Collection

2011 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Jennifer Van Donk; Justin Lekos; Sarah Baker; Kevin Yamauchi; Adam Paicely; Brian P. Self; A. Matthew Robinson

October 14, 2010, from http://odysseyteams.com/programs/helpingHands2. LEGS For All. LEGS For All . Retrieved January 19, 2011, from http://legsforall.com/projects/kneeproject.php3. Hansen, A. H., D. S. Childress, and E. H. Knox. "Prosthetic Foot Roll-over Shapes with Implications for Alignment of Trans-tibial Prostheses." Prosthetics and Orthotics International 24.3 (2000): 205-15. Print.4. Carberry, A., Lee, H.S., Ohland, M.W. (2010) Measuring engineering design self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education. 99(1): 71-79.5. Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., and Blanchard, C. (2000) “On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS)”. Motivation and Emotion. 24(3

Collection

2011 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Shoba Krishnan; Ruth Davis; Marco Bravo; Melissa Gilbert

  182 Somewhat True, A Little True and Not True”. Items were organized around three constructs: 1. Self-Efficacy in STEM Learning (e.g., I am good at using technology) 2. Knowledge of STEM ideas (e.g., I know about the engineering design process) 3. Attitudes toward STEM Learning (It is fun to learn about science, technology and engineering)The survey was administered before and after the implementation of the intervention. Theclassroom teacher administered the survey and coded each student name before submitting thesurveys to the research team. At the onset of the intervention, student sense of self-efficacy in doing STEM wasstronger than their knowledge about or attitudes toward STEM dispositions as seen in Table 1.At post

Collection

2011 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors