received PD), or by co-planning or co-teaching with classroom teachers.18 Enrichment teachers were typically wellsuited to be resources for the engineering portions of the STE units based upon many of theircollective prior experiences with engineering design challenges in after school activities likeDestination Imagination, FIRST Lego League and the state’s Engineering Challengecompetition. Furthermore, enrichment teachers’ focus on engaging students in higher levelquestioning and critical thinking was consonant with the skills needed to move through theengineering design process.Research Questions and Null Hypotheses This study aimed to investigate pilot year teachers’ perspectives on their identities – aselementary teachers, broadly, and
weaker team (bottom 25%) that would be doing considerable learning on our dime if this were a real-world situation.Table 7 summarizes average performance scores for the past six years, assuming the rubricdefined in Table 6. The data suggest improvement in team performance. This result seemsreasonable since the program has focused more on teamwork and team-building issues during thepast five years and since the instructors of the capstone course have worked to continuouslyrefine and improve the team building and interpersonal communication lesson plans. It isimportant to note that we carefully screen the team performance scores to identify any teamsexperiencing communication problems or personality conflicts during the
the literature, we were not able to find papers about funding workshops or the evaluation offunding workshops, but we were able to find two extremely useful resources online that wewould like to share. The first resource was Dr. Robin Walker’s GRFP Essay Insights Website atthe University of Missouri (http://grfpessayinsights.missouri.edu/). At this website, we found arubric for students to self-evaluate the quality of their essays that we plan to incorporate to ourfuture workshops. The second resource is hosted on the website of Kappa Delta Pi, theInternational Honor Society in Education. It is a presentation by the Director of Retention andRecruiting at Texas A&M University, Megan Palsa, and can be found at the following website:http
-eight out of thirty-nine possible participants had amajor within the Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, one being a MechanicalEngineer. Most students in QC are juniors and seniors with more than one prior course instatistics. By the end of this course students should have the ability to identify, formulate andsolve engineering problems, and model the stochastic nature of management systems andengineering relationships to the planning, organization, evaluation and control of human centeredsystems. The course places a heavy emphasis on control charting using Minitab 16. QC will becalled the Level 2 course for the remainder of this paper.At the start of the experiment, students provided various items of demographic information (e.g
. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153-184. 14. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Incorporated. 15. Cotten, S. R., & Wilson, B. (2006). Student-Faculty Interactions: Dynamics and Determinants. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 51(4), 487-519. 16. Astin
FlowVisual, along with tutorialand evaluation materials online at http://www.cs.mtu.edu/~chaoliw/2dflowvis.html. This willprovide other instructors with a useful teaching aid, allowing them to revise their curricula andteaching practices. Due to its simplicity of operation, we plan to further develop a tablet versionof this tool for use at museums, science centers and similar institutions to develop exhibits inscience and engineering.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported in part by the Dave House Family Foundation and the U.S. NationalScience Foundation through grants IIS-1017935, DUE-1105047, and CNS-1229297. The 2Dflow data used in this work are slices extracted from a 3D hurricane simulation data set. Wethank all students who participated in
selectively random study groups with diverse members. In summary thisresearch was planned to include the following elements: Developing a frame work for collaboration Formulating a selectively random study group to enhance the interaction between students of different backgrounds and educational performances Breaking the cohort of like minded students or students of similar performance level Engaging and managing a big class in a small university context Improving the performance of minority students and fostering sense of belonging among the students of all kinds Investigating quantitatively as well as qualitatively the effectiveness of selectively
important to be able to work in teams. … Usually problems are bigger [than] just one person [can] solve.” [Paige, SPri, Sophomore]By sophomore year, Paige had already learned that the scope of problems in engineeringrequired teamwork in order to adequately address them.The precipitous drop in the importance of teamwork among graduates was surprising. Paige, oneof the three participants that report teamwork as “not important” in her work, told theinterviewer: “One of the skills you need for this job is program management, just knowing how to plan out, how to get a team going” [Paige, SPri, EPS]This seems to contradict her survey response. Similarly, Nate said teamwork was not importantbut reported working with various teams on a
