students, especially those typically underrepresented inSTEM, to take the high school courses needed in preparation for 21st century workforce needs.Each EYE Module is designed such that students use engineering practices and apply requiredmathematics and science content to develop solutions to relevant problems facing humans today,fostering the development of engineering “habits of mind.”The set of eight EYE Modules are comprehensive and extensive instructional guides for middlegrades teachers to implement collaboratively in mathematics and science classes. The Modulesaddress standards-based STEM content and practices that fill gaps between state-mandated andtested content and what business and industry say they need, including innovative
-prospective-students-essay. (accessed October 1, 2013)13. Kaplan-Leiserson, E. 2008. Mind the Gap. National Society of Professional Engineers,http://www.nspe.org/PEmagazine/pe_0108_mind-the-gap.html (accessed September 30, 2013)14. Knowledge@Emory. 2010. Managing Millennials in the Workplace.http://knowledge.emory.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1351. (accessed October 1, 2013)15. Winograd, M, and M. Hais, 2011.Millennial Momentum: how a new generation is remaking America. NewBrunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.16. Burstein, D. 2013.Fast Future: How the Millennial Generation is Shaping Our World. Boston, MA: BeaconPress.17. Alsop, R. 2008.The Trophy Kids Grow Up. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.18. Abaffy, L. 2011. Millennials Bring New Attitudes
back to when we all started writing our first scene performances, everyone was stuck sitting in their groups and trying to systematically plan out the script and staging in their heads rather than getting up and trying it. It’s something that we aren’t taught a lot of in engineering. I can’t count how many times I’ve had a group report to write and we’ve sat there deliberating on how exactly we want to write it, when it would have been much easier to just start writing what ever comes to mind, and then editing later. I think that free “artistic” style of thinking (not saying that artists aren’t systematic in what they do) is something we can all learn from.6.2 Representations of Science and Technology in the Popular
or delivery, and identification ofnew market share. The culmination of the course is to present the groups’ business ideas toinvestors and judges (in a business pitch competition), and use feedback and knowledge gainedfrom these presentations to make a final report including an analysis of the businesses’ potentialfor success.The guiding principle in designing this course was that modeling the process of ideation, Page 24.624.7research, development and commercialization in a course environment would foster anentrepreneurial spirit in engineering undergraduates; making them less risk-averse and morecreative and open-minded in their approach to
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Exploring Entrepreneurial Characteristics and Experiences of Engineering AlumniAbstractIn recent years one of the goals of the National Science Foundation (NSF) has been to encouragenew generations of engineering students to become more entrepreneurially-minded and self-employed in the engineering field. Engineering schools in the United States have specificcurricular requirements that students must fulfill in order to graduate, and some of theserequirements may incorporate a component of entrepreneurship education. As part of theresearch reported here, data from a survey of recent engineering alumni were used to examineand determine which engineering
educator needs to share ideas openly to discuss and frame a better future for our activities. Having the flexible and open-‐minded approaches and philosophical basis together with shared engineering values and concepts are essential for paving a better road to the future of engineering and engineering education. AcknowledgementThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under awards: DUE 0837314 and DUE-‐0920164. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The author would like to thank
shedesigned advertisements for a local art school, edited a magazine to present scientific research topublic audience in more interactive styles, and co-founded the aeronautics club at Smith. Someof her classmates chose to expand their horizon by travelling to different parts of the world. P1spent a semester in an exchange program studying architecture in Denmark; she also made afield trip to Nepal with her teammates, gathering information for their Design Clinic project. P4pursued a minor in Portuguese. While she was studying in an exchange program in Brazil, anindependent study course attracted her to social sciences, after which she made her mind toswitch to engineering arts.When H4 first came to HMC, he didn’t have a good understanding of what a
