much greater proximity topeople and communities than have the systems of the past. As a result, there is a growing interestfrom communities that might host these systems to shape key decisions about how these systemsand facilities are designed. Despite this shift, students are given little to no formal training onhow to frame
Oklahoma. He received his B.S. (2019) in Chemical and Biological Engineering from Colorado State University and his Ph.D. (2023) in Biomedical Engineering from University of Oklahoma.Dr. Stefan Wilhelm, University of Oklahoma Dr. Wilhelm is an Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. In 2014, he received his doctoral degree from the University of Regensburg (Germany) under the supervision of Prof. Otto S. Wolfbeis (Institute of Analytical Ch ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Longitudinal Analysis of Strategies for Improving Biomedical Engineering Student Knowledge of Career Paths and Desired
material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.(2236075). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. References[1] R. R. Baiduc, R. A. Linsenmeier, and N. Ruggeri, “Mentored Discussions of Teaching: An Introductory Teaching Development Program for Future STEM Faculty,” Innov High Educ, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 237–254, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10755-015-9348-1.[2] D. Oerther, “Using nursing theory to improve the teaching of engineering practice.,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2017.[3] D. B
frameworks on students’ skill acquisition in a process safety course.References[1] Zhiqiang Gao and R. R. Rhinehart, “Theory vs. practice: The challenges from industry,” in Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference, Boston, MA, USA: IEEE, 2004, pp. 1341– 1349. doi: 10.23919/ACC.2004.1386761.[2] R. R. Rhinehart, “Understanding the Rationale Behind the Academic-Practice Gap,” Control. Accessed: Aug. 24, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.controlglobal.com/manage/asset- management/article/11303683/understanding-the-rationale-behind-the-academic-practice-gap[3] S. R. Brunhaver, R. F. Korte, S. R. Barley, and S. D. Sheppard, “Bridging the Gaps between Engineering Education and Practice,” in U.S. Engineering in a Global
and Academic Unit(UNIDA) for its mentoring and guidance in developing scientific articles in higher educationresearch.References [1] OECD, Education at a Glance 2023: OECD Indicators. In Education at a Glance. OECD, 2023. doi: 10.1787/e13bef63-en [2] S. Banchefsky, K. L. Lewis, and T. A. Ito, “The Role of Social and Ability Belonging in Men’s and Women’s pSTEM Persistence,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, p. 2386, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02386. [3] L. Benson, C. Bolding, J. Ogle, C. McGough, J. Murphy, and R. Lanning, “Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Belongingness in Civil Engineering,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa
in engineeringentrepreneurship education,” Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 3(1), 4-13, 2020.Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127419890828[2] P. Weilerstein and A. Shartrand, A, “A decade of technological innovation: A retrospectiveview of the first decade of the NCIIA,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, ConferenceProceedings, Pittsburgh, PA, 2008. Available: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-56749132141&partnerID=tZOtx3y1[3] J. Blessing, K. Mekemson, and D. Pistrui, “Building an entrepreneurial engineeringecosystem for future generations: The Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network,” ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA, 2008. Available: https://peer.asee.org/3488.[4] S. Sheppard, S
,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 651–676, Dec. 2019.[3] S. Sentance, E. Barendsen, and C. Schulte, Eds., Computer Science Education: Perspectives on Teaching and Learning in School. Bloomsbury Academic, 2018.[4] S. C. Rezvanifar and R. Amini, “Work in Progress: Mandatory Attendance in Office Hours to Improve Students’ Learning Experience,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2018, p. 29992.[5] A. J. Magana and G. Silva Coutinho, “Modeling and simulation practices for a computational thinking‐enabled engineering workforce,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 62–78, Jan. 2017.[6] M. García-Morales, “Bridging the Gap Between Hand
, and gendered pathways,” The Sociological Quarterly, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 67–90, 2023.[4] J. Kim, Buffers and Barriers to Female First-Generation Students’ Career Development. PhD thesis, The University of Iowa, 2021.[5] J. S. Light, “When computers were women,” Technology and culture, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 455–483, 1999.[6] S. N. Khan, “Qualitative research method: Grounded theory,” International journal of business and management, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 224–233, 2014.
