Asee peer logo
Displaying all 6 results
Collection
2013 GSW
Authors
David H. K. Hoe
undertaken in Spring 2012 at our institution to determine the impact of varioustypes of peer interaction exercises on student learning in a Signals and Systems course. This is ajunior-level course in the electrical engineering curriculum, which provides foundationalmaterial for several senior-level classes. This paper is outlined as follows. First, a generalbackground of the Signals and Systems class is described followed by a description of thedifferent types of peer interaction exercises utilized in this study. Second, the methods ofassessment and an analysis of these results are given. The paper concludes with a summary anddiscussion of plans to further improve the use of peer interaction in-class exercises
Collection
2013 GSW
Authors
Priscila Martinez-Avila; Emmanuel Varona; Doug D. Carlton; Abegayl Thomas; Kevin A. Schug
learning of students in generalchemistry courses. At The University of Texas at Arlington, completion of general chemistry is acore requirement of the engineering curriculum, and the Chemistry for Engineers courseeffectively combines traditional first and second semester general chemistry courses into a onesemester course. Similar to other institutions, our students face obstacles to learning chemistry.These are evident from the low passing rates that are reported in literature and seen in ourclassrooms. The university has instituted the Arlington Undergraduate Research-basedAchievement for STEM (AURAS), a National Science Foundation-funded program to promotesuccess in general chemistry, and ultimately increase retention and graduation rates
Collection
2013 GSW
Authors
Christina K. White; Richard H. Crawford
) interdisciplinary curriculum that integrates engineering, public policy, business,and ethics, and more; (3) entrepreneurship to turn creative ideas into inventions andinnovations; (4) global dimensions necessary to navigate our modern economy; and (5) service-learning to deepen the social consciousness of the Scholars. The GCSPs are in part, a responseto national innovation-focused policies such as Educate to Innovate and Innovation Strategy forEconomic Development, which have inspired new ideas and research in engineering education.Throughout human history, imagination has come to fruition in many ways, notably throughengineering which drives immense advances in civilization. These advances can be seen withsignificant engineering feats that drastically
Collection
2013 GSW
Authors
Amir Karimi; Randall D. Manteufel
factors include teaching, advising andcurriculum. Non-academic factors are related to cohorts and a sense of community. Studentswho believe they belong in engineering are more likely to be retained in engineering.The impact of freshmen-level courses on student retention have been studied4,5. The freshmanlevel classes do have an impact on 4-year retention. This finding is consistent with theunderstanding that curriculum and instruction have strong impacts on retention. Students whobuild connections between theoretical academic aspects of the curriculum and professionalengineering practice, are more likely to be retained in engineering. Likewise, those who buildconnections with other students develop a sense of belonging and are less likely to
Collection
2013 GSW
Authors
John Sibert; Matthew Goeckner; Dave Galley; Kory Goldammer
and computer science. Theresponse from faculty and students has been overwhelmingly positive with, for example, amolecular biology student commenting that this is the best experience of her life and a facultymember sending an unsolicited e-mail report that his engineering student is outstanding andcompleting tasks so quickly that the faculty member is challenged to keep him occupied – a goodproblem to have! Most importantly, all twenty students who have participated in the program arecurrently or will be pursuing STEM degrees at UT Dallas.Peer Led Team Learning (PLTL)The integration of Peer-led Team Learning (PLTL)9 into the UT Dallas STEM learningframework has been supported, in part, by the Collaborative. The PLTL program began in theFall
Collection
2013 GSW
Authors
Edward E. Anderson
DOLLAR, A. 2007. An interactive web-based statics course. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI.12. STIEF, P. and DOLLAR, A, 2009. Study of usage patterns and learning gains in a web-based interactive static course. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4): 321-334.13. PHILPOT, T.A. 2008. Mechanics of materials: an integrated learning system. New York, NY. Wiley.14. PHILPOT, T.A. 2005. The role of MDSolids in international mechanics of materials education, International Journal of Engineering Education, 21 (2).15. STANLEY, R. 2009. A way to increase the engineering student’s qualitative understanding of particle kinematics and kinetics by utilizing interactive