characteristics of engineers that enable themto produce or inhibit them from producing the innovations that U.S. society so urgently desires.We define these characteristics of engineers that enable or inhibit them from creating innovationsas engineering innovativeness or non-innnovativeness.Study participants defined an innovation as: “Simply put, it’s a new way of doing things. It’s breaking tradition and taking a new approach to solving an old problem. I think an innovation is actually only truly innovative if it is delivered to the world and widely adopted, and enjoyably used.” Riley “In my mind innovation is recognizing a need, or a gap, or a circumstance that could be better and then bringing to bear new ways of
pursue a career in energy industry or to enroll ingraduate programs in the energy field. It is important to encourage students to learn to use suchkind of software packages that work with renewable energy systems. Because by taking theadvantage of such tools students can learn and adapt better solutions to fix the energy problemissues. It is is important to keep in mind that how we are using the energy today will shape theway how we live in the future.References1. Engineering Accreditation Commission, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,"http://www.abet.org/criteria.html. (2002).2. Petty, I.: Vision 2020 - Education in the next Millennium. In: Hagström, A. (Ed.), Engineering Education:Rediscovering the Centre (Proc. SEFI Annual Conf
profession and its educationalinstitutions, along with the public, not mutually benefit from a view of the public that honored itsknowledge in regards to engineering?With the questions above in mind, I have written the following paper to challenge the dominantbelief in the engineering educational and professional community that the public’s view ofengineering is somehow deficient. I have termed this belief as “dominant,” not just because two ofthe most influential engineering-related agencies, the National Academy of Engineering (NAE)and the National Science Foundation (NSF), have both claimed that the lack of publicunderstanding of engineering was having a negative effect on the engineering field and society ingeneral. 1 (p. 7) I have termed the
University. NSF and several private foundations fund his research. His research and teaching focuses on engineering as an innovation in P-12 education, policy of P-12 engineering, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering, the measurement and support of the change of ’engineering habits of mind’ particularly empathy and the use of cyber-infrastructure to sensitively and resourcefully provide access to and support learning.Dr. Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica E. Cardella is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and an Affiliate of the Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University. She is the Director of the MEDLEE
implications, these findings have important instructional implicationsfor both engineering curriculum design and teaching practices.BackgroundEngineering tasks are implemented with various objectives in mind, including improvedperformance in math or science and increasing the number and diversity of students interested inengineering7. Even so, classroom observations, descriptions from published research e.g., 2, as wellas curricula descriptions (e.g., Engineering is Elementary8, Learning by Design9, and others7),have revealed that the overarching organization of classroom design tasks are generally quite Page 24.981.2similar.In these classrooms, a
, and technology knowledge and skills; and 3) promote engineering habits of mind,including systems thinking, creativity, optimism, collaboration, communication, and attentionto ethical considerations.According to OECD31, differences in young people‟s career choice can be attributed totraditional perceptions of gender roles and identities as well as the wide acceptance ofcultural values associated with particular fields of education. Therefore, high school students‟attitudes to engineering may be an important predictor of not only being adequately preparedto engineering but its pursuit. If more high school students acquire positive attitudes towardsengineering, more of them will be motivated to choose engineering as a career.An attitude is a
for the entire first- yearengineering students. All engineering students are brought into the First-YearEngineering Program that is part of the Department of Engineering Education.They are required to complete a common first year core of classes matriculating to theirrespective engineering major (Jeremy, 2006). As the industries and societies that revolvearound faces mind-boggling challenges especially if one works with Informationtechnology, manufacturing, oil or gas. They need for engineers in this field are veryacute. Federal stimulus spending in such areas as energy technology and infrastructureshows an increase in demand. But there is still
