learners becoming aware offacts, to engaged learners understanding and analyzing concepts, to interactive/introspectivelearners able to assign value and discuss ethics, to global self-regulated learners who grasp theirrelation with the world, evaluate options for positive action, and share their learning with others.3For engineering education program development, it is important to see that students need toreach the level of interaction if they are to have the capacity and the desire to consider the valueof a project, to decide what really matters and to answer the question - for what good purpose(cui bono?).Several recent publications from The National Academies Press are useful in setting theeducational context for the relational learning
Engineering & Mechanics at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM). Papadopoulos has diverse research and teaching interests in structural mechanics, biomechanics, appro- priate technology, engineering ethics, and engineering education. He serves as Secretary of the ASEE Mechanics Division and serves on numerous committees at UPRM that relate to undergraduate and grad- uate education.Aidsa Ivette Santiago Roman, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Aidsa I. Santiago-Rom´an is a Tenured Assistant Professor in the General Engineering Department at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus (UPRM). Dr. Santiago earned a BA and MS in Industrial Engineering from UPRM and Ph.D in Engineering Education from
Conversion project lead with the iFoundry and on the steering committee of the College of Engineering’s Strategic Instructional Initiatives Program.Kathryn F Trenshaw, University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignProf. Michael C. Loui, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Michael C. Loui is a professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering and University Distinguished Teacher-Scholar at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His interests include computational complexity theory, professional ethics, and the scholarship of teaching and learning. He serves as editor of the Journal of Engineering Education and as a member of the editorial boards of College Teaching and Accountability in Research. He is a Carnegie
50-minute periods which is twice that for a lecture-based course, reflecting the studio nature of EDSGN 100.The first project is more structured and provides the students with an opportunity to learn andapply a design process while developing their teamwork, communication, and ethics skills. Thesecond project is industry-sponsored and more open-ended, and typically all teams in all sectionswork on the same project. Students apply stakeholder needs assessment, ideation, research,analysis, testing, concept selection, detailed design, prototyping, and reporting.In the Zero Energy Home (ZEH) project, students work in four person teams to design the homeof their dreams with the main constraint being that it must produce as much energy as it
: Comsol Training Week 2 May 26 10:00am-12:00pm Seminar: How to Conduct Research? May 28 10:00am-12:00pm Group Meeting June 03 2:00pm-5:00pm Field Trip: Visit the University of Science and Technology Beijing Week 3 June 04 9:00am-10:00pm Presentation: Research Ethics 10:00am-12:00pm Group Meeting June 11 10:00am-11:00am Seminar: Introduction to Heat Pipes Week 4 11:00am-12:00am Group Meeting (Mid-term project presentation) 2:00pm-5:00pm Field Trip: Visit Beijing Aeronautics and Astronautics University Field Trip: Visit Fuel Cell Research
Jason Durfee is an Associate Professor of Engineering & Design at Eastern Washington University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University. He holds a Professional Engineer certification. Prior to teaching at Eastern Washington University, he was a military pilot, an engineering instructor at West Point and an airline pilot. His interests include aerospace, aviation, computational fluid dynamics, professional ethics, and piano technology.Ms. Doris M Munson, Eastern Washington University Doris M. Munson is the Systems/Reference Librarian at Eastern Washington University Libraries. She holds a M.L.S. from the University of Washington, Seattle, and a B.S. from Oregon
Page 23.100.2concepts and to impact the breadth of student learning (in terms of ABET outcomes “(c) anability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realisticconstraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability” and (h) “the broad education necessary to understand theimpact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context”).The senior design project can serve as an excellent culminating experience in the program ofstudy when it focuses on research and design projects that have practical value to consumers orto industry. For the ET program at Drexel University, the senior design course is a year
