well as their ideal future teaching methods, are characteristic ofessentialism and perennialism, two philosophies that were commonly demonstrated for themduring their undergraduate and graduate careers. Several discrepancies between Inventoryresults and student self-reflections support the need for educational interventions to informgraduate students (i.e. future instructors) about educational philosophies and their implicationsfor teaching and learning.MotivationToday’s graduate students represent the next generation of faculty. This particular generation ofgraduate students has participated in a variety of teaching styles and interventions, from lecture-based classes to problem-based learning and technology-centered instruction. As they
of women in the technical professions of anengineering university has a number of advantages while presenting many problems. Among themany problems are the following: (1) a lack of career advancement for women in engineeringeducation; (2) a shortage of women in administrative positions with influence in the decisionmaking process; (3) the resurgence of chauvinistic stereotypes for women; and (4) the conflictbetween family and professional life.This paper explores the impact of gender bias in the Russian academic community and assessesthe obstacles for technically trained women in the male dominated Russian university.IntroductionSince 1917 and until the end of the Soviet era, the role of women was very important in theengineering and
’#educational#benefit#created#an#opportunity#for#the#United#States#to#expand#its#technical#workforce#while#serving#those#who#served.#PostF9/11#veterans#include#a#diverse#and#qualified#pool#of#future#talent#for#the#nation’s#engineering#and#science#employers.#Ushering#them#into#technical#fields#as#workFforce#ready#engineers#and#scientists#requires#a#community#of#partnerships#between#the#veterans,#the#nation’s#educational#institutions,#technology#firms,#the#government’s#technical#and#scientific#organizations,#and#others.###To#help#form#those#partnerships#and#generate#ideas#on#how#to#encourage#postF9/11#veterans#to#use#the#new#benefit#toward#educational#opportunities#that#lead#to#careers#in#science#and#technology,#the#National#Science#Foundation#(NSF
-year collegein the Midwest funded for over 7 years. In a previous study we found that REU studentsinteracted more frequently with graduate students than their faculty advisor while in the program.In this study we examined more closely the role of the graduate student mentors and how itdirectly influenced the REU student experience. Two data sources analyzed in this study werepre- and post-program surveys and semi-structured interviews, both administered to the REUstudents. Three main themes emerged from the data, including: 1) Academics and Careers, 2)Teaching and Learning, and 3) Building Relationships. When examining the nature of these interactions, 75% of REU students reported havinginfluential experience with their graduate student
awarded by President Obama the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) in 2011. Her award citation read ”for outstanding research into how early experiences can lead children to pursue engineering later in life and for working with teach- ers from diverse schools to develop new teaching materials and methods that can help students become innovative and more technologically literate.” The PECASE is ”the highest honor bestowed by the US Government on Science and Engineering professionals in the early stages of their independent research career.” Dr Evangelou’s research group is actively involved in research into early childhood antecedents of engineering thinking, developmental factors in
Education Innovation Center The Ohio State Univer- sity Columbus, OH 43210 Rogers.693@osu.edu Rogers joined the university in October, 2008 bringing with him 35 years of industrial experience. His career includes senior leadership roles in engineering, sales, and manufacturing in robotics, electron- ics, sensors, and controls industries. Throughout his career, Rogers has developed products using an innovative process consisting of multidisciplinary teams focused on understanding customer needs and converting them to commercially viable products and services. He brings this experience to the university where he leads the effort in developing company-sponsored, product-oriented Capstone design programs. As part of the
Paper ID #6806Florida’s Model for Industry-Technical Education PartnershipsDr. Marilyn Barger, National Science Foundation ATE Centers Dr. Marilyn Barger is the Principal Investigator and Executive Director of FLATE, the Florida Regional Center of Advanced Technological Education, funded by the National Science Foundation and housed at Hillsborough Community College in Tampa, Florida since 2004. FLATE serves the state of Florida as its region and is involved in outreach and recruitment of students into technical career pathway; has produced award winning curriculum design and reform for secondary and post-secondary Career