Graphics added to make satisfied/sufficient content mind reader’s job easy. Correct use of No ambiguous statements Appendices are appropriately numbers/numerals in every compiled for brevity and ease instance of use No more than two comma All sentences are logical Bulleted/numbered lists are errors used when appropriate No “crazy,” confusing Engineering conventions of sentences tables/graphics are followed No “crazy” significant figures
label of “Maker” is the source of pride.Discussing Overlapping IdeasDuring both approaches terms that overlapped in the descriptions of making and engineeringwere recorded. These terms were used to create a definition of the relationship between Makersand engineers.From the ad-hoc post-it approach several key concepts were seen in both responses to What isMaking to You? and What is Engineering to You? First is the use of ambiguous direct objectssuch as thing(s), something, and stuff when talking about accomplishing tasks. This suggests thatwhile engineers may be considered more specialized both groups accomplish some various task.Next is the use of action verbs making, building, creating, and make. What comes to mind whenMakers thing of
Paper ID #9049Predicting Entrepreneurial Intent among Entry-Level Engineering StudentsDr. Mark F Schar, Stanford University Dr. Schar works in the Center for Design Research - Designing Education Lab at Stanford University. He is also a member of the Symbiotic Project of Affective Neuroscience Lab at Stanford University and a Lecturer in the School of Engineering. Dr. Schar’s area of research is ”pivot thinking” which is the intersection of design thinking and the neuroscience of choice where he has several research projects underway. He has a 30 year career in industry as a Vice President with The Procter & Gamble
, Performance, I Choose (LPIC) combinations L P IC Example C* R “While rote learning may sometimes achieve the reward of better grades, it rarely rewards the students of a better understanding of the material. However, I believe that the way the school system is currently set up, rote learning is rewarded favorably over conceptual learning. While a conceptual learning style would be favorable on exams if the concepts were allowed to be solidified in students' minds, 10-week terms packed to the brim with engineering work does not allow time for some conceptual learners to attain confidence with the concepts. These students are then quickly
Paper ID #8857Developing Engineering Ethics through Expert Witness Role PlaysDr. Bradley J. Brummel, The University of Tulsa Bradley Brummel is an Assistant Professor of Psychology at The University of Tulsa. His research inter- ests include using role plays and other simulations to teach responsible conduct of research. He conducts interdisciplinary research with Mechanical Engineering, Neuroscience, and Computer Science. His work has appeared in journals such as Science and Engineering Ethics, Personnel Psychology, Human Rela- tions, and Journal of ManagementDr. Jeremy S. Daily P.E., The University of Tulsa
Paper ID #8663Engineering Vocabulary Development using an Automated Software ToolMr. Chirag Variawa, University of Toronto Chirag Variawa is an accelerated-stream Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the University of Toronto. He earned his B.A.Sc. in Materials Science Engineering in 2009 from the same institution. He is the first Graduate Student member of the University of Toronto Governing Council elected from Engineering. His multi-disciplinary research uses principles from arti- ficial intelligence, computational linguistics, higher education and aspects of neuroscience to
. Page 24.279.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Collaboration within Engineering Education Research’s Community of PracticeAbstractEngineering education research (EER) is a relatively young field of inquiry, established with theintent to improve the academic experiences of young and emerging engineers. While manyresearchers’ perceptions of how to improve engineering education stem from traditionalclassroom experiences, a select group of researchers belong to EER-oriented departments, labs,and research centers. These on-campus resources create a formal bridge between EER-expertnetworks and offer researchers an opportunity to collaborate with other like-minded
Paper ID #9209Integrating Sustainability Engineering into Second-Year CompositionDr. Connie Gomez, Galveston College Dr. Gomez received her Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Drexel University in Philadelphia, PA. She has worked in the areas of computer aided tissue engineering and sustainability at the University of Texas at El Paso. She is currently a member of Galveston College in Galveston, TX, where she is developing a new engineering program.Ms. Leslie Braniger, Galveston College Page 24.778.1
years [6]. More recentlyin 2011, Mercer University focused solely on engineering courses they determined were the“weed-out” classes [7].Keeping in mind the struggles that students were facing in engineering courses, The Citadelselected to review the D, F and Withdraws grades (DFW) in courses that were prerequisites toengineering courses. Beginning in fall 2012, it became apparent that many of the prerequisiteclasses to get into engineering courses were some of the most troubling for our engineeringstudents, therefore resulting in high DFW rates.As shown below in Figure 3, a comparison of DFW rates for Fall 2012 and Fall 2013 for courseswith SI session demonstrates a decrease in the DFW rates in Chemistry, Math and Physicscourses, whereas