showed not only a high degree ofsatisfaction among the graduate student population, but also a general improvement of skills ineach of the three main focus areas.IntroductionAlthough industry requires young Ph.D.s. with well-rounded professional skills,1 many newgraduates lack these skills. First, with large number graduate students matriculating frominternational undergraduate programs, many students lack the ABET-required skills such asworking in multidisciplinary teams; understanding professional and ethical responsibility; andunderstanding the economic, environmental, and societal impact of their decisions.2,3Communications skills are also an issue.4 Second, for many universities the typical target forplacement of doctoral students is in
students in need got extra attention in times that the pace of the course was fast. Because of this particular students’ decision to stay on and try harder he began to open up about his fears and concerns about transferring to a four year university. During a session of field work this student asked: “How hard are other courses and how do they compare to this course?” This question started a conversation about work ethic and how much effort would be needed to succeed in an engineering curriculum at university. The instructors expressed that it would not come easily and would need a high level of commitment. Also we expressed that there would be set backs and times where they would like to give up
new trendin the energy industry. Energy-using system designers are paying more attention to lifetimeenergy costs.By preparing students to work in the renewable energy field, the REET program will be poisedto be one of the forces driving this change. Educating experts and professionals who can solvethe problems of utilizing a broad range of energy resources more efficiently and more effectivelywhile being sensitive to the environmental and human costs often associated with energygeneration is a fundamental need of the market. Statistics show that there is a growing trend inthe "Renewable Energy Industry" which provides justification for the growing need for thesekinds of professionals in this global industry, where sustainability and ethics
. Introduction A quote by John Reinert, an engineering manager at Aeroflux Microelectronics inColorado Springs, CO states, “The soft skills are just as important the engineering skills.” Thisstatement has been proven to be true for companies of all sizes, particularly for small startups,which employ a large percentage of engineers who graduate from various schools. This isbecause at a small startup company that is trying to make in-roads into a new market, using thesesoft skills are extremely important. The technical skills are the defining skills and the soft skillsare the enabling skills. These soft skills include: Oral and written presentation skills, ethics,interpersonal skills, understanding globalization, how to function on teams as well
socialization in chemistry and history. Higher Education, 2006. 54: p. 723-740.8. Blackmore, K. and K. Nesbitt. Identifying Risks for Cross-Disciplinary Higher Degree Research Students. in Proc. Tenth Australasian Computing Education Conference. 2008. Wollongong, Australia.9. Vanstone, M., et al., Interdisciplinary Doctoral Research Supervision: A scoping review. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, in press 2013.10. Goodyear, R., C. Crego, and M. Johnston, Ethical Issues in the Supervision of Student Research: A Study of Critical Incidents. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1992. 23(3): p. 203-210.11. Nisselle, A. and R. Duncan, Multiple supervisors from multiple disciplines: Lessons from the past as
studies at the Instituto Tecnol´ogico de Celaya, M´exico. Her research interests are in the field of Process Systems Engineering, and include the analysis and design of thermally coupled and alternative distillation configurations, the design of nonideal distillation systems and the synthesis, optimization and control of chemical process with recycles streams.Prof. Ramirez Apud Lopez Zaira, Universidad de las Americas Puebla Zaira Ram´ırez is Science, Engineering, and Technology Education Ph.D. Student at Universidad de las Americas Puebla in Mexico. She teaches ethics and development complex thinking skills related courses. Her research interests include faculty development, outcomes assessment, and creating effective
semesterrepresents half a year of enrollment).The biological engineering program used this course to meet several a-k outcomes during ABETaccreditation in 2009. This service-learning component was used to successfully illustratestudent mastery of the following outcomes: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, Page 23.248.9 manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams (h
objectives vs others.The experiment gives students exposure to Instrumentation, Models, Experimentation, and DataAnalysis (objectives 1-4 of Feisel and Rosa8). The use of a guitar string as the vehicle forlearning allows the students to develop Psychomotor (the ability to actually touch andmanipulate the device) and Sensory Awareness (objectives 8 and 12, respectively.) The exercisealso helps reinforce “soft skills that are so important in professional practice: Safety,Communication, Teamwork, Ethics (objectives 9 – 12). Tuning, fret positioning, the tone controlcircuit relate to Design (objective 5). Finally, although not intentional, students will sometimesget exposure to objective 6: Learning from Failure. The portability and affordability
