responsibilities is key to their ownacademic success making appropriate mentoring and training crucial1.In the College of Engineering each of our four departments was assigned funding for threeTeaching Assistants that are designated Fellows. The Teaching Fellows (TFs) not only takeclasses, work on their thesis research and assist with undergraduate laboratories, they also havethe opportunity to gain direct classroom experience as instructor of record for a freshman orsophomore course. With these opportunities in mind, the College of Engineering Dean’s Officeand the four department Chairpersons formed a committee to develop a summer trainingprogram that prepares the TFs for the teaching experience.Since TFs are assigned to a wide variety of different
faculty positions, either immediately following graduation, or laterin the career), we decided to offer the new AGEP-focused “Career Roundtable” session duringthe annual PROMISE AGEP Summer Success Institute in August 2012.The Career Roundtable format for both the campus-based seminar and the AGEP-focusedseminar is advertised as a “speed-dating-styled” career seminar. The format borrows elementsfrom several tried and true event types: traditional job fairs where students walk through rows of employers at rectangular tables, panel front table with 2-3 speakers, information sessions that feature one key employer (e.g., An IBM Seminar, An MIT Lincoln Laboratories Seminar), and networking lunches at conferences.The
obvious differences between the discussion topics selected by more- andless-experienced mentors, combining the responses from both groups highlights interestinggroupings among the topics. For instance, nearly all mentors chose to discuss logistics, the valueof the research, and the student’s role: 98% of mentors discussed how students can seek help for research-related questions 93% of mentors discussed the intellectual merits or significance of the research area/topic 91% of mentors discussed students’ expected work schedules 91% of mentors discussed the value of the student’s role within the project/groupDiscussions of how the student would be integrated with existing research and laboratory/groupprocesses were the next
Education Director for the NSF Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Advanced Self-Powered Systems of Integrated Sensors and Technologies (ASSIST).Prof. Mehmet C. Ozturk, North Carolina State University Mehmet C. Ozturk received his BS degree in Electrical Engineering from Bogazici University in Istanbul, Turkey in 1980. He received his MS degree from Michigan Tech in 1983 and his PhD degree from NC State University in 1988. Immediately after graduation, he joined the faculty in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Since 2008, Dr. Ozturk has been serving as the director of the NCSU Nanofabrication Facility, which operates as the central laboratory for the entire University. In 2012, he became the
Paper ID #8404Enticing Undergraduate Students to Pursue Graduate Research at an Undergraduate-Focused InstitutionDr. Aaron P. Wemhoff, Villanova University Dr. Aaron Wemhoff earned his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley in 2004. He started work as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Villanova University in 2008 after working for 3 years at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Page 24.533.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Enticing Undergraduate
thought that wasa good exercise. That is, it is difficult to collaborate with each other. So, you need to be tolerant.Or, sometimes, you need to do more and don’t have high expectations towards others.Sometimes, other team members are better than you. So, it becomes a dynamic process, like,who is going to be the leader of the group. If you think other group members are not so good,you should, don’t complain. Instead, you can undertake more responsibilities; just try to be theleader. If there is someone better than you in the group, then try to be a follower. So I think, it isabout a cooperative mode. I think being in the laboratory is the same as well. That is, you shouldappreciate others' advantages and discover the strengths of others.”In this
, University of Michigan John Younger, MD, is a Professor and Associate Chair for Research in the Department of Emergency Medicine. In addition to being a practicing physician, he leads a research laboratory focused on issues re- lated to bacterial fouling of materials. In the context of human health, the work concentrates on infections of implanted medical devices. In other contexts, his work focuses on ways to prevent, or even facili- tate, bacterial interactions with engineered surfaces. Examples of the former include preventing fouling of industrial surfaces. An example of the latter is the development of new technologies to enhance the detection of low-level bacterial contamination in clinical samples and food.Prof
experience and motive using student comments and survey data on perceptions of the Page 24.189.2course. Those who work in graduate teacher training and graduate student development may beinterested in this paper.IntroductionMany universities and colleges provide teacher training for graduate teaching assistants (GTAs).The GTAs play an important role as instructors, lecturers, laboratory and recitation teachers,graders, tutors, proctoring exams and grading homeworks. An Internet search on trainingmanuals or programs will bring up dozens of these teaching tools for GTAs, suggesting thatthere are a variety of methods and strategies to prepare graduate
summary slides about writing mechanics in their own time, as theyfeel necessary. Writing mechanics is not included on the graded test, although students may opt Page 24.966.8to take a self-evaluation of 30 multiple-choice questions to determine if their skills in that areaneed more attention. The faculty members apply the summarized standards of the CGSC and thePurdue Online Writing Laboratory (OWL) APA guidelines to evaluate students’ writtenproducts, so the rules and principles for effective academic writing and writing mechanics areroutinely reinforced.Student understanding of these principles of effective academic writing taught during
Technologies Laboratory have addressed sus- tainability challenges in the fields of systems design, technology selection, manufacturing, and water.Mr. Adam B. Baker, University of Michigan Page 24.1238.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 The PhD Advising Relationship: Needs of Returning and Directing-Pathway StudentsI. IntroductionThough a majority of engineering PhD students begin their doctoral career shortly aftercompleting an undergraduate degree (and perhaps a Master’s), a significant minority of studentsare “returners,” students who pursue a PhD after
-sustaining fellowship program with Virginia Tech(VT) hosted at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology (RHIT), with the vision of graduatestudents and faculty working together to connect research and practice. The program was Page 24.651.4originally intended to provide a laboratory for VT graduate students to practice engineeringeducation in the classroom and for RHIT faculty to build their expertise in the discipline ofengineering education. The implemented program retained the benefits to RHIT faculty, butchanged the activities of the fellows. In essence, the program took advantage of the expertise ofthe first applicants to re-envision their roles as