Asee peer logo
Displaying all 4 results
Conference Session
Aerospace Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Trevor J. Bennett, Texas A&M University; Kristin D. Nichols, Texas A&M University; Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace
thisknowledge and adapt it to changing environments. Table 1 lists several qualities an effectivedesign engineer should possess. These characteristics will be used later as a metric to measurehow well students exhibit these qualities in a design environment. Table 1. Qualities of a design engineer4. The Engineer or Engineering Student should be able to … QUALITY 1. Communicate, negotiate and persuade 2. Work effectively in a team 3. Engage in self-evaluation and reflection 4. Utilize graphical and visual representations and thinking 5. Exercise creative and intuitive instincts 6. Find
Conference Session
Aerospace Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alexandra Emelina Coso, Georgia Institute of Technology; Amy Pritchett, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace
educational intervention for a senior capstone course in aircraftdesign at a large, research-intensive university. The intention of this intervention is to providestudents with the opportunity to consider specifically how stakeholder requirements and concernscan be integrated into the design of a fixed wing vehicle. Lab sessions will focus on importantcharacteristics of engineering design, specifically collaboration, negotiation, and communication.The students will also engage in reflective activities to prime them for the lab activities andcontent. These reflective activities include the opportunity for students to consider what designactivities they have been utilizing in their individual design projects. In addition, the students willbe introduced
Conference Session
Aerospace Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Judy Santa Cruz, Texas A&M University; Dimitris C. Lagoudas P.E., Texas A&M University; Darren John Hartl, Texas A&M University; Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace
. Evaluationfeedback was provided to each presenter to improve on clarity of presentation content, delivery,slides, and graphics. In addition, each student was recorded during his or her presentation to self-evaluate their presentation skills. Reflecting on her presentation style, the student became awareof her weaknesses in delivery and made immediate improvements in subsequent programmeetings based on the feedback from the scholarly community.Description of the technical aspects of the projectSpecimen preparationSheets of equiatomic NiTi were pre-cut and electro-discharge machined (EDM) along the rolleddirection with area remaining to allow for clamping in the EDM fixture. The sheets were 25%cold worked with as-received thicknesses of 0.50 and 0.25 mm
Conference Session
Aerospace Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
William Michael Butler, Lockheed Martin
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace
asmeasured with the Likert scale questions of Part 2 of the survey. Limitations of the survey werethat even though the survey was designed to measure conception, the respondent was limited andsomewhat guided by the options listed on the survey. These may not fully reflect therespondent’s conception of engineering design. To help address this, the survey did provide theoption for the respondent to provide additional comments and add design activities. The questions used in the survey addressed content validity in that they presented astudent’s knowledge of design; construct validity in that selection of the most and least importantdesign activities gave some insight into the student’s reasoning; and criterion validity in that wealso gained