and appointments with peer researchconsultants. Access points related to consultations with archivists and media librarians wereadded in Spring 2012.Working with campus institutional research staff, we were able to correlate Fall 2011 library usewith higher term GPA and retention for first year students while controlling for other variablesrelated to student success.1 The Student Success line of inquiry is useful for demonstrating thatsuccessful students do find value in the library. However, as students move beyond their firstyear, the factors contributing to student success become increasingly complex and interrelated.Therefore, while we continue to collect first year data and plan to check the correlation strengtheach semester, we are not
productioncan increase along with their knowledge. Professors can talk about the similar kinds of writing that Page 23.676.7they do and the ways in which they handle the writing tasks. Students should also be required tobegin the process of oral presentation early in their academic careers. Professors should give theirstudents every chance available to speak of the technical knowledge that they are learning. Asinterest grows, planned seminars and workshops can be provided that will emphasize theimportance of the engineering faculty as the catalyst for improvement.The structure of unified technical knowledge and communication skill can be
Paper ID #7837Impact of Open Educational Resources in Higher Education Institutions inSpain and Latin Americas through Social Network AnalysisProf. Edmundo Tovar, Universidad Polit´ecnica de Madrid, CIF Q2818015F Edmundo Tovar, Computer Engineering educator, has a Ph.D. (1994) and a Bachelor’s degree (1986) in Computer Engineering from the Universidad Polit´ecnica de Madrid (UPM). He is Certified Software Development Professional (CSDP) from the IEEE Computer Society. He has been Associate Dean for Quality and Strategic Planning in the Computing School of the Universidad Polit´ecnica de Madrid. From this last position he
, tinkerers do not plan out what they aregoing to do, nor do they use any type of process to come to a certain solution. Instead, they use aprocess of guess and check, and try different things until they find something that works—aprocess of elimination. Though Alon makes this claim, that evolution is much like a “tinkerer,”he does state that the “solutions found by evolution have much in common with goodengineering design.” He elaborates on three examples of these similarities between engineeredsystems and biological systems: modularity, robustness, and the use of recurring circuitelements.The first, modularity, Alon defines as “a set of nodes [in a system] that have strong interactionsand a common function.” In order for a set of nodes to be
the University of Canterbury. Prior to joining Canterbury in 2004, he worked for ten years as a transportation engineer and traffic researcher for Opus International Consultants. Dr. Koorey’s wide- ranging experience includes considerable research and consulting work on road safety modelling, speed management, sustainable transport planning, crash analysis, and the design and operation of rural two- lane highways. At Canterbury, he has taught professional design project courses since 2006. He has also delivered oral and written presentation skills to students for many years.Prof. Aisling Dominique O’Sullivan Ph. D., University of CanterburyDr. Keith Comer, Chalmers University of Technology
mostly disagreed whethera certain skill was hard or easy to rate, and other insightful comments. We used these commentsto modify the scoring system to make it more useful.In ongoing work, we are gathering one more round of stakeholder feedback from executives,faculty, TAs, and students. We plan to 1) use this input to make additional changes to thescoring system and 2) start to test the reliability of the revised scoring system. Results from thiswork—more comments about the scoring system and preliminary reliability data from twoengineering schools in Georgia Tech—will be included in the ASEE presentation. We will alsomake the newest version of the presentation scoring system available to our audience.References 1. Utschig, T. T., &
learning of mathematical and science concepts.Although there was no comparison group, students who participated in the curriculum showed Page 23.797.5significant growth in both science and engineering. In another design based science curriculum, Klein and Sherwood9 followed schools over three years to see if mathematics and science scoresrose. They found that students in the experimental group which used the design based sciencecurriculum demonstrated statistically larger increases on assessments of both science knowledgeand concepts.Informed engineering design pedagogy Effective use of engineering design pedagogy requires careful planning