Paper ID #8922Mentoring Engineering Students:Challenges and Potential RewardsDr. Waddah Akili, Iowa State University Waddah Akili is an academician and a civil engineering consultant in Ames, Iowa. Has published in various fields including: geotechnical engineering, foundations, and pavement materials & design. He has been involved with contemporary engineering education issues, addressing a wide range of topics of interest and relevance to engineering institutions and practicing engineers, in the US and abroad
manufacturing. The educational programs are aimed at furthering education in engineering and engineering technology by promoting global excellence in engineering and engineering technology, developing future generations of entrepreneurially-minded engineers. This is achieved by partnering and investing in educational initiatives and programs between industry and institu- tions of higher learning. Michael has served on various advisory groups including, the editorial board of the Journal of Engineering Education, Boeing Higher Education Integration Board, American Society for Engineering Education Project Board and the National Science Foundation I-UCRC Industry University Collaborative Research Center Advisory Board. Michael
satisfaction, diversity,and learning31.Course contentDeveloping the course content involved keeping both aspects of our mission in mind: teachingengineering design as a way of knowing, a broadly relevant method for problem discovery,definition and solution; and also developing students’ professional preparation. The vocabularyof design used in the course was drawn from the IDEO/Stanford d.school version of the designprocess (Figure 1), and from the textbook developed at Harvey Mudd College32.Figure 1. Engineering design process, adapted from Stanford d.schoolCourse topics included: an introduction to the design process; case studies such as the evolutionof bridge design and the way the properties of available engineering materials informs the formand
Paper ID #8773Promoting Undergraduate Research in the Electrical Engineering Curricu-lumProf. David Hoe, The University of Texas at Tyler David H. K. Hoe did his undergraduate and graduate studies at the University of Toronto. His professional experience includes positions at General Electric’s Research and Development Center as a Staff Engineer and at the University of Texas at Arlington as a Research Associate and Adjunct Professor. He assumed his present position as an Assistant Professor in the Electrical Engineering Department at the University of Texas at Tyler in August 2008. He teaches classes in Computer
. 2000;34(1):16–25.4. National Science Foundation. Introduction to the IGERT program. 2013. Available at: www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/igert/intro.jsp.5. Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR, eds. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academy Press; 2000.6. Jamieson L, Lohmann JR. Innovation with impact: Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education. Washington, DC; 2012.7. Jamieson L, Lohmann J. Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education. Washington, DC; 2009.8. Lemke J. Cognition, context, and learning: A social semiotic perspective. In: Kirshner D, Whitson J, eds. Situated Cognition: Social, Semiotic, and
[11]; therefore, students shouldlearn to notice and reflect on the structure, function, and behavior of a process, a device, or anatural phenomena [7]Teamwork Page 24.1155.5Teamwork is central to the work of engineers, as the development of most solutions requiresmultiple people with diverse expertise, perspectives, and skillsets. Engineers collaborate withprofessionals across disciplines gathering multiple perspectives to garner the most effectivedesign solutions [19]. Promoting engineering habits of mind, which includes collaboration [6],has been proposed as one of the three principles to guide engineering education design anddelivery in
acclimation to proficiency.Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10-14.[9] Bransford, J. (Ed.). (2000). How people learn brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). Washington,D.C.: National Academy Press.[10] Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition andInstruction, 8 (4), 292-332.[11] Denzine, G. (2007, June). Five misconceptions about engineering students' motivation that affect theteaching and learning process. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education, Honolulu,Hawaii.[12] Smith, K. A. (1999, October 28-29, 1999). Cooperative learning and the new paradigm for engineeringeducation. Paper presented at the ABET Annual Meeting, Baltimore, MD.[13] Vergara, C. E