rather thanfilters prospective engineering students for their further studies.Bibliography1. R. Chabay and B. Sherwood, "Modern Mechanics," American Journal of Physics 72. (2004). p. 439-445.2. www1.iclicker.com3. Otero V, Pollock S, Finkelstein N. 2010. A physics department’s role in preparing physics teachers: The Colorado learning assistant model,” American Journal of Physics. 78(11):12184. www.socialhwk.com5. http://groups.physics.umn.edu/physed/Research/CGPS/CGPSintro.htm6. www.colorado.edu/sei/class7. David Hestenes, Malcolm Wells, and Gregg Swackhamer, “Force Concept Inventory” The Physics Teacher, Vol. 30, March 1992, 141-158 Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV
). Embedding design projects into multidisciplinary engineering education. Educational and Information Technology (ICEIT), 2010 International Conference on, 3, V3-398-V3-402.5. Wiki. (2012). How to Plan a Micro Hydro Power Plant, on line http://en.howtopedia.org/wiki/How_to_Plan_ a Micro_Hydro-power_Plant, accessed at 3June20126. Pokharel, S. (2003). “Promotional issues on alternative energy technologies in Nepal”, Energy Policy 31: 307– 318.7. Arismunandar, A and Kuwahara, A. (1991). Teknik Tenaga Listrik, Jilid I, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta.8. Brown, J. (1984). Hydro-Electric Engineering Practice, CBS Publisher & Distributors, London. Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV
Engineering Education, 86(2) (1997), 70-71.6. Prados, John W. (2004). "Can ABET really make a difference," International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(3), 315-317.7. Shuman, L.J., Besterfield-Sacre, & McGourty, J. (2005). "The ABET Professional Skills" Can They Be Taught ? Can They Be Assessed" ; Journal of Engineering Education, 41-55.8. Singh, S., (2003). “An Interactive Approach to Improve Civil Engineering Education,” Proceedings of the 32nd Symposium of IGIP’s Annual Conference, 335-337.9. Koehn, E., (1997). “Engineering Perceptions of ABET Accreditation Criteria,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice.10. Morgan, J., & Barroso, L. R. (2006). “Project Enhanced Learning in Structural
Education 2672. Tehrani, F. M. 2011. Implementing Situational Leadership in Engineering Classrooms. Proc. Pacific Southwest section of American Soc. for Engrg. Edu., California State University, Fresno. 114-124.3. ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology). 2010. Criteria for Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Baltimore, MD: ABET. (www.abet.org).4. Hersey, P., Angelini, A.L., & Carakushansky, S. 1982. The Impact of Situational Leadership and Classroom Structure on Learning Effectiveness. Group & Organization Studies. 7 (2), pp. 216-224.5. Komives, S. R., Lucas, N., & McMahon, T. R. (2009
, 2002.2. S. Bergin and R. Reilly. The influence of motivation and comfort-level on learning to program. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group pages 293-304, University of Sussex, Brighton UK 2005.3. Jens Bennedsen and Michael E. Caspersen, Failure rates in introductory programming, SIGCSE 2007, pp 32-36.4. Computing Education for 21st Century (CE21) Program Solicitation NSF 12-527 http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2012/nsf12527/nsf12527.htm5. V. Barr and C. Stephenson, Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community?, ACM Inroads, Vol. 2 No. 1, March 2011.6. Irene, et al., Computational Thinking for Youth in Practice
77Bibliography 1. Tongue, B. H. and Sheppard, S. D. (2005) Dynamics: Analysis and Design of Systems in Motion, John Wiley & Sons. 2. Meriam, J. L. and Kraige, L.G. (2006) Engineering Mechanics, Volume 2, Dynamics, 6th Edition, John Wiley & Sons. 3. Self, B. P. and Redfield, R. (2001) New Approaches in Teaching Undergraduate Dynamics. Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 4. Prince, M. and Vigeant, M. (2006) Using Inquiry-Based Activities to Promote Understanding of Critical Engineering Concepts. Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 5. Self, B. P., Birdsong, C. and Rossman, E. (2008) A new spin on
Technical Entrepreneurship Case Studies,” the Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship (JEEN), Vol. 2, No.1, Winter 2011.3. “Moving Forward to Improve Engineering Education,” National Science Board, 19 November 2007, 58p.4. Todd, R.H., Sorensen, C.D., and Magleby, S.P., “Designing a Capstone Senior Course to Satisfy Industrial Customers,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 82, No. 2., 1993, 99 92-100.5. Katehi, et al. “A New Framework for Academic Reform in Engineering Education,” Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2004.6. Luryi, S., Tang, W., Lifshitz, N., Wolf, G., Doboli, S., Betz, J.A., Maritato, P., and Shamash, Y., “Entrepreneurship in Engineering Education
Median = 4 SD = 0.654.a. Explain the use of a flowchart for PIC programming. Mean = 3.93 Median = 4 SD = 1.014.b. Calculate and write a time delay loop(s). Mean = 4.07 Median = 4
thesetechnologies for both coordination and communication in the field help them increase productivityand quality of the work process, which ultimately increase profitability and lower the potentialdelay and undocumented issues.References1. C.H. Nam and C.B. Tatum (1992). Strategies for technology push: lessons from construction innovations, Construction Engineering and Management2. Chitkara, K. K. (1998). Construction project management: Planning, scheduling and controlling, McGraw-Hill, New Delhi.3. Emmitt, S. and Gorse, C. 2003, Construction Communication, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.4. Higgin, G., and Jessop, N. (1965). Communications in the building industry: The report of a pilot study, Tavistock Publications, London.5. T.M. Toole
concepts. Moreover,during the oral examination, the ULAs offer additional individual explanations anddemonstrations to cover students’ conceptual and technical deficiencies.Final Project ECE175 Spring 2013The final project is to write a c program to simulate the card game called “War”. The rules are: 1. You are to play with a deck of 52 cards, ranking from low to high as follows: two, three, …ten, jack, queen, king and ace. There are 4 suits (H S D C) of each numbered and face cards, although for the game, suits are ignored. The deck needs to be shuffled, then deal 26 cards to each of two players (This is called a hand). 2. Each player places the top card face up on the table and the player with the higher card takes the
technologies.References1. H. G. Yeh, D. F. Gayme, S. H. Low “Adaptive VAR Control for Distribution Circuits with Photovoltaic Generators,” IEEE Trans. On Power Systems, Vol 27, No. 3, August 2012.2. C. Demoulias, “A New Simple Analytical method for Calculating the Optimum Inverter Size in Grid- connected PV Plants” Electric Power System Research, vol. 80, Issue 10, pp. 1197-1204, October 2010.3. R. Manly. (2013, Nov 15). Energy Conference Returns [Online]. Available:4. http://www.csulb.edu/misc/inside/?p=44313 Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2014, American Society for Engineering Education
, Howard T., 1983. Ecological and General Systems, New York, Wiley.39. Odum, Howard T., and Elisabeth C. Odum, 2000. Modeling for All Scales, New York, Academic Press.40. Odum, Howard T., and Elisabeth C. Odum, 2001. A Prosperous Way Down: Principles and Policies, Boulder, University Press of Colorado.41. Hall, Charles A. S., and Kent A. Klitgaard, 2011. Energy and the Wealth of Nations: Understanding the Biophysical Economy, New York, Springer.42. Meadows, Donella, Dennis Meadows, and Jorgen Randers, 2005. Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update, White River Junction, Vermont, Chelsea Green Publishing.43. Meadows, Donella H., 2008. Thinking in Systems, White River Junction, Vermont, Chelsea Green Publishing.44. Naess, Arne, 1973. The