design, isolated traffic signals, and driving simulation.Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Washington State University Dr. Shane Brown conducts research on cognition and conceptual change in engineering. He received his bachelor’s and Ph.D. degrees from Oregon State University, both in Civil Engineering. His Ph.D. degree includes a minor in Science and Mathematics Education. His master’s degree is in Environmental Engineering from the University of California, Davis. Dr. Brown is a licensed professional civil engineer and has six years of experience designing water and waste water treatment facilities in central California. He was the recipient of the NSF CAREER award in 2011. Dr. Brown’s research focuses on theoretical
Page 23.735.7household tools. Top left to right: 1950’s office chair; early 1990’s office chair. Bottom left to right: 2000’s ‘green’office chair; late 1990’s office chair.AssessmentsStudent perceptions of sustainability concepts and applications were measured through pre- andpost-assessment surveys. This survey research was approved exempt under IRB protocol #PRO10010207 at The University of Pittsburgh and #1206007924 at Arizona State University.These pre- and post- assessment surveys were administered in all three courses, NDE, DfE, andGB, for a period of four years from 2009-2012. Formative, pre-assessment surveys wereemployed to collect information regarding students’ preconceptions and/or previous knowledgeof careers that integrate
theory of situatedlearning was used to identify and inform the ways in which being research mentors can preparethe mentors for their future careers, specifically in terms of how they are prepared to becomemembers of the communities of practice they aspire to join. The benefits for research mentorswere classified as follows: (1) benefits related to preparation for their future careers, such asstrengthening their technical skills and content knowledge, and developing and improvingvarious professional skills, and (2) benefits related to their current positions asstudents/postdoctoral scholars, such as receiving help with their theses or research projects.This study is part of a longer-term study to determine the effectiveness of this
the department of Electrical and ComputerEngineering (ECE) at XXX to increase the recruitment, retention and development of womenand under-represented minorities. ROSE-BUD was established in 2009; it was funded by an S-STEM grant from the National Science Foundation. The goals of the program are to providescholarships, improving the infrastructure for advising and mentoring, and teach professionaldevelopment skills to prepare students for careers in engineering. The program is open tostudents from all demographic backgrounds. Although, there is a special emphasis on recruitingunderrepresented populations in electrical and computer engineering (e.g., women, African-American, Hispanic, and Native American). The ROSE-BUD program creates a strong
dataset at Time 1 is 43%.The overarching model for the study proposes that retention is shaped by self-efficacy, which, inturn, is based on the impact of students’ demographic characteristics, the effect of workexperience – in particular cooperative education, and the contextual support provided by theuniversity as well as by others, such as parents and friends. In this paper, we report the results ofthe study incorporating these principal variables on retention over three time periods. Thedependent variable, retention, is calculated as the number of students who both stayed in theiruniversity and in their major. The three efficacy forms consist of work, career, and academicself-efficacy, signifying the confidence that students have in their own
)are interviewed and surveyed to collect data, which will be analyzed using social cognitivecareer theory.The broader significance and importance of this project will be to support the informalengineering field’s ability to inspire more children to pursue engineering pathways (from initialinterest in engineering to choices in college majors and an ultimate career as a professionalengineer). The project builds on strong partnerships with many youth organizations, such as theGirl Scouts of the USA, FIRST and the National Engineers Week Foundation. This projectincludes not only a research program, but also the development of new web resources that canfurther promote children’s interest in and understanding of engineering.MotivationEngineers
several decades computational methods have increasingly played a central role inMaterials Science and Engineering (MSE) for characterizing structure, simulating processes andpredicting materials' response. To align with this shift, an MSE department at a researchuniversity in the U.S. Mid-Atlantic region launched a curricular innovation to inculcate studentswith a basic facility with computational methods and to leverage computing proficiency toincrease student comprehension of core MSE concepts. In this study we investigate the impact ofthis curricular innovation on students’ (a) perceptions regarding the utility of integratingcomputation in their studies and their future careers; (b) perceptions regarding their own abilitiesto implement
underrepresented racial/ethnic groups toengineering need to start early and continue throughout the K-12 years, in order to be trulyeffective. Further implications of this study, as well as in-depth analysis of the results for eachengineering sub-discipline, will also be addressed in the paper.Introduction As our nation continues to call for a larger domestic engineering workforce, an untappedresource for new workers exists in our schools in the young women and increasing population ofstudents from underrepresented races and ethnicities. Women and other underrepresentedpopulations are still not pursuing these majors and career fields in numbers representative oftheir status in colleges or in the workforce. How do students select their
