in science, technology,engineering and mathematics courses, as well as increase retention in thesecourses/fields. A Toy-FUN-damentals first-year seminar course has been taught at the UniversityPark campus, and it has ‘proven to increase retention of women in the College ofEngineering’. At the Abington campus, we have developed a modified version of thiscourse, using Power Wheels® cars to illustrate engineering principles. Our overall projectinvolves students in two existing courses -- Engineering Design (EDSGN 100-forfreshmen students) and a sophomore-level Computer Engineering laboratory course indigital design (CMPEN 275). This paper will outline the educational outcomes and contributions of each classin the analysis and
studentsaimed to find the maximum compression member and tried to minimize it by changing theirdesigns, which was indeed a redesign. That necessitates them to carefully examine their bridge’struss, which led them to better comprehend why the trusses are constructed the way they are.It has been observed that students enjoy and learn better from laboratory lectures when they areconnected together as a single project rather than a discrete set of unrelated exercises8. By meansof the bridge design project, students did not only perform an experiment with beams and loadcells but they used those equipments to test and improve their designs. They also had theopportunity to observe some reasons that caused the calculated and the measured values to bedifferent
and Assistant Department Head of the Department of Engi- neering Education at Virginia Tech. He is the Director of the multi-University NSF I/UCRC Center for e-Design, the Director of the Frith Freshman Design Laboratory and the Co-Director of the Engineering First-year Program. His research areas are design and design education. Dr. Goff has won numerous University teaching awards for his innovative and interactive teaching. He is passionately committed to bringing research and industry projects into the class room as well as spreading fun and creating engage- ment in all levels of Engineering Education
required inboth the engineering and the engineering technology programs. The portion of the EDSGNcourse under study involves multiple student design projects—one lasting two weeks andanother lasting 3 weeks. CBIOS is taught to all engineering technology students in their junioryear. It consists of a common lecture for all sections of the course and separate laboratoryexperience for each section with a maximum of 16 students per section—76 students in 5laboratory sections. For this work, the final two laboratory projects served as test period.Table 1 shows the breakdown of the basic data for participants and team makeup. The teamsizes ranged from 3 member teams to 5 member groups. The groups changed membership andsize between the two projects
learning in industrial design and engineering technology programs with anemphasis on design concept prototyping and technological prototyping respectively, thisinterdisciplinary course integrates these parallel tracks to provide a seamless collaborativelearning experience. From the identification of a research problem to the development of aworking prototype, the collaborative studio/laboratory reinforces creative and critical thinkingwith an emphasis on human, technological, and aesthetic aspects of product development. Thisapproach to undergraduate education can provide constructive and authentic learning experiencesto meet the industry needs. This paper reports the preliminary results of the pilot phase of a one-year grant awarded through the
currently Associate Director of the O.T. Swanson Multidisciplinary Design Laboratory and Clinical Associate Professor of the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering at RPI. His responsibilities include managing the operation of the Design Laboratory and optimizing the experience for students working on engineering design projects.Samuel Chiappone, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute SAMUEL G. CHIAPPONE, JR. Manager, Fabrication & Prototyping, School of Engineering Education MS Management Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, 1999 BS Teacher of Technical Education Subjects - State University of NY, Oswego, NY, 1997 AAS Industrial Tech. /Mfg. Option - Hudson Valley Community College, Troy, NY
. http://www.powerfilmsolar.com/rollable-solar-chargers/technical-data.php6. http://www.powerfilmsolar.com/foldable-solar-chargers/technical-data.php7. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/mep-tqg.htm8. http://www.purepowerd.com/docs/PPDMobileSolarPowerSystemSpecs.pdf9. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, CO 80401. (PV System Operation and Maintenance Manual)10. Kronenburg, Robert Portable Architecture, Architectural Press, 2003 - Architecture - 274 pages11. Kronenburg, Robert Transportable environments, Taylor & Francis, 199812. Kronenburg, Robert, Klassen, Filiz, Transportable environments 3, Taylor & Francis US, 2005 - Architecture13. Kronenburg, Ephemeral