responded. Educators agree that thequality of engineering teaching needs to be improved, and the content and delivery of traditionallectures fail to motivate students to meet learning challenges and job requirements. TheDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Minnesota Twin Citieshas developed a comprehensive plan to revamp the electric energy systems core courses. 1 Thereformed curriculum has integrated the three sub-areas of electric energy systems, i.e. electricdrives, power electronics, and power systems, into a single focus area. The new curriculum isable to cover a broader range of topics with greater depths while allowing students to explorecomplimentary areas, such as control systems, mechanical systems, and
in other classes? 9. Would you prefer having textbooks as eBooks on the iPad rather than a printed book?(Y/N) 10. Did you have an iTunes account before this course?(Y/N) 11. On the following scale, indicate with an “X” how you anticipate dividing your time between a laptop and an iPad for this course. Laptop iPad Page 23.833.14Post-Course Survey of Student Perceptions: 1. On a scale of 1 (no desire) to 5 (strong desire) how much would you like to use an iPad in a future course? 2. On a scale of 1 (gained no experience) to 5 (I now own one (or plan
arange of categories. In light of the background discussion above, the objective of this introductory effort is two-fold. First, we provide a broad overview of the results of the program with regard to ABEToutcomes. Second, we recommend potential best practices for internships of each type withinthe context of the two institutional types that generated the data, with implementation andassessment of these best practices planned as a future activity.Summer Internship Opportunities The summer internship opportunity, as defined within the context of this work, is anoptional, practical engineering experience afforded to students at the United States MilitaryAcademy (USMA, West Point, NY) and the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA
build anelectronic textbook that would be massively interactive featuring mini-games, puzzles, SCORMcompliant data collection, leader boards, and the expected assortment of videos, animations, andinteractive models.Research DesignTo assess the pedagogical impact of the newly developed online and dynamic textbook onstudent learning outcomes, we designed an iterative educational research study. Informed by theprevious grant work,8,9,10 we have planned to explore the following student learning outcomes:(a) content understanding, (b) attitudes towards engineering, (c) life-long learning skills, and (d)skills to locate resources pertaining to energy and its sustainability resources.To assess students’ content understanding, we developed a content
Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. “Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies”, Washington, D.C., 2009 Page 23.268.1320. Wood, R.E. “Task Complexity: Definition of the Construct”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 1986, pp. 60-82.21. Cernusca, D. and Carroll, D. “Integrating Online Instructional Tools in a Large Engineering Course: An Exploratory Study”. The 2008 ASEE Midwest Section Annual Meeting, Session 202 – Novel Classroom Practices - Online, Tulsa: OK.22. Boston, W.E
: Peppers, Papers, Pueblos and Professors, June 24, 2001 - June 27, 2001. 2001. Albuquerque, NM, United states: American Society for Engineering Education.13. Koehn, E., Engineering experience and competitions implement ABET criteria. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 2006. 132(2): p. 138-144.14. Labossire, P. and L.A. Bisby, Lessons learned from a design competition for structural engineering students: The case of a pedestrian walkway at the universit de Sherbrooke. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 2010. 136(1): p. 48-56.15. Houston, B.L. Incorporating concrete canoe & steel bridge planning into a construction management course. in ASEE
Paper ID #7081Conflicts in learning: A critical analysis of problem based learning in relationto cultivating innovative engineersMs. Zhang Fenzhi, Aalborg University Fenzhi Zhang earned her BSc in Pedagogy from Henan Normal University in China. She continued her graduate studies in the area of higher education in Beijing Normal University for three years. She is currently working on a Ph.D project in Department of Planning in Aalborg University, Denmark. Her research interest is engineering education, innovation and conflicts management
1-5 1 = poor no 5 = superior/very yesWhile the survey results shown in Table 3 represent self-reported data, they do provideinsight into the quality of the technical program, the impact of the societal experience,and the impact the iWSG has had on participants several months after they took part inthe course. Under the technical portion, the topics and level of materials were deemedvery good but the students were not as positive about time for discussion. This wasclearly stated in their written comments that more time should be allowed for discussionwith their foreign participants. We have noted this for planning of future courses butalso see this as a positive point in that the students were eager to learn more from theirglobal