may not be meeting those challenges.MethodsContext: This research was conducted at a single large research intensive (RH-VH) public universitylocated in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States, as part of an NSF Funded S-STEM program. S-STEM programs are intended to support low-income students in their trajectories to and through school.While most funded SSTEM programs in the United States are aimed at undergraduate student support, thisSSTEM is unique in that it supports low income Master’s students to obtain thesis-based MS degrees.Students in the program are supported financially, have substantial professional development programming,regular mentorship meetings with faculty affiliated with the program, and peer/near-peer mentoring. At
, “Teaching the Process of Science: Faculty Perceptions and an Effective Methodology,” LSE, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 524–535, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-01-0005.[3] J. Handelsman et al., “Scientific Teaching,” Science, vol. 304, no. 5670, pp. 521–522, Apr. 2004, doi: 10.1126/science.1096022.[4] A. J. Carroll, “Thinking and Reading like a Scientist: Librarians as Facilitators of Primary Literature Literacy,” Medical Reference Services Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 295–307, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1080/02763869.2020.1778336.[5] A. J. Carroll, S. J. Hallman, K. A. Umstead, J. McCall, and A. J. DiMeo, “Using information literacy to teach medical entrepreneurship and health care economics,” Journal of the Medical Library Association
Count course was educationally effective” Scored out of 5 Section Completed Average Median S. Dev Online MWF 11 4.78 5 0.33 Online MW 7 4.73 5 0.47 Face-to-Face (1) 17 4.54 5 0.66 Face-to-Face (2) 13 4.18 4 0.95 Hybrid 15 4.07 4 1.1It's likely that some students' dislike for the flipped classroom method contributed to the lowercourse evaluation scores for the hybrid and in-person sections. These are
K are correlationcoefficients of the compared ratios for assignments 1, 2, and the final project, respectively. Thecell highlighted in bold demonstrates the strongest correlation. The coefficients with * indicatethat they are statistically significant, assuming α = 0.05 and a two-tailed t-test.that team members negotiated with each other and split the work such that one works more in oneassignment and the other balances it out by working more in the subsequent assignment/s. If thecontribution between the team members is equal across all assignments, then the total work ratioshould be close to 1.Additionally, we used the time taken by each team member to complete the assignments as ametric to determine if team members distributed work
emphasis on community well-being, support ethical and comprehensiveapproaches to the development of AI. AI ethics initiatives can guarantee that technological 110advancements benefit all members of society by incorporating indigenous standpoint theory,which prioritizes the protection and inclusion of indigenous communities. Acknowledgingindigenous viewpoints enhances the conversation about AI ethics and promotes a more just andaccountable method of technological advancement.References[1] D. O. Eke, K. Wakunuma, and S. Akintoye, "Responsible AI in Africa: challenges and opportunities," 2023.[2] O. R. Olaopa and O. A. Ayodele, "Building on the strengths of African indigenous knowledge
). Some suggested using case studies for deeperunderstanding (“I think you could delve more into case studies and study them in a moredetailed way so as to get a broader scope of human ideologies, history and perspectives” -Student Q).Many students reported that they overcame their initial negative views of humanities whichthey used to previously find “monotonous” (Student R) or irrelevant to engineering. “Ithought humanities wasn’t very related to science and engineering, but I realise now that asan engineer it is very important to be aware about all these topics” (Student S).Quantitative Data Analysis Figure 1: Box plot for Survey QuestionsStudent Evaluations: The course was piloted for the first time with engineering
Engineering Education, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 3–22, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306419017749580[7] H. Nguyen, Liang Li Wu, G. N. Washington, Kyu Yon Lim, and C. Fischer, “Collaboration Patterns and Design Practices in First-Year Project-Based Engineering”, 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, June 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34298.[8] H. Nguyen, L. Wu, C. Fischer, G. Washington, and M. Warschauer, “Increasing Success in College: Examining the Impact of a Project-Based Introductory Engineering Course”, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 384–401, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20319.[9] S. Jacques, S. Bissey, and A. Martin, “Multidisciplinary Project Based Learning within a collaborative
complex and context- transdisciplinary) sensitive issues—contextualizing knowledge and action within relevant socio-ecology. Project/problem-based Simulations that mimic actively attempting to study/address a learning (in class) community/organizational problem—undertaking an individual/group/class project deemed by the student(s) and professor to be necessary and useful within a known context but without engaging or by only minimally engaging stakeholders outside of the class. Active learning (in class) Learning in which students are actively involved in constructing meaning, making
two research questions, we designed a survey, sent it to K-12 computing educationresearchers, and then analyzed the results.3.1 Survey DesignWe began our survey design by modifying the survey used by McGill et al. due to its similarnature of exploring barriers in CER [32]. Our survey differs by explicitly considering barriers inK-12 computing education.Our survey had four primary sections: Research Background, CAPE Research Focus, Barriers toConducting Research, and Participant Demographic Characteristics. In the Research Backgroundsection participants were asked what age and school group they conducted research with, whatrole(s) they identified as in the K-12 CER community, and what communities (e.g. HistoricallyMarginalized Racial Groups
]. Available: https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv:63792[9] L. J. Ball, J. St.B.T. Evans, I. Dennis, and T. C. Ormerod, “Problem-solving Strategies and Expertise in Engineering Design,” Thinking & Reasoning, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 247–270, Nov. 1997, doi: 10.1080/135467897394284.[10] G. Downey, “Are Engineers Losing Control of Technology?,” Chemical Engineering Research and Design, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 583–595, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1205/cherd.05095.[11] E. S. Klochkova, M. V. Bolsunovskaya, and S. V. Shirokova, “The Significance of Humanities for Engineering Education,” in 2018 XVII Russian Scientific and Practical Conference on Planning and Teaching Engineering Staff for the Industrial and Economic Complex of the Region (PTES), Nov
, or b) faculty do not know about the workshops and as a result, do notattend.A few faculty differentiated high quality teaching from inclusive teaching by reasoning (eitherfor themselves or for their institution) that high quality teaching is related to end of courseevaluations. To that point, Maria, professor of chemical engineering noted, “for my institution,high quality teaching means good scores from student[s], which I don’t necessarily think is highquality or inclusive…student ratings do not include aspects of access and inclusion.”Of note, Tanya, an associate professor of chemistry, expressed that some faculty feel that highquality teaching means more work and inclusive teaching is less rigorous. Specifically, she said:“I don’t know