from the industry sponsored model, is the need and request to include students fromother departments, to form multidisciplinary team. For example, Harris Inc. asked for theinvolvement of students from the Electrical/Computer Engineering (ECE) department and theMechanical Engineering (ME) department to work together on mechatronics-related projects. AirForce Research Laboratory (AFRL) has requested the inclusion of Industry Engineering (IE)students for their familiarity of the manufacturing process especially, the use of moderncomposite materials processing technique developed by the IE department of the College.For many years we have made attempts to integrate cross-disciplinary engineering students in ourprojects with little success as a
AC 2011-331: ANALYSIS OF REFLECTIVE MEMOSMark W. Steiner, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Mark W. Steiner is Director of the O.T. Swanson Multidisciplinary Design Laboratory in the School of En- gineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) and Clinical Professor in the Mechanical, Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering department. Mark graduated from Rensselaer with a B.S. in mechanical engi- neering in 1978 and a Ph.D. in 1987. He has been a member of the Rensselaer faculty since May 1999. Mark worked at GE Corporate from 1987 to 1991, consulting and introducing world-class productivity practices throughout GE operations. In 1991 he joined GE Appliances and led product line structuring efforts resulting in
communication networks.Carlos Pomalaza-Raez, Indiana University Purdue University, Fort Wayne Carlos Pomalaza-Rez is an Electrical Engineering Professor at Indiana-Purdue University, Indiana, USA, and a Visiting Professor at the University of Oulu, Finland. He received his BSME and BSEE from Universidad Nacional de Ingeniera, Lima, Peru in 1974, and his MS and PhD in Electrical Engineering from Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, in 1977 and 1980, respectively. He has been a Faculty Member of the University of Limerick, Ireland, and of Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York. He has also been a member of the technical staff at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory of the California Institute of Technology.Edwin Chobot, Purdue
Page 22.912.2electromechanical engineering program at Wentworth Institute of Technology. Theelectromechanical engineering program is a faculty-driven, high-quality EAC-of-ABETaccredited five-year interdisciplinary electromechanical engineering program.1 It wasestablished in 1992 at Wentworth Institute of Technology. Under EAC rules, theelectromechanical engineering program had to simultaneously meet the accreditation criteria forelectrical engineering and for mechanical engineering. The graduates of this program are trueinterdisciplinary engineers proficient in tackling interdisciplinary projects in all their electricaland mechanical complexity. In addition, the graduates have excellent laboratory and machineshop skills. Recently,1,2 a
ofimportant behaviors. Recommendations include incorporating a professional spine in thecurriculum, whereby students may have an opportunity to integrate their knowledge in acontextual environment. A second recommendation outlines the need for students to makeconnections between theory and practice and to develop the thinking skills required forengineering practice. This requires an inductive, as opposed to a deductive, approach to teachingand learning.The integration of professional identity, knowledge and skills requires that students have anopportunity to experience engineering practice, through so-called approximations to practice.Often this means exposing students to laboratory or design project teaching methods (they aredifferent). A recent
AC 2011-837: IMPLEMENTATION AND ASSESSMENT OF A CAPSTONECOURSE DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE PROGRAM LEARNING OBJECTIVESMohamed E. El-Sayed, Kettering University Dr. Mohamed El-Sayed is a professor of Mechanical engineering and director of the Hybrid Electric Vehicle Integration and Durability Laboratory, Kettering University. He is the current Editor-in-Chief of the SAE journal of Materials and Manufacturing. Dr. El-Sayed has over thirty years of teaching experience in the area of design, design simulation, design optimization, and automotive design. Dr. El-Sayed has over twenty years of Automotive Design, Development, and Validation experience. Dr. El-Sayed was the lead engineer on the design optimization and quality
