Asee peer logo
Displaying all 2 results
Conference Session
Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Imelda Olague-Caballero, New Mexico State University; Delia J. Valles-Rosales, New Mexico State University
Tagged Divisions
Industrial Engineering
team; communicate effectively; and knowledge of contemporaryissues while building students' self-efficacy through direct interactions with industryprofessionals. This model will increase the students' employability by facilitating the creation ofmeaningful connections to the real world of work, and will develop the students' ability tonavigate and negotiate the social, political, and practical dimensions of a workplaceThe model allows teams of 4 students to participate in this experience; they work under thesupervision and guidance of a graduate students acting as peer mentor, who is responsible toassist and support the team during the completion of their project. It is required that the teamspend two hours a day during twelve weeks
Conference Session
Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Paul C. Lynch, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA; Cynthia Bober, Penn State University; Jennifer Louise Mines, The Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Divisions
Industrial Engineering
assessments that measure students’ thought processesand level comprehension of class material1, 9-10.Questions J through N: Instructor Approachability, Passion, and FairnessA large-scale study by Austin (1993) discovered that the interaction between faculty and studentswas one of the most predictive factors of beneficial change in students’ academic advancement,personal growth, and satisfaction14,16. Another study by Atman et. al, “Enabling engineeringstudent successes,” found that senior students’ behavioral motivation, psychological motivation,motivation from a mentor, and motivation to do social good were related to how often studentsinteracted with instructors and how satisfied students were with instructors14. Clearly, studentand instructor