-Champaign she • Leads the strategy enhancing the Grainger College of Engineering (GCOE)’s commitment to diversity, equity, inclusion, and access. • Develops robust structures to support faculty and staff appropriately to ensure an equitable, inclusive, and supportive workplace and learning community. • Collaborates with the Associate Dean (AD) to 1) define strategic priorities and examine policies, and 2) develop DEI goals and objectives for the College and its units. • Utilizes data collection and analysis to identify challenges, enhance transparency, establish accountability measures, propose effective solutions, and define metrics for evaluating progress within the college’s units and other assigned areas. • Leads and
. Crafted by S2D participantswith the support of writing coaches, personal statements written during the program reflectparticipant stories and the effectiveness of programming and staff. The exit survey providesfeedback on programming from the participant perspective which will help administrators takesteps toward enhanced curriculum building. Currently, research is being conducted to performpost program analysis. The research details where past S2D participants are now, how S2Dcontributed to their academic journeys, and which component(s) of past S2D programming pastS2D participants found most useful. Post program analysis provides administrators with insightregarding long term outcomes of S2D programming.BiasTwo types of bias to be highlighted
theProfessoriate (AGEP) Program Solicitation." NSF21-576, 2021. [Online]. Available:https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2021/nsf21576/nsf21576.pdf[19] P. Felder, "On Doctoral Student Development: Exploring Faculty Mentoring in the Shapingof African American Doctoral Student Success." Qualitative Report, vol. 15, no. 2, 2010, pp.455-474.[20] R. W. Lent and S. D. Brown, (2019). “Social cognitive career theory at 25: empirical statusof the interest, choice, and performance models.” J. Vocat. Behav, 115, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2019.06.004[21] R. W. Lent, H.-B. Sheu, M. J. Miller, M. E. Cusick, L. T. Penn, and N. N. Truong,“Predictors of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics choice options: A meta-analytic path analysis of the social–cognitive choice model
totalsto visually observe the relationship between the variables and found a positive, monotonicrelationship (Figure 1). We calculated Spearman’s correlation coefficient using the ranks of thetotals and found a moderate positive correlation between the variables (r s=0.59). Mostrespondents had a favorable disposition to diversity, equity and inclusion, on both the personaland professional scales.Items that scored least favorably (i.e., average scores less than 3.5 on the scales are summarizedin Table 4. The table shows that faculty hold less favorable personal and professional beliefsabout linguistic differences; this may infer that respondents place English learning as a priority inand outside the classroom. The table also shows that faculty hold
. (2022). The men need to be involved: A criticalframe analysis of gender+ equity narratives. ADVANCE Journal 3(1).https://doi.org/10.5399/osu/ADVJRNL.3.1.13Ballakrishnen, S., P. Fielding-Singh, and D. Magliozzi. (2019). Intentional Invisibility:Professional Women and the Navigation of Workplace Constraints. Sociology Perspectives61(1):23-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121418782185Bilen-Green, C., Green, R. A., McGeorge, C., Anicha, C., & Burnett, A. (2013, June 23-26).Engaging male faculty in institutional transformation [Conference paper]. American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, United States.Bilen-Green, C., Carpenter, J. P., Doore, S., Green, R. A., Horton, K. J., Jellison, K. L., Latimer
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 A narrative study of food insecurestudents in engineering and computing Justin C. Major, Ph.D 2025 CoNECD Conference This material is based upon grants supported by the New Jersey Office of the Secretary of Higher Education (NJOSHE). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the reviews of NJOSHE. 1 Hunger is a serious issue among college students. • ~24-30% of college
Page 13 of 22 STUDENTS PUNCHING UP Researcher: When you all faced difficulties or issues with your design, was there a particular resource that you went to? Like, was there a person(s), online, or what kinds of things did you do in order to get beyond the difficult parts of the design process -- Mario: [interrupts] My group, we really just walked around to see the other plane designs. Royal: Hmmmmmm [looks at Mario] [All laugh] 12Here, the researcher asks a question around how students navigate difficulties --specifically, the kinds of resources that they seek out in such moments.[narrate quotes]Mario interjects with one answer to the question. This is
