work? 2) Over the course of their early college experiences with mathematics, science, and engineering, how do students’ global affect about mathematics, science, and engineering change? 3) How do students’ local and global affect about mathematics, science, and engineering contribute to/interact with their identities, including engineering identity?While affect has been widely studied using qualitative methods, our parallel use of qualitativeinterviews and piloting of quantitative survey instruments will contribute to the development ofquantitative measures of affect that can be employed by others in STEM education. For thepurposes of this short grant summary, we will be focusing on the second research question
, J. Robinson, J. McLean, K. Jensen, and H. Golecki, “Revolutionizing Robotics: Broadening the Definition of Engineering by Engaging Students in Soft Robotics,” The Science Teacher, vol. 90, no. 5, May 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.nsta.org/science-teacher/science-teacher-mayjune-2023/revolutionizing- robotics[16] H. M. Golecki, T. Tran, E. McNeela, and K. J. Jensen, “Pilot Study of the Impacts of a Robotics Curriculum on Student’s Subject-related Identities and Understanding of Engineering,” in Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education, Baltimore, MD, Jun. 2023.[17] S. E. Coulter, “Using the retrospective pretest to get usable, indirect evidence of student learning,” Assessment &
interventions were developed: (i)the use of international engineering case studies ina quantitative analysis course,(ii) the intentional formation of multinational student design teamswithin a capstone design course, (iii) a Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL)research project in a transport phenomena course, and (iv) an engineering course coupled to acommunity-engaged project. The research aims to address the following questions: 1. To what extent can global competence be developed in engineering students through the use of the proposed global engagement interventions? 2. What are the relative strengths of each of the proposed global engagement interventions in developing global engineering competence?For this project, the
climate survey included the climate scale with 50 items for 9 constructs anddemographic items to capture the respondents’ complex social identities. During summer and fall2023, we collected our first pilot study data of 287 doctoral engineering students from 28institutions in the U.S. The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with the data from 287 engineeringdoctoral students revealed the latent factor structure of the climate scale for eight constructsindicated by 39 items. Internal consistency was good. Based on the EFA results, we planned torevise the items and add new items for the second round of data collection for the second pilotstudy in Year 2. Results from studies using the finalized survey are expected to guide specific policies
- Engaged Educational Ecosystem," in American Society for Engineering Education proceedings: ASEE, 2020.[5] D. Wood, A. Gura, J. Brockman, A. Rayna Carolan-Silva, S. Boukdad, and J. C. Alarcon, "Informing Replication of the Bowman Creek Educational Ecosystem Pilot," in American Society for Engineering Education proceedings, A. Genau Ed.: ASEE, 2019.[6] D. Wood, A. Gura, J. Brockman, and S. Alptekin, "Student Outcomes in Academic Community Engaged STEM projects with Multi-Dimensional Diversity.," in American Society for Engineering Education proceedings: ASEE, 2018.[7] G. Arastoopour, N. C. Chesler, and D. W. Shaffer, "Epistemic persistence: A simulation-based approach to increasing participation of women
. Walker, "Impacts of a Summer Bridge Program in Engineering on Student Retention and Graduation," Journal of STEM Education, vol. 19, no. 2, 2018.[4] D. Wood, A. Gura, and J. Brockman, "Critical Findings in the Development of the Community- Engaged Educational Ecosystem," in American Society for Engineering Education proceedings: ASEE, 2020.[5] D. Wood, A. Gura, J. Brockman, A. Rayna Carolan-Silva, S. Boukdad, and J. C. Alarcon, "Informing Replication of the Bowman Creek Educational Ecosystem Pilot," in American Society for Engineering Education proceedings, A. Genau Ed.: ASEE, 2019.[6] D. Wood, A. Gura, J. Brockman, and S. Alptekin, "Student Outcomes in Academic Community Engaged STEM projects with
identity in the professional formation of engineers and a diverse, transdisciplinary engineering workforce.Hannah Wilkinson, Utah State University Hannah Wilkinson is a graduate student in Engineering Education at Utah State University. She received a B.S. in Chemical Engineering in from the University of Utah and a M.S. in Engineering Education from Utah State University.Samuel Shaw, Utah State University Samuel Shaw is an undergraduate student in Mechanical Engineering at Utah State University.Allison Miles, Utah State University Allison Miles is an undergraduate student in Mechanical Engineering at Utah State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 CAREER: ‘Support our