numerous requests from members of theIndustrial Advisor Committee and senior executives of the local automotive industry to developa mechatronics course in order to meet the demands of the current engineering environment. Agraduate-level mechatronics course was developed in 2001. It was jointly taught by one facultyprofessor from the Mechanical Engineering Department and one faculty professor from theElectrical and Computer Science Engineering Department. Unfortunately, student feedback wasnot favorable and the course was never taught again.Since 2006, several visionary curriculum renovations were implemented; the creation of anundergraduate mechatronics course was one of the curriculum renovation plans. The course
more disciplined. Don't judge me. HW was not a priority to me in high school but college requires discipline and good study habits. My study habits are completely different than high school. I probably need to study more now that I am in college. Forcing myself to study more than usual will be the hardest thing for me to adapt to engineering school. I plan to improve my study/homework habits in college. I’m a pretty lazy person when it comes to homework, but I do it if I need to. I am well aware that my studying habits are going to have to change in order to be successful in engineering. In high school I did not study much and still made good grades. I understand that in
insights; whether he has been involved intraining others and his experience in a supervisory role. His broad appreciation of engineering ingeneral and the extent to which he strives to keep abreast in his own field are also relevant. Inconclusion, the candidate will be tested on his knowledge of engineering processes andmanagement, his appreciation of investigation, planning, design, construction, manufacturing,operation, maintenance, and research of engineering works.EssayThe essay writing is intended primarily to be a test for the candidate's knowledge and experiencein engineering practice and management, as well as the broader issues of the engineer incommunity. It would also demonstrate the candidate's ability to organize his thoughts and
Page 23.465.17proposed experiments were discussed and a plan of implementation was developed. Regularmeetings on the design, manufacture, testing and analyzing the results stretched during the eightweeks period of this activity. The URF designed and built all the apparatus contained herein withcontinuous supersivion provided by his mentor.Design, manufacture and testing of these experimental apparatus were effective in educating theURF in several other ways as well. These activities helped him better understand the mechanicaldesign process as a whole and at the same time educated him about the way he can use severalmachine tools including milling machines and a lathe.As to the cost, the design and implementation of these instructional devices
response of a student in Engineering Dynamics about the definition of lifelonglearning and the research experience:“To me, lifelong learning is a skill, an acquired ability for one to continue their education in non-academic environments. ……. I knew that there were online journals available to the CCSUstudents from the FYE program, but since it wasn't a requirement for any assignment, I neverutilized it. I’m happy now that I did because some of the information is of high quality andexactly what I was looking for. For example, trying to Google-search about bungee cordsproduced ……... All in all, now that I know how to and where to find new information, I plan touse it for the future, starting with a Matlab vision project, and even for fun when I
Technical Council Committee 2-32. “Attracting Students to a Professional Career in Transportation Engineering.” ITE Journal, 60(1), 1990, pp. 42-48.11. Handy, S., Weston. L., Song, J., and Lane, D. “Education of Transportation Planning Professionals”. Transportation Research Record, 1812, 2002, pp. 151-160.12. Luna, R., Hall, R., Hilgers, M., Bham, G., Morris, C., and Morrison, G. “Introduction of GIS into Civil Engineering Curricula.” 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburg, PA.13. Luna, R., Hall, R., Hilgers, M., and Ge, L. "A GIS Learning Tool for Civil Engineers", Intl. Journal of Engineering Education, (ISSN:0949-149X), 26(1), 2010, pp. 52-58.14. Learn Civil GIS, “Transportation.” (July 1
ofthe course have been planned for the Spring 2013 semester including: The reverse engineering of a single electromechanical commercial product that includes wired and wireless communications. In addition to serving as the project for laboratory, the chosen product will also serve as the target example for each of the topics presented in class. Using a team-based methodology in the lab in order to more efficiently use student time and effort while highlighting the importance of good quality documentation and communication. This includes the opportunity for student teams to share their reverse engineering results, testing and data collection/analysis processes. The