., Yarbrough, D., Rothmyer, A., Rajagopalan, G., Otta, S., Caughey, D., Bhaskaran, R., Smith, S., Hutching B., and Moeykens, S., “Development of Hands-On CFD Educational Interface for Undergraduate Engineering Courses and Laboratories”, ASEE, AC 2004-1526, 2004.11. Blekhman, D., “Lessons Learned in Adopting a CFD Package”, ASEE, AC 2007-830, 2007.12. LaRoche, R., Hutchings, B., and Muralikrishnan, R., “FlowLab: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Framework for Undergraduate Education” , ASEE, AC 2002-1520, 2002.13. Ormiston, S., “Incorporating CFD into the Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Programm at the University of Manitoba”, Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the CFD Society of Canada: CFD2001, pp. 333
consisted of onedesign course in each of the two semesters, with an emphasis on laboratory experiences.Through these courses, the students were given 245 minutes of lab time each week (divided intotwo weekly lab periods of 170 minutes and 75 minutes, respectively) to work on various open-ended design challenges, as well as 50 minutes each week for lectures, which taught primarilywritten and graphical communication skills. The initial design course utilized the projects toexperientially develop important skillsets, such as the design process, project management,verbal communication, teamwork, social considerations, and the application of scientific andmathematic principles. These skills were expected to be developed by the students, with
AC 2011-2181: RE-DESIGNING CAPSTONE DESIGN: TWO YEARS OFEXPERIENCECameron J Turner, Colorado School of Mines Dr. Cameron Turner is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines where he runs the Design Innovation and Computational Engineering Laboratory. At CSM he teaches undergradu- ate and graduate courses in engineering design and is a member of the Senior Design Leadership group. Dr. Turner is currently the course coordinator for the Engineering Capstone Design program and is active in the Computers and Information in Engineering Division of ASME. Page 22.1213.1
, Arizona. He has a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical engineering from Northern Arizona University, and a master’s degree in mechanical engineering from the Northern Arizona University. He is the faculty advisor for the student section of ASME. His experience includes various engineering po- sitions at Raytheon, M.C. Gill Corporation, Royal Plastics Engineering, SouthWest Windpower, and the Naval Research Laboratory. He is a practicing professional mechanical engineer in the state of California, and Nebraska.Theodore A. Uyeno, Northern Arizona University Dr. Uyeno is an adjunct professor of comparative biomechanics in the department of biological sciences at Northern Arizona University. His specialty is the analysis of
problem' infuture iterations of the methodology. Additionally, we may consider evaluating our intuition thatthe method will save time, compared to a control who is not applying the methodology. Ourhypothesis is that there will be a breaking point, that is for projects with a longer time scale, themethod will be most effective.Acknowledgements This work is supported in part by a grant from the Air Force Research Laboratories(AFRL/RW at Eglin AFB, FL, ARFL/RB at Wright Patterson AFB, OH and AFRL/RX atTyndall AFB, FL) and, in part, by The University of Texas at Austin Cockrell School ofEngineering and the Cullen Trust Endowed Professorship in Engineering No. 1. In addition, weacknowledge the support of the Department of Engineering Mechanics
] EU (European Union), 2000. “Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September”, 2000 on End-of-Life Vehicles, 9 pp.[6] Sawyer-Beaulieu, S., 2009. “Gate-to-Gate Life Cycle Inventory Assessment of North American End-of- Life Vehicle Management Processes”, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario.[7] Platts, K.W., 2004. “Developing knowledge and skills in engineers: a learning laboratory Education and Training”, Vol. 46, No .4, pp. 206-213. Page 22.483.9Appendix Table 4 Example of printed work instructions (10 pgs in length) for a parts assembly used for
Department Head of the Department of Engi- neering Education at Virginia Tech. He is the Director of the Multi-University NSF I/UCRC Center for e-Design, the Director of the Frith Freshman Design Laboratory and the Co-Director of the Engineering First-year Program. His research areas are design and design education. Dr. Goff has won numerous University teaching awards for his innovative and interactive teaching. He is passionately committed to bringing research and industry projects into the class room as well as spreading fun and creating engage- ment in all levels of Engineering Education. Page 22.904.1