through graduate education, and gender and race in engineering.Dr. Allison Godwin, Cornell University Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an associate professor in the Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at Cornell University. Her research focuses on how identity, among other affective factors, influences diverse students to choose engineering and persist in engineering. She also studies how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belonging and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a 2016 National Science
Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 24, no. 2, 2018, Accessed: Feb. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.dl.begellhouse.com/journals/00551c876cc2f027,4c37811e62eac771,359bf188 17ac4bed.html[19] L. N. Fleming, S. E. Burris, K. C. Smith, L. B. Bliss, I. N. Moore, and F. Bornmann, “Beyond persistence: Graduate school aspirations of Hispanic engineering students at HSIs,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014, pp. 24–228. Accessed: Feb. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/beyond-persistence-graduate-school- aspirations-of-hispanic-engineering-students-at-hsis[20] M. G. Cuellar and A. M. Gonzalez, “Beyond the Baccalaureate: Factors Shaping Latina/o Graduate
California, Irvine and is working on a Masters in Science Education at California State University Long Beach. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Breaking Through the Obstacles: Strategies and Support Helping Students Succeed in Computer ScienceIntroduction and MotivationNot only that there is a continuously growing number of students who want to study computerscience (CS) but also there is a large need for CS graduates. The computing jobs are crucial forthe development and growth of the economy worldwide. For example, the data from theIntegrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) [1] by the U.S. Department ofEducation’s National Center for Education Statistics
is or is not preparing them to address macroethical issues?We also pose a question to assess our curriculum: RQ3) How does the macroethical curriculum impact students’ perceptions and awareness of macroethical issues and their desire to engage with the macroethical implications of their future work?In the first year of our project, we are developing a survey to conduct quantitative and qualitativeanalyses of students’ awareness and perception of macroethical issues in aerospace engineering,as well as their educational experiences on the topic. A pilot study of a proposed two-factorstructure based on RQ1 and RQ2 did not offer evidence of validity via confirmatory factoranalysis (see the poor fit shown in Figure 3
. Glass, E. Kociolek, R. Wongtrirat, R. J. Lynch, and S. Cong, “Uneven Experiences: The Impact of Student-Faculty Interactions on International Students’ Sense of Belonging,” jis, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 353–367, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.32674/jis.v5i4.400.[3] N. Mayat and S. L. Amosun, “Perceptions of academic staff towards accommodating students with disabilities in a civil engineering undergraduate program in a university in South Africa,” Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 53–59, 2011.[4] E. E. Blair, R. B. Miller, M. Ong, and Y. V. Zastavker, “Undergraduate STEM Instructors’ Teacher Identities and Discourses on Student Gender Expression and Equity: Stem Instructors’ Discourses on
, where her thesis topic was Nanoparticle Diffusion in Polymer Networks. Her research interests include polymer physics, nanoparticle diffusion, and engineering and physics education.Lily Skau, Austin Peay State University Lily Skau is an undergraduate student at Austin Peay State University pursuing a bachelor’s degree in Engineering Physics and a minor in Mathematics and Sociology. She plans to graduate with her degree and minors in May of 2026 and enter the industry as a Mechanical Engineer.Dr. Bobette Dawn Bouton, Austin Peay State University Dr. Bobette Bouton is an associate professor at Austin Peay State University. Her current area of research is socio-emotional development in the domain of empathy. She is a
identify potential users, wesurveyed first-year undergraduate engineering students to capture their intention to participate inacademic makerspaces. This study reports on work done as part of a larger study that follows thepaths of first-year students at two academic institutions, tracking their participation andperceptions of makerspaces over four years. Quantitative data were collected from two onlinesurveys that were distributed at the beginning of the Fall 2022 semester and the end of theWinter/Spring 2023 semester. Each survey took approximately 10 minutes to complete andconsisted of a series of Likert-type and single-selection questions about theirattitudes/motivations toward makerspaces and psychosocial assessments of their