demonstrate engineering principles.Cong Li, Massachusetts Institute of Technology I am currently working as a systems engineer in the aerospace industry, I contributed to this project as an undergraduate researcher and helped create early versions of the simulation using MatlabDr. Benita Comeau, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Benita Comeau teaches a laboratory course on micro/nano engineering, in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She is a Chemical Engineer by degree, and received her BSE from the Univerisity of Michigan and PhD from the Georgia Institute of Technology.Ms. Emily Welsh, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Ms. Welsh works as an educational technologist
online qualitative and quantitative survey whichwas designed using questions from previously published self-efficacy and teacher experienceinstruments. Participants were also invited to discuss their experiences during a virtualinterview.Results indicate that COVID-19 continued to disrupt STE teaching and learning through the2021 – 2022 academic year and that STEAM Labs, collaborative group work, and investigativeproblem solving skills were missing from STE instruction. Findings reveal that there is renewedinterest in project-based learning, inquiry-based learning, innovative pedagogy, STEAM Labsand engineering as the “keystone” to STEAM education, especially as COVID-19 healthprotocols and restrictions subside. To apply the results of this
well in the course. We foundthat over all students who spend more time do not do better in the course perhaps becausetheir time is not spent effectively. Yet, students who spend more time on practice examsperformed better in the class. This is especially true for students who come into the coursewith low expectation to do well. In future work, we plan to examine how we might turn thisinformation into an intervention.5 AcknowledgementsWe would like to acknowledge the Grainger College of Engineering Strategic InstructionalInitiatives (SIIP) program for the funding for this project. We would also like to thank ourSIIP Education Innovation Fellow, Ashlynn Stillwell, for her guidance and support.References[1] E.L. Deci and R.M. Ryan. 2012. Self
institution. Different departments offer different sections of this course,with each section having up to 80 students. All sections are project-based, operating on adesign-build-test framework. We created our section with the intent to teach students theimportance of engaging with publics and communities as part of the engineering design process.While such engagement is increasingly becoming the norm for the design of smaller, and lesscomplex systems, the designers of complex sociotechnical systems – transportation and energysystems being two key examples – seldom engage with communities during the process oftechnology development. This is especially the case for energy technologies and facilities. Thesesystems have but a handful of ‘users’ in the
of leadership, project management, accountability, andsolutions-focused mental posture are a natural fit for the engineering field—a match that studentveterans can use to build a sense of ‘belonging’ as they transition.1. Background - Student VeteransStudent veterans are older, post-traditional students who pursue higher education [1-2]. Ohlandreports that economics plays a major role for non-traditional students, and especially for studentveterans. It is the primary factor to return to school, where to attend, and what degree program tostudy [3]. Institution preference is often affected by proximity to current location and to family,cost and reputation. Student veterans are motivated by career opportunities, self-improvementand personal
test, while there was nostatistically significant difference between the two interventions for the retention test. The VRlesson was also found to result in higher emotional arousal and lower cognitive engagement. Theauthors suggested that the excessive emotional arousal caused by VR high immersion distractsthe learner from cognitive processing of the information. On the other hand, Lai et al. resultsindicated that students using AR perceived a significantly lower extraneous cognitive loadcompared to those who learned with conventional multimedia [49].There were mixed results in terms of student preference. While students preferred the AR morein [37] and [49], projection-based VR with TV screens was found to be preferred by students inthe study
supporting STEM faculty on STEM education research projects.Dr. Sharon Miller, Purdue University Sharon Miller, PhD, is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering at Purdue University. She received a BS degree in Materials Science and Engineering from Purdue University and MS and PhD degrees in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Michigan. Her educational efforts focus on biomedical engineering discipline-based educational research, including design self-efficacy, project-based learning, critical reflection in ethics, and high-impact practices. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work in Progress: A Multi-level Undergraduate Curricular
civil engineering projects. Dr. Perry’s current work centers on understandin ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Students’ Metacognitive Regulation Strategies in Written Reflections within Third-Year Introductory Environmental Engineering CourseAbstractLifelong learning plays an important role in achieving success in one’s professional life.Engaging students in metacognition assists in the development of their lifelong learningabilities. Instructors can integrate reflection activities in their courses to provide multipleopportunities to students for metacognitive engagement. During reflection, students regulatetheir cognition by engaging themselves in three dimensions of metacognition
