Interdisciplinary Design Experience and a core faculty member in the Institute for Leadership in Technology and Management at Bucknell. He was the founder and inaugural chair of the Undergrad- uate Research Track at the Biomedical Engineering Society (BMES) conference, and co-organized the Biomedical Engineering Body-Of-Knowledge Summit. He served on the board of the Biomedical En- gineering Division of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) and was elected as chair of the division in 2012. He is the winner of the 2010 National ASEE Biomedical Engineering Teach- ing Award and in 2011 was selected to be a National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education faculty member
Paper ID #7050Evaluation of Perceptual Changes in an Engineering Sales ProgramDr. David Paul Sly, Iowa State University Dr. Dave Sly is a Professor of Practice within the Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering department. He is a registered Professional Engineer with B.A., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Industrial En- gineering, as well as an M.B.A. in Marketing from Iowa State University. In addition to teaching, Dr. Sly is president of Proplanner, an Industrial Engineering software company located in the ISU Research Park. For the past five years, Dr. Sly has worked extensively with business and academia on the
used in early education settings, it canbe applied to higher education for complex subjects that are being taught for the first time,particularly in the form of peer-scaffolding.A study on scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments, “Bridging Research andTheory with Practice,” explores the possible effects of student learning development “incollaboration with ‘more able peers’.” While it is apparent that peer-assistants are potentiallyvaluable to the cost-effectiveness and quality of education for their classmates and instructors,there is still limited data on the personal and individual effects on such peer assistants. One studytouches on some of the personal gains of a peer learning assistant stating, “The cognitiveprocesses
Management and Applied Psychology. She has held several professional service positions including the President of the Engineering Management Division of American Society of Engineering Ed- ucation and the President of Epsilon Mu Eta, the Engineering Management Honor Society. She teaches courses in Total Quality Management, Engineering Economics, Entrepreneurial Analysis of Engineering Design, Statistics for Engineering Managers, Management of Engineering and Technology, and Senior Design. Her research areas include knowledge engineering, as well as, knowledge and information man- agement. She has been published several times including chapters in the books Eshbach’s Handbook of Engineering Fundamentals and Engineering
Point, New York. He graduated from West Point in 1985 with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering. He earned a Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1994 and a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Kansas in 2004. He has taught courses in aeronautics, thermal-fluid systems, heat transfer, computer- aided design, and aerospace and mechanical engineering design. He is a licensed Professional Engineer and is a rated pilot in both rotary and fixed wing aircraft. Page 23.833.1 c American Society for Engineering
meetwith peer writing tutors before submitting their lab reports for many years, prior results had beenmodest at best. This time, the tutors met with the instructor of a junior-level course and theirtutoring supervisor for an hour-long training session two weeks prior to the deadline forsubmission of a lab report in the course taught by the instructor. Detailed instructions werepresented to the tutors by the course instructor, indicating their responsibilities in helping thestudents improve. The instructions also indicated where the students needed to acceptresponsibility for both making appropriate changes to their lab reports as well as understandingthe underlying methods that yield better written communication. The tutoring
So Few Textbook ChoicesLet's define Engineering Technology (ET), in contrast to what it isn’t: it's not Engineering orIndustrial Technology or Technician study. ABET’s website compares ET & Engr. thusly: “Engineering programs often focus on theory and conceptual design, while engineeringtechnology programs usually focus on application and implementation. Also, engineering programs typically require additional, higher-level mathematics,including multiple semesters of calculus and calculus-based theoretical science courses.Engineering technology programs typically focus on algebra, trigonometry, applied calculus, andother courses that are more practical than theoretical in nature.” 1Engineering Technology is a young