Paper ID #5924Development of a Multidisciplinary Summer Research Program for Commu-nity College Students in Science and EngineeringDr. Sharnnia Artis, University of California, Berkeley Dr. Sharnnia Artis is the Education and Outreach Director for the Center for Energy Efficient Electronics Science, a NSF-funded Science and Technology Center at the University of California, Berkeley. She oversees programs to recruit and retain underrepresented students in science and engineering and science and also outreach to pre-college students to introduce them to the exciting career opportunities in science and engineering. Dr
careers in fields related toenergy through mentored engagement in a real research setting.APPLICATIONPARTICIPANTSStudents are recruited nationwide by postings on webpages of associations for undergraduateprograms and emails to undergraduate outreach coordinator or undergraduate director ofinstitutions that have limited research opportunities. One advantage is that the program ismultidisciplinary and composed of faculty from different engineering departments, physicaland mathematical sciences, targeting a large body of students.The minimum overall GPA for application is 3.5. Applications were filled online through theprogram web site. The applicants provide personal information, gender, demographic, andupload official transcripts’ files. One open
about gender and race in the context of engineering education. She was awarded a CAREER grant in 2010 for the project, ”Learning from Small Numbers: Using personal narratives by underrepresented undergraduate students to promote institutional change in engineering education.” She received a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) in 2012. Page 23.489.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Engaging Foucault to Better Understand Underrepresentation of Female STEM FacultyIntroductionUnderrepresentation of
no statistically significant changesbetween student responses on the post-course and one year survey regarding knowledge,confidence in developing solutions, and interest in pursuing further studies or careers in globalhealth. Additionally, student comments on the one year survey reflected high levels ofenthusiasm for the subject and provided insight into the impact of the experience on the studentsover the period of one year.BackgroundRecently, there has been significant interest amongst engineering programs regardingopportunities that develop and enhance the global perspectives of undergraduate students. Thisinterest is in part to address ABET student outcomes criteria 3h (the broad education necessaryto understand the impact of engineering
students at the high school and undergraduate levels in their successful pursuit ofengineering careers. This objective is accomplished by actively partnering students with seniorURM mentors (i.e. post-doctoral associates and faculty members) in research and professionaldevelopment. Students that completed the program more likely have a firm understanding of thetranslational aspects of their research, enabling them to make informed career choices tomaximize their expertise and biomedical interests. Ultimately, this outcome can be achievedthrough engaged participation in: a “mentoring incubator” and mentoring course led by URMfull professor; interactive seminars and roundtable discussions with mentee “success story”resource group; sessions with
in Engineering Service-LearningAbstractAttracting and retaining women in engineering is critical in the USA today. While women arecoming to college in overrepresented numbers, they are not represented equally to men inengineering majors. Though a university can only have limited impact on the attrition of womenin the engineering workforce, we can (and must!) work to improve recruitment and retention andto graduate women with adequate preparation for an engineering career. An increasing numberof engineering programs are integrating service-learning (S-L) into their curricula.For the past eight years of one S-L program, students in a college of engineering have beenwidely surveyed at the beginning of their studies and at the end of each
more effective research programs for communitycollege students to pursue their science and engineering academic and careers goals.Introduction The American Association of Community Colleges reported in 2012 that 44% ofundergraduate students in the U.S. were enrolled in community colleges1. Approximately 50% ofthe African Americans and Hispanics who were undergraduate students attended communitycolleges. In addition, 57% of community college students were females and 46% of allcommunity college students received some form of financial aid1. Based on the increasingenrollment numbers and student demographics, community colleges play a critical role insupporting the U.S. efforts to increase the diversity, knowledge base, and skill level of