-efficacy and science course trajectories. Journal of Research in Education 27(1), 79.[8] Microsoft. (n.d.). Closing the STEM Gap. Microsoft. Retrieved September 28, 2021, from https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE1UMWz[9] Kerger, S., Martin, R., & Brunner, M. (2011). How can we enhance girls’ interest in scientific topics? British Journal of Educational Psychology. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02019.x[10] Fletcher, T., Hooper, K., Alfonso, D. F., & Alharbi, A. (2024). Gender and STEM Education: An Analysis of Interest and Experience Outcomes for Black Girls within a Summer Engineering Program. Education Sciences, 14(5), 518.[11] Vela, K. N., Pedersen, R. M., & Baucum, M. N. (2020). Improving
during her Ph.D. studies at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, fostering the next generation of Hispanic engineers.Julie E Lorenzo, University of Illinois at Urbana - ChampaignDr. Natasha Mamaril, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Natasha Mamaril is currently the Associate Director for Undergraduate Research in The Grainger College of Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests include academic motivation and the assessment of student learning. She has a B. S. in Chemical Engineering and obtained her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Educational Psychology from the University of Kentucky. She also has nine years of industry experience
, “Exploring inclusive pedagogy,” Br. Educ. Res. J., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 813–828, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1080/01411926.2010.501096.[8] D. E. Chubin, G. S. May, and E. L. Babco, “Diversifying the engineering workforce,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 73–86, 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00830.x.[9] G. Light, S. Calkins, M. Luna, and D. Drane, “Assessing the Impact of a Year‐Long Faculty Development Program on Faculty Approaches to Teaching”.[10] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “The National Effective Teaching Institute: Assessment of Impact and Implications for Faculty Development,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 121– 134, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01049.x.[11] Y. Steinert et al., “A systematic review of faculty
reduced the model to three factors, the overall analysis became less coherent, further justifying our choice to retain the two-item factor. Internal consistency for each factor was determined by a Cronbach’s alpha value higher than 0.70[32]. The breakdown of eachfactor can be found in the tables below. s part of the exploratory factor analysis, we named the factors to determine underlying themesAin grouping the survey items. Factor 1 included survey items related to limited growth, lack of flexibility, and discouraged creativity, so we called this factor “Limited Innovation and Growth.” Factor 2 included survey items related to slow work, unproductive work, and isolation, so we called this factor
in supporting students who begin their STEM studies at a two-year college. Inaddition, the findings could lead to institutional policy recommendations aimed at supportingstudent engagement with professional STEM societies pre-transfer to help smooth thetransition from two-year to four-year institutions and into the professional workforce.References[1] Koch, A. J., Sacket, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., Dahlke, J. A., & Beatty, A. S. (2022). Why womenSTEM majors are less likely than men to persist in completing a STEM degree: More than theindividual. Personality and Individual Differences, 190. Retrieved fromhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886922000356.[2] National Center for Education Statistics. (2024). Diversity and
Engineers: Reforming Humanitarian Engineering for Gender Equality in Education. In 2022 IEEEInternational Humanitarian Technology Conference (IHTC) (pp. 6-11). IEEE.Solorzano, D., Ceja, M., & Yosso, T. (2000). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African Americancollege students. Journal of Negro education, 60-73.Trbušić, H. (2014). Engineering in the community: Critical consciousness and engineering education. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems:INDECS, 12(2), 108-118.Waite, S. R. (2021). Towards a theory of critical consciousness: A new direction for the development of instructional and supervisory leaders. Journal ofEducational Supervision, 4(2), 65.Watts, R. J., Griffith
and a process for you to consult with mentors (e.g. peer mentors, parents, friends, faculty, professionalmentors, personal mentors, etc.). The more you invest in this process early, the more the rewards will pay off. Most studentseither never complete an IDP during their tenure as students or they tackle an IDP as seniors as a means to find a job aftergraduation. For us at WFU Engineering, we are committed to your personal and professional growth from semester one!Goal(s)/objective(s) (1) Understand the value and purpose of an independent development plan for personal and professional growth. (2) Reflect deeply on personal and professional short-term and long-term goals accompanied by action items and evidence of achievement. (3) Conduct
plans and secondary plans or provide emotional, provides support psychosocial, and/or academic encouragement into STEM pathwaysFamily No family member with Family member(s) provide Family member(s)Support whom student discusses emotional support provide various types future plans of support (emotional