engineering design, collaboration in engineering, decision making in engineering teams, and elementary engineering education.Dr. Adetoun Yeaman, Northeastern University Adetoun Yeaman is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the First Year Engineering Program at Northeastern University. Her research interests include empathy, design education, ethics education and community engagement in engineering. She currently teaches Cornerstone of Engineering, a first-year two-semester course series that integrates computer programming, computer aided design, ethics and the engineering design process within a project based learning environment. She was previously an engineering education postdoctoral fellow at Wake Forest University
could make fair comparisons when evaluating the demonstrations’ efficacy.DiscussionIn implementing this intervention, we observed some areas we can improve upon in the future.Because few students had Wolfram Player, the software that runs these demonstrations, alreadyinstalled on their computers, some recitation time was spent on the installation and downloadingprocess. In future semesters, we would ask students to download the software ahead of time.Once the demonstrations are finalized, we can also contribute them to the WolframDemonstrations Project library [5] for online access through web browsers.In addition, these recitations were not directly overseen by the instructor, to give students timewith their peers and student TA to explore
hypothetical prompt implicitly and automaticallyelicits one’s beliefs, attitudes, and capabilities toward the behavior in question. Thisquantification of intentions serves as a crucial step in the operationalization process, facilitatingthe empirical examination of these psychological constructs.Intentions provide the starting point for investigating behaviors, framing the various attitudes,beliefs, and controls that impact the behavioral decision-making process. However, intentionsalone are insufficient in predicting behaviors; a student might fail to complete assigned tasks ontime due to unexpected project challenges, even if they have strong intentions to meet deadlines.The following sections break down the components that guide intention
and I started to take women of color and other marginalized identities under my wings as a gratitude to my mentors. (Author 2) For me, being international plays a significant role in my life as an engineering education scholar. As someone who has lived and worked in different countries, I bring a diverse perspective to my research, teaching, and interactions within the academic community. My international background influences how I approach topics in the classroom and in my scholarly work. Engaging in collaborative research projects with colleagues from around the world has deepened my appreciation for the interconnectedness of global issues in engineering education. Also, recent global events
Engineering Education, 2024 Improving Efficiency and Consistency of Student Learning Assessments: A New Framework Using LaTeXAbstractInstructors often rely on What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get (WYSIWYG) word processorapplications like Microsoft Word to create student learning assessments such as homeworkassignments and exams. The shortcomings in this traditional method led to the authors’motivation to develop a better method. This project focuses on the development, usage,evaluation, and dissemination of a student learning assessment system based on LaTeX, adocument preparation system commonly used for scientific documents. We call it the StudentLearning Assessment Modular System (SLAMS). With this system, educators
tends to center around consumers inforeign countries and a specific market segment (e.g., mature adults, seniors, or young people).User needs analysis is complex as it varies according to the product, scope of the project, type ofusers and their roles, implementation constraints, and development and design timeline [24]. Theliterature is scarce on comparisons of generational differences among consumers within theUnited States and their affective-cognitive decision making in adoption of smart devices. Thisstudy analyzes affective-cognitive constructs that contribute to adoption of wearable andenvironmental smart devices for college students and their parents and applies the findings toexample use cases in engineering design.The research
Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She received her B.Eng. and Ph.D in Computer Engineering and Informatics from the Polytechnic School, University of Patras, Greece. She has extensive experience on building data management and database solutions for large-scale systems in collaboration with industrial and governmental agencies, and academic partners. She has published her work in peer-reviewed international conferences and journals. Her current research interests include data management, data valuation and AI and engineering education. Her teaching/mentoring activities focus on developing and offering classes in project-based learning environments as well as