Paper ID #6950Unlocking Student Motivation: Development of an Engineering MotivationSurveyMr. Philip Reid Brown, Virginia Tech Philip Brown is a Ph.D. candidate in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. He has a B.S. from Union College and a M.S. from Duke University, both in Electrical Engineering. His research interests include informed career decisions, mixed methods research, motivation and learning theories and intervention development.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Page 23.1284.1
engineeringdegree, and whether a student have chosen an engineering discipline to pursue. Several surveysadministered at strategic time points during the semester were used to track level of interest inpursuing engineering and to identify key events that can be consider as precursors to leavingengineering. Reflection essays were also employed to understand how the first semesterexperience affects student’s perception of engineering as a career of choice.An analysis of entrance surveys indicated a high level of interest in pursuing an engineeringdegree in most students surveyed. Key events, such as their first calculus test, triggeredindecision in some of the students. Early results identified a group of students at risk of leavingengineering during the
differently when selecting or changing majors?Education researchers cite parental education background and achievement levels as a factorinfluencing a child’s education performance and career choice. Parental education attainmentlevel is used, for example, by the National Assesment of Education Progress (NEAP) forlongitudinal studies that report on education progress in reading and mathematics of 9, 13, and17 year old students in U.S. schools.2 Research Question 3: Do important influencers on the choice of engineering major affect UNH engineering students differently based upon their parents’ educational background or achievement level?The UNH Tagliatela College of Engineering offers seven different types of engineering majors
provide fundamental understanding of basic concepts in logistics transportation andrelating classroom theories with real time examples. Educating the K12 educators program wasdesigned to educate them with career opportunities, future perspectives of logistics transportationprofessionals, and resource availability. This paper will discuss the need of STEM education inlogistics transportation, sample curriculum design, implementation issues, and lessons learnedregarding the project. Page 23.381.2IntroductionLogistics transportation has become one of the last frontiers that still remain to be conquered bymost businesses in the twenty first century. Yet this cannot be
basedon excellence in teaching. All three of these individuals are faculty at R1 institutions and havereceived recognition for their innovative teaching in terms of awards and media attention.Pseudonyms have been assigned to protect confidentiality. The three individuals are at distinctcareer stages – an early-career assistant professor, a mid-career associate professor, and a late-career full professor. Pseudonyms are prefaced with e, m, and l respectively to indicate early-,mid-, and late- career stages. The questions in the interview were designed to elicit the stories Page 23.1145.3of how they came to adopt and evolve their teaching and to
success by firstworking in such positions in professional and discipline societies as well as understanding theimpacts for early career faculty.Michigan State University was funded through the NSF ADVANCE program for an InstitutionalTransformation Grant. One of the components of this ADVANCE grant focused on women’sleadership. This leadership project had an overarching goal of understanding what factorsmotivated women faculty to become leaders. Within this overarching goal, the women’sleadership team also wanted to better understand the roles their disciplinary/professionalsocieties played in leadership development and advancement.As a beginning step to meet these goals, the women’s leadership team needed to first understandhow women participated
emerged calledEngaging Youth through Engineering or EYE. The goal of EYE was and still is to engage areayouth in grades 4-9 in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) academics andcareers by providing students with a coordinated continuum of curricular and extra-curricularexperiences that use real life engineering design challenges as a “hook.” Once “hooked,” andwith careful guidance and support of “adult influencers” (teachers, counselors, parents, andbusiness volunteers), the theory of action is that youth will become motivated and choose to takethe high school mathematics and science coursework needed in preparation for STEM post-secondary study and careers, but not required by the district or the state.The EYE curriculum at
Engineering from the University of Calif. at Santa Barbara in 1990. He earned his B.A. in Physics and Applied Math from the University of Calif. at San Diego in 1984. He was conferred the A.S. in Engineering at Sierra College in 1981Ms. Ofelia Aguirre, Center for Science and Engineering PartnershipsProf. Megan T. Valentine, University of California, Santa Barbara Megan Valentine joined the UCSB faculty in 2008 as an assistant professor in Mechanical Engineering. She received her Ph.D. in Physics from Harvard University in 2003. She then completed a post-doctoral fellowship in Biology at Stanford University under the sponsorship of the Damon Runyon Cancer Re- search Foundation and the Burroughs Wellcome Fund through a Career