Collection

2024 Rocky Mountain Section Conference

Authors

Timothy Frank; Daphne DePorres; Emily Stoneham; Joel Sloan P.E.; Vincent Bongionanni; Eric Tucker

reflected on the interviews of engineers with diversebackgrounds. This may speak to the framing of the subject within the context of the course. Afterwatching the diversity exemplar videos, students were asked to reflect on the types of people thatdo engineering. Responses, almost unanimously, were very much aligned with a growth mindset.Some student response examples include:• Flexible• Good communicators• Critical thinkers• Passionate• Myriad of traits• Determined• Open minded• All shapes and sizes, from all walks of life• Any type of person• Aren’t afraid of change• Love to learn• Versatile and able to adaptIt is difficult to say how much hearing the personal and professional journey of a variety ofpracticing engineers that identify with an

Collection

2024 Rocky Mountain Section Conference

Authors

Loraine Glidewell; Marisa Mendoza-Maurer; Joseph L. Polman; Daniel Knight; Angela Bielefeldt

choice in rural Appalachia: Sparking and sustaining interest, International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 33, no. 1B, pp. 463-475. 7National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine (NASEM, 2018). How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24783National Center for Education Statistics (NCES, 2016). Selected statistics from the public elementary and secondary education universe: School year 2014-15. Table 4. National Center for Education Statistics.National Research Council. (NRC, 2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National

Collection

2024 Rocky Mountain Section Conference

Authors

Jack Elliot; Alex Nielson

-C: What are the primary limitations of SNA in engineering education research?With these RQs in mind, we identified a scoping literature review as the most fittingmethodology.MethodologyTo answer our RQs, we applied a scoping literature review methodology. A scoping literaturereview offers an initial evaluation of the extent of the current literature on a specific topic andidentifies the depth of that research. Identifying the scope and depth of prior research is helpfulfor researchers to highlight gaps in existing bodies of research, determine if one or moresystematic reviews are necessary, and identify trends in the existing literature [5].The first step in our scoping review process was to conduct an initial search through GoogleScholar