experience with circuits.Demographic information was collected using the Comprehensive Assessment of Team MemberEffectiveness (CATME) teaming software. CATME is a web-based application developed byresearchers at Purdue University to improve the effectiveness of student teams in collaborativelearning environments [34]. Students were required to collectively complete thirteen weeklyhomework assignments and one group project in the collaborative learning framework.Additionally, students were encouraged to prepare for exams as a group. However, aside fromthis collaborative approach to coursework and study, students were required to individuallycomplete two midterm exams and a final exam.Participants and Data CollectionPre- and post-course surveys were
student success through the major will be tracked, with students taking the assessment againwhen enrolled in the senior project course.Summary of FindingsThe analysis of the collected data revealed preliminary insights into the spatial and visualizationskills of freshmen and seniors in the MET program. Freshmen exhibited an average score of 23.7out of 30 on the PSVT:R, while seniors scored slightly higher with an average of 24.5. Furtherexamination of the data will be necessary to identify potential differences in spread and medianbetween the two groups.Initial observations suggest that seniors may exhibit a smaller spread in their scores, indicating amore consistent performance. This could be interpreted as, barring outliers, seniors tend to
techniques.The SLG programming followed the same outline of the lead author’s learning theory course andtherefore did not include much discussion regarding facilitation of this modality.Lessons LearnedDuring the summer of 2023, we embarked on our first iteration of our CoP and SLG. We cameinto this project with a shared hypothesis that there is a missing focus on the science of learning,including the impact of interactions between faculty and students, in faculty development. Webelieve this is a key factor in why there is limited change in faculty beliefs and behaviorsregarding teaching and learning as a result of faculty development programs.Elements of our CoP programming that were successful as reported by our first cohort ofparticipants included
and add additional details. f. Creating the Environment and Characters: The project incorporated free online resources in the public domain for environmental elements and character models. We felt it would be natural for a character to teach the user how to operate the robot. After finding a suitable character and matching environment, we used a free AI voice generator to create a voice that matched the character. g. Writing the Tutorials: We first wrote out how the tutorials should go, and as we kept adding more elements to the application. For example, in some parts of the tutorial, it became evident that the user would need a closer look to understand. So, we incorporated a small TV that would
Paper ID #41451Classicle Sticks: An Activity to Improve Student EngagementDr. C. Richard Compeau Jr., Texas State University C. Richard Compeau Jr. is a Professor of Practice in the Ingram School of Engineering. He is interested in teaching and curriculum development. His work is typically project-specific for the EE Capstone.Dr. Kimberly Grau Talley P.E., Texas State University Dr. Kimberly G. Talley, P.E. is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Technology, Bobcat Made Makerspace Director at Texas State University, and a licensed Professional Engineer. She received her Ph.D. and M.S.E. from the University
projects.Education can be viewed as a means to contribute to and develop human capital in the startupecosystem by investing in and developing the competencies and capacities of individuals in orderto improve their economic value and productivity. In both the educational and entrepreneurialecosystems, the outcomes of increasing the quality of human capital are demonstrated byindividuals who increase earning potential (their own and/or their organizations), enhance theirability to innovate and adapt to changing technologies and markets, and become more productiveand engaged citizens. In higher education, this is accomplished through project- and problem-based pedagogies, and high-impact practices where students engage in internships, learningcommunities
lecture on best practices for protocol writing then leveraged our longitudinaldesign project to assign a group homework to assess student capacity for protocol writing withthe additional opportunity to complete said protocol (Blooms Taxonomy level: application).Module 3: The revision of consensus standards. Modeled after industry panels to reviseconsensus standards, we have piloted an in-class activity for different stakeholders to collectivelypropose and write standard revisions. In BME 410, we provided students with ISO 15971 Invitro diagnostic test systems: Requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testingin managing diabetes mellitus for review. Students were then placed into five teams representingdifferent relevant
. Karl A. Smith, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Emeritus Professor of Civil, Environmental, and Geo- Engineering, Morse-Alumni Distinguished University Teaching Professor, Faculty Member, Technological Leadership Institute at the University of Minnesota; and Emeritus Cooperative Learning Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University.. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: PLSG – An Observational Study of Student Questions to Identify Levels of Cognitive Processing Reached During DiscussionAbstract - This Work in Progress study reviews the PEERSIST (PEER-led, Student Instructed,STudy group) project, which explores the achievement and persistence of students
