undergraduate students feel more comfortable and atease approaching graduate students with questions or to ask for help19,20.Knowledge Gains Knowledge gains related to the students’ increased understanding of academia, careers,and research in the science and engineering fields. In Katarina’s interview there were 15 units ofdata (16%) placed in the theme related to knowledge gains and Estelle’s interview there were 39units of data (20%). Every technique Katarina was introduced to in the laboratory was new to her, so she hadto rely on the research group to teach her how to perform the techniques. Her graduate studentmentor expected her to write laboratory reports on each the laboratory techniques that shelearned. As challenging as the
to account for complementary topics,two text mining techniques were applied in five years segments by extracting 6 and 10 topicsfrom the corpus of documents associated with each segment. Latent Semantic Analysis andLatent Dirichlet Allocation are two text mining techniques commonly used for topic extractionover large volumes (corpora) of text documents producing a summary of topics that describe theentire corpus of documents. These topics were then analyzed to determine how the overallengineering education evolved over a period spanning approximately three decades. The resultsindicate the overall engineering education has evolved from teaching basic engineering anddesign skills, computers, systems and processes; to creative teaching
students in authentic, ill-structured engineering tasks facilitates the development oftheir engineering skills.1-3To facilitate students’ authentic practice of these skills we have developed a learning systembased on virtual laboratories. In this learning system, student teams take on the role of processdevelopment engineers. They are tasked with finding suitable input parameters to be released tohigh volume manufacturing through experiments that are completed virtually. When studentsperform experiments, the lower cognitive demand affords them the opportunity to build a richexperimental design. While not instructed to do so, most student teams inevitably resort tomodeling as a tool to progress towards completion.Student team modeling practices are
Research Laboratory, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, USA. His research interests includes Combustion, Propulsion, Gas dynamics, CFD and Engineering education.Dr. Robert J Helfenbein, Indiana University-IUPUI, School of Education Rob Helfenbein is Associate Professor of Curriculum Studies at Indiana University-IUPUI and Director of the Center for Urban and Multicultural Education (CUME). He earned his Ph.D. and B.A. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Dr. Helfenbein offers courses in Teaching Secondary Social Studies and graduate level courses in curriculum theory, qualitative research methods, social foundations, and urban education. Dr. Helfenbein has published and edited numerous
California Institute of Technology, where he was an AT&T Bell Laboratories Ph.D. Scholar. Dr. Wood was formerly a Professor of Mechanical engineering at the University of Texas (1989-2011), where he established a computational and experimental laboratory for research in engineering design and manufac- Page 23.758.1 turing. He was a National Science Foundation Young Investigator, the Cullen Trust for Higher Education Endowed Professor in Engineering and University Distinguished Teaching Professor at The University of Texas at Austin. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013
work with academic assessment, particularly relating to ABET. She can be reached at jmcferran@uaa.alaska.edu.Dr. Steffen Peuker, University of Alaska Anchorage Dr. Steffen Peuker is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of the Thermal System Design Laboratory at the University of Alaska Anchorage. He is teaching the Thermal System De- sign, Thermal System Design Laboratory, HVAC Systems Optimization and Introduction to Engineering courses. His work in engineering education focuses on hands-on undergraduate engineering education in the HVAC&R area, student-industry cooperation, and developing innovative ways of merging engineering fundamentals and engineering in practice and research
Paper ID #7506The Influence of Feedback on Teamwork and Professional Skills in an Au-thentic Process Development ProjectMs. Debra Gilbuena, Oregon State University Debra Gilbuena is a PhD Candidate in the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engi- neering at Oregon State University. She currently has research focused on student learning in virtual laboratories. Debra has an MBA, an MS, and 4 years of industrial experience including a position in sensor development, an area in which she holds a patent. Her dissertation is focused on the characteriza- tion and analysis of feedback in engineering education
alternatives to prevalent educationalpractices. For example, a variety of educational approaches were presented in the plenarysession of the 2011 ASEE annual conference. Examples of some of the approaches presentedincluded active learning, formative assessment as a strategy to support learning, and problem-based learning. Each description of an approach included a summary of research-based evidenceon specific educational impacts. The National Science Foundation, which funds projects forimproving STEM education through its Course, Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement(CCLI) and Transforming Undergraduate Education in STEM (TUES) programs, has sponsoredforums in which panels of practitioners and scholars were commissioned to investigate the issueof
Factors from Virginia Tech.Dr. Maura J. Borrego, National Science Foundation Page 23.147.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Fidelity of Implementation in the Statics ClassroomAbstractMany teaching innovations have been developed over the last 20 years, including a number ofResearch-Based Instructional Strategies (RBIS). However, there is limited research to addresshow many faculty members are using these strategies, or when they do implement them, whetherthey are following the theory and steps as intended by the developers. The measure of how wellan implemented
Paper ID #6900Training in Troubleshooting Problem-Solving: Preparing Undergraduate En-gineering Students for IndustryMr. Presentacion Rivera-Reyes, Utah State University - Engineering Education Presentacion Rivera-Reyes is currently a graduate teaching assistant and a PhD student in the Engineering Education Department at Utah State University. He formerly held a position as Professor of Telecommu- nication Engineering at Technological University of Honduras. He received his B.S. in Electrical Engi- neering from the National Autonomous University of Honduras. He has experience in the telecommu- nication industry where
Paper ID #7553The Impact of Inclusive Excellence Programs on the Development of Engi-neering Identity among First-Year Underrepresented StudentsDr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the engineering assessment specialist at the Integrated Teaching and Learning Pro- gram and Laboratory. He holds a BA in psychology from Louisiana State University, and an MS degree in industrial/organizational psychology and PhD degree in counseling psychology, both from the University of Tennessee. Prior to joining the University of Colorado at Boulder, he gained extensive experience in assessment and
deflect when you push, pulland twist them in a single object. Experience suggests that students have substantialdifficulty with combined loadings, but it is unclear why this is true.Understanding how theories of conceptual change may fit student misconceptions inengineering disciplines is ultimately useful because it could inform teaching practices.For example, if what is proposed in this paper has validity then spending time withstudents on how objects move and change shape under a variety of loads may help dispelthe myth that stresses only act in the direction of applied loads.Acknowledgements This material is based upon work supported by the National Science FoundationCourse Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement Program under Grant
in the Department of Statistics at North Carolina State University.Dr. Eric N. Wiebe, North Carolina State University Dr. Wiebe is a Professor in the Department of STEM Education at NC State University and Senior Research Fellow at the Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. A focus of his research and outreach work has been the integration of multimedia and multimodal teaching and learning approaches in STEM instruction. He has also worked on research and evaluation of technology integration in instructional settings in both secondary and post-secondary education. Dr. Wiebe has been a member of ASEE since 1989.Jeni Corn, Friday Institute for Educational Innovation, NC State University As the Director of