facilities including significant analysis, CAD, rapid prototyping,machining, and engineering laboratories. Capstone student teams take real-life design projectsfrom concept generation and modeling to a working prototype including documentation.Companies that sponsor Capstone projects provide BYU an educational grant of $20,000 whichprovides an initial budget for each team of $1,500. Approved costs that exceed the initial budgetare the responsibility of the sponsoring company. All documentation, drawings, and prototypescreated by the student teams are provided to the sponsoring company. In addition, BYU grantsall intellectual property that may be developed by the team to the sponsoring company. Thispractice is similar to what occurs in industry as
. Eng. Ed, Vo l. 18, No. 6, p. 644, 200219. Sheppard, K. and Gallois, B., The Design Spine: Revision of the Engineering Curricu lu m to Include a Design Experience each Semester, A merican Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Charlotte, North Carolina, June 1999, Session 322520. Sheppard, S. et al. (2008), “Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field”, Jossey -Bass.21. Stiver, W., “Sustainable Design in a second year engineering design course, I. J. Eng. Ed., vol 26, no 2., pp. 1-6, 201022. Topper, A., and Clapham, L., Fro m Experiments to Experimentation; A New Philosophy for First Year Laboratories, C2E2 2001, Victoria23. Wolf, P. and Christensen Hughes, J. (eds.) (2007), Curriculu m
. In contrast, the consecutive cohort gets an uninterrupted period of two terms to devote totheir project. The students are all on campus, so there are no barriers to meeting, and 24 houraccess to computer modeling laboratories is provided. The consecutive cohort in theory has moreaccess to faculty advisors as well.Despite the potential benefits of two consecutive terms on campus, it seems that there is somebenefit to going on co-op after the first term of Capstone. Many groups do manage to continueworking on their problems, despite the distance between group members. Groups have also beenknown to take advantage of subject matter experts at their co-op company to get information tohelp them solve their design problems. During co-op, students
Group of Superconducting Super Collider and Computer Safety and Reliability Center at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. He also worked on projects and consulted for a number of private companies, including Lockheed Martin, Harris, and Boeing. Zalewski served as a chairman of the International Federation for Information Processing Working Group 5.4 on Industrial Software Quality, and of the International Federation of Automatic Con- trol Technical Committee on Safety of Computer Control Systems. His major research interests include safety-related, real-time computer systems.Gloria A. Murphy, NASA Gloria A. Murphy is currently the Project Manager of the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate (ESMD) Space
society.Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) is located in Cambridge, Massachusetts and isknown as a pre-eminent institution of research, teaching, and learning in the sciences andtechnology. As an institution founded to impart applied knowledge, MIT implements educationfrom a laboratory approach, stressing hands-on experimentation. This approach is congruentwith the Institute‟s motto, Mens et Manus – “Mind and Hand.” The mission of MIT is to advanceknowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that willbest serve the nation and the world in the 21st century. MIT is dedicated to providing its studentswith an education that combines rigorous academic study and the excitement of discovery withthe support and
development for many years and decided to approach thisaugmentation of engineering education from within the technical domain we are most familiarwith. The ‘laboratory’ for this endeavor has been a graduate level engineering design course thatis offered at Georgia Institute of Technology every spring, namely, ME6102 Designing OpenEngineering Systems. We have jointly orchestrated this course for many years. In the followingsections, an overview of this course, its context and content, the way it is structured andorchestrated, and in particular the fashion in which it serves as a vehicle and example for re-designing engineering education are presented
AC 2011-1570: PROJECT-BASED LEARNING AND DESIGN EXPERIENCESIN INTRODUCTION TO ENGINEERING COURSES ASSESSING AN IN-CREMENTAL INTRODUCTION OF ENGINEERING SKILLSAndrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University Andrew Gerhart, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. He is actively involved in ASEE, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and the Engineering Society of Detroit. He serves as Faculty Advisor for the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Student Chapter at LTU, chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, director of the LTU Thermal Science Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate in Energy & Environmental Man