229Balance Response Platform for Stability Assessment for KinesiologyRehabilitation Device after Knee SurgeryLift for Placing and Extracting of a Handicapped Person to the PoolRobotic Painting DeviceConversion of an Internal Combustion Automobile into an Electric VehicleHovercraft Vehicle DesignPlatform for Mounting Inspection CamerasThermal Management UnitSolar Hot Dog CookerAutomatic Shish Kebab MachineRickshaw DesignSterling EngineMovable Mirror Focusing Solar CollectorReferences 1. Kreiner, Jesa, “A Contemporary Method of Teaching Machine Design Courses”. Event # 1824, 86th Annual Conference of the ASEE, University of British Columbia, ASEE Journal October 1978, Vol. 69. 2. Kreiner, Jesa and S. Krishnamurthy, “ Relevance of
of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References 1. National Academy of Engineering, Technically Speaking, National Academy Press, Washington D.C., (2002). 2. Tech Tally: Approaches to Assessing Technological Literacy, Elsa Garmire and Greg Pearson, editors, National Academies Press, (2006). 3. S. Florman, Engineering and the Liberal Arts, McGraw-Hill, NY, 1968. 4. Krupczak, J.J., D. Ollis, “Technological Literacy and Engineering for Non-Engineers: Lessons from Successful Courses,” Proceeding of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2006). 5. Krupczak, J. & D. Ollis, “Technology
enterprise is the National Science Foundation’s CI-TEAMprogram, which is designed to promote the acquisition of knowledge and the requisite skillsneeded to create, advance and exploit the potential of cyberinfrastructure.The long term objective of CIBRED is to make state-of-the-art science and engineeringresearch more accessible to all by providing training, education, and mentoring to meet theneeds of current and future scientists. Such an objective could be applicable to the future ofengineering education. CIBRED”s target audience is high school and college STEMstudents STEM and its complementary agenda is the introduction of a CIERRA education,outreach and training strategy for broadening participation and the applicant pool in the
theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction 4: 295-312.[2] Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors 40, 1-17.[3] Pollock, E. Chandler, P. and Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction. 12(1), 61-86.[4] Sweller, J., J. Van Merriënboer. and F. Paas. 1998. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review 10(3): 251-296.[5] Renkl, A., and R. Atkinson. 2003. Structure the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist 38(1):15-22.[6] Renkl
Students, J. Engr. Education, 87, 469-480.4 Rodger, S. H. (1995). An Interactive Lecture Approach to Teaching Computer Science. Proceedings of the twenty- sixth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, 1995, Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 278 – 282.5 Beekes, W. (2006). The ‘Millionaire’ Method for Encouraging Participation. The Journal of the Institute for Learning and Teaching 7, 25-36. Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Regional Conference 436 Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). A Learning to Collaborate