such as teachers, family members, and members of theoutside community. There are many reasons to engage in community-centered instruction: toexpose students to real-world ethics and government policy; to practice communication withpeople outside their own academic and social community; to promote student reflection on howtheir work affects their community and how community affects their work; to provide a benefitto the community (a design of a useful device, information gathering and analysis); to engender asense of professional responsibility; to provide a cultural context for their work, and additionalfocus on social issues. Experiential clinical and service-learning programs involving localcommunities have been performed in the health
., gender, age, classification, and ethnic origin), the NEO–FF21 forthe five factor evaluation, and the ND–LOC19 for the LOC evaluation. Administration of theassessment battery took approximately 60 minutes. Appropriate institutional review approvalswere obtained and American Psychological Association (APA) ethical guidelines for researchwith human participants were followed.InstrumentsThis section briefly summarizes the measurement instruments employed in this study:Assessment and Learning in Knowledge Spaces (ALEKS).20 The focus of the ALEKS testemployed was calculus readiness exam used by the engineering program as a means ofmeasuring students' mathematical readiness for college level calculus. Scores from the ALEKSare used to determine if a
Activities in the First Year. International Journal of Engineering Education. 2008;24(2):409-419.15. van de Poel I, van Gorp AC. The need for ethical reflection in engineering design: The relevance of type of design and design hierarchy. Science, Technology, and Human Values. 2006;31(3):333-360.16. Garrety K, Badham R. User-Centered Design and the Normative Politics of Technology. Science, Technology, and Human Values. 2004;29(2):191-212.17. Oudshoorn N, Pinch T. Introduction: How Users and Non-Users Matter. In: Oudshoorn N, Pink D, eds. How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003:1- 28.18. Chambers R. Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last. Warwickshire
interests in engineering education focus on project-based learning and service-based pedagogies.Dr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Dr. Angela Bielefeldt, PE, is a professor and associate chair for Undergraduate Education in the De- partment of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. She began incorporating service-learning projects into the capstone design course for environmental en- gineering in 2001. Her engineering education research interests include attracting and retaining students, sustainable engineering education, engineering ethics, and assessment of learning outcomes.Prof. Kurt Paterson P.E., Michigan Technological UniversityProf. David O
Paper ID #6155Methodology for Evaluating Statistical Equivalence in Face Recognition Us-ing Live Subjects with Dissimilar Skin TonesDr. Rigoberto Chinchilla, Eastern Illinois University Rigoberto Chinchilla, PhD in Integrated Engineering, Ohio University, is an Associate Professor of Ap- plied Engineering and Technology at Eastern Illinois University (EIU) since 2004. His teaching and research interests include Quality Design, Biometric and Computer Security, Clean Technologies, Au- tomation and Technology-Ethics. Dr. Chinchilla has been a Fulbright and a United Nations scholar, serves in numerous departmental and
to theories of personal epistemologydevelopment throughout a Civil Engineering program. Page 23.963.10Acknowledgements This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 1025205. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1. Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.2. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986
andapplication of leadership. Leadership I includes topics such as leadership theories, styles,practices, and challenges as well as practice-based case studies. Leadership II continues withvisionary leadership and leadership development while focusing on empowerment, integrity, andintegration. This course includes practice-based case studies involving leadership andengineering design, and it prepares students for their first professional summer engagement.Leadership III builds on the foundation of Leadership I & II. It includes case studies in integrityand character, and it includes topics on opportunities, limitations, constraints and consequences(ethics), and principles of assessment and evaluation.Professional Practice I & II are summer
education and ethics. He wasAssociate Editor for the ASCE’s Journal of Hydraulic Engineering from 1993 to 2005. He has writtenor co-written numerous journal papers and articles, including the book titled ”Comprehensive Water Dis-tribution Systems Analysis Handbooks for Engineers and Planners, published by MWH Soft. Bryan haswon a number of teaching awards and recognitions including being a finalist in the TVO’s best lecturercompetition and received the American Water Works Association’s (AWWA) award for the Best Engi-neering and Construction Publication Article for 2008. Dr. Karney was awarded the Northrop Frye awardfor excellence in teaching and research in 2009
