Paper ID #10525Challenging Students’ Values and Assumptions Through Project-Based Learn-ingDr. Diana Bairaktarova, The University of Oklahoma Diana Bairaktarova is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Practice in the College of Engineering, School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering at University of Oklahoma. Diana has over a decade of experience working as a Design Engineer. Her research is focused on human learning and engineering, i.e. understanding how individual differences and aptitudes affect interaction with mechanical objects, and how engineering students’ personality traits influence ethical decision-making
(h) The broad education communicate effectively (c) An ability to design a professional and ethical
favors empathizing over systemizing. Studies show a consistent pattern with the“S>E profile for physical science students as a group, and a E>S profile for humanities studentsas a group, regardless of sex.”113. Scenario-Based Curriculum for Solid MechanicsThe scenario-based learning has long been used as a pedagogical technique in a variety oflearning domains, primarily in business education where it is viewed as a technique to teachcomplex decision-making skills.12 In engineering education, the scenario approach is most oftenused in the teaching of engineering ethics that focus on the ethical challenges of professionalengineers and use “social world” stories like the Challenger disaster or Hurricane Katrina.13 TheNSF has funded previous
establishes the processes, and post-processes, required todevelop the final desired properties. Paying particular attention to options of materials/processesearly in the design phase can greatly reduce cost and delay in product introduction.The prediction of product volume, a strategic decision, can also have a significant effect onultimate material/manufacturing costs. Some processes have high initial tooling cost with lowunit production cost; other have low tooling cost, but higher unit production cost. Knowledge ofboth materials and manufacturing methods, combined with accurate estimates of productvolumes, determine the profitability of the end product.There is also the issue of ethics. Selection decisions for materials and processes have a
economics and ethics, and graduate finite elements, numerical methods, thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, plasma fundamentals and gas dynamics.Bradley S. Davidson, University of Denver Bradley Davidson is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering and director of the Human Dy- namics Laboratory at the University of Denver. He holds a BS in civil engineering from Tennessee Tech, an MS in engineering mechanics from Virginia Tech, and a PhD in biomedical engineering from the Vir- ginia Tech–Wake Forest School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences. His research in musculoskeletal biomechanics emphasizes measurement of human movement and motor control, with applications in the lumbar spine stability, total knee
consider first-hand experiences with students.Identify desired attributes of graduates (such as Survey industry partners and department faculty.critical thinker, ethical) and desiredknowledge/skills of graduates (such as finiteelement analysis and communication).Identify objectives and constraints. CRC compiles.Benchmark other curricula. Review literature, explore university web sites, and invite seminar speakers.Generate concepts for new curriculum. CRC and department faculty and staff brainstorm.Select concepts for new curriculum. Departmental faculty and staff provide
topics relevant to the course outcomes. [III] (g, i) {knowledge}5. Employ the ability to learn independently or to know when to ask for help, to most efficiently and successfully acquire knowledge. [III] (d, g) {application}6. Comprehend the ethics of programming. [I] (f) {comprehension}7. Identify how programming and mathematical content applies to the field of engineering. [I,II] (h) {knowledge}[ ] course outcome link to course goal( ) lower case letters (a-k) link to ABET student outcomes{ } Bloom’s taxonomy’s cognitive level of learning (knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis,evaluation)Figure 1 – An excerpt from the syllabus showing the course goals and outcomes mapped to each other, ABET
system, component, or process to meet desired goals (d) an ability to function on a multi-disciplinary team (e) identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) understand professional and ethical responsibility (g) communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and
of engineering students a force in the worldaround them. The structure of the courses within a department could expand to all requiredcourses as in the following. The communication elements in each course are shown below.EGR 100 – Intro to Engineering Design (Freshman)Resumes, email, short engineering focused reports, engineering writing demands, problemsolving, speaking, ethics, and orientation to the university/college/majorsME 201 – Thermodynamics (Sophomore)Student communication survey, refresher for past grammatical expertiseME 332 – Fluid Mechanics (Junior) ME 371 – Machine Design ILaboratory Reports: (Approx. 9 @ 4-6 Short Technical Reportingpages each) Design Analysis Reports (2 @ 4-6
appreciation for international engineering cultures; gain knowledge of, and sensitivity to, cultural norms; understand the differences in problem definitions and problem solving strategies that exist between cultures; and gain an appreciation for ethical responsibilities.Before proceeding with an overview of assessment and a frank evaluation of the efficacy of thePMFC, it is important to note that few of the core and experimental components detailed aboveare truly original in form. Workbooks, blogs, instructional videos, case studies and concept-based evaluation tools, for example, all have been utilized, with varying degrees of success, ineducational contexts7-9,13-28. As such, the true novelty of the PMFC largely stems from
Paper ID #8496Student Perceptions of Connections between Statics Class and Co-op WorkExperienceDr. Diane L Peters, Kettering University Diane L. Peters is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University in Flint, MI. Her engineering education research focuses on the links between industry and academia.Dr. Joy Arbor, Kettering University Joy Arbor is assistant professor of communication in the Department of Liberal Studies at Kettering University. She teaches communication, public writing, and ethics