- Conference Session
- Capstone Design
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Gene Dixon, East Carolina University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education
prior art, customer objective(s), customer requirements,design economics, drawings, analytical results, engineering changes, test reports, and an openissues list4. Patent search results may also be included. As the design develops, the presentationshould provide insights into design activities, design alternatives considered and selected,technical/economic trade-off analysis and justifications, and conclusions21. Often the TDR process includes oral presentations. During oral presentations, designassumptions, analysis, alternatives and design methods are challenged during question andanswer (Q&A) portions of the TDR. Duesing4 (2004) states that it is “…critical that engineersexplain their concepts and designs to an engineering and
- Conference Session
- Developing the Design Skillset
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Ibrahim Mohedas, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education
? Documenting the effect of usability sessions on novice software designers. J Res Comput Educ. 2001;33(3):235 – 250.12. Scott JB. The Practice of Usability: Teaching User Engagement Through Service-Learning. Tech Commun Q. 2008;17(4):381–412.13. Mohedas I, Daly SR, Sienko KH. Characterizing Students’ Use of Design Ethnography in a Capstone Design Course. Int J Eng Educ. 2014. In Press.14. Zoltowski CB, Oakes WC, Cardella ME. Students ’ Ways of Experiencing Human-Centered Design. J Eng Educ. 2012;101(1):28–59. Page 24.1126.915. Creswell J. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
- Conference Session
- Best of DEED
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Carl A. Reidsema PhD, The University of Queensland; Lydia Kavanagh, The University of Queensland; Lesley Jolly, Strategic Partnerships
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education
their learning.In addition, communication and support tools such as an online Q&A tool, Facebook forumand online tutoring were provided. These online resources were organised through an in-house developed “Learning Pathway” tool that provided links to what students needed toknow and what they needed to do. The Learning Pathway tool organised and presented thisinformation on a weekly basis. The results of these improvements are apparent in Figure 4but more is needed to communicate the rationale in ways that make sense to students (seediscussion below).Observation of student learning activities revealed many unexpected insights into whatstudents need to learn and how they go about learning it, from the group in the workshop whocould not
- Conference Session
- Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Ang Liu, University of Southern California; Stephen Y. Lu, University of Southern California
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education
24.1035.13Traditionally, the team-instructor interaction on design projects mostly takes place during thereview presentations in class. For example, after all teams present their design process/outcometo the whole class, the instructor interacts with each team during the limited Q&A minutes. Thedisadvantage is that the instructor often spends a significant amount of the interaction timecorrecting every team’s similar mistakes in using the design method instead of demonstratinghow the instructor would design differently. As a consequence, it is common that the grading ofdesign presentations is largely determined based on “how correctly the methods were used”instead of “how creatively the problem was solved”.6. Conclusion and future worksThis paper presented
- Conference Session
- Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Warren F. Smith, UNSW, Canberra, Australia; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma; Farrokh Mistree, University of Oklahoma
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education
of surveys completed by individuals Table 4 – The Survey Questions and the Surveys in which they were asked (Highlighted: 1,3,4,7,16,17,20,22,23,24 – 10 consistently asked competency questions)Q # Question 1A 1B 2A 2B 3&4 ABILITY TO MANAGE INFORMATION AND PROCESSES1 I am confident in my ability to scope, plan and manage a process * 1 1 1 12 I am confident in my ability to gather, interpret, validate and use information