tracked. This program has proven to be successful in the ECE department forimproving female and minority enrollment and it would serve as a great model for the institute tomeet its diversity goals. Therefore, the primary purpose of this action plan is to grow the highlysuccessful ROSE-BUD program into an institution-wide ROSE-BUD MAPS program. As part of the professional development program, students will be taught professionalskills, including communication, teamwork, understanding ethics and professionalism. Theseactivities will provide an additional benefit for female and URM students because they can beginto develop social networks as soon as they arrive on campus. Some of the key activities willinvolve one of the three annual career
analysistechniques to introduce the topic of engineering systems.28 Page 23.1129.6Pierrakos, et al. at James Madison University teach a series of six design courses using problem-based learning (PBL) experiences that reiterate the design process and expose students to designtheory and practice, qualitative and quantitative reasoning, sustainability, systems thinking,ethics, and professional skills.29Gandhi, et al. at the Stevens Institute of Technology propose that the use of case studies can bevaluable in engineering education.30 They propose using systems thinking techniques, such asstrategic assumption surface testing, soft systems methodology, critical
such as economics, environmental, social, regulatory, health & safety, constructability, and sustainability analyze real world situations to determine design needs, design requirements, and compare treatment strategies for site remediation know where to find information on chemical toxicity and site remediation methods understand the larger framework of site remediation, including ethical considerations, public involvement, cost/benefit analyses work effectively in teams and communicate technical information via both written and oral formatsOver the 15-weeks of the semester, the class met twice each week for 75-minutes per class.Class time was used primarily for lectures with a few
be able to “design a system, component, or process to meet desired needswithin realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health andsafety, manufacturability, and sustainability.”Various methods2 have been discussed by educators to develop student’s conceptions of designthrough undergraduate engineering curriculums. A project-based approach3-11 has beenconsidered as one of the most effective ways and has been implemented in different courses.More specifically, capstone design courses8-11 were notably preferred among these courses. Thiswas because engineering students were required to synthesize their knowledge learned through awhole undergraduate curriculum, and apply their skills in senior designs
theoretical courses. Therefore, there iscurrently no agreement on the appropriate number or frequency of engineering designcourses for a curriculum and there is a wide variety of engineering design curriculum acrossinstitutions10.The same is also true for the methods used and content of engineering design courses1,10.Some institutions teach the design process using a traditional lecture format. Others prefer touse case studies to teach some aspects of the design process such as ethics, legalconsiderations, and safety. Still others adopt experiential teaching methods such as problem-based learning or service learning activities to teach engineering design courses3-4. In theinstitutions that still have only one capstone experience, the engineering
Paper ID #6175The Teaching and Evaluation of Technology and Engineering Concepts to Do-minican Junior High and High School StudentsDr. Geoff Wright, Brigham Young University Dr. Geoffrey A. Wright is an assistant Professor of Technology and Engineering Education in the College of Engineering at Brigham Young University.Prof. Ron Terry, Brigham Young University Ron is a Professor of Technology and Engineering Education at Brigham Young University. His scholar- ship centers on pedagogy, student learning, and engineering ethics and has presented/published numerous articles in engineering education.Dr. Steven L Shumway
problems. The average coefficient of determination is 0.161. (The first problem of the final exam concernedprofessional ethics question and thus was excluded from the analysis.)DiscussionIt is important to note that our effort features capture only a portion of the effort expended bystudents on studying. Other elements of studying, such as the amount of time spent reading thetextbook or working on scratch paper, are not captured by the digital pens we use. However, webelieve that the amount of time spent problem solving on homework provides a useful measureof a student’s effort in a course.The results of the linear regression analysis of the overall-effort features indicate that students’effort does account for a considerable portion of the