logistics of each modality, this hopes to identify the similarities and differencesthat contribute to student success, shedding light on the critical role of course design inengineering education.While traditional face-to-face instruction has long been the standard method of teaching, the riseof hybrid and fully online courses has introduced new possibilities and challenges. Hybridcourses blend the benefits of face-to-face interaction with the flexibility of online learning,allowing students to engage in discussions, collaborate on projects, and participate in real-timeactivities. Fully online courses, on the other hand, offer students the convenience of learningfrom anywhere at any time but require strong self-discipline and time management skills
, Construction Engineering, Construction EngineeringTechnology, etc.) by various departments and colleges (Applied Science, Engineering, Business,Management, etc.). To recognize CM as a STEM field, more specifically an engineering field, thedefinition of “engineering” by Lucas and Dobrijevic as “the application of science andmathematics to solve problems” [9] is considered. While CM students do apply science andmathematics to develop cost estimates and schedules, it should be also noted that successfulconstruction relies on the application of several other engineering concepts including statics,dynamics, structures, hydraulics, and soils analysis. Graduates of CEPs must understand how theseconcepts apply to the construction projects which are undertaken
, while my students work through the later stages of a community-based service-learning project for a local nonprofit, they have also been reading excerpts from Lewis’s GoingInfinite and evaluating effective altruism through Bankman-Fried’s story. We have confronted thequestion of whether EA would treat their design project as a suboptimal use of their time on acause of merely local significance. We have also, ironically enough, read Bankman-Fried’sexpressions of loathing for books as an object of study. Lewis quotes a blog written during hissophomore year at MIT: I could go on and on about the failings of Shakespeare…but really I shouldn’t need to: the Bayesian priors are pretty damning... When Shakespeare wrote almost all Europeans
problems step by step. Each class is 50 minutes long, and it meetsthree times a week. Class time includes a brief lecture from the instructor about the day's topicand related real-world examples, followed by a session where students solve problems.In the summer of 2020, the Mechanics of Materials course was chosen to undergo a redesign aspart of the "INCLUDE, Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for EngineeringInnovation" research project. This project was supported by the Engineering Education Centersof the National Science Foundation. Its goal was to revolutionize engineering education andfoster an inclusive environment that supports learners with neurodiversity. While universaldesign principles can make courses accessible to everyone
may lead to bias in the resultsof the qualitative findings. Future work will include correlations of perceived learning experience to directassessment of learning through performance and grades in the course. We hope that these further insightswill help instructors identify changes that can be made to enhance student disposition toward difficultcourses in their curriculum.V. AcknowledgmentsWe would like to acknowledge the Grainger College of Engineering Strategic Instructional Initiatives(SIIP) program for the funding for this project. We would also like to thank our SIIP Education InnovationFellow, Ashlynn Stillwell, for her guidance and support.References[1] Mourtos, Nikos J. "Challenges students face when solving open-ended problems
focuses on chronicling this variation and fostering the development of teachers’ computational thinking using robotics and applications of artificial intelligence.Dr. Ibrahim H. Yeter, Nanyang Technological University Ibrahim H. Yeter, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor at the National Institute of Education (NIE) at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) in Singapore. He is an affiliated faculty member of the NTU Centre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE) and the NTU Institute for Science and Technology for Humanity (NISTH). He serves as the Director of the World MOON Project and holds editorial roles as Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education and Editorial Board Member for the Journal of
complementary disciplines. At the beginning of eachacademic year, social events were hosted to help new HAIS students assimilate into the learningcommunity. At the end of each semester, research teams met to present progress and findings fortheir projects in a mini research conference-style session. HAIS scholars across all five years ofdata reported high levels of satisfaction with the HAIS program in general, with the researchteam and mentoring rated higher than study halls. SOC was consistently rated as high, andSTEM Affinity as measured by the STEM Affinity Scale, was also consistently high.I. Introduction There are well-known and widespread issues that come with recruiting and retaining adiverse group of students into STEM (science