marginalizedcommunities [3]. Together, QuantCrit can provide valuable broader insights on the CCW heldand used by students of minoritized populations. One example includes Perez Huber et al.’s [10]use of QuantCrit as a counter story methodology to share the occupational outcomes of Latinestudents.Our study explores the use of think-aloud methodology to provide an avenue for integrating theprinciple of Voices and Insight in survey design. Voices and Insight posits that all data issubjected to socially constructed interpretations, thus prompting researchers to reflect on howtheir beliefs and experiences shape their understanding of the data [3]. Voices and Insights alsorecognizes the importance of the knowledge and experiences held by minoritized individuals.Using
. Price, "Enhancing the success of minority STEM studentsby providing financial, academic, social, and cultural capital," In ASEE annual conference &exposition, vol. 2014, 2017.[10] G.H. Kuh, J.K. Kinzie, J.A. Buckley, B.K. Bridges, and J.C. Hayek, J. C. “What matters tostudent success: A review of the literature. In commissioned report for the national symposiumon postsecondary student success, National Postsecondary Education Cooperative, 2006.Available: https://nces.ed.gov/npec/pdf/Kuh_Team_Report.pdf[11] J.J. Fry, "Reframing the deficit mindset: first-generation students and concurrentenrollment," Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, TX, 2020.[12] G. Menezes, C. Bowen, J. Dong, L. Thompson, N. Warter-Perez, S. Heubach, D
Zoom meeting code.” Instances like this were made more difficult by thepandemic, because remote staff meant that office phones went unanswered, and there would notbe a way to reach someone quickly as mentioned by Participant 8. When Participant 10 started the process to get accommodations in January, he was notgranted any until April. In the “multiple months before I got anything – I was just hanging in thebalance.” In addition to the time he waited for his accommodation appointment, he also had towait two months prior to get tested for ADHD, for which he needed a formalized diagnosis inorder to be approved for accommodations. Not only did these wait times impact Participant 10’s access to accommodations, but he“would’ve gotten
Learning Environments," International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 157-174, 2020.[2] P. M. Griffin, S. O. Griffin and D. C. Llewellyn, "The Impact of Group Size and Project Duration on Capstone Design," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 185- 193, 2013.[3] K. Gieskes and I. Tiu, "The Effect of Male to Female Ratios on Female Students in Engineering and Technical Science Majors," in 2024 ASEE St. Lawrence Section Annual Conference, York University, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2024.[4] A. E. Bell, S. J. Spencer, E. Iserman and C. E. Logel, "Stereotype Threat and Women's Performance in Engineering," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, pp. 307-312, 2003.[5] B
). MethodsInstrument and VariablesWe used the Advisor Support and Self-Efficacy for Thesis completion (ASSET) survey to gatherdata for our study. With engineering graduate programs at HSIs as a focus and SCCT as atheoretical underpinning, ASSET was designed to explore graduate students' thesis ordissertation self-efficacy and their perceptions of advisor support. The instrument is based onVarney’s Dissertation Self-Efficacy (2010) and Zhao et al.’s Advisor Behavior (2007) scales,adapted to the engineering context as the Thesis Self-Efficacy and Advisor Support constructs.Previous work, which comprised an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), provided constructvalidity evidence for the adapted scales in the instrument (Mercado Rivera et al., 2023).The survey
Paper ID #45214Fostering Tomorrow’s Black STEM Entrepreneurs: Insights from an InnovativeSTEM Program Promoting Equity-Centered EntrepreneurshipDr. Ebony Omotola McGee, The Johns Hopkins University Ebony McGee, associate professor of diversity and STEM education at Vanderbilt Universityˆa C™s Peabody College, investigates what it means to be racially marginalized in the context of learning and achieving in STEM higher education and industry. In particDr. Shelly Engelman, The Johns Hopkins University Shelly Engelman, Ph.D., is a Research Manager at Johns Hopkins University and also the Director of Research and Evaluation at
, while focus on performance aims to do well compared to others. Additionally, students canfocus on s on achieving positive outcomes (success) or avoiding negative outcomes (failure)[14]. By combining these concepts, there are four types of achievement goals. • Mastery-Approach: Focused on achieving personal growth or mastering a task. • Performance-Approach: Focused on being better than others and gaining recognition. • Mastery-Avoidance: Focused on avoiding misunderstanding or failing to learn. • Performance-Avoidance: Focused on not being seen as worse than others.Feeling of inclusion A sense of inclusion refers to student’s perceptions of acceptance by others. However,